DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Calif. priest tells Obama supporters to confess because voting for Obama was a mortal swin

  • foxy · 12 months ago
    Swin? Is that a typo John?
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Well, they do Swindle you out of your money....and your soul
  • verloren · 12 months ago
    Yeah, it should be 'a mortal swim'
  • BusyTimmy · 12 months ago
    I think it's "swine."
  • sullivan · 12 months ago
    I am always amazed what this hypocritical sh-t bag of a church will do! They actually think their members adhere to their teachings. Years ago I was abused by a priest and the head priest asked my family to be part of a cover-up! Need I say more?
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Wow, not surprising, but still shocking to hear. That's awful. And yes, they are sh*tbags. I often think now at 43, (I am sure most of the teacher I had do not work anymore, or are dead) But I always wanted to go back to my grade school and let them know as an adult what a horrible experience it was. I am also convinced that many of them are sadists. They enjoy discipline in a very scary way.
  • vkobaya · 12 months ago
    I believe in God, and am trained Catholic, but am beginning to believe that God has nothing to do with the Catholic Church ... nor any other Christian Church. These are manmade creations, not God's.

    Ratman is nothing more than a very bigoted, warped, twisted, vile, hypocritical old man, greedy for power, wealth and the good things in life. He has lied repeatedly, and apparently does so as easily as Bush. The bullshit about the homosexuals being to blame for the child molestation scandals. I had a coworker who was raped and her priest was not a gay. Ratman also lied when he said that condoms don't prevent AIDs or pregnancy. I am very puzzled about the behavior of his Cardinals. Mahoney was a very good liberal bishop, but when he was appointed Cardinal, he instantaneously flipped and supported California Proposition 187. While he has moved left slightly on immigration, he has lied, and concealed evidence and continues to do so in the child molestation cases and about homosexuals.

    This current priest's motivation is racism since he kept his mouth shut when Kerry was running and that is very crucial as Kerry was an active Catholic. He also has kept his mouth shut about the child abuse scandals another very, very obvious hypocrisy.
  • Rob Mule · 12 months ago
    Wow...What a waffler...Father's angling for patron saint of quick pastry, the Curia or any Vatican posting knowing his boyish smile ain't cutting it post abuse scandal.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 12 months ago
    Now that the whole country is looking to government to help them out, it's time to revise Ronald Reagan: religion is not the solution, religion is the problem.
    PS: always run spellcheck on new post. :)
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    I went to Catholic grade school for eight years, then onto one year of Catholic HS, followed by four years of Catholic college. I can tell you beyond the shadow of a doubt and with confidence in this general statement, that most of these priests, some nuns, and Catholic school teachers should not be around kids, they are a bunch of sexually repressed self loathing, freaks, with no grip on reality. Who cares what this priest thinks anyway. He just looks rediculous, even to most Catholics. This priest needs a therapist.

    Even my parents now regret sending us all to Chatholic school. It is detrimental to a childs growth.
  • PAULinDC · 12 months ago
    Mark, therapy would be contrary to the spirit of the Church's objectives. The Catholic Church counts on the sociopathic nature of its shepherds. It would otherwise collapse.

    Fully half of the Brothers that taught at my high school were dating students at the time. After coming out in my 30's in DC, I ran into many of my my classmates, who quite unintentionally and independently corroborated each other's stories.
  • Rob Mule · 12 months ago
    Jeez, what a statistic...My memories of the sainted brothers (similar to monks but without the bad haircuts and travel restrictions) running the private Catholic boys high I attended go from tragic to high camp.
    The tragic first...Two molesters, a priest running the extracurricular Outdoors Club (enjoy the fun of a camp out with a sex predator) and a brother coaching the swim team bore moral if not criminal responsibility for the later suicides of two boys I knew. Both molesters had years on the job to prowl to their heart's content so there are likely many other victims...I know the priest I've mentioned was tangentally involved in court testimony during our area's Diocese-wide abuse lawsuit.
    The high camp during my 4 years culminated in a brother who arrived in my junior year.
    This guy had a peroxide blond pompadour, a pudgy Liberace-like face, a high, light voice and sharply pointed, manicured fingernails...oh, and he played the organ...insisted on it actually...at school events previously organ-free…Oh, and he loved to wear big white cardigans. I swear I'm not kidding. I'm unaware of his sexual proclivities but, if any, they had to be beauts.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    There is nothing intrinsically sinful about peroxide.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    But there is if you play with your organ too much. You grow hair on your palms and go blind......

    Actually that is a very sad story...horrible that this occurs.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    That's so true. My vision before the Lasix surgery was 20/600 in my good eye.

    But you know, the worst thing a Catholic school girl could do was bleach her hair and start smoking. Of course our parish was largely Italian, so it turned their hair a sinful orange. I was so blessed being a dirty blond.
  • Rob Mule · 12 months ago
    Nor cardigans or organ playing...
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Now PD! You do realize that your photograph is the occasion of sin for some of us. I've had to save it to disk. Now I really must go.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Agreed. I can't tell you how many priests I have met in Gay bars. One of them was in full leather and a harness and had a beard and body like Santa Claus. I am still having nightmares about that. I get the ebee jeebees just writing this out.

    Not that I care...but the hypocracy of course is why I mention it.
  • PAULinDC · 12 months ago
    .... and for all those that voted for the pro-death-penalty, preventive war/murder candidates? What of them, Father? And the adulterers in your flock?

    I [and all my siblings] was raised as a Catholic and attended 12 years of parochial school, lo' those many years ago. This Thanksgiving, - though I love my family - I was shocked to hear the white anger (things like "Our 'bama") and the hypocritical complaints that mimic the leitmotif being display by Fr. Illo.
  • j-IX-o-XI-b · 12 months ago
    OT ~ Prepare For Gay Invasion, Redneck America!

    http://wonkette.com/404640/prepare-for-gay-inva...

    Be Afraid....VERY AFRAID.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    THAT is hilarious......wow in 2008 there are people like that in this country. And they vote.
  • larry · 12 months ago
    Nothing like a closeted priest over compensating? Sorta like Michelle Malkins machinations in her sorted quest to be one of the WASP in the GOP.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Yes, this man is gayer than Ru Paul.
  • Christopher Armour · 12 months ago
    I think he meant mortal swim.
  • Rab · 12 months ago
    Why do catholic priests hate the very humanity they profess to love? What a bastard religion.
  • TomJoad · 12 months ago
    That's it. If the church is going to meddle in politics, and arbitrary at that (like where the hell was the catholic church under the nazis....oh yeah, THEN they were apolitical. shheeesh) they they can pay taxes like anyone else.

