DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Gates accepts position as Obama's defense secretary

  • mario · 1 year ago
    This is "change you can believe in"?
  • red_dwarf · 1 year ago
    Exactly my take as well. Gates is a right wing rat b______ - but oh well. What 'ya gonna do?
  • naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago
    While I have a distaste for Gates going back to the Iran-Contra era, I think the fact that he was a member of the Iraq Study Group, whose advice Bush refused to take, makes him a little more palatable in these times. Like Obama, he sees the need to get out of Iraq and finish the job in Afghanistan, which Bush abandoned. I think he will most likely be a temporary hold over to facilitate a transfer of an on-going war to the Obama administration.
  • EmGD · 1 year ago
    This is a great idea full of rainbows and unicorns....why? He's been light years ahead of Rumsfeld, but that's a bar so low practically anyone could step over it. I doubt things are so complex that it would be more difficult than normal to switch DefSec's. Is this just so Obama has sufficient cover for pulling out of Iraq? Waiting until Wes Clark is eligible? I don't hate Gates as a pick, but like with Hillary, I haven't exactly head a compelling reason for his selection beyond purely political matters.

    http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    meet the new boss....
    I just hope all those people who were inspired by obama, can now remain active, remain voters, learn more... b/c we will need them to pressure obama all the time. For example, he is going in the wrong direction so far.. (still better than bush, or course - but come on - we want much better). I don't want clinton2.
    more: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/108539/obama%...
  • DKarma · 1 year ago
    big mistake barack big mistake
  • naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago
    I disagree. The Obama administration cannot go cold turkey into the mess created by Bush, and he can always fire Gates if he gets out of hand.
  • EdNSted · 1 year ago
    Sure. And he's Lieberman by the balls as well....
  • davidkc · 1 year ago
    Obama's first big mistake.
  • EdNSted · 1 year ago
    A small bit of good news:

    Report: Brennan Out of Consideration For Intelligence Post

    and the money quote from BTD:

    "In case people were wondering, THIS is why you do not wait to express your "concern" about issues and personnel."
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    good.
  • AdrianBrowne · 1 year ago
    Rachel Maddow has been saying she's *okay* with this idea.
  • nogo postal · 1 year ago
    Yeah sure we want to give some kind of label to Obama and his choices..It makes it easier for us.
    A simple question..
    What musical genre of music would you place Frank Zappa?
    There are still some who remain confused about President-Elect Obama because he is moving beyond the political cliches with which we cling..
    tap yer toes
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX8415wWqU4
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    I love Frank Zappa. Music of the Absurd...
  • Tyler Mabry · 1 year ago
    Oh, we've got trouble in River City!
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    Holy shit!

    I just saw a friend of mine who said people are really getting scared about the financial situation in this country. A few are moving to the mountains, but most people will stay where they are.

    But it's pretty bad out here, I kid you not.
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    why would they 'move to the mountains' ?
  • MaudGonne · 1 year ago
    We just had a guy selling a refrigerator truckful of gourmet steaks come to our door, offering whatever at half price! black angus and all. Seems the intended restaurant target went out of business.....
  • Hardrada · 1 year ago
    What about the neo-cons and wingnuts that were surrounding Gates? If they get switched out with competent people, keeping Gates may not be too much of a problem.
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    This is perfect. Because it gives Obama cover to get out of Iraq then in a few years he can dump Gates.
  • MaudGonne · 1 year ago
    WASHINGTON -- Many of the Republicans emerging as potential members of the Obama administration have professional and ideological ties to Brent Scowcroft, a former national-security adviser turned public critic of the Bush White House. Mr. Scowcroft spoke by phone with President-elect Barack Obama last week, the latest in a months-long series of conversations between the two men about defense and foreign-policy issues, according to people familiar with the discussions. The relationship between the president-elect and the Republican heavyweight suggests that Mr. Scowcroft's views, which place a premium on an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord, might hold sway in the Obama White House.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122747548224451...
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    Good decision! The probable cabinet reorganization of the late summer of 2009 will change that, of course, but for a smooth transition with the troops still trapped behind enemy lines in Iraqistan, that's the only sensible choice.

    [Remember, FDR had a potpouri semi-socialist, pacifist cabinet until Pearl Harbor. Then he tossed out all of them and appointed a war cabinet full of hawks.]
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    It will last longer than the summer of 2009. I think Obama just wants someone as Defense Secretary that conservatives and right of center folk can trust, so when we leave Iraq Obama has some cover. Gates will probably leave in a couple of years though.
  • Amicus · 1 year ago
    Who is on deck for the Defense Policy Board?
  • unrepentant_expat · 1 year ago
    I hope Obama really knows what happened to LBJ's Great Society and War on Poverty when he didn't withdraw from Kennedy's involvement in Viet Nam.
  • Amicus · 1 year ago
    Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as secretary of State
    ----------
    She's "too big to fail". As such, it's dangerous for the Party.

