DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Gay groups decry Obama defense of DOMA

  • W. Scott Simpson is a Bushie · 5 months ago
    W. Scott Simpson, the DOJ attorney who drafted and submitted the Motion, is a member of the LDS Church, and his father was at one time the President of a Mormon Temple. It's unclear when he became a part of the DOJ, but it is since at least 2004.

    His web site is here:
    http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.co...

    It is worth considering that Mr. Simpson was acting, as senior trial counsel, without clearing the Motion past higher-ups in the DOJ. That is, he may not be required to do so, and thus had a bit of a free reign here.

    Given the recent increase in the profile of Mormon antipathy to LGBT causes . . . it's not unreasonable to think that Simpson was acting beyond the scope of what the administration would have wanted him to, perhaps motivated by his personal religious convictions.
  • nicho · 5 months ago
    So, Obama is not in control of his own administration. Wow -- that's truly frightening. I thought we were voting for him to be in charge. Not just to pose for pictures, while other people screwed his constituents.

    You would think that on a politically charged issue such as this Obama would want someone to vet the brief before it was filed to see if it jibed with his own policies. So, there are three choices: Obama agrees with this. Obama's administration is not under his control. Or, Obama doesn't give a shit what these people submit as briefs. This isn't helping.
  • W. Scott Simpson is a Bushie · 5 months ago
    Well, of course you could do it like Dick Cheney, and have the West Wing politicize every case the DOJ is involved with.

    Your choice.
  • nicho · 5 months ago
    So lawyers in a subordinate position just get to put their own views into briefs and stab their boss in the back. These lawyers work for the administration. They are supposed to make the arguments their "client" wants them to make. I'd be really pissed if I hired a lawyer and he went to court and made some argument I found morally repulsive -- and I'd fire his ass in a heartbeat.
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    This smells like good cop/bad cop strategy. The admin gets props from the right wing, but can tell progressives and gay people that "the Mormon wrote it." Disgusting.
  • FNReedie · 5 months ago
    If that's the case, then we can expect Obama to redact the brief.
  • W. Scott Simpson is a Bushie · 5 months ago
    One would hope. But he'll have to find some way of having AG Holder meddle in an ongoing bit of litigation; that's tricky without doing the same sorts of crap liberals were so upset about when Dick Cheney and the West Wing did it during the previous administration.
  • joe · 5 months ago
    So once again people who believe that God is a physical man with many wives and lives on the planet Kolob is directing our fate. Can someone PLEASE explain to me why we can't bring awareness of these peoples belief systems into the public eye?
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    Fascinating point, and could explain a lot if true. Mormons are pathological homophobes who should be run out of public office.
  • feminthecity · 5 months ago
    And liberals are still firing shots at Palin. Morons.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    That's because Palin is a Moron. "what newspapers do you read ?" DUH !!!!!

    People, alright, he hasn't snapped his finger and changed all the GLBT rights he said he would....Hum Remember what happend to Clinton, when he rushed to allow Gays in the military ? That is how we got DADT. Obama has to take it slow, and we need to understand. Now if he still hasn't done anything after 2 or 3 years in office, Yes then we should go after him whole hog.

    I am not sure but I think he has been busy running the country. It was Run into a hole with the Republicans, and we need to understand that the Whole Country needs to come first.
  • Gridlock · 5 months ago
    sit down, be quiet, wait, he's too busy, he has too much on his plate, he can't multitask.

    he's not taking it slow. HE IS MOVING BACKWARDS ON HIS PROMISES. He is moving in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

    ------------------> not obama

    <------------------ obama

    Get it?
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    I get it Gridlock, you like to stand and Block everything from happening, unless it is going your way. That is what a Gridlock is.

    It is called patients people, we lived 8 years with Bush and his distruction of the American Middle Class.

