DISQUS

gumdrops · 1 year ago

"Fake "Cone of silence" controvery grows - McCain refusing to directly answer the questaion. "

Typo!

tlsintx · 1 year ago

Our Little Maverick either lied to a Man of God or the Man of God himself, is lying...or both!

for the Grand Old Party of Traditional Family Values and Religious Fundamentalism, that's no fake controversy...

bluestockton · 1 year ago

Our Little Maverick? How about Our Little Plagiarist? I'd like to see the MSM ask him about that closeted Christian guard at the Hanoi Hilton whom McSame apparently ripped off from a Solzhenitsyn novel.

JillyG · 1 year ago

Plagiarizing the Solzhenitsyn cross in the dirt story is about as damning as it gets--but do you think the main stream media will take it up? After giving McCain a pass all year long? After continually asking why Obama isn't doing better than he is in the polls? While they play around with this election--they do a disservice to the entire country.

Mikki --SE Pennsylvania · 1 year ago

You have definitely put your finger on it tlsintx: Mr.Warren is either incredible naive or he is a liar and a hypocrite.I doubt that he is naiveif he had created such a large evangelical establishment. Mr. Warren IS a LIAR and a HYPOCRITE.
I tuned in at the beginning (on C-SPAN), as many I am sure believing what was said about McCain, the cone of silence, and his not hearing the questions. As the questioning of Obama went on, I began tho think that maybe Warren might be a cut above my idea of a evangelical as his questions and handling seemed reasonable and fair-handed.
Once McCain was in the chair, I regret to say Mr. Warren's bias in favor or McCain began to make itself shown; Warren made no efforts to rein in McCain and allowed him to go on multiple times giving snippets of stump speeches but also dragging out his favorite war fantasies which he has polished over the years but which seem to have less and less credibility each time they are rehashed. Also I felt it was clear McCain had been given, or knew the questions in advance. He prvious performances are proof of his being unable to keep in mind his own positions on one topic, let alone many.
Hearing Sunday about the debacle of the "missing" cone of silence just added more fuel to the fire. Even an ompartial observer would have to make this event a DISMAL FAILURE for Mr. Warren. That he could lie so easily is quite despicable and bringd shame on him personally as well as on the Southern Baptist Church of which he and his church are part.. McCain we know is a liar,conniver, aand crook, so his actions were no surprise. But Senator Obama and the view public is due a public apology from Mr. Warren.

tlsintx · 1 year ago

Our Little Maverick doesn't understand blackberries either?

You know, since he cheated, you'd think his answers would've been better...even with cheating, he SUCKS!

http://firedoglake.com/2008/08/18/mccains-bushl...

DavidinPS · 1 year ago

Okay, since our "journalists" can't seem to figure out the un-dodgeable question for McCain and staff, we should try to construct one. How about this "Did Mr. McCain receive ANY information by ANY means from ANYONE regarding the content of the interview with Mr. Obama before doing his own interview."

Suggestions and improvements please.

MikeinSanJo · 1 year ago

At least SOMEONE is following this. I think we need to put more pressure on Rick Warren.

(I couldn't find a personal e-mail, but this is the e-mail to the main Saddleback Church - info@saddleback.com)

Either he is in on this sham, or... McCain looked this man in the eye, in front of his congregation, and lied right to his face.

That says a lot about the man's respect for evangelical christians.

eliot99 · 1 year ago

The phone number for Saddleback Church is 949-609-8000

Django · 1 year ago

I didn't watch it (on purpose), but weren't they supposed to be on stage together at the beginning, then again at the end?

I smell a Rove...

nikto · 1 year ago

You have an accurate nose, Django.

sittenpretty · 1 year ago

that old senile bugger either downed an entire bottle of GINKO BILOBA,or was fed EACH and EVERY question like pablum...that is all,look at his past performances

HereinDC · 1 year ago

When was the coin toss to see who goes first?

HereinDC · 1 year ago

Email questions to Larry KING

Warren will be on Larry King tonight.

FLOOD CNN with questions

KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago

McCain lovers posting to Tapper: (fingers in ears) We can't hear you! Nahnahnah.....

HereinDC · 1 year ago

Larry King WOULD know at 8:59EST if one of his guest was not in the Green room...let alone not in the building.
so would Leno,Letterman or Carson.

hauksdottir · 1 year ago

So would ANY host!

