-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/05/clinton-continues-attacks-on-obama.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
Geez - Are we witnessing Hillary go beserk right in front of our eyes?
IGNORE HER.
HILLARY IS MENTALLY ILL CLUB
since 2008*
*before that I just found her to be a distasteful, opportunistic liar.
This from an editorial in today's NYTimes: "There is a lot of talk that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is now fated to lose the Democratic nomination and should pull out of the race. We believe it is her right to stay in the fight and challenge Senator Barack Obama as long as she has the desire and the means to do so. That is the essence of the democratic process."
I could care less whether Hillary wins, loses or drops her drawers in the Oval Office, but back off, please, and let democracy take its course.
how about we focus on McStain and his senior moments???
But the question is WHY is she still out there? If she persists in following through the next, what 6 contests, then I am falling into the camp that says she is out to destroy Obama in preparation for a run in 2012
It's very sad actually. I am watching people who stood by each other lamenting the Bush administration deeds turn to yelling at each other as though they were trolls. Thanks Hil.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/action/tshirt/?sc=8
What would be a good design for a Hillary Clinton Tee Shirt? Maybe just a fat lady singing.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view...
Gotta say:. Any group with 3 members from NY State and 3 members from Texas are just pulling your leg when they call themselves "swing state."
Sen. Clinton would like people to believe that her plan consitutes universal coverage by virtue of her mandate that all citizens purchase coverage. There's the rub, though, true universal coverage involves government run and funded health care without an insurance industry, except those that provide optional extended coverage benefits beyond those provided by said government. In point of fact, she wants the same thing proposed by both Edwards and Obama, an enforced group insurance market open to all people that invites existing insurance companies to the market. What's worse, her plan reduces insurance premiums far less than either Obama's or Edwards' plans call for. When you dig deeper into the plans only Obama and Edwards implement components designed to drive down the actual cost of care. So, while Clinton's plan purports a reduction in premium cost of approx $500 / yr for avg family of 4, Obama's plan purports to reduce the cost of premiums by $2500 /yr for the average family of 4, and that's been verified by a panel of independent analysts. His plan then goes a step further to reduce the cost of care in a number of ways that also serve to make the provision of health care safer.
As much as many of us in healthcare would like to see universal healthcare offered in the U.S., the reality is this is unlikely to pass in our current political atmostphere, and something needs to happen to reduce the burden of health care costs in our country immediately. As a nurse, and as a parent and consumer, I can live with Obama's plan. Sen. Clinton's, on the other hand, lends itself to some very big problems, not the least of which are imbedded in her mandates and just how those are enforced, and in the fact that she calls it universal when it's anything but. People will expect to receive one thing and end up with quite another. In other words, if you think Canada sounds bad, just wait unitl you have to seek care under Clinton's plan!
Once the slug has salt poured on it, the slug begins profusive sliming as it begins to shrivel. The voters and superdelegates are pouring salt on Hillary, and as slugs do, she is sliming and shriveling. Do you see any difference between the two?
Thank you for that explanation. I swear I hear them talk about their plans but didn't real know what they were saying.