DISQUS

AMERICAblog: David Brooks: A Republican senator put ‘his hand on my inner thigh’ for a ‘whole’ dinner party

  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 4 months ago
    "How the hell did this happen? Where did this fairy ever get the idea that I was gay? And where did he get those fantastic boots?"

    ----

    LMFAO!!!!
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 4 months ago
    Mr. Brooks, may I call I you David? Good, thanks. I have been a big fan of your column, even though I have a staffer who cuts you out of the paper, and then throws the rest away. Then he gives me a summary of your column--so smart. On the money. I thought your book about yuppies, you call them BoBos was great. Well, I had a staffer read me a summary. But BoBo--that's so, well, cute. I feel such a connection between us, since I hate BoBos too--they always drive Volvos and eat sushi and vote for the Democrat party. You know I'm a man of the people, and my people are salt of the earth. Yes, this beef is great--from Idaho, I think. It's got a, um, beefy taste. You know, I like those glasses you wear. Where did you get them? My wife thinks I should update these aviators, I've had them since the 1970s, but I think I look good in them, don't you?
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 4 months ago
    [cue porn track with funky bass and wah-wah percussive guitar]
  • jurassicpork · 4 months ago
    BarbinMD has a priceless take on that on DKos: "OK, Mr. Op-ed pundit, show us on this doll where the senator touched you."
  • donbux · 4 months ago
    More to the point, who would put the moves on David Brooks? I mean, EW!
  • ShirleyGoodnessanMercy · 4 months ago
    Well, the most feminine men in the US Senate are Lindsay Graham, Jeff Sessions, and Orrin Hatch. But everyone feels sure Mitch McConnell is gay. So maybe it's one of those four. But ya never know. So many gay men are more masculine than straight men, and so many straight men are uber-fey, so ya just never know.
    Maybe it was Russ Feingold. I keep praying he will magically become gay since he is sooooo hot!
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 4 months ago
    He's more likely to become gay than he is to become a Republican. He's one of the more "progressive" Dems in the Senate. (Actually, he would have been called a centrist Democrat in the Nixon era).
  • woodroad34 · 4 months ago
    "So many gay men are more masculine than straight men, and so many straight men are uber-fey, so ya just never know"

    I call 'em "male impersonators" and straight guys I've talked to call 'em "scary". I remember a bunch of us tried to set up a friend with this one guy who was very soft, but turned out to be straight. Gaydar switched off.
  • Butch1 · 4 months ago
    He is also a democrat. I thought Brooks only ran in republican circles.
  • John · 4 months ago
    For Republicans, homosexuality is always wrong. Except, of course, when it is closeted upper-class, conservative white males. These people are more "Victorian" than the actual Victorians.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 4 months ago
    but what they do isn't 'homosexuality'... its just two men helping each other out.

    there's a difference... I'm not sure what it is exactly, but then again I'm a gay liberal.

    /snark
  • woodroad34 · 4 months ago
    Victor/Victoria Victorians
  • okojo · 4 months ago
    For the Party of Jesus, they sure liked to act like a bunch of Romans.

    Caligula/Palin 2012

    You know it feels right.
  • jimtreg · 4 months ago
    I want to say Lindsey Graham, but that's too obvious. I'm betting on "Big" John Cornyn.
  • Mike_in_the_Tundra · 4 months ago
    I think I would have stopped Lindsey Graham after the first three seconds. Pulling the index finger back towards the upper wrists stops them every time.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 4 months ago
    I know Big John adverts to being Big John in his now-classic ad, but enquiring minds want to know: "big" how, hmmmmm?

    Or is what is considered big in Texas, just really snack-size in the other 49 states?
  • judybrowni · 4 months ago
    THE WHOLE DINNER PARTY?

    The WHOLE dinner party?

    As a woman who has been groped more than she would have liked to have been, I'd like to inform David Brooks that if you don't like that hand near your genitals, you may remove it.

