-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/1-in-3-delaying-health-care-needs-but.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
13 hours ago · 69 comments
-
Can you find the one pet?
3 hours ago · 11 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
13 hours ago · 48 comments
-
A dog named Boo
9 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
16 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
This would have been a more useful way to spend $700 billion than to give it to the banks and let them sit on it.
I go to work, highly paid developers and project managers... many stink! its truly mind boggling to me.
seriously, great post indigo, because I see it being SPOT ON
Washing your hands isn't enough but it's a start. And they're not even doing that!
Seriously, this very topic came up at work the other day. A man came to fix one the printers. While waiting for the IT person to come and fetch him, he was looking at the headline about the financial crisis in the local paper and shaking his head.
I offhandedly said, "Funny that we can nationalise the banks but we can't have Universal Health Care, because that would be socialism"
The man is from Ireland and has a brother that still lives there. He told me about his brother having to stay in hospital for 17 weeks with septisemia (sp?). And then he told that the only bill his brother got was for the phone calls he had made.
So again I ask: If the government can nationalise the banking system, why can't we have universal health care?
How in the world could Universal Health Care NOT pay for itself? Mind boggling.
However, taking your kids to the doctor for every sniffle is really stretching it. And how many people without insurance are having to use emergency rooms for common illnesses? How many older people do you know who got through childhood without ever seeing a doctor except for vaccinations and were healthy most of their lives? Life is never going to be perfect, but we should sort out those conditions that really require a doctor's care and those we can take care of ourselves.
I"ve had a really bad cold since Sunday (and I never get them--this is a particularly nasty strain we haven't seen around here) and so have several of my friends, and none of us have been to the doctor. Any doctor who tells you to come in for a cold is just making you pay through the nose for a consultation, nothing more. There is nothing he can prescribe--nothing--that you can't get OTC.
If people would use more sense in monitoring their own health, perhaps there would be more resources for those who truly cannot afford treatment for real problems. And how many resources, for instance, are used for plastic surgery procedures, breast implants, etc.--absolutely unncessary and in many instances, doctors can find ways to get around the insurance. One woman I know got an eyelift because her surgeon said "drooping eyelids" which "obscured her vision" were medically necessary, which was bullshit--she simply wanted her insurance co. to pay for it when she could easily have afforded it herself.
http://www.betterthangreens.com/Catalog_167.html
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month estimated that infections caught in U.S. hospitals kill 90,000 people annually and urged hospitals to do more to track and prevent the infections.
That is 250 people a die from catching an infection while in the hospital. It does make sense since that is where all the sick people are but the number is frightening.
No yearly physicals, exams etc. Not a good health plan but it's what I have to deal with. I am just glad I don't have kids to worry about as well. So tell me, just why would National Health Insurance be a bad idea? Canada is looking more and more attractive!
The sad thing is that no one cares. It's hell out here.