    This invites so much ... controversy. The Press will have an endless meme, "Does Hillary agree with the President or not, today?" It's a distraction.
  • An_American_Karol · 1 year ago
    There goes any chance charges will be filed against the current administration.
  • Dave of the Jungle · 1 year ago
    I'm not so sure, Karol. Gates came on rather late in the game.
  • An_American_Karol · 1 year ago
    But he wasn't willing to state waterboarding is torture, or was that someone else?
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    An Obama administration is not change, it is the same old same old.
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    As long as we get out of Iraq, he fixes the economy, and he gets universal healthcare through I will be a happy man no matter who he has in his cabinet.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Nice prioritization!

    I do not know if he can fix the economy, but if he stops warrantless wiretapping, gets us out of Iraq and gets some form of healthcare through then I will be happy with his 1st term.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Name me any new faces. Hell, if Hillary got elected, the only difference in a clinton adminsitration and Obama's would appear to the Sec. of State.
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    Janet Napolitano?
  • jurassicpork · 1 year ago
    Oh. Joy.

    Meet the news boss.

    Same as the old boss...
  • HS · 1 year ago
    Hahahahahahaha. Ohhhh, man.
  • Chris From Maine · 1 year ago
    I hate this.

    Someone PLEASE explain to me why Wesley Clark is not the new Defense Secretary!

    I guess change wont come to the Pentagon anytime soon.....
  • KerrynowCampau · 1 year ago
    I was hoping for Clark as well >:-(
  • houstonray · 1 year ago
    Thank you Chris, I've been hoping to see Wesley Clark's name somewhere in the new Administration but I'm sad to not see it. I don't think there is any viable place left for him. Very sad, he would have been great....
  • JP · 1 year ago
    Clark cannot be Defense Secretary. By law you have to be out of the military 10 years before you can become Sec. Def. He's not there yet.
  • DKarma · 1 year ago
    Two things...one: why hillary for sec you ask? one word: clinton.
    why not gates? Hmmm let's see...BUSH PICKED HIM!
    Name the last GOOD thing that George Bush did.
    Go ahead.
  • cosanostradamus · 1 year ago
    .
    Some dipsh*t from one of the major weekly newsrags that nobody reads any more was just on with Rachel, yapping about Gates.

    Rachel sneered at the reaction from the "netroots," and the newsrag guy sneered at "the Left," saying that everybody else, the people who "mattered" in DC were applauding the Gates retreading. As if those of us who were foolish enough to support Obama from jump were now utterly irrelevant, and not worthy of a voice. When, of course, it's the Right who are irrelevant and unworthy.

    BTW, how is Rachel, as an un-expert who keeps up with the news and comments on it, any better or worse than any blogger? Because GE or NBC Universal or whoever has anointed her? Likewise the newsrag dick. F*ck 'em all.

    This ain't over, corporatista's. We won it, and we're not giving it back. If Obama has to go in 2012, so be it. It's the policies, not just the people that we object to. And we object to Gates on both counts. "Extraordinary rendition," anyone?
    .
  • truthseeker · 1 year ago
    I'm as disappointed in some picks (Lawrence Summers), but, damn people...he hasn't even taken office yet and from the looks of Bush, et al, they are more than willing to do nothing for the last days of the Administration and leave the "running of the country to Obama..." who doesn't have any power to actually do anything. Feet to the fire, yes...but give a chance.
  • Bob W · 1 year ago
    I think it makes perfect sense to keep Secretary Gates in place; Obama is just being pragmatic. Gates has not been an ideologue the past two years. He has demonstrated competence, held subordinates accountable, and proven adept at operating in DC.

    Most importantly of all, keeping a steady hand at DOD gives the new administration cover to focus on an ambitious domestic agenda.

    If Obama is going to spend political capital, he will do so by expanding entitlement programs, especially Health Care, not by appeasing the idealists who see his election as the repudiation of every last second of the past 8 years.
  • nogo postal · 1 year ago
    On January 19th 2009...a biracial man (who looks black from a distance) will be sworn in as our 44th President.
    I truly believe irony is the fulcrum in our lives. The basic common denominator that we are criticizing or supporting a President-Elect over his choices by the content of his character and not his melanin just like previous Presidents IS exactly what Obama represents.
    We are entering an era where the lazy tags...niches...labels....are being reduced to ashes blowing in the wind.
    As we are a nation of lazy tags...niches...labels...this change is uncomfortable for many.
    It's cool if you do not get it now...but the to the bone reality will take place in Washington in January..

    Tap yer toes
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bEQCRiWR2Y
  • Eric · 1 year ago
    This is hilarious. What would the Obama campaign have been like if he had said "change we can believe in, such as having the same guy Bush had run the war"?

    You guys bought into the retarded marketing. Each new bit of news will extinguish your hopes and make you realize that you enthusiastically kept the status quo firmly in place.