-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/connecticut-supreme-court-rules-in.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
More about the Yule Goat
11 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 29 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
How Barack Obama undermined the Obama presidency
5 days ago · 181 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrEZdLsS7Eo&feat...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz4Z6L4u8E4
enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itEucdhf4Us
The end of the YouTube video is great in that it shows the FACE of America. Obama supporters: different races, hopeful, progressive fighters for America!
I especially though the guy screaming "commie faggots!" was typical of Republican terrorists.
http://bloggerinterrupted.com/2008/10/video-the...
I am glad to see them stand up for the rights of ALL Americans.
Sorry, Dad, I'm Voting for Obama
by Christopher Buckley
"Obama has in him—I think, despite his sometimes airy-fairy “We are the people we have been waiting for” silly rhetoric—the potential to be a good, perhaps even great leader. He is, it seems clear enough, what the historical moment seems to be calling for.
So, I wish him all the best. We are all in this together. Necessity is the mother of bipartisanship. And so, for the first time in my life, I’ll be pulling the Democratic lever in November. As the saying goes, God save the United States of America."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/...
Now, if Connecticut will throw Lieberman out of office, I can finally be proud of the state of my birth again!
For now, though, just a little bask in the common sense of equality.
I would love it if the approach would change, somewhat, however. It would be nice if the meme adjusted somewhat to the following line of questioning: How is it alright for those who wish to rigidly define marriage to impose their will upon religions (or specific churches within religions) who WANT to marry same-sex members of their congregation?
Separation of Church and State, anyone? Defining marriage in such a draconian manner, as opposed to defining it as a specific line of legal protections two or more individuals willingly join together in, is imposing a specific religious view upon the masses. Adding the non-religious opens it all up even further. Gay marriage, consensual polygamy, communal marriage, all of it should be completely, 100% legal, and noone has the right to impose their specific religious views upon people who wish to join together in such a manner. It quite pisses me off every time I hear the, "The Bible defines marriage as..." line of reasoning.
edit: Berlusconi (Italy) said it, per Drudge, (don't lecture me about Drudge please).
Has anyone noticed how much Cindy McCain looks like Maleficent?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2a/M...
http://timesonline.typepad.com/photos/uncategor...
http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/