-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/cafferty-why-does-john-mccain-want-to.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- Like we miss Cholera
- The Hill: 'Cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel’s once-impregnable political armor'
- Gibbs just flashed crib sheet on palm at WH briefing, included 'eggs, milk, bread, hope and change.'
- Lieutenant Dan Choi back on military drill duty
- AP photo shows Palin cheated, read notes off her hand at Teabagger conference
Paulson says we should all be angry. Fuck him. Someone needs to ask him how angry he was when he was paid salary and bonues of $38 million by Goldman Sachs in 2007.
They all knew what was going on. They created this mess in order to transfer more wealth to the wealthy---ala the Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09...
(We're coming after you, Old Man.)
Why does Obama, in the midst of the worst crisis in America since 1929, pretend it's "business as usual"? Why is he not putting the good of the country, suffering as it is, above the needs of his petty little campaign? Why is he not as selfless and dedicated to his country as Senator McCain is? Why is he so concerned to score points in a stinkin' lil' "debate" when Sen McCain is bringing both parties together for a workable solution to this huge crisis, which could mean the end of America as we know it?!
peedub.com
http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
He has no clear position, and he will get hammered. He wants to wait until all the answers are supplied to him based on the outcome of the decision, and then pick the most spin-able points and adopt them as his own.
He's stolen every theme of Obama's campaign already, why not game the system once again to use to his advantage.
What a scumbag.
It is just too hard for McGramps to run his campaign, pay attention the financial crisis he helped create, and also hold the debate.
Poor McTunnelvision, just one problem at a time, please!
Or maybe theres something else going on here.. this is the first time I can remember when a presidential candidate backed out of a debate.
You called it right.
America...your next PRESIDENT...Barak Obama. I am so very impressed with the way he is handling this problem as well as all of the other problems that his campaign has had to handle.
I will be proud to have him as MY (and ours) president. He is on the ball and ready at anytime...no fears here.
And for the first time in the past 14 years we might actually have a president that the American public voted into power.
"This is exactly the time when the American people need to hear from the person who in 40 days will become responsible for this mess. It will be part of the president's job to deal with more than one thing at once."
However, I think McCain will go too and slip in complaints that what they're doing takes away focus from the economic crisis.
Obama, "John McCain and I both have big planes with our names on them that can get us from Mississippi to Washington, DC and back..."
OUCH AND BAMMO!
Also, "The only possible miscommunication was when we were going to do some kind of joint statement without John McCain appearing live on national 'tee vee'" (paraphrasing)
Obama just declared what I theorized happened, they spoke about the economic crisis and McCain slipped in, "I really want to delay debates and possibly suspend out campaigns and Obama was silent..." then John McCain SPRINTED to national press and got on national 'tee vee' and announced he was postponing his campaign and the debate was cancelled. McCain is desperate.
The reason why I say thirteen plus is that I'm sure each house could probably comfortably house at least two to three families. LOL!
Our next President will have to deal with several god-awful messes all at once. Conducting a campaign, going to debates, returning to Congress to cast votes---these are matters Obama has shown he can do easily. McSame? Not so much.
Matthews has Orrin Hatch on, and that punk just said, "I think Republicans and Democrats need to come together in a bipartisan manner and work together." Then he went ahead and bashed Obama by saying, "John McCain is known for his bipartisanship and Barack Obama is not," followed by Matthews exclaiming "Fair enough!" That is exactly what I'm talking about. Matthews just lets Republicans, like Orrin Hatch, slam Democrats without ever challenging their partisan statements.