    I was in the Air Force,I was patient, did my duty and got out. People just have a little patients. How was your military life ? I have walked the Walk, and you ?
  • Ben Dover · 5 months ago
    Sure have. 519th MP Bt, 293rd MP Co. US Army.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Congrats Ben, Were you a screeming Queen demanding everyone accept you or did you just live your life. Thats what I did, I live my life, went where I wanted and did my job.
    You can stand together and sing Kum-ba-ya if you want, all I am suggesting, is we give the man a chance, I didn';t realize that the GLBT community hold priority over everything and everyone else in the USA.
  • Butch1 · 5 months ago
    I have as well. I'm a decorated combat veteran of the Vietnam Conflict and a proud gay man. If I weren't, would I have to shut up and move aside by your logic? What did your service to this country have to do with your answer? Why is that important to this conversation?

    I'm tired of just waiting for the proper time or we have more important things to accomplish than my equal rights. I'm getting old and I do not want to have run out the clock waiting and making nice just so some heterosexuals won't get upset with me demanding my rights. There you have it!
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Great service to our country Butch1, What does it have to do ? Really ? It has everything to do with it. We served our country to fight for the freedoms that we don't get. President Obama is the first President that even really vocalizes that we exist.

    I have yet to tell anyone to shut up, and I would never. What I am suggesting is, we give him some time to do the job.
    The discrimination of the GLBT is over 220 years in its creation, it will take him some time to correct it.

    I am not suggesting backing down, I am just suggesting patience. Again, if he doesn't do anything by 2011, then by all means, Let him have it via the Internet, media, papers, how ever we can get the words across.
  • Butch1 · 5 months ago
    My thoughts were you had presented your service as a tool to silence those who have not served their country. At least, that is how I read it. I think every person's viewpoint regardless of whether they have served or not is important unless they are über-patriotic and urging the war on and notwilling to do their part if they are of the right age and healthy enough to serve.

    As I mentioned before, I'm getting long in the tooth and I've been patiently waiting for our government to do the right thing. It appears to me, that they will not do it unless forced to do so. I've unfortunately, run out of patience. Thank you for your service, as well.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    I would never think of silencing anyone, if someone can have an intelligent conversation, if they agree with me or not, they deserve to be heard. It is when I see or hear name calling and bitter childish arguing is when I grow tired. I agree, although I am but 47 years old, it has taken a long time, I look that a couple more years is worth waiting.

    I get so angry at these 20 somethings that are bitching and screaming they want their rights NOW !!! They don't even know what it took to get what we have now !!! They never lived through Anita Bryant, Jessie Helms, Falwell, The start of AIDS.

    They just think that what we have now came easily and so should the rest.

    People like you and I that have seen what it took to get here are tired of waiting for what we know will come.

    I look at these people the same way I looked at George W & Dick Cheney when it came to them being Commanders of the Military. You didn't walk the walk, how dare you even think about telling me what we are to do.
  • Randy · 5 months ago
    70% of Americans favor repeal of DADT. 58% of conservatives favor repeal. The situation is NOT like 1993! Obama won't lose political capital by repealing, he will actually gain it -- which makes his inaction all the more puzzling and frustrating. Unless, of course, the military has something on Obama that is forcing him to capitulate....
  • Butch1 · 5 months ago
    The military is too dense to have anything on anyone. Tell you what I would like to do is meet those weasels who sniff about trying to find gays and lesbians in the service. I would bring them to the front lines and make them do what they were trained to do, be soldiers and not little tattletales.
  • Ben Dover · 5 months ago
    Yes, yes. Let's hold hands and sing Kum-ba-ya!
  • nicho · 5 months ago
    Nobody is asking him to snap his fingers and do anything. We're just asking him not to trash us -- not to compare gay marriage to incest and child abuse. We're asking him to support us. No one expects that he can wave a wand and change anything overnight. We're not as stupid as you seem to think we are. However, Obama hasn't shown us one shred of support, despite promising on the campaign trail to fight against DOMA. He did the exact opposite with this.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Really Nico: Read what is being said here. I haven't heard him Trash the GLBT community not has He compare gay marriage to incest and child abuse.