    Seriously, enough of the hypoctritical bullshit. They want to get into it, fine, you lose the tax exempt status. Simple as that.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    I think the real tax that the churches are paying for meddling in politics is that we now openly ridicule them. It didn't used to be that way. Personally I love it.
  • LeeFromHamburgNY · 12 months ago
    When I read about this yesterday in the newspaper, I thought well, there's another dictitorial catholic priest imposing the catholic church's beliefs on it's parishioners. As I read further, though, the bishop of that diocese disagreed with the priest and stated that no person should have to give up their right of privacy and confess their voting choice to their priest.

    Its really a shame that there continues to be these bigots in a position of power, however, christians tend to believe there is evil all around us and this type of thing simply helps to substantiate that belief...
  • cowboyneok · 12 months ago
    What does it take for the very dangerous Talibangelicals to get their tax exempt status revoked? I know if you are a progressive church its very easy. All you have to do is say something positive about a Democrat and your tax status is GONE, but if you are a Talibangelical then you can pretty much get away with any kind of Political Action Committee work. If the message is hate and ensuring the rich keep their tax cuts then hands off, right?

    Seriously.
  • pdxprobert · 12 months ago
    These endeavours by the religious community to merge religion and politics are deliberate.. They're meant to create a 1st amendment challenge of freedom of speech ...

    Their goals are to gain approval through a supreme court decision allowing them to preach politics from the pulpit and in a greater goal, to form their own lobbying organizations and still maintain their tax exempt status...

    They're not called mega churches for nothing... these churches will become the new union halls and they will seek the same political clout that unions used to wield..
  • wmforr · 12 months ago
    Fortunately Saint Ronald began the bust-up of the Unions and put the power back where it belongs in the hands of filthy rich corporate executives whose desire to rape is the motive force of the magical free market.

    By the way, why is it that those who claim to embrace Christianity have an almost religious faith that the sin of Greed will make all things work to the better?

    Perhaps, by extension, Lust will hold families together, Anger will serve our international interests, and Pride should be our diplomatic stance.

    And let's let the lower classes be satisfied with Envy and Gluttony.
  • pdxprobert · 12 months ago
    crazy stuff isnt it...
  • wmforr · 12 months ago
    Every time I hear "People of Faith" spoken of a the untouchable angels, I want to remind the speaker that the 9/11 terrorists were People of Faith.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    You got that right. I automatically get suspicious when I hear this term.
  • cowboyneok · 12 months ago
    Exactly. The religious extremists will be the end of all of us. In fact, they WELCOME the "end of days" and if they could push a button to make their Armageddon fantasy start to occur, they would do it. I'm a person of faith but I believe G-d is still speaking to us, and I happen to moderate when it comes to trying to tell other's how to live or die. I'm more of a advocate of the "do unto others" kind of philosophy / religion.

    Three major extremist religions who are extremely dangerous and need to be DEPROGRAMMED before they kill all of us?

    A. Al-Qaida - Taliban - muslim extremists
    B. Talibangelicals - christian extremists
    C. Zionistas - jewish extremists

    There are some really good people of all those faiths who aren't insane and work to make people's lives better instead of LIVING to DIE in some kind of jihad.
  • tomjuarez · 12 months ago
    Wow what a tolerant and non-bigoted group of posters. Amazing that a blog that leads the charge against bigotry for one group has no problem acting as the kindling for bigotry against another.

    Not saying that what this priest said was OK - it was idiotic (and against church doctrine) , but it's hypocritical to decry the GOP punditry's latching on to the screeds or quotes of every moonbat lefty as evidence of the intentions of "the left" (Ward Churchill anyone?) and then turn around and bash the whole of the church and therefore all parishioners. I expected better here. *sigh*

    Oh well, turning the other cheek I guess -I hope you all have a lovely day and God Bless you,
  • Indigo · 12 months ago
    Don't turn the other cheek yet, we're not finished slapping the first one.
  • Butch1 · 12 months ago
    How "christian" of you, when you call everyone out for commenting on this obviously republican leaning, political priest using his position to try and influence voting by using his religion and power over them. Yet, you immediately call all liberals as "moonbat lefties" showing your own political leanings and do not see that as being as shallow as you claim "a tolerant non-bigoted group of posters" are?
    Sorry, me thinks your own bigoted frock is showing.
  • tomjuarez · 12 months ago
    Wow you obviously need to re-read my post.
  • Butch1 · 12 months ago
    "Moonbat - leftie" is a republican handle for anyone left of their thinking. I'm surprised you would use it if you are a progressive.

    "We" do not sit by in silence anymore when people of authority, such as this priest, claim dominion over his flock. This is a new day and you may call it what you will, but we will not remain in silence anymore whilst watching our rights or the persons we voted into office be soiled by some sore-loser of a priest. He and others of his ilk hold no authority over myself and many of us. His parishioners who voted for Obama should protest by cutting off their funds to the collection plate and replace them with notes as to why. They should question him why he turns his back on adulterers or divorcees going to his parish. We do not pick and choose what we want to say and ignore other rules and regulations. They should consider going to a different mass, unless this priest does them all, then perhaps, they should switch parishes. He's welcome to his own demons but he shouldn't use his position to punish others for their freedom to choose which person they want in office.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    You can switch parishes all you want. The doctrine comes from the top. It does not matter whether you are in the US or Europe or Africa. LIke I mentioned before, we in the US tend to think the vatican is some kind of democracy. It is not. Quit applying your western thinking to a 1700 year old values based relgion. You either take all of it, or none of it. Period.
  • Butch1 · 12 months ago
    Agreed. If you want to get away from this very vocal priest, one should choose a different parish where the priest is less political, at least voicing their will as over the line as this one. One other option is to quit the church of course. I have no problem with that at all.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    That's why they call it Catholic. It's universal. You just can't avoid it, as we're all seeing.
  • Rob Mule · 12 months ago
    Bless yourself...
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Turning the other cheek? If there were elected officials who were working in "Jesus name" creating laws that personally affect your freedom.....after years and years and years of this. Being told you are less than, that you need to change your ways, and you are basically going to hell. Discussing how these people are really in need of help is not being bigotted, it's the truth. And you do not have to be a psychologist to figure it out. We are not telling people not to worship, they can worship chickens for all I care. We are a country built on religious freedom, and freedom from religion. We are not the ones discriminating here. If you walked a mile in our shoes, you would feel the same way.

