-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/11/citi-cutting-53000-employees.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
1 hour ago · 2 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
13 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 30 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
BUT, I worked my ass off there (more than once working 3 days straight and only leaving to shower at a hotel and buy fresh clothes). They have a long history of treating their rank and file employees like shit and were one of the first to make widespread use of temporary employees back in the '70's to whom they provided no benefits.
Prince and several current top executives just bought millions worth of shares last week when the price went below $9. And they announce 53,000 jobs to be cut today--these people are criminals and belong in prison.
"if you only knew, how a man who has a lot can't wait to get more...'
Van the man Morrison - 'If you only knew'
Please all of you suckers and fucking idiots on this board that backed this bailout please raise your hand and be noticed!
If possible, please fire the MBAs twice.
Thank you.
Bigger is NOT better. This is being proved over and over and over. Even as the federal govt has grown under the Bush regime, it has governed horribly, wasted tons of money and grown the federal debt to historic proportions.
This "solution" looks like one done made "in committee".
They are seeking almost $8 billion in cost savings. Yet their board just voted (Oct 28th?) to pay a _cash_ dividend, at an annual rate of $3.4 billion (that would be about 12% of the $25 billion that they got from the government paid out in cash to the common shareholders...).
Consider this, too: you write down a bunch of residential mortgages and maybe some derivative holdings. why does that mean you fire 53,000 people across the whole business, especially if you advertise that your capital base is second to none in the industry, almost? ... anyway, I guess we'll know more when we get a glimpse of in what areas they think they can cut...