    Like I said if he hasn't stepped to the plate by 2011, OK then we need you hit the streets and voice our thoughts. Not 4 + months after he took office.
  • Gridlock · 5 months ago
    Oh honey, Palin walks by with her panties around her ankles and her stupid face smeared in pig lipstick. Who in their right mind wouldn't send a wiffleball towards that.
  • BoulderBitch · 5 months ago
    Well, this why I could not, in good conscious, vote for Obama. The writing about him was on the wall, even then. If the gay community was smart, we would have supported the candidates who genuinely had our backs--Nader and McKinney. True, they were both considered long shots, BUT HOW MUCH LONGER ARE WE GOING TO WASTE OUR VOTES ON THOSE WHO CONSTANTLY FORSAKE US? I can't do it anymore.
  • adamnben · 5 months ago
    Not. Another. Dime.
  • BobSanDiego · 5 months ago
    Face it, we've been had. And not just on gay rights, either.


    "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..."
  • dn89 · 5 months ago
    really? same as bush? so right now, Obama is using the executive Branch the same way as bush did? So he is actively working to keep a faux war going, flooding money to oil and health executives and being a sheep to the 'market knows best mentality'.

    I am pretty sure that this is just a minor set back. Also I think that the GAY movement does not have a focus or a leader at the moment. It is not well organised at all. I am not gay but I fully support everything that you are trying to achieve, but for the sake of my life, I dont know how disowning Obama after 5 months in Office will solve your problems.

    The DOJ attorney had to defend that case, it was the law. You can't disregard laws. Also the issue of Gay rights is so divisive in America that if he did do something dramatic like a stop L for DADT, his whole agenda is down the toilet.

    Seriously folks
  • Mimikatz · 5 months ago
    First, they didn't HAVE to defend it. The AG can tell the courts when he thinks a law is uncionstitutional. Second, the point is that they didnlt have to defend it in such an insulting, demeaning and factually inaccurate manner.

    This brief had to have been revewied at several levels. DOJ is notorious for not letting attorneys have any kind of a leash at all.
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    Exactly, Mimikatz. They can defend or not defend. They chose to defend in absolutely unacceptable, hate-encouraging terms. And what do they get in return? The ire of the progressives who helped put Obama in office, check. The withdrawal of progressive dollars, check. The support of the right wing, whose views are exactly mirrored in the DOJ's arguments - NOT check. They're just laughing at Obama and at us and happy that he and his DOJ are doing everything they can to stop our progress, even as societal views are evolving right past him.
  • nicho · 5 months ago
    He is keeping the faux war going. He is funneling money to his cronies in the banks and insurance companies. He is being a sheep to the market mentality. In fact, he is Herbert Hoover Part II.

    Please try to keep up.

    He's also torturing, hiding "inconvenient" facts from us, keeping prisoners without trial.

    But he does give one hell of a speech.
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    Very well said, nicho. Just because the mainstream or centrist commentators are saying his "change" is happening doesn't make it so. Look at the bank bailout situation. Obama doesn't even have the guts to cap these rapacious executives' pay. It's increasingly looking like smoke and mirrors from this admin. Very depressing.
  • Pete · 5 months ago
    You are an idiot. But in your defense I guess since you're straight you've never had to contemplate the concept that just having sex with another consenting adult that you chose to have sex with was illegal in many places (just a few years ago). It was under the evil George Bush that the Supreme Court nullified those laws. I'm not aware that the Bush administration tried to fight it. I'm not aware that the Bush administration tried to do anything when Massachusetts made gay marraige legal - and they could have tried, as Obama's administration is trying to defend DOMA. The Bush adminstration professed support for the constitutional amendment supporting DOMA (well, except the evil Cheney who is and was is on record against it), but really didn't try that hard.

    I'm not arguing that the Bush adminstration was gay friendly. It wasn't.

