-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/07/bush-hhs-pushing-reg-that-would-require.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
12 hours ago · 69 comments
-
Can you find the one pet?
2 hours ago · 11 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
13 hours ago · 47 comments
-
A dog named Boo
8 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/31/7431/84...
Okay all was resolved that day and my partner was allowed in to see me.
So I decided to have a bit of fun with this. I called a lawyer who does gay rights pro bono and I said, "let's nail this little bitch"
We did...she lost her job that week.
I win!
I'm sure that Jebus will watch over his homophobic
flock, so I won't worry about how that dumb bitch will
get by with no more jobby-job!
I love it!
What they're trying to do is label anything which stops a fertilized egg from implanting a potential abortifacient. There are already federal laws in place so that no federal funding can go to any company or organization which "discriminates" against people who refuse to provide abortion services if they have a moral disagreement with it, so this would expand that to cover people who don't want to provide anything that also fits under the new definition. It would cover most forms of birth control, including IUDs and Plan B.
It would also cover many hormones which MtF transsexuals take, including various forms of Provera.
It wouldn't cover situations dealing with a gay person having a heart attack or a Catholic at a Baptist hospital, though. It isn't a general "I'm morally against this so I don't have to do it" regulation.
Still, in an emergency, one might not be able to do this.
What fools.
Religious conservatives embrace a darkly corrupt spiritual evil.
and @ Boston Queer in Dallas: Ha ha ha ha! Yay for you! Well done, sir. Chortle. And I hope you're feeling better these days.
And no, I do not feel the slightest bit of guilt over it. At all. Ever.
Sickening.
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jul/...
And if McBush is elected, it will continue...so while people they don't approve of are homeless, starving, etc., no "food ministry" or other "faith based" outfit, profiting from the taxpayers, will help them.
Better stock up now on everything. Evil is ruling this country.
"Critics argue that the broad definitions of abortion and the types of workers who could object would cover everyone from the top doctor at a hospital to the janitor." Just what any woman would want--a janitor making her health care decisions, let alone a fundie doctor.
And those types would also seek to insinuate themselves in health care situations to push their agenda.
As an atheist, I suppose I wouldn't get treatment, either...
Never trust anyone who sees "god" in food or stains. And never, never trust anyone who doesn't like a cocktail every now and then.