    In terms of this particular incident. What's wrong with reporting this?? Nothing. If this priest is going to rant and rave like this, then he should shout it from the mountain tops and own it, and be proud of it. The problem is, if he does this- about 85 percent of the public will think he is completely nuts. So don't blame us for posting this story.

    Every law, every social norm is built around YOU. As a gay person in this country, we have to constantly monitor ourselves, keep ourselves in check because of the attitudes of people like this priest spouting this type of nonsense. If this priest is going to say this type of stuff, we have the right to call him out on it.

    We are tollerant of what ever he believes, he is protected by the constitution to not be persecuted for his religious beliefs. Sadly I am not afforded the same rights, or consideration that we give other groups.

    Try being a gay kid subjected to years of verbal, mental and sometimes physical abuse in grade school and later. Then get back to me on your 'tolerant' comment.

    It is a common tale in the Catholic church of abuse. Turn the other cheek? Many of these people should be in jail. Give me a break.
  • tomjuarez · 12 months ago
    I don't disagree with a single point you make above and am truly sorry for the abuse you suffered. That being said -I stand by the assertion that making a mountain out of a single priests molehill is the very kind of rhetorical sophistry "we" hate when it comes from the right. Sure publish, discuss, ridicule his statements from the highest perch but don't think it is illustrative of either Church doctrine or the beliefs of the majority of catholics.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Tom,

    The Pope is infallible on issues of morals and faith. It is Catholic doctrine to be as extreme in their beliefs as they are. The problem with Catholics in the U.S is they think they can be 'caffeteria catholics' and pick and choose which doctrines by which they abide.

    There is no wiggle room here. You either take all of the pope and catholic doctrine, or none of it. It's been that way for nearly 1700 years.

    The Catholic Church is not a democracy. It is a dictatorship. And if the followers sit idley by and watch this insanity go on, then they are guilty whether they believe him or not. They can choose not to go.

    I was raised Catholic, and one major cultural difference here is the Catholics tend to put their head in the sand when problems arrise, as if they don't exist. No one is gay, no one can get an abortion, in any circumstance. No kids were, or are being abused by priests. Well my friend it is happening and the Catholic church act like accomplices by virtue of their silence.

    Quit making excuses for people like this priest. And yes, we should not generalize....but when the doctrine comes from the top, and no one does anything and there are patterns of abuse and extremism rampant in the Catholic church, I think we have the right to discuss it.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Actually the Popes have only declared infallibility on two matters, the first being the Assumption of the BVM, and the second being her Immaculate Conception, though there is disagreement that the second was truly declared infallible because Pope Pius XII wasn't literally speaking "ex cathedra" at the time. I believe he was actually standing, rather than sitting upon the Throne of Peter, so no one is quite sure if God ignored him or not. However the BVM seemed quite confident in her Immaculate Conception when she appeared in 1858 to Saint Bernadette Soubirous above a bush in a dirty cave next to the dump outside Lourdes, France.

    The big question is if the Doctrine of Papal Infallibility was ever itself declared infallible. Papal infallibility was only declared through the Sacred Magisterium of the First Vatican Council in 1870, and at the time Pope Pius IX worried that infallibly declaring himself infallible would sound just too tacky.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Yes, I am sure I learned all that at one point in one of my endless religious classes. But I am certain I slept through most of it...though it was so mind numbing and nonsensical that I may have blocked it all out.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Catechism and theology classes are where we learned to daydream. And look at us now!
  • Martin · 12 months ago
    You are so brilliant. Do you have a blog or something like that, I could read your comments on the church all day long :-D
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Oh, sweetie! Thank you so much. No I don't. Sister Benedict Bulldog rightly labeled me a high-potential low-achiever. I've been laid up lately with little to do but feed my OCD. I manage to overcome my dyslexia by touch-typing in a mirror. But thnak you so mcuh!
  • PAULinDC · 12 months ago
    Mr. Juarez, I've read the posts here and they don't reflect a single point of view on the topic at hand, so I think you're generalizing to make whatever preordained [no pun intended] point you came in here with.

    Fr. Illo's perspective is not the first instantiation of politics into the pulpit since the election. Reverend Jay Scott Newman in SC did the same thing recently and the examples were common during John Kerry's campaign. So, there is ample [and likely statistically-significant] evidence to support the contention in many of our posts that this is an institutional perspective (Catholic League, anyone?). Ergo, these instances are not moonbat Catholics ... it is systemic. The point that many posters here are trying to make is that Fr. Illo isn't some rogue element and the Church should be called on it. Also, the posts here reflect the history of abuse that the Church has perpetuated.
  • Verchiel · 12 months ago
    Based on the Vatican's own position, Illo is, indeed a rogue with his blanket claim that voters should seek confession:

    A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.

    http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/bisho...

    While that may seem like splitting hairs to some, the fact remains that the Catholic Church's position is that abortion is a serious sin. That said, it understands that it is not the only issue for a voter's consideration. It's a sensible position that balances faith with the complex mix of policy choices at stake when electing an official.

    Illo--and any others like him--have clearly gone off the reservation.
  • ProgressiveMom · 12 months ago
    I handed out this same passage from the Bishops' statement in NE Pennsylvania (read that "Scranton") when I canvassed for Obama /Biden this fall. Many Catholics were very surprised at how nuanced and thoughtful the statement was verses what many had heard from their own Bishop.

    Priests like this one are making it up as they go along: why haven't they spent the last 8 years condemning the inaction on the part of the Bush Administration? ---- Hypocrites, all.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Isn't it a riot that someone has to tell them what is right and wrong? Medical science has found the part of the brain that they believe is the seat of the conscience. And guess what. Everybody has one. And they are all remarkably the same. And it doesn't matter if you have had a lot of religious training or none at all. They theorize that there are some very basic concepts of right and wrong that are prewired into the brain.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    True! It is always the immediate intention, not the consequence, that God weighs. Of course I'm sure you've noticed that most Catholics have been trained not to think things through that deeply on their own. They think they are committing a mortal sin by voting for Obama, so therefore they are. An erroneous conscience can nonetheless send one directly to Hell, even if what you did wasn't a sin. If you believe it's a sin, it's a sin. Pity. If they'd just educate themselves instead of relying on priests and nuns to do it.
  • tomjuarez · 12 months ago
    Mr inDC, the Catholic League is a fringe group of laity who speak neither officially nor unofficially for the Church. This is yet another example of tarring an entire group -in this case one that is made of millions- with a single anecdote. Moreover you then turn on a dime to attack catholics with the actions of protestants? It would seem that you have unwittingly revealed your own "preordained point". Mine was simply that bigotry is bigotry. When the Church errs you are absolutely right that it should be called to account -however this "systemic" argument for the present issue is laughable.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    But if his viewpoint is "preordained", it can only be considered invalid if he is Protestant, for as we know, only Catholic ordinations are valid. Well, so are Russian and Greek Orthodox, though schismatic. Well, and then there's the Succession of Utrecht. They split with Rome 350 years ago, but the Bishop of Utrecht was still validly ordained before the split, so his successors are validly ordained. Oh yes, and then there are the Uniate churches, such as the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodoxy and the Assyrian Church of the East. They remain loyal to the Pope and are thus valid, though separate. Then of course there are the Armenian, Byzantine and Greek Catholic Churches which are separate Rites within the Catholic Church, and thus completely valid, as are the Alexandrian, Antiochian, and Chaldean Catholic Churches.