    But what many lefties just don't get was that the Bush administration didn't really care about gay issues one way or the other. That isn't great, what what it does mean is that in a federal system like ours, when the federal government is disengaged an issue (and if you believe in the constitution, it should be disengaged from a lot of issues it's engaged in), the states get to make a lot of their own choices. Like to legalize gay marraige, which some states did under George Bush - effectively making him the first President in US history to preside where gay marraige was legal, and one of a handful of world leaders to have gay marraige legal somewhere in their jurisdiction.

    In fact, Obama is on track to make his presidency to be the first in a while to set back gay rights. I know that GWB is considered to have set back gay rights, but he didn't. Probably not by design. But the reality is, gay rights did not move backward during his tenure, whether he liked it or not. Gay rights moved back for the first time since Bill Clinton - a Democrat - signed DOMA, on Obama's election day, when California voted for Proposition 8. (By the way, blaming the Mormons? That was brilliant PR for Dems! Even though statistically at least 1 million people voted for both Obama and Prop 8. Probably not many Mormons. Thanks California Dems!)

    But you know what? My partner and I of 16 years couldn't give a shit less what you think of our relationship, or what the government, or Obama thinks about it. But we're lucky enough to have the resources to not have to care. Liberals like you should care about the young gay couples who are floundering in this economy and who need the government goodies that you support, but who you only want to give to straight couples right now, because Obama's political future is more important than fairness to them.

    Oh, and proof you're an idiot: "I dont know how disowning Obama after 5 months in Office will solve your problems." Did it occur to you that many gay couples' "problems" are because they don't get federal benefits that you do? Benefits that would help them through this tough economy (which has to be an added strain to a relationship that is inherently more challenging than any yours could ever be, not counting the challenge that you're strident idiocy brings)?

    It's clear that you couldn't really give a shit less about gay couples at all. You are mad about the "faux" war. (Which one? Iraq or Afghanistan? At least you're right about one thing: There really isn't a war in either place because they're both stabilized now, especially in Iraq.) You are mad that some people still believe in the free market. You are mad that health company executives and oil company executives make more money than you.

    That is what you really care about, not the rights of gay couples. Otherwise, you would not view DOMA's defense as a "minor setback." How about this. Let's nullify whatever relationship you have with someone you love, and see what a minor setback that would be to you. You fucking idiot.
  • WHYN0T · 5 months ago
    I warned y'all before the election Obama is full of hot air. He's not the man you think he is. He's a danger to our Constitution. How many of the Bush era directives that diminished our freedoms has this guy repealed.
  • Trev · 5 months ago
    How many sucker punches do we let this man deliver before we realize he is not on our side?

    I got caught up in the rock star thing, too, but it's time to admit we've been duped by a very crafty politician.

    And to think I used to laugh at the fundamentalists who let the Republicans jerk them around.

    Fool me once...
  • gaydem · 5 months ago
    Is this a complete list of signatories? Is so, then why are the National Stonewall Democrats so glaringly absent?
  • AJ · 5 months ago
    These are the same groups that came out against any federal case at this time, so I'm not sure about their "shock".
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    The storm is here.
  • FNReedie · 5 months ago
    Lets see how long it is before these same groups hold fundraisers for Obama and his admin.
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    Good point. However, if these groups stand their ground I'm sure Obama looses a hell of a lot more than just money when trying to heard voters in '12.
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    Wow. This is a big deal isn't it? That is a lot of groups telling Obama he, "simply departs from both mathematical and legal reality."

    This has to be big on the next few news cycles and Sunday morning shows right?
  • Marie Pickert · 5 months ago
    I actually believed Obama would be different. I was mistaken. I am sorry because I wanted this country to be a place welcoming all people. instead we have another idiot who thinks Rush will love him if he just keeps putting down the people who brought him to power. I am very disappointed in Obama.
  • Jingles · 5 months ago
    it is too late to start regretting your vote.....the blogosphere and media drank the kool-aid and believe the hype.....

    just like bush, the country voted for him and now we have to face the consequences of making another bad choice when it comes to picking presidents.....

    maybe next time, people will actually pick a president with experience and not just talk......
  • timncguy · 5 months ago
    Is there any rule that says the government MUST win this appeal?