What if there was an accident or breakdown on the road, or someone needed a cup of coffee, throat lozenge, or other trifle to make them comfortable before speaking? That church is a broadcast house, so the preacher KNEW that guests might want to glance in a mirror beforehand. A good host meets the guests and asks if they need anything while there is time to remedy a situation. Simple courtesy means that greeting your guests and assuring their comfort is of highest priority.

A broadcast host who doesn't know where his speakers are is like a chess player missing a queen and who places it on the board in mid-game. Rude and stupid and dishonest.

aarrgghh · 1 year ago

um, for those who don’t get the reference, the “cone of silence” actually doesn’t work.

sittenpretty · 1 year ago

W wore a wire for the debate..............these dumbass cretins can NEVER be trusted i repeat NEVER

DavidinPS · 1 year ago

Just sent this to Larry King for Mr. Warren tonight.

"Since I have heard nothing but dodges and half answers to this very simple question, I'm hoping you can answer it forthrightly: "Was Mr. McCain capable of receiving ANY information by ANY means from ANYONE regarding the content of your interview with Mr. Obama before doing his own interview."

Here's the link if you want to send one too:

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.lkl.html

HereinDC · 1 year ago

Here's how you should frame the question:
Mr. Warren, "Did you know at 7:59pm that John McCain was not in the building?"

Busboy · 1 year ago

Rick Warren said that he told both camps before the debate what the debate topics would be.

Coming Undone · 1 year ago

I know this may be a a small point but why was McCain late,they knew it was supposed to be a special forum with this so called cone of silence so why was he late?

tjlabs · 1 year ago

Who dares to question or impugn the honor of St. John the Insane? Here's the answer. http://www.tagg-lines.com/2008/08/mccain-campai...

CDS2 · 1 year ago

Doesn't it seem logical that both McCain and Obama would be totally prepared to answer any and all questions regarding everything religious and certainly including the abortion issues? I guess it's just that every time a Republican gets one up, it's always a conspiracy?

Lolis · 1 year ago

I don't think John McCain got one up. If you think we are winning the war in Iraq, that abortion is genocide, and that all the Supreme Court judges who are not Republican are radicals then he won. But he was going to win with that crowd anyway. Meanwhile, Obama showed a more complex understanding of the issues we face. He expressed more sincerity when talking about his faith and what Christianity means in the world.

McCain did not follow the rules. Whether or not he got questions beforehand does not matter. He acted without integrity and has cast reasonable doubt upon his honor. He pretended that he was in "a cone of silence" at the beginning. He therefore lied to the public. I already emailed Rick Warren and demanded that he apologize to me, the viewer, for this deception in order to clear his name. I also demanded that he give a clear timeline of what happened. I suggest others do the same.

McCain will never apologize, but Warren might have to.

vkobaya · 1 year ago

McCain will never apologize, but Warren might have to.

Warren has nothing to apologize for. He is a minister, a man of God, ordained before God, a spiritual leader, one of the chosen, a pure, holy and blessed man, a living saint. How dare you criticize this man who is so far beyond your comprehension. Of course, all satanists, non-believers, infidels, heathens and enemies of all that is good, pure and holy, enemies of God's chosen nation think that Warren lied. They are the same ones who want the heathen, infidel, Godless Iraqi to win the war, want to surrender to evil. You just have to look at Obama, and you can see at once he is not a Christian, cannot be, never has been a Christian and can only be Muslim.

That is why you expect Warren to apoogize. You support the evil, heathen, infidel, Godless Muslims because you also worship Satan. You want to put Satan into the Oval Office.

Mikki --SE Pennsylvania · 1 year ago

WARREN IS A LIAR AND A HYPOCRITE and he very definitely needs to apologise to Obama and to the viewing public.

Maybe the appropriate authorities need to investigate his entire operation.

cowboyneok · 1 year ago

YOU NEED TO TAKE YOUR MEDICINE, NOW!

Ready4theworld · 1 year ago

Stop trying to fool us Sean Hannity!!!

MikeinSanJo · 1 year ago

Questions like "Who is the wisest person you know" (paraphrased) is not necessarily something you would expect in a religious forum, and for McCain to pull Petraeus out of his ass (literally) stinks of pandering (and ass-juice).

The only conspiracy is why do the dems keep trying to play fair and honest when they know the 'pugs will keep doing the same cheating they have always done. The Dems try to speak from their hearts (yes, I know they try to finesse and nuamce what they are saying), the pugs speak from a script (or a tiny microphone hidden under his jacket and tucked away in his ear - like at Bush's debate with Kerry).