    So, just to review, Mr. PAULinDC's point can be considered valid if he is Roman Catholic, Russian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, .Succession of Utrecht, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Assyrian Church of the East, Armenian Catholic, Greek Uniate Catholic, Alexandrian Catholic, Antiochian Catholic or Chaldean Catholic. Otherwise we must reject Mr. PAULinDC's viewpoint as invalid, which is a real shame because I think he is spot on.
  • pdxprobert · 12 months ago
    I heard there was a conflict in the mid 1800s where protestants were killing catholics in the Boston MA area..... I think it was called the bible wars or something like that.. I've never heard this before, but some guy on a radio station I was listening to mentioned it... unfortunately I was in bed and didnt write the actual name of the incident when I heard it... is short term memory the first to go? Have you or your partner heard of this time in our country? and if yes, what was the name given to it?
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Are you referring to the burning of the Ursuline convent In 1842? I think it led to three days of rioting. Not sure if the Ursuline sisters got the upper hand or not. Those old habits were very hard to break.

    http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a225/cokebott...
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Of course there is one way that you can reject Mr. PAULinDC's point even if he belongs to one of the eleven churches the Pope recognizes as valid. In his argument he used the word "instantiation" when he should properly have used the word "instance". Therefore he violated Proper Form, and his argument must be considered invalid, just as when a priest omits or mispronounces a word during the consecration of the Blessed Eucharist, thus rendering it merely a piece of stale bread.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    You are good. :-)
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Now you've made me commit the sin of pride, because I believe you with all my heart. ;0)
  • Butch1 · 12 months ago
    The catholic church condones what the Catholic League says and does, otherwise, they wouldn't be sitting quietly by whilst the League blathers on and on.
  • Attila the Blond · 12 months ago
    On turning the other cheek:

    As my ol mama used to say: Turn the other cheek, but keep in mind you only have four of them. If someone keeps hitting after that, hit back, HARD.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    But TomJuarez, please don't take the criticism seriously. As a good Catholic you know Father Illo got it wrong. No Catholics will lose their state of grace by going to communion after voting for an abortionist. They already lost their state of grace and condemned themselves to hell by voting for Obama.
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    "They already lost their state of grace and condemned themselves to hell by voting for Obama" -- Or those who voted for the murdering, lying, stealing, warring Bush/Cheney. How many catholics are there remaining who haven't lost their grace on one side or the other? The Devil's really in those details.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Lest you forget: Catholics, and the religious fringe are only concerned with the time in the womb...after that, they care less about pesky things like innocient civillians and soldiers that die in war. After you pop out, you are on your own.
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    Oh, no you're not. They try to keep their talons in you until you die--this story about the Revruhnd tells you that -- how to vote, what to eat, who to associate with...and lest we get Harry Potter-sized trolls on here, all conservative religions are like that--basic brainwashing, no ideas but their own. Free will be damned.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Not if they gave a good confession, said an Act of Contrition, and did their penance. And remember, for a confession to be good it is not necessary that you are sorry for what you have done. If you fear going to Hell, that is enough. It doesn't matter if you go out and murder, lie, or steal again, just so long as you truly intended to amend your life at the time of confession. Sanctifying Grace is really quite easy to come by if you know how to play the game.
  • Butch1 · 12 months ago
    As we all know, a mortal "swin" is much worse than a mortal sin. (snark)
  • Older_Wiser · 12 months ago
    Glad I left the church over 50 years ago. Glad I eschew all religion, too...
  • EmGD · 12 months ago
    Classy. Maybe the pastor should look at the skyrocketing abortion and teen pregnancy rates under President Religion and note that a myopic push for abortion bans and abstinence only education doesn't actually reduce anything except knowledge. Perhaps Catholics decided instead to vote for someone who would actually work to educate kids and put in the real work that needs to be done to reduce abortions and unwanted pregnancies.

    http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
  • Indigo · 12 months ago
    Translation needed:"state of grace" = special privilege of mocking orphans and stealing from widows. Anything else?
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    I'm afraid some of them do more than just mock those poor orphans.
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    I found myself in Rome about 1978, doing research at the special collections of the Vatican Libraries: Biblioteca Casanatense...full of porn, male to male love letters, all sorts of neat little nasty goodies collected by His Assholiness over the centuries. Anyway, an old buddy of mine from HS was there studying for the priesthood. He used to love wearing the full cassock and berretta even in July. So we hooked up for a little cafe latte near St Peter's Square. Well of course we were speaking American English and as we crossed the square heading back to my research room, a really fat tacky American tourist woman, dressed in hideous shorts and gross Hawaiian shirt, approached us and asked,
    "Excuse me Father, is there a time difference between the Vatican City and the rest of Italy?'" My buddy, without missing a beat, replied,

    "Yes, madam, about 800 years."