    There seem to be a lot of invalid arguments being made in this brief. Wouldn't a good team of lawyers on the other side have a chance at winning against the DOJ.

    Must of the crap they cite here was debunked in the Iowa Supreme Court decision.

    YOu've already posted the study that debunks their cost containment argument.

    Loving v Virgina would seem to be on point.

    The complete circular logic of saying gays aren't being denied anything they had before they were married is ridiculous. No one, gay or straight, is entitled to marriage benefits BEFORE they get married.
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    That's it. Not another dime for President Homophobe. I'm not interested in the "too much on his platter" argument, when he has time to fill his platter with the most heinous anti-gay rhetoric. Honestly, this is the worst yet. "Fierce advocate"? Not another dime.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Really mamazboy: Please present any evidence of your accusations of Obama being a Homophobe.

    Post like yours just give the Radical Right all the Fuel they need, you are a very scary person.
  • mamazboy · 5 months ago
    Oh please, get a clue. If you had half a brain, you'd see that the radical right doesn't need any fuel. They do exactly as they please without any help from me or anybody else. If you can't see that this is a full-blown attack on gay people coming out of the DOJ and sanctioned by Obama, you're blind. They're using every argument imaginable, including the ones about incest that the Christian idiots like to employ. Obama's DOJ and Obama himself standing by these arguments -- which they obviously do since Bush and other presidents have shown the administration doesn't have to defend policies they don't believe it -- brings them closer to the radical right than to centrism or the progressive side. Take off your blinders, Marc.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Name calling, Really ? How old are you ? Is going back to Jr. High Argument tactics the way you think you can debate ? By looking at your reply, you are questioning if I have half a brain ?

    Again, show me any evidence of your accusations of Obama administration being a Homophobe !! This administration has yet, as far as I have seen Never used the incest argument. You might think he is, but you would be wrong. Unless you can show me where he has stated he believes that.

    You can read between the lines just like the Bible beaters do, and look just as foolish. Or you can deal with the actual facts. I have no Blinders, but unlike you I am not looking at the world with Pink Glasses, I live in reality, were everything takes work, discussions and agreements, not edicts.
  • professor austin · 5 months ago
    Marc,
    Can't you do any research yourself? the 54 page document in question is located at: http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/obama-justic...
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    "professor austin" Thank you for the sarcastic comment & link to the document. By chance did you see the date of the link ? Here I will help you out, 6/12/09 at 9:44 am. So you evidently have the time to sit at the computer and watch and find all of this, I did have more pressing issues to deal with today.

    You are so reading in between the lines to come to your conclusion. Let me break it down for you, Just because something is lawful in one place or state, doesn't not require another state to allow it, if it conflicts with that states laws. He is not comparing same sex marriage to Incest or pedophilia, but if that is what you see....well ?

    From the beginning, Pres. Obama stated that Same Sex Marriage should be left to each individual state to determine. This is not a news flash.

    Now if you wish to continue to read between the lines and come to your own prejudice notions, then carry on. See something that is not there. I do not see that in what is written.
  • TheGaySpecies · 5 months ago
    Marc,

    You cannot be serious. The THREE issues central to GLBT are ENDA, DADT, and DOMA (I'm sick of this alphabetic soup as I am of Obama's 180-degree reversals). Secretary Gates informs us that DADT has little or no chance of passage -- ever. And ENDA, where is it?

    Oh, and NO REPUBLICAN Administration since Eisenhower has EVER drawn parallels of GLBT to incest and pedophilia. In fact, it was Reagan's observation that homophiles are NOT pedophiles that lead to his OPPOSITION to Proposition: The Briggs Initiative (1978), and as president copious funding of NIH research for AIDS.