CDS2 · 1 year ago

Hey, just because you don't like his answer (Petraeus), doesn't make it wrong? Politicians playing 'fair and honest' ? What world do you live in....Disneyland ?

MikeinSanJo · 1 year ago

Hmmm... Clearly you know how to spell "wrong".

Please indicate exactly where in my previous comment I said McCain's answer was wrong.

Typical republican. You make a totally false and incongruous (that means your comment is inconsistent with my original post) statement about something someone said or did, and then argue your own lie to try to demonstrate how right you are.

I know there is no actual "fair and honest" in politics. As long as the Dems are trying to play catch-up with the republican crime lords we call government (think CNN trying to catch Fox News) there will be no honesty in government. The party of the people can never out-spend the party of big oil, corporations, and false religions.

ron071 · 1 year ago

CDS2, like all Reublicans, evades the key question of why wasn't McSame where the rules said he had to be? How can you defend the clear breach of the rules? Has the Bush era made you immune to lies, distortions, and lawless behavior? Surely, Mc/same will ( if ever elected or selected )bring us more of the same.

DCinDC · 1 year ago

Why was McCain late for getting to the event?

TheOriginalLiz · 1 year ago

probably running late due to his afternoon nap and meds.

HereinDC · 1 year ago

Off topic,
Can we all make a pledge to watch only MSNBC during the Democratic Convention next week?

Joneses · 1 year ago

Not the actual questions but a broad indication of what the questions would be like.

I like to know the actual time McCain and crew finally appeared at the Church. They knew they had to be there before Obama's question and answer period, and to be in the "cone of silence" room.

This is extremely fishy. Think if Obama did that, the corporate media would never let it go.

HereinDC · 1 year ago

This Warren guy has this Big Mega Church and a Green Room and all the hoopla of a tv studio in his Mega church. He broadcast his sermons.

You can't tell me he DID NOT know that the other guest was not there at 7:59pm.
You can't tell me at the first commerical break that someone didn't say into Warren's earpiece that McCain wasn't there.

HereinDC · 1 year ago

John' A has been on tv quite a few times. I think the host would know if John wasn't there for his segment.

jr · 1 year ago

"I'll say anything to help the republicans under the guise of bipartisan"-fatter Chuck Todd Rick Warren

katymine · 1 year ago

If this event was even-steven and the coin toss was done just prior to the questions(I did not watch) then wasn't McCain in that cone of silence already. WHY wasn't McCain already in the church?

This stinks and questions need to be asked, when was the coin toss, when who would go first decided, who was connected via blackberries and text messaging and this goes RIGHT to the character issue.

Liar Liar pants on fire

HereinDC · 1 year ago

When was the coin toss? Who was at the coin toss?

I know it sounds like a simple question, but aren't these the type of questions no one ever asks? And it could be just the question that would open up the can of worms?

boloboffin · 1 year ago

I knew well before the event that Barack was going first. I think it was announced early in the day on C-Span. In fact, I'm sure that it was announced there. So the "coin toss" was done much earlier.

However, come to think about it, the way that Warren set that up, if you didn't know that the decision had already been made, you might have assumed that the coin toss happened and McCain was put into the cone of silence then and there. Tricky tricky.

camille · 1 year ago

'Member how McCain said that one thing.....what was it now?....hmmmm...oh yeah, he said, "I hate war." Here's the thing: NO, he DOESN'T. It's the one thing, the one idea, he loves best in all the world. His entire perception of international relations is filtered through a militaristic prism that makes the expenditure of military might the best, the ONLY solution. In this, he is profoundly infantile and dangerous.

TheOtherWA · 1 year ago

Warren didn't ask McCain if any of his staffers had handheld satellite radios and relayed the questions to McCain. Some needs to ask that very specific question. I doubt the McCain campaign will answer it.

confusion · 1 year ago

confusion wonder...watta hell goin on, McCanny and netwurk moguls pay a guud money for bobble-heads to keepy mouth shut, no telly when McLiar Lie. Sumwun gonna pay for this...send to Georgia gulag.

confusion · 1 year ago

confusion think...Repelicans need find smarter POW to run for Prez nex a time...POW McWhako under 'CONE OF STOOPID'!