    I nearly pissed myself.
  • pdxprobert · 12 months ago
    Was your friends name, Guido Sarducci?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO8x8eoU3L4
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    ROFL...no his name was Danny Sullivan. He later took his vows, left his
    vows, married a nun, and they have seven kids.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    My husband left his vows, married a nun, had three kids, and ended up with moi! How small is the world of the spirit!!
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    You got Danny beat!
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    We're thinking about having one of his kids aborted, even though he's 33. Is that sinful, or what?!
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    ROFL you're bad
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    ROTF!!!
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    And I left out the best parts of that story...some of the shit I found in
    the Vatican collections...OMFG...male on male porn etchings of cardinals
    with little boys, diaries of Papal Nuncio's gay sexual proclivities. How the
    hell they ever let me in there to do my research I will never know. Danny
    made some connections for me at the time. As Bette Davis would say, "Who do
    you have to fuck to get out of this movie?" To which a co-star would say,
    "The same person you fucked to get the part." You do the math. But that
    library was really a horn maker...some of the best gay historical porn I've
    ever seen. Look up Thomas Rowlandson on the net...then imagine his work
    using only men.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    OMG!!! Why don't they make any of this stuff available on the Vatican website?!? I'm calling Rome this minute. Now let's see. If I remember correctly the Vatican switchboard number is Et Cum Spiri 220.
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    Ah...no...the Biblioteca Casanatense is decidedly NOT open to public view.
    It's a small but elaborate, elegant 18th C room in the bowels of the Vatican
    Libraries. It houses all sorts of cool shit. My musicological research led
    me there because of a very obscure Roman 17th Century composer. He'd been a
    household musician to a Cardinal Montaldo. Danny got me permission...it was
    not easy...to get into the library for ONE HOUR. Well the little
    queen-priest running the show took a fancy to me. Needless to say I got to
    return several times...ahem.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    OMG! Fabulous! Did you get to see any of the suppressed Gregorian Sequences? I hear they could make Carmina Burana blush.
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    I never got into those manuscripts...my hours there were limited...and this
    little efficious faggot priest or prelate was making sure I did not touch
    anything other than my work. I did manage to sneak in a tiny spy-style half
    frame 35mm camera and took pictures of the manuscripts I was looking at and
    a few other tasty tidbits. Sort of a microfilm camera. I lost those films
    twenty years ago somewhere in a move or during my divorce. They may have
    wound up in a box full of research materials I donated to Yale...some poor
    bloke in the library there probably got a boner lookin at them...ROFL...the
    one thing I really remember vividly was the gay porn by Rowlandson. It was
    awesome shit.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    I am in such AWE! Thank you, thank you for sharing! I shall be contemplating that poor soul in the library who was innocently exposed to the occasion of sin as I'm carted off to the Lucky Store in search of buttermilk for my hubby to whom I am still legitimately married in the eyes of California, if not the Lord. I shall be borne to the store upon a crude litter by a lowly postulate and three novices as I stoically attempt my knitting despite terrible suffering too horrible to describe.... Oh wait. That was Jennifer Jones in The Song of Bernadette. Never mind. I'll walk.
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 12 months ago
    You are just too damned funny...Pax vo Biscum baby!
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Et cum Spiri 220.

    Just got back from the grocery store bearing the hubbie's Bulgarian culture buttermilk. I keep telling him it has nothing to do with Bulgaria. I told him it's just a bunch of germs, but he won't listen. He thinks it's exotic.

    Well, now must set up for dinner, and then it's a thrill-packed evening of TV. We're thinking about starting to watch the evening news during dinner again, but we're nervous that they may still inadvertently show Bush while they're doing a story on the real President, id est Obama. Maybe we'll wait a few more weeks.

    Nite nite!
  • mlbuck · 12 months ago
    The irony is that an Obama administration is more likely to reduce abortion in this country by changes in sex education an economic relief than a McCain administration would have done by just being against them.
  • foxy · 12 months ago
    Frankly, when are they going to learn to be "relevant" in today's world and society?
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    They're still working on becoming relevant in yesterday's world and society.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    relevant....ha...that's hilarious....:-)
  • Milli · 12 months ago
    They could be relevant if they actually taught what Jesus stood for and what he actually professed (the camel in the eye of the needle thing, Sermon on the Mount, etc.) Instead they accuse you of being a sinner if you breathe the wrong way and try to stuff a whole bunch of crap into your head that Jesus never said. I remember as a teenager being taught by the nuns that the more you masturbate, the more time in Purgatory you'll get. So instead of teaching tolerance and love, we were taught that we would go to hell if we had too many impure thoughts about the hot Spanish teacher. If I was taught what the Sermon on the Mount really about, I forgot it because I was wrapped in a haze of teenage self-hatred and self-doubt thanks to my catholic school experience.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    You are so lucky. Our Spanish teacher was a nun.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    That would require that they stop teaching about invisible beings. They're still struggling with divorce. Giving up theism will take centuries more.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    I'm afraid the Rev. Illo has it all wrong, and it is shocking that a Catholic priest would not know his theology. According to Church law it is IMPOSSIBLE for a Catholic to lose their "state of grace" by receiving communion sacrilegiously as a result of voting for Barack Obama. You see, according to Holy Mother Church, by voting for a candidate who supports abortion, you commit the "Sin of Cooperation" by supporting abortion, which the good Father Illo knows to be a "mortal sin". Therefore you no longer are in the "state of sanctifying grace" long before you trot up to the communion rail. Therefore you risk nothing by going to communion, because you are already going to Hell for voting for an abortionist. True, Father Sicko is correct that receiving communion in a state of mortal sin is a sacrilege, but Dante was heretical in suggesting that there are different levels of Hell. Hell is all the same no matter what you did or how many times you did it, and committing a sacrilege on top of the mortal sin of cooperation merits no more punishment that, say, eating meat on a Friday or skipping Mass on a Holy Day of Obligation (before Vatican II when the Pope threw all that nonsense out.) You still burn for all eternity either way. So Father Bozo has it wrong. Voting for Obama sends Catholics to Hell. Committing a sacrilege is just icing on the cake. Father Dildo's error is that he seems to assume that someone is still in the State of Sanctifying Grace after voting for Obama, and doesn't get sent to Hell until receiving communion. For this the good Father should be condemned to Hell for ever and ever, but Holy Mother Church is all merciful when it comes to the stupidity of its sacred clergy. The poor dear probably spent his high school years in the chapel praying about masturbation, and then immediately joined the seminary upon graduation, so he's never actually experienced the real world. His head has been filled with nonsense since the nuns first got hold of him, and he can hardly be blamed for taking all that bullshit seriously. He'll be fine. The Church will send him off to some backwater monastery for a permanent retreat where he can pray out the rest of his days without ever getting a clue.
  • Zorba · 12 months ago
    I'm getting a headache. Yet another example of a church that should lose its tax-exempt status for meddling in politics. Can we just get religion out of politics, and politics out of religion, once and for all?
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    We've come a long way since the middle ages. They used to run everything. Now they have to convince us to vote their way.
  • Sacanagem · 12 months ago
    Because what the American public wants is a president who opposes abortion rights above everything else.

