DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Clinton, who AP calls "a dogged but deluded also-ran," now says West Virginia is the next test to prove she's more electable

  • sittenpretty · 1 year ago
    follow me,AP>Nedra Pickler>>>>>total BULLKACKY
    OAK?
  • jr · 1 year ago
    "Obama won't debate me in WVA and KY"-Hillary
  • ChairmanMo · 1 year ago
    WHOM
  • FunMe · 1 year ago
    GREAT NEWS!

    Obama to ignore Hillary:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080508/pl_po...

    "Obama to declare Victory on May 20"
    :-)
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    meanwhile, Cindy McCain says she won't release her tax returns, even if she gets to be first lady! so there.

    http://agonist.org/schecter/?p=9748

    i cannot WAIT until this Hillary shit is over.
  • johnosahon · 1 year ago
    why did the first female president of kkk (beacuse that's the only presidency she will EVER RECIEVE) not win IOWA, ALASKA, and EVERY CAUSUS STATE where at least 95% of the population are WHITE?

    why did hilary not WIN ALL the states as 65% of the population of america are WHITE?
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    That's it for me. I've been following all of Hillary's moaning, complaining and race baiting long enough.
    I will now say this: If Hillary is anointed as the Democratic nominee I will NOT vote in the presidential portion of the general election. Period.
    I would rather saw off my own arm than to pull the lever for Hillary.
    I once held the Clinton's in the highest esteem, voted for Bill twice. But that esteem has now turned into nothing but absolute contempt for the both of them.
    You hear that Hillary? You have forever lost two votes from this address.
    STEP ASIDE AND TAKE YOUR AND BILL'S OVERBLOWN EGOS WITH YOU!

    Obama '08!
  • moxiegrrrl · 1 year ago
    What's extremely sad to me is that this gives false-hope to her die-hard supporters. She is clinging with bloody fingernails and it's shameful that she's still asking people to fork over hard-earned money when the signs are all there that it's not gonna go her way. And yes, I'm sure there are many supporters who will see donating as money well spent, but look at the big picture. She'll get next Tuesday and declare her campaign "reinvigorated!" only to have the math that has been available for the past 3 months to finally slap her in the face. And all those people she dragged along with her will take it out on Obama.

    For a second there I thought she would be classy and ease her supporters into supporting Obama, but this is just getting sick.
  • Eyeball_Kid · 1 year ago
    Interesting comment. I suspect that, Harvey Weinstein notwithstanding, Hillary's financial base is drying up fast. With so much money already dumped into all of the presidential primary candidates, and with the Hillary balloon already popped and shattered, no one in their right mind is going to throw good money after bad. Agreed, that's what Hillary's already done by donating 11 million dollars to her own campaign, but then again, she's not in her right mind.
  • moxiegrrrl · 1 year ago
    I think you'd be surprised just how often people will throw good money after bad... think of all the people that get scammed by infomercials, all the people that STILL think Bush is the best president ever... heck think of all the fans Charlie Manson has!

    (No, I am not comparing Clinton to Manson, I am making the point that if a freak like Manson still has devotees, Clinton will have no problem getting SOMEONE to give her money).
  • michaelt · 1 year ago
    if obama is not the nominee there's going to be more than black people in the street.
  • mountainhigh · 1 year ago
    The media exploited the hell out the "scorched earth" policy and it got them readers and viewers. Well "scorched earth" is yesterday news and they know it, which why you will see more and more words like deluded in referring to Clinton. They have a new quest and that is to paint Hillary as the desperate or tragic figure of a failed campaign. There will tons of stories now about her damaging the Clinton legacy, questioning her "real" reason for continuing and finally, questions about her judgment.

    I doubt that any, like the aritcle above, will be sympathetic to Hillary.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    ...How does Cindy McCain get that horse hair and carved wood look?
    Anyway, I'd imagine HRC will delve into her vast repository of "experience" and "testing" to finally come to grips with her misdirected campaign...She could be a real power in the Senate and a social maven with the regular ear of whatever survives as punditry if only she'd use that lovely sunroom for a crafty salon instead of video studio.
  • KerrynowCampau · 1 year ago
    Starting to look pathetic?

    I think pathetic was reached a while ago.
  • Nigel Elliott · 1 year ago
    So caucus and small states only matter when Clinton is expected to win them.

    The Clintons are disgusting people. Go away and next time run for the GOP ticket, since under their rules, she would be their nominee by now.
  • grandma · 1 year ago
    HRC proxy Weinstein threatens Pelosi, Dems with nuclear winter if they don't back FL/MI revote

    Producer and HRC mainstay Harvey Weinstein is pushing a plan in which he would put together the dollars required to do primary re-votes in Florida and Michigan. He wants the blessing of key Democrats -- with their kneecaps intact or otherwise.
    CNN describes two threats Weinstein reportedly levied in a call with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday:

    "[A] person familiar with the phone call said what might have upset Pelosi is that Weinstein also suggested that if Democratic leaders 'did not fix' the Florida and Michigan problem, powerful Democrats may abandon the eventual party nominee in favor of Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, in November.