    Or give the groper a quick kick to the ankles.

    To allow the groper to continue says as much about you as him.
  • judybrowni · 4 months ago
    The one time I allowed a groper to continue, there were extenuating circumstances: it was a fellow worker suffering through a meeting, his wife was nine months pregnant, I liked him, and I was bored shitless with the meeting.

    Kinda brightened my day, neither of us ever referred to it again.

    So, David, either the dinner party was extremely boring, or ya liked it and the groper.

    The only remaining question: was his wife very pregnant at the time?
  • nikto · 4 months ago
    Gosh. That makes me want to attend long,
    boring meetings with you.
    :)
  • caphillprof · 4 months ago
    I feel confident that there are some women who would rather put up with being groped by a U.S. Senator than alienating him from themselves.

    I suppose we can get a good giggle out of whether or not David Brooks actually liked being groped and where he might belong on the Kinsey 1 to 6, but I am thinking this was a pretty important U.S. Senator and Mr. Brooks believed it was in his own best interest, personally and career wise, to ignore the groping.
  • Ken · 4 months ago
    Actually the Kinsey scale goes 0 to 6, although it's probably fine that you left out value 0 ("completely heterosexual") in this particular case.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 4 months ago
    Like David Brooks is all that.

    I'm gonna plump for a truly desperate closet case like Larry Craig.

    Speaking of plump, I'm not sensing that David Brooks's thighs are taut and muscular.
  • okojo · 4 months ago
    I veer from the an easy lob like Craig. However I think he likes the really anonymous tearoom, and gay bar scene, because that is what he is used to.

    This sounds like Senator Graham of doing things.

    Perhaps it was future Florida Senator Charlie Crist?
  • jimtreg · 4 months ago
    I agree about Craig - first of all, as Craig isn't in the Senate anymore, and has more or less be ostracized, Brooks wouldn't have hid the guy's name. Graham is too much of a closet case to pull anything off like this in public, and Crist isn't a Senator yet. I'm guessing its a conservative, married, mid-aged Senator.
  • elRey · 4 months ago
    of course it was Lindsey Graham!! Duh!

    I've always found the utter nerdiness of David Brooks a bit charming.... (when he's not making me angry)
  • Sphinx · 4 months ago
    McConnell
  • okojo · 4 months ago
    Lindsey Graham.

    If it was Maria Cantwell or Blanche Lincoln, he would be writing a combo of a romantic novel a la Scooter Libby, and a column how these vixens were destroying America. He would asked them to sit next to him at many dinner parties.

    My back up answer is Senator Brownback. Sort of like figuring the usual suspect, the most repressed and self righteous have to express their urges somehow.
  • caphillprof · 4 months ago
    Our Puritan heritage will cause this topic to be addressed mostly as tittillation, but actually American immaturity regarding sex lies behind many of our national problems, not just civil rights and marriage equality for the glbtqi community.

    Republican politicians are especially hypocritical on sexual matters, saying one thing to their Christianist constituencies, while doing something else in what would be their private lives if it weren't for their HYPOCRIsY. Certainly we know that many politicians in both parties, vote or act publicly one way, while pursuing their own antithetical interests.

    Sex in Washington is very much a two-way street. Yes, the rich and/or powerful take advantage of their situation and press against lesser beings. But, also, many lesser beings, like rock'n'roll groupies, throw themselves at the rich and/or powerful.

    If we could set aside our prejudices, I'm sure some situations would be clearly predatory by the politicians but other situations would be predatory by the non-politician. I think we might be surprised how often both sides are in play.

    It may well be that professional politicians are particularly lonely and perhaps they have more marital problems than their constituents. Maybe. Or, perhaps they are much like the rest of us who have more private lives.