Indigo · 1 year ago

Perhaps the good reverend was referring to the Biblibcal "cone of silence" that is mentioned in the Fundamentalist Apocrypha written on mystic pages that only the Elect can see and interprete.

ezpz · 1 year ago

Or maybe the "cone of silence" from Get Smart:

"The Cone of Silence is one of many recurring joke devices from Get Smart, an American comedy television series of the 1960s."

",,,Part of the humor is in the irony that Agent 86 and Chief cannot hear each other clearly, while bystanders outside the Cone of Silence can hear everything they say as well as speak to them. Sometimes the bystander would even act as a relay so that Chief and "86" inside the device could communicate. Often at the end of the labored conversation, Chief would become terribly frustrated and upset as it quickly becomes clear that the Cone of Silence is (as expected) completely useless..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_of_Silence

It looks like Pastor Warren and John McShame had an inside joke going on that they duped the public with when Warren's first question was:

"“Now, my first question: Was the cone of silence comfortable that you were in just now?”

Of course we all know the pow's response with that creepy grin:

"I was trying to hear through the wall.”

ron071 · 1 year ago

Poor Pastor Rick. He has ruined whatever reputation he previously had. Why would this man stoop to this level? Perhaps he was hoping for more publicity to aide his many fundraising efforts. He is just like the other mega-church guys we've all heard about. Just the cash from the faithful is his mantra.

JMOHR · 1 year ago

This is the time to strike McCain on every ethics related issue that the Democrats can manage. It should take the form of three ads: Flip-flops, ties to lobbyists- going back to Keating, and his own admissions of pandering/dirty campaign. We do not directly strike at the "cone of silence" issue. Surrogates keep asking the question. Should media pundits try to respond during an interview about McCain's past - then the response should be the same as we saw before - McCain has changed himself to pander because he is ambitious enough to lick a dirty floor to win this election. Should someone respond with the POW issue, there should be a pilot response - McCain did eventually crack as a POW and made propaganda broadcasts, maybe he could not take the pressure during the campaign to act honestly.

Mikki --SE Pennsylvania · 1 year ago

McShame may have been a POW, but he was NO WAR HERO; he was a COLLABORATOR. Lets get those records he was so anxious for the Vietnamese to seal back of and into the public eye. He has been a liar, a crook, a charlatan and a moral leper ever since he came back. He has no honor.

ron071 · 1 year ago

JMOHR mentions the propaganda by McCain while a POW. What is the source of this and who has ever seen this film? A real source would be a North Vietnamese who has seen or made the film. Without some proof it becomes just a smear.

tlsintx · 1 year ago

the GOP trolls have arrived to defend their Little Maverick from the mean, mean questions that should never be asked of a Former Prisoner of War.

ron071 · 1 year ago

McSame is revolting. It is beyond belief that he is a candidate for this country's highest office. After Bush who ever thought a McSame could ever expect to win this office? To elect McSame would be INSANE!

dommyluc · 1 year ago

It would be absolute Divine Justice to see Saint John Sidney McCain brought down because of a lame-ass "forum on faith" that was skewed in his favor in the first place. I just wrote the ABC blog with my opinion, but I thought I'd also post my comments here just in case ABC - who will all know are TOTALLY unbiased toward Democrats - decides not to publish something that is truthful:
Our Little Maverick gets caught scamming the American electorate again, and then he whips out his big bad POW meme to defend himself once more. Why, a POW couldn't possibly lie now, could he? He couldn't possibly change his position on the major issues every 45 seconds, or confuse Sunni and Shia, or not know that Czechoslovakia no longer exists, or try to put the US at war with Russia for his own political gain, or impugn the patriotism of his opponent while using his military past as a cover against retaliation, or call his wife a c***, or cheat on his crippled suffering first wife with a blond millionairess in defiance of the Code of Military Justice without being prosecuted by the Navy for his infidelity because his father was an admiral, and on and on and on. If this was a Democrat doing all of this they would have committed suicide by now from all of the reportage from the so-called "liberal media". But of course Saint John gets a pass, as always. And by the way, when is the major media going to answer the question I have been asking since the start of McCain's campaign: How does being a POW qualify one for becoming POTUS? Anyone? Brian Williams? Charlie Gibson? Katie Couric? Tom Brokaw? Bob Schieffer? ANYONE WANT TO ANSWER ME? (crickets)

HereinDC · 1 year ago

Your rant was too long....even though I liked it.
Gotta keep it simple so other people can repeat it.