    "But the three officials briefed on the call insisted Weinstein went further by suggesting that if Pelosi did not consider his proposal on the revote, he would help slow the flow of donations to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which works to elect House Democrats."

    http://minnesotamonitor.com/showDiary.do?diaryI...
  • mountainhigh · 1 year ago
    Here is the answer Pelosi should shoot back to Weinstien

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmUVr_Qt2Wg
  • moxiegrrrl · 1 year ago
    Why is it that some people don't seem to understand that MICHIGAN and FLORIDA broke the rules set up and AGREED TO BY CLINTON. I am sorry those votes won't count, but maybe that will teach people to stop breaking the rules?

    And stop blaming it on Obama. HE didn't break the rules.

    EDIT: not that Clinton herself set up the rules. I meant they were previously set up by the party. But they were agreed to by Clinton.
  • grandma · 1 year ago
    mountainhigh...

    Right on.....thanks for that link
  • KISSman · 1 year ago
    It's funny how on MSNBC, everyone was saying it was over and talking about how the process in which Hillary would gracefully exit. But that's not happening nor going to happen.

    She is going to run about as hard as she has been running and will likely prod Obama about his electability because this is her only argument. Unfortunately, it's one of the most destructive she can make. If she wants to highlight how her stances on issues are better -- fine. But to talk about how he basically can't win in the fall -- that's wrong.

    Hillary and Bill are going to kick & scream the whole way. They believe that if they do the right thing now, it would show a sign of weakness. They are going to fight on and the only thing that may change is that the attacks will be a little more subliminal. She won't say "my opponent", but you'll hear a lot more of, "I'm the only candidate who can...."

    I'd like to see a balloon drop in Oregon for Obama when he officially wins the majority of elected delegates. She can complain all she wants, but the visual will say it all and the perception will solidify him as the nominee.
  • Eyeball_Kid · 1 year ago
    I'll be voting in the Oregon primary, and I'll proudly vote Hillary into the dustbin. Unfortunately, it wasn't always this way for me. I thought the world of Hillary Clinton in 1996, when I squeezed my way to the rope line in Corvallis to shake her hand as she was stumping for Bill. Now, I find her arrogance and destructiveness to be repulsive. I can't stand to look at her on the screen. She's fitting into the same hate-filled category as Dick Cheney, sorry to say.
  • blackwolf · 1 year ago
    Fascinating isn't it? Hillary has always been this way friend. It just took a certain chain of events to bring it out.
  • KISSman · 1 year ago
    Most of us supported Bill and Hillary in the past. I know it's a shock to them, but it didn't mean that we wanted them back in the White House just because we really liked them in there during the 90's. I really think that they believed that we all would welcome them back with open arms after 8 disasterous years of Bush and they still can't believe that we don't want them.
  • JohnShreffler · 1 year ago
    The Clintons: small bitter failures, doggedly clinging to religion, guns, and Crown Royal shots chased down with a Bud. Made for West Virginia, it seems.
  • moxiegrrrl · 1 year ago
    *wonders if Clinton will show up on inauguration day wondering where her secret service detail is.*
  • vkobaya · 1 year ago
    *wonders if Clinton will show up on inauguration day wondering where her secret service detail is.*

    And very angry and nasty screeching that the incompetent, stupid, N---- loving Secret Service turned away her moving van from the White House.
  • vkobaya · 1 year ago
    He he he! Alright people, where is your sympathy? Come on now! Deluded? No! Clinton is clearly completely out of her ever loving mind. Deluded is when these people are still walking the streets, still able to function on some level, not a threat to others. perhaps needing some slight medical help. Hillary is far beyond that. She has no connection at all with reality, is a serious threat to those around her and should be restrained in a straight jacket, a steel frame, locked up in a heavily padded cell and medicated to the gills. Now come on, your hatred, anger, bitterness and condemnation is undeserved. Show the humane, liberal, progressive kind, gentle, loving souls that you are supposed to have and give her the sympathy she has earned ... right after we lock her away, in a straight jacket, padded cell and doped to the gills.

    As for Bill, I think he was tipped off by Hillary's lawyer that she intends to file divorce papers on January 20, 2009, at one minute after noon, after she is inaugurated. He intends to prevent that humiliation by having her locked away in Bellvue.
  • Eyeball_Kid · 1 year ago
    "Make this stop." Oh?? The leadership hasn't the balls to make it stop because most of the "leadership" is tied to the "Democratic LEADERSHIP Council" (DLC), that obsolete group of centrist DINOs who share cocktails with the neo-conservatives at after-hours social events.

    "Make this stop." What a joke. Hillary is the Queen of the DLC. If she wants to wreck the Democratic Party, she has the DLC's blessing. Go ahead Hillary. Spread your shit all over the faces of the true Democratic base. Show them who's boss.
  • tomjuarez · 1 year ago
    I wrote Senator Boxer today asking her to reconsider her superdelegate position. I explained that I hadn't written previously because I understood both her loyalty to Senator Clinton and that California had gone to Clinton, but that now that Clinton's nomination is all but impossible she needed to put her loyalty aside because it isn't worth the cost of ceding the nation to the GOP for another 4 disastrous years and splitting the party.