    I particularly like the article below for the headshot, in which Fr. Illo looks gayer than a treeful of parrots. Not that there's anything wrong with that; I wonder, however, if Fr. Illo's highly principled beliefs extend to denying communion to closeted priests...

    http://www.modbee.com/1618/story/516763.html
  • green_libertarian · 12 months ago
    I've got poor gaydar, but was thinking the same thing when I saw his picture.
    ding ding ding ding
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    He probably has a picture of the ol' Rat-zinger wearing his red prada slippers and ermin cape under his vestments and he probably just drools at the the thought of them. What a queen.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    In a leather harness, chaps and prada pumps.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Are you sure he wears his ermine cape under his vestments? Ermine can be very itchy when it gets sweaty. And it would tend to snag the sequin cross on the Papal bustier.
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    :-) no, no, no...the picture of rat-zinger is under the Revruhnd Joseph Illo's vestments...perhaps Illo has some other ermine fetish--underwear, jewelry/hardware
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Hahahaha! I get it. He's wearing a Illo scapular. I'd sure like to see the flip side! Oh wait. You mean a Ratzinger scapular? Forget it. I'm not interested in seeing the seat of Papal power.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    He's got the 'gay face'. It is a known fact that families that think a child might be gay be ushered into the priest hood to keep from being a 'practicing homosexual'. I saw it a lot when I was growing up.

    He is gayer than a pink easter bunny, truly. No doubt about it.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    "Gayer than a treeful of parrots" ROTFLMAO!! Thank you for making my morning!

    We have a friend who is still a priest. When he visited us last year he told us about masturbating for the first time in his life at the age of 62. He's a very kind and intelligent man, and very open - with us, at least. He honestly doesn't know if he is gay or straight. He has spent a lifetime divorcing himself from his sexual feelings. He went straight into the seminary at an early age, and has been playing by the rules ever since. He has no idea who he really is, and I'm amazed he was able to allow himself to explore sexuality at all. The Church has created the perfect environment for confused, sexually repressed in the extreme priests to wreak havoc upon themselves and others.
  • iamevolved · 12 months ago
    Only when he confesses to fucking little boys.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Or girls. Let's not be stereotypical.
  • iamevolved · 12 months ago
    Hahahahahahahahahaha!!! A priest girls.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Oh, yes. I'm afraid it's all too common. Priests are given much more access to boys than girls, who are usually under the care of nuns. But that doesn't stop some of them. Of course the Vatican would prefer that you think the children were abused by gays rather than pedophiles. They like to blur the distinction because it provides them cover for going after gays.
  • sconset · 12 months ago
    This story really whizzes me off. I am a practicing Catholic and if any priest, Bishop or cardinal ever told me that there would be consequences because I voted for a candidate who was prochoice, I would stand up and let that priest have it.

    If the churches and the religious right want to interject themselves into politics, then they should lose their tax exempt status.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    YES THEY SHOULD. AND IT IS MY HOPE THAT THIS GUY IS BEING MONITORED BY THE IRS.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    It is a mortal sin to strike a priest, unless the immediate intention of striking him was not to strike him, but rather to stop him from doing harm. It is always the immediate intent that must be considered above all else. If your immediate intent was just to silence him, then you could probably have beaten the crap out of him and it would only have been a venial sin.
  • iLLogicaL · 12 months ago
    I hope yr joking.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Sorry, but in the words of the immortal Anna Russell, "I'm not making this up, you know."
  • RIPWAMU · 12 months ago
    Yup, just another example of why churches should lose their tax exempt status and why no one should dip into their pockets to put in the coffers. Disgusting.
  • green_libertarian · 12 months ago
    Oh, and not that I think anybody did a blanket condemnation of all Catholics, it's notable they voted for Obama at a higher percentage than did the general public.
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    Ah, the sin of denial. Perhaps one should practice what one preaches. Exactly what is the "mortal sin", as opposed to any lesser sin, that voting for Obama would incur? Again, the religion of hate and venality. He should be ashamed to call himself Christian, since he obviously doesn't understand the meaning of the word. GOP politicians wrap themselves in the Flag -- conservative Priests wrap themselves in little boys.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Try thinking of priests as spiritual lawyers.
  • woodroad34 · 12 months ago
    I hear the music from "Jaws" and see the breakaway law firm from Eli Stone.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    LOL! Yes, I think I hear it too. Plus the theme from Gone With The Pulpit.
  • sullivan · 12 months ago
    I have an idea....go to their website and leave a polite message on how you disagree with them. I did that before and the priest reported on NPR that he was besieged by letters and was considering changing his mind. Anyone have a contact?
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Technically the priest can not change his mind unless he changes his conscience. He must follow his conscience, even if it is at odds with Catholic teaching. He therefore must condemn all Obama voters to Hell, unless he believes he agrees with Church teaching, which coincidentally agrees with him, though they really don't have the balls to admit that they are really that hateful and would prefer to just sweep their constipated beliefs under the carpet. He'll probably get silenced by his Bishop who doesn't want the Church to get into more hot water by exposing the lunacy of their dogma.
  • Milli · 12 months ago
    These Prada-wearing hypocrites have the audacity to accuse other people of sinning when they are actually on the fast track to hell after they kick the bucket. Its funny but they never called their own followers who voted for Bush sinners. Bush only dropped bombs on innocent people (including the unborn babies contained within) killing, injuring, and displacing millions for absolutely no reason. Nope, if you are a Catholic who voted for Bush, you're in the clear! Whew.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Well, technically only those who voted for Bush in 2004 are in peril of losing their immortal souls. Those who voted for Bush in 2000 are not responsible for what he did later. Of course they should have known that as Governor he was responsible for allowing the execution of hundreds of inmates in the Texas penal system, but that is not sinful according to Catholic tradition, because killing is ok'ed by the bible under many circumstances. Come to think about it, so is war, so long as it is a just war. So maybe those who voted for Bush in 2004 are in the clear after all, so long as they believe that Iraq is a just war. And anyone stupid enough to vote for an idiot in 2000 and again in 2004 is probably stupid enough to believe Iraq is a just war. Stupidity does reduce or eliminate culpability according to Catholic theology. Hey! Republicans may get to Heaven yet!
  • green_libertarian · 12 months ago
    Look, there are HUGE problems with the Catholic Church, but they are consistently against the death penalty and devote resources to that end. And the Church has certainly not termed the Iraq invasion and occupation a "just war".
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    They have defacto, I'm afraid, by not condemning it, which they must do if they view it as evil. They have made statements calling for peace, but that is not the same thing, I'm afraid. The Catholic Church officially supports war and the death penalty. In fact, the Church has been involved directly in many wars (see "history"), and executed many thousands directly through the Inquisition. In modern times they have blessed many wars, and remained silent on others. The last person officially executed by the Catholic Church was a school teacher by the name of Manuel Santiago Vivar, tried by the Inquisition in Cordoba, Spain in 1818, and strangled to death for the crime of teaching Deism. The Inquisition, formerly known as The Congregation of the Holy Office of the Inquisition, later changed its name several times, and is currently called The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. It is currently headed by Cardinal John Levada, the former archbishop of San Francisco. My hubby's ex was Levada's housekeeper, and could tell some stories! Levada replaced Cardinal Josef Ratzinger as head of the Inquisition when Ratzinger became the current Pope. Some speculate that Ratzinger chose Levada because of his experience fighting gay rights in San Francisco, and his handling of the American Church's sex abuse scandal. He is in a good position to become the first American Pope. In the not so distant past the head of the Inquisition was known as the Grand Inquisitor. So the current Pope can be said to have been the former Grand Inquisitor and head of the Sacred Office that was indisputably responsible for executing thousands. However Ratzinger, known as "God's Rottweiler" was more interested in destroying theologians he disagreed with, and of course going after gays.
  • Verchiel · 12 months ago
    It bears repeating that the lead "Prada-wearing hypocrite" is actually not on the same page as this joker in Modesto:

    A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.

    http://www.priestsforlife.org/magisterium/bisho...

    The concession that the balance of a candidate's positions outweighs the single issue puts the Catholic Church miles ahead of many other so-called "values voters."
  • Milli · 12 months ago
    I wouldn't exactly call that difference "miles ahead". Obama or any other pro-choice voter isn't "in formal cooperation with evil" because they wan't abortion to remain legal. We don't prefer abortion. We don't wish it to happen. We don't vow to kill as many fetuses as we can. We think its a tragedy too and its an insult to us when we're called "evil" by any church. The difference between pro-choicers and the churches is the way they look at the situation of the women who are having abortions. The catholic church says abortion is a sin. Thats it. Thats there answer to a complex problem. They don't take into account the individual circumstances of the women who seek abortions. Poor women, women in abusive relationships, women who have more children than they can care for are demonized for seeking abortions. How is understanding their situation and showing compassion for their decisions "evil"? Why do old men decide that they know whats best for women they never met or care to ever know?

    Here's my other problem. The Catholic Church condemned the war in Iraq and called for its end. This obviously meant that to them it was an unjust war. So why didn't the church call for all those Catholics who voted for Bush in 2004 to confess? It just seems like the church concentrates on the issue abortion being the gravest threat to humanity. I'm sorry but dropping bombs on innocent people who are living breathing, functioning human beings who actually feel fear, pain, and misery is a bigger moral problem than abortion. A three year old Iraqi child who sees his family killed in front of him takes priority over a three week old fetus. Its always about the unborn with the religious zealots, its NEVER about the already born. Why?
  • Verchiel · 12 months ago
    "So why didn't the church call for all those Catholics who voted for Bush in 2004 to confess?"
    ----------------

    You're overlooking the fact that "The Church" hasn't called on anyone to confess here, either; some priest has. As far as the Catholic Church, as an institution, goes, the same standard is applied in both cases: the voter is not morally culpable for the candidate's position.

    Overall, the Church's position here, is at least consistent. (Once again, much more than can be said of most "values voters.") The taking of a life is wrong, be it through, abortion, execution, or unjust warfare. That's not the sort of belief that's going to be swayed by individual circumstances like financial burden or abusive relationships.

    Insulting as you may find their pronouncements of what is or isn't "evil," that's their doctrine. Just as they didn't shift their opinion on the war simply because it had some measure of popularity (back when it did, anyway), they're not going to, here, either.

    Not everyone with a strong opinion is a zealot. In this case, the priest, contravening the Church's own position on the issue, very much is. The Catholic Church, as a whole? Not so much.
  • Mark in Florida · 12 months ago
    Every sperm is sacred....
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Not the Protestant ones.
  • Nigel Elliott · 12 months ago
    Obama's winning the election was God's will. That priest is calling God's will a sin. It's excommunication time for that one!
  • Uranus Hz · 12 months ago
    It was God's will too, also:
    1) despite the super-duper prayer teams' best effort in trying to get it to rain, Obama's acceptance speech in Invesco field enjoyed perfect weather.
    1a) yet the start of the RNC was delayed due to a hurricane
    and too, also 2) Ann Coulter's mouth has been wired shut
  • Carol · 12 months ago
    How much faith-based initiative "bribe" money did this priest get?
  • Malacandra · 12 months ago
    That's a nice "first stone" you're casting there, Father Illo.
  • iLLogicaL · 12 months ago
    Please tell us how to live our lives AFTER you've stopped molesting little children and promoting a genocidal anti-condom policy in Africa. Actually, just fark off...you guys make me sick.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Well, yes, a lot of people have to die of AIDS because the Church says condom use is wrong. But think of all the zygotes that never would have been imbued with an immortal soul if the parents had been selfish and used a condom.
  • RIPWAMU · 12 months ago
    How is it a mortal sin if you haven't committed it? Is there a new moral sin I haven't heard since I stopped going to Mass? If abortion is the mortal sin and you haven't had an abortion then under their wacky sin list you haven't committed a sin.