Here's my rant:
Did Warren know at 7:59pm that McCain was not in the building?
Oprah would know, Leno would know,Letterman would know.

cowboyneok · 1 year ago

PERFECT... love what you've written.

By the way, I just saw where the Republicans are attacking MSNBC for Andrea Mitchell simply BRINGING UP the "cone of silence" story. They are blaming the messengers... Republicans, of course, aren't explaining why McCain wasn't where he was supposed to be but simply damning ANYONE who talks about it.

Mikki --SE Pennsylvania · 1 year ago

Dommyluc: Your comments were excellent. I agree in every point except that I would never ask for an opinion from the idiots who infest ABC.

Dave_Latchaw · 1 year ago

The forum was broadcast live on KNX (AM) the local CBS affiliate. No fancy gadgets required.

BorninUSA · 1 year ago

I do not want to believe that Rev. Warren was in on the hoax, but it is becoming more and more obvious that he was. If he wasn't then McCain pulled another dirty trick that included shitting on Warren. McCain has succeeded in dragging Warren in to this mess and making Warren look like an ass for not knowing that one of the participants in the forum wasn't even in the building when the forum began.

Larry King should ask Warren:
why wasn't McCain in the building?
did Warren know he wasn't there?
why did Warren make it sound like the coin toss immediately preceded the coming on stage of Obama?
why did Warren then say McCain was in the 'cone of silence'?
why wasn't McCain on stage at the beginning so both participants could be introduced?
if Warren was so innocent of McCain's absence why did he try to make it appear that things were going as scheduled?
when was Warren informed of McCain's absence?
how can Warren be so sure that McCain wasn't told the questions?
why did Warren let McCain run the show after telling Obama no stump speeches?

I am sure there are many, many more questions that should be asked of Rev. Warren and I am sure that none of these will be asked.

lynchie · 1 year ago

Larry will ask if Warren knows Liza and what he thinks of her singing. Did he ever spend a weekend with Sammy Davis and Frank Sinatra. King's interviewing skills are not unlike watching a fly crawl up a drape.

ron071 · 1 year ago

Only fools would expect Larry King to get any truth out of any story. He's been the soft-ball guy for years and all guests go on this show for that reason. Don't waste your time. Warren will use King as he used the rest of us for his own self-promotion. That's what he is all about.

lynchie · 1 year ago

Got that right.

SarainKC · 1 year ago

You can email your questions for Rev Rick on CNN's website.

Personally, I lost faith in Rev Rick when I found out he charged $500-$2000 for tickets to the event. I'd like to know where that money is going, as well.

naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago

Those are all good questions for Warren. I cannot believe he would not have made sure that both parties were in the studio or church before he began. Wouldn't anyone in charge of a program do that? Would Larry Kind go on the air without making sure his guests were there?

naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago

My husband says another question is to ask Warren is if he used a two-sided coin to make Obama go first.

hauksdottir · 1 year ago

Warren knew.

Warren lied to the audience.

He said that he tried to get a question in advance to both participants, since it required a committment... and he couldn't find McCain.

Yet, this oh-so-holy man-of-god went out in front of his well-heeled audience and claimed that McCain was safely sequestered. Even if so, a room with no TV doesn't qualify as sequestered in this day of techy gadgets: ipods, blackberries, cellphones, and whatnot... sprouting from every guy's pocket.

It was all a charade perpetrated upon people who'd paid hundreds and thousands of dollars for their seat in that hall and upon the public listening in.

McCain cheated. Answering questions about Katrina, teachers, and SCOTUS before those questions were asked of HIM? Stupid. He can't even cheat discretely... but has to rapidly spill the answers before he forgets them!

Warren lied. About the coin toss, about McCain's being in the building, about none of the questions being known in advance... and about McCain's cheating. He almost called his bluff with the aside about poker (although that could have been a warning to McCain that he was being too obvious with the preknowledge), but there was so much money glittering in his coffers... and so many customers watching.

The only losers are the people who respect the rules, and who expect others to abide by them.