    I even said that it would be reasonable for Clinton to stay in until May 20th to end on wins and prehaps recoup some of the cash she's spent -but not if she's going to continue attacking Obama and certainly not beyond that date.

    Maybe more people should do this to the supers in their states?

    Also, I think we need to take a breath and look objectively at what's happening now:

    Clinton's still courting her supporters for funds because she has to to retire her campaign debts. She's still talking about "winning" but this isn't hurting Obama, and I'll bet that (just as in her "victory speech" on Tue) there will continue to be a marked softening in tone -with little if any mention of Obama in her discourse.

    Even her referring to WV as the next test is just typical political boilerplate and doesn't really damage Obama. She sees the writing on the wall, but a campaign that has gone on this long isn't going to be tied up quickly. After May 20th it's a different story.

    I'd wait until then to start mercilessly bashing her -unless she starts attacking Obama again then all bets are off.
  • DAB · 1 year ago
    As I've stated here before, I've been an Obama supporter ever since Edwards dropped out, and I've contributed to his campaign. But as we get closer to this decision, I continue to be very worried about November, and all this internecine battling doesn't worry me so much for the reasons people are saying, but because it's skewing people's priorities, including Obama's supporters'. I don't think Clinton is doing the party any good by staying in, but from her perspective, I think the following analysis (in today's WSJ) by Karl Rove of all people is pretty much gulp-inducing:

    "My analysis of individual state polls shows that today Mr. McCain would win 241 Electoral College votes to Mr. Obama's 217, with 80 votes in toss-up states where neither candidate has more than a 3% lead. Ironically, Mrs. Clinton now leads Mr. McCain with 251 electoral votes to his 203 with 84 in toss-up states. This is the first time she's led Mr. McCain since I began tracking state-by-state results in early March."

    A friend of mine who's been die-hard for Hillary from the beginning sees it this way, given the Democrats' history: Bill and Hillary Clinton are excoriated for doing anything to win... by people that will do anything to lose.

    I don't necessarily agree with him, but I have to think there's a better way than these two candidates slugging it out or, as here, us slugging it out on their behalf.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 1 year ago
    DAB 12 minutes
    ---

    DAB... remember, you're quoting kkkarl rove.

    first, examine the facts... hillary can't win the primary.

    second, consider that even with rush limbaugh telling repugs to vote for her in both races yesterday... she still lost NC and ONLY won Indiana BY 2%!

    the repugs want her to win... why?

    because the TRUTH is opposite from kkkarl's statement. mccain stands a good chance of beating hillary... I don't think mccain stands a chance against Obama.

    why? because he represents change. hillary is starting to align more and more with the far right side of moderate... leaning into regular repugnican territory.

    if people want REAL change in Washington, they won't vote for mccain OR hillary.

    last point, kkkarl lies about EVERYTHING... why would you consider his analysis unbiased or truthful??
  • DAB · 1 year ago
    Soundboy Jeff, don't get me wrong. I understand all that about what the Republicans want to run against (and now Rush is trying some of that fancy reverse psychology by switching his "support" to Obama) and that hatred of Hillary had a large part to play in why i supported Obama in the first place. Because I know too many Republicans who would crawl through glass to vote against Hillary even if Fidel Castro were running against her. But I don't think Karl lies about stuff like this -- he's too baldly cynical to lie about election math, especially when he's getting paid for his insights. I think instead that he's doing what he's always done, which is to focus on the Electoral College, and that's what WE need to be doing.

    His column goes on to say that once we've finally settled, officially, on Obama, he'll get a big bump and lead McCain. (And then he adds his and McCain's expectation that McCain would come back from that, same as GHWB did against Dukakis around the same time. I wouldn't be so blithe about that if I were him, however.)

    All I'm saying is that BOTH Obama and Clinton -- AND THEIR SUPPORTERS -- need to be focused on beating John McCain this November IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. Not on winning the nomination, purifying the Democratic Party, or any of the other things we seem to think we'd rather do. I agree that one of the best ways this could be accomplished would be for Hillary to drop out now. But just because she won't drop out isn't a reason to turn getting her to do so into our primary concern or objective. There needs to be some jujitsu maneuvers here by Obama (which I think he's doing pretty well) and by his supporters (which I think we're not) if we're going to neutralize her, win back her supporters, and win the Electoral College votes this November.
  • TomJoad · 1 year ago
    Tell me please why Hillary has SO much power? She is a contestant in a game show, and she gets to rearrange the rules to fit her? She even gets to first say one set of rules apply, then when she loses with that set, that another should apply.

    It is sickening. I don't understand why she is still on the ticket.Why shouldn't she be relegated to a write-in candidate? Kucinich (who I would LOVE to vote for, even more than Obama) had to drop out when it was just starting practically. Other candidates. it would be a HUGE mistake for Obama to offer to pay Clintons debts, or offer vice to her, it would look weak, and would look like a payoff. Mc Cain would (quite rightly) have a field day with that.

    I would love to see a woman president. Hillary is not it though.
  • DougStamate · 1 year ago
    It won't stop until there is a nominee chosen by the convention. To quote from Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land": "Waiting is."