    It's the hypocrisy that is so problematic, a hypocrisy that the journalism establishment aides and abets rather than addresses.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 4 months ago
    That's hypocrisy, sweetie.
  • caphillprof · 4 months ago
    I was editing away while you were posting.
  • chicagogo · 4 months ago
    Is the Dairy Queen too obvious?
  • chicagogo · 4 months ago
    Sorry, I take that back. I hadn't seen that it was a Republican.
  • Dennis Dugan · 4 months ago
    Mitch McConnell was the secretly randy fellow who came immediately to mind, perhaps because he's got enough power to make Brooks think he had to pretend not to feel the "intrusion."

    So easy to stop these types, really- all it takes is moving away slightly on your chair & whispering, "Well, Senator (or Father Mike or Uncle Tim), you're "barking up the wrong tree."

    Too afraid Mary McConnell would cut off your access, dear BoBo? Or turn the tables if caught & accuse you?
  • benb · 4 months ago
    Oh, David, You Catholic girls start much too late,
    but sooner or later it comes down to fate...
  • KerrynowCampau · 4 months ago
    I love The Onion
  • nicho · 4 months ago
    Anyone who objects to this sort of behavior and still puts up with it is as bad as the person doing it.

    I would have said -- in my best barroom voice -- "Get your hand out of my crotch, Senator, NOW." And, I would have made sure that everyone in the room heard me.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 4 months ago
    well... I kinda understand why brooks didn't do that.

    with all the closet cases on the hill, he'd never work again.

    however, he could have looked at this guy's hand and said 'excuse me' and got up from the table. I think the guy would've taken the hint when he sat down again.
  • HelenRainier · 4 months ago
    I would have grabbed the guy's hand and twisted his fingers backward. It would be fun to watch him to watch the expression on his face as his tried to keep from screaming in pain.

    Yea, I'm a bit of a "sadist."
  • Butch1 · 4 months ago
    Why Helen, I'm shocked . . . ;-)
  • HelenRainier · 4 months ago
    Hee, hee, hee -- evil laugh!
  • Butch1 · 4 months ago
    Perhaps, giving a push on a pressure point in the hand would have gotten an appropriate reaction. ( unless this senator is into the S & M scene then all bets are off. )
  • Indigo · 4 months ago
    I don't believe him.
  • mirth · 4 months ago
    Neither do I. But I'm curious about why he would say it.
  • Dennis Dugan · 4 months ago
    And if (I agree, a large if) true, why in God's name announce it on MSNBC? Proud of it, little BoBo, just trying to make a splash, or did your mouth get ahead of your brain on this one?
  • Busboy · 4 months ago
    It was probably Arlen Specter. On the night train to the darkside.
  • faeriedust · 4 months ago
    I needed a good laugh, whether it is true or not, (mostly Not), but it was funny as hell. Thanks for the hilarious article, on the Onion, that is what I was reading.

    I don't think that someone would do that to a complete stranger, maybe wishful thinking? Mmmm.
  • nikto · 4 months ago
    Senator Orrin Crotch?
  • SD_Dave · 4 months ago
    My guess is it was Larry Craig when he was still a Senator. But who knows.
  • Bill · 4 months ago
    Don't you think that Brooks is in the closet?
  • Butch1 · 4 months ago
    I hope not, just what we need, another Log Cabin Republican in denial.
  • Marshall Y. · 4 months ago
    "Excuse me Senator, but your pinkie finger is about an inch away from my glans."
  • Butch1 · 4 months ago
    The whole evening??!!!

    That sounds more like: "If you don't stop that in 20 minutes, I'm going to call the cops!" ;-)
  • coolcatdaddy · 4 months ago
    When I first read this, I thought, "Gee, that's strange. Isn't David Brooks kind of old for a Republican Senator? He's like over 21."

    Then I felt rather nauseous.
  • devlzadvocate · 4 months ago
    Foley came to mind first, but Brooks isn't his type. Next would be LC or Miss Pittypat. Even if he didn't have the guts to say "Remove your hand from my inner thigh, SIR", he should have said he had crabs or something.
  • teammarty · 4 months ago
    Maybe they can pray together at C Street.