The Obama camp has to recognize that Americans don't like cheaters, and we really don't like STUPID CLUMSY INCOMPETENT cheaters. This is a great topic for an ad campaign... showcasing all of McCain's efforts at gaming the system from the Keating 5 to lying in a church... in D&D terms: a chaotic evil player character and not one you trust leading the party.

joeb56 · 1 year ago

This is a major story. Not because of what happened, but because the Repubs are lying about it. It's obvious to anyone with a brain that McCain knew what Warren was going to ask. He actually asked when Warren was going to "get back" to the SCOTUS question when the question hadn't been asked of McCain, only to Obama. Whether he had access to the questions beforehand, heard them himself or was apprised of them during the braodcast is is moot. He knew and he lied. Lies drove Nixon from the White House, not the breakin at Watergate. Monical Lewinsky didn't impugn Clinton, lying about it did. Bush going to war didn't qualify as underhanded, his lying about the reason did.

Lying is a human trait. We all do it. When we are caught, we try to find a way out of it. Politicos, when caught lying, do the same. In this case, with every word parsed - every move chronicled by media, something as blatent as this is going to be major. This is bigger than Jeremiah Wright.

Milli · 1 year ago

This story is never going to be bigger than Jeremiah Wright because the media won't do it. They don't care if McCain lies because they never cared that Bush lied.

cowboyneok · 1 year ago

Get this! NOW, the Republicans are accussing MSNBC of biased coverage for allowing Andrea Mitchell to bring this major story up during "Meet the Press." Folks, the Republicans are trying to SHUT THIS STORY DOWN before it gets legs. They realize they are too late, of course, so they are SHAMING the messengers.

naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago

It is too late. I hope it gets covered on Olberman/Maddow, Colbert and Jon Stewart. And to think, Andrea Mitchell brought it up inadvertently!

tommytoonz · 1 year ago

Mr. Warren started by asking Mr. McCain, “Now, my first question: Was the cone of silence comfortable that you were in just now?”
Mr. McCain deadpanned, “I was trying to hear through the wall.”

John McCain, on the very first question, lied to a Pastor, lied to the audience that paid $500-$2000 to be there and lied to the viewers and listeners on tv and radio. Very first question and McCain, a Christian, breaks one of the 10 commandments.

Milli · 1 year ago

Why didn't they put McCain in a sound-proof glass box right there on stage? They could have tested the box's sound-proofedness by announcing that there was a 20-year old busty sorority girl with a bottle of viagra waiting backstage for McCain.........

moreleesafer · 1 year ago

LOL! fabulous!

naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago

I read somewhere that CNN was going to run the whole Saddleback program again after Larry King, but then decided not to. Does anyone know? There must be some way for people to review the video, because if you go over it with a fine tooth comb, the truth will come out. This all reminds me of one of my favorite movies, Robert Redford's Quiz Show.

nikto · 1 year ago

CONE OF LIES.

CONE OF DECEPTION.

CONE OF ROVE.

CONE OF BULLSHIT.

ron071 · 1 year ago

What's one more lie to McSame? His campaign has taken the Rovian tactic of lies and cheating to new heights to compensate for the pathetic level of their candidate. Expect them to lie more and more until the truth is thrown in their faces each and every time. Bush/Cheney/McCain/Rove/Gramm/Gonzalez, etc.

They all operate from the same playbook of lies and distortions.

Helga3412 · 1 year ago

CNN just had video of McCain's cars leaving the hotel at 8:01 eastern time, 5:01 pacific time. Warren started his comedy hour at 5 PM. McCain knew all along he would not be first and he could leave after the event started and he could have easily listened to Warren's questions and Obama's answers.

gallery · 1 year ago

The only "cone of silence" is around the corporate media, who will howl that we are over reacting because we're liberals. Of course they listened in and prepped grandpa.
I refuse to get a giant headache over this. It only proves how sleazy republican are that they have to cheat to win.

Stevens · 1 year ago

"Let's not forget that CNN is carried on satellite radio as well"

So is the FOX News Channel...which aired Warren's interviews with Obama and McCain. Both Sirius and XM broadcast live FOX News TV audio too.

allen2727 · 1 year ago

This is unbelievable. To think that a presidential candidate would conveniently "show up late" to a meeting in which both candidates were to be asked identical questions reaks of cheating... I have absolutely no doubt that McCain has lost all of his previous dignity and will be do whatever his Republican counterparts find necessary to retain the white house... no matter how dishonest and unethical. The rules were put in place... McCain broke the rules and had full access to both the questions and Obama's answers... and we are supposed to believe that McCain and the trustworthy Republicans chose not to cheat??? UNBELIEVABLE!!! I pray to God that the voters see through this fluff and realize McCain is not capable of being a president.