    I am so bored with these organized religion crackpots. I am so glad I separated church from my mental state when I was 10. When I was 9 my grandma died and when I wanted to quit my communion classes because God did not listen to my constant prayers to let her get better (I was 9), my mom and I were called into a meeting with the Father. He told me that I didn't pray hard enough and that is why she died. I stomped out and never looked back. When I lived in NC I was asked by my coworkers what church I went to. When I told them I don't go to church they were appalled and told me that was unacceptable, everyone had to go to church. After picking my laughing self up off the chair I gave them my most heartfelt true "Bless Your Heart". Some never spoke to me again and it wasn't because of the laughing.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Congratulations to you! I'm sorry you had to go through all that. But congratulations on being able to walk away from it at such a tender age. I wish I'd had that kind of courage.
  • RIPWAMU · 12 months ago
    Thanks! It was more stubbornness than courage :-)
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    No, it was courage too. I was far less courageous, and went the more conventional route of refusing to do my homework and trying to burn the church down.
  • Steve · 12 months ago
    To think I was raised Catholic...sheesh.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Don't let it get to you. When you die you'll be baptized Mormon.
  • Blueflash · 12 months ago
    Not too many pay heed any longer to screwed-up closet-case Catholic priests whose own sexuality has become so dark and twisted that they end up seeking out children, all the while condemning psychologically healthy gay people. These people are yesterday's news. The Catholic church is dying in the West and the little that remains is becoming indistinguishable from fundamentalist Protestantism.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    But it's growing in the Third World, which means it's getting more conservative. Eventually they will be moving the Vatican to São Tomé.
  • serge · 12 months ago
    I thought we in South Carolina had the market covered on this kind of bullshit religiosity. Now I know better. As a thoroughly, completely, unequivocally apostate Catholic, I guess I shouldn't be too surprised.
  • Naja pallida · 12 months ago
    A mortal swin is like a knock off mortal sin, from China... with lead paint.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Lol. Or should that be wed paint? Oh, wait. Then what would red paint be? Never mind.
  • bmeadows · 12 months ago
    Yes, and John McCain supports dropping bombs on innocent civilians. Then there's that small historical incident called "The Inquisition".
  • Asterix · 12 months ago
    I don't know what the fuss is about. This guy is just a parish priest--holding something approximating the rank of sergeant in the army of Rome. His job pretty much extends to delivering sacraments to the civiliams (with the exceptions of Confirmation and Holy Orders, which is pretty much reserved for the commissioned officers like bishops), fundraising and delivering the message of the day from headquarters. He does not interpret scripture, nor do his opinions constitute doctrine.

    Have any of these reporters checked with his bishop to see what they think?
  • Verchiel · 12 months ago
    Fr. Damnation's bishop isn't on board with his little tirade:

    But the Most Rev. Stephen Blaire, bishop of the Stockton, Calif., Diocese, said he disagrees with Illo. He said Catholics should not feel compelled to disclose how they voted to their priest.

    Blaire said Catholics who carefully weighed many issues and settled on a candidate, such as Obama, who was supportive of abortion rights, were not in need of confession. He said confession would be necessary "only if someone voted for a pro-abortion or pro-choice candidate -- if that's the reason you voted for them."

    "Our position on pro-life is very important, but there are other issues," Blaire said. "No one candidate reflects everything that we stand for. I'm sure that most Catholics who voted were voting on economic issues.

    "There were probably many priests, and I suspect many bishops, who voted for Obama."


    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/56697.html
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Church_____State

    Church___State

    Church__State

    Church_State

    ChurchState

    ChurScthate

    ChSutracthe

    CShtuartceh
  • Verchiel · 12 months ago
    Unfortunately, showing that this rogue priest 's actions were repudiated by his bishop would seem to indicate the exact opposite of the blending you seem to think this is indicative of.

    Illo's position runs counter to the local hierarchy as well as that of the Vatican. The Catholic Church is not attempting some incursion, here, no matter how many silly visual aids you post.
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Well, it's difficult for the Vatican to say that Illo's position runs counter to its teaching, since it does not. It would be more accurate to say that Illo's position runs counter to Vatican policy, which is to avoid getting caught dabbling in politics in such a way that makes the Church appear disrespectful of non believer's rights, or further alienates its dwindling membership. As your example clearly demonstrates, the Church is attempting to appear as if they are not interested in politics. But being a completely political organization, it's in their blood. They are of course politically savvy enough to distance themselves from yet another "rogue priest" who espouses the extremes of their theofascism, especially since their involvement in Prop 8 has just been exposed.
  • gonzalez · 12 months ago
    Will someone please send this to that IDIOT. I'm a catholic who voted for President-Elect Obama and I'm proud of it. What is the church going to do about it? I can live with my vote for Obama. Can the church live with covering for child abusers?" They are all IDIOTS! Stay out of politics and stick with the dictatoral church!
  • KeithNovo · 12 months ago
    Perhaps he should confess that he disobeyed Christ's teachings: "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's."
  • tufdaawg · 12 months ago
    I live in Modesto, and you should see the letters to the editor about this article (modbee.com). Too bad Modesto is known for only bad things (Lacy Peterson, Fr. Illo, etc.) and not all of the good things that go on here.
  • judybrowni · 12 months ago
    I first realized that Catholic theology made no fucking sense as a 7-year old when told that Mortal Sins, which send you directly to hell forever after, included murder, adultery -- and missing Mass on Sunday.

    One of these things is not like the other.

    Yup, didn't seem fair to a 7-year-old that I'd be sent to hell, if I missed Mass and was hit by a Popsicle truck before I'd had the chance to go to Congession and get that sin wiped from my soul.

    Me in pigtails in Hell with Hitler and the Grand Inquistor, I guess.

    Also didn't seem fair that little pagan babies went to Limbo, where they'd never see the face of God, for the sin of not having been baptized Catholic.

    Didn't make sense then, doesn't make sense now (although the Church has since had second thoughts on their bigoted Limbo.)
  • RitornaVincitor · 12 months ago
    Amen, sister! I personally had trouble with the virgin birth. I had no problem with the Angel Gabriel and the Annunciation, and Joseph believing her story, and all that. It was the actual virgin birth that bothered me. Since Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin, she was the only non-divine human being not subject to the punishments that God gave Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden for eating the apple. Therefore she did not have to bear her children in pain. So the Church teaches that she did not have a painful childbirth. Instead she was nine months pregnant one instant, and the baby Jesus was lying in her arms the next. They insist Mary could not have had a natural delivery because she was free from Original Sin. I was able to accept that she was ever virgin - that Joseph never "knew' her - that those mentioned in the bible as Jesus' brothers were actually just his cousins - that when she died of old age she was brought back to life and assumed up into heaven where she was crowned Queen of Heaven and now stands with her heel on Satan's head. I was even able to accept that they found roses lying in her grave where her body was supposed to be. But I just never quite got why she couldn't have a normal delivery and yet be miraculously spared the pain. I mean, if all the other crap was possible, why not that too? The whole baby teleportation thing just bothered me. If my parents hadn't lied to me repeatedly about Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny I might never have learned to questioned authority. But I did and, well, the whole faith thing just started to unravel.

    Oh, by the way. Hitler was Catholic.
  • Charles · 12 months ago
    Catholics have their heads so far up their asses with their obsession with church rules. It's one big circle jerk: state of grace, confession, mortal sin, absolution, sacrilege, etc. This is an organization who held a meeting to decide if they were going to stop molesting children or not because church doctrine didn't prohibit it. Ultimately, this is an internal issue, but those of us who sit at the grown ups table can't allow them to take a seat until they recognize that no one outside of their group doesn't give a shit about their ideology.