    Me thinks YOU have blinders and scales on your eyes.
  • Butch1 · 5 months ago
    They were being too nice. The brief was uglier to us than our response back to them. We need to start fighting fire with fire.
  • postdamnit · 5 months ago
    Someone on the blog earlier today suggested that we as a group stop donating to the Democrats until they earn it.

    By chance I received a solicitation for $$ in the mail this afternoon from, you guessed it, the Demo's. I took his suggestion and returned their donation card (free postage to boot) with the notation in large red letters across the front stating: No Gay Rights, No Gay Dollars!

    I intend to do this from now on and also to express this sentiment in any other venue where it is appropriate.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    Excellent idea postdamnit: I suggest every one place this on your face book, it wont work unless we make it a national movement.
  • Father_Time · 5 months ago
    Looks like you've been sacrificed on the alter of -"Other issues are more important and we don't have enough votes in congress to get everything we want anyway and since you are an extreme minority, we'll be seeing ya!"

    Conclusion:
    DODT will not end.
    DOMA will remain.

    Hey but, Civil Unions are still open.
  • Marc · 5 months ago
    No Father Time: It is my belief that DADT will end as will DOMA, and slowly we will get the right to marry, but all comes with time.

    Did you know it has been 40 years since the Stonewall Riots, did you know it was the Cross Dressers, Drag Queens & Lesbians that started the Riots, and yet a majority of Gay Men still have prejudice feelings against Transgendered, Drag Queens and Lesbians. We are so discriminative in our own community and yet we demand all others to accept us!

    It has taken us 40 years to get where we are, waiting a couple more, giving President Obama some time in office before we label him a heretic.

    We so hate the labels placed on us, and yet we are so quick to label others.
  • Matthew · 5 months ago
    It's all complete and utter smoke 'n mirrors with Obama. He fails to realize that words mean nothing if they are not meant with action. He can say all he wants to court the gay community, but I will not tolerate his silence when it comes to walking the greatest walk of all: genuinely supporting a vulnerable American minority. This report did not have to contain such homophobic language, but I'm not surprised to see that it came from a Mormon.
  • Duane Williams · 5 months ago
    John Aravosis talks as if Obama personally authored the brief or approved its wording. Is it possible that he could personally oversee every document created by the Justice Dept. and other federal agencies nominally under his control? That seems rather far-fetched to me.
  • Pete · 5 months ago
    You are an idiot. Of course he didn't write it, but the language in the defense of DOMA is so odious that it contradicts Obama's professed support of gay rights. When an underling writes something that is controversial and totally contradictory to the President's position, generally someone at the White House will correct or clarify it. If the Obama White House doesn't do that here, it's a tacit agreement with the content. I'm quite positive that is the standard you used for the Bush White House.
  • Musicman · 5 months ago
    As a straight man and a strong supporter of civil rights, I find this reversal of position heinous and disheartening. I hope this is something that got by Obama rather than something that was done as per his directive.
  • Phil S · 5 months ago
    After all the hard work the GLBT community did to help get Obama elected, I am shocked and offended by this blatant form of discrimination. Obama needs to come out and publically explain himself and why he has turned on the GLBT community.
  • Ronald M · 5 months ago
    An open letter to:
    The Democratic Party LGBT Leadership Council
    Brian Bond
    Executive Director
    gllc@dnc.org

    Thomas Petrillo
    Finance Director
    PetrilloT@dnc.org


    Dear Mr. Bond and Mr Petrillo,


    The following is a letter to Barney Frank and Tammy Baldwin. It will be snail mailed to them. You and they need to know that it is being sent to our mailing list and I am encouraging those on the list to forward it to every one they know.

    The Obama administration has declared war on our community. We obviously have zero influence on this administration. We need to stop financing our own oppressors.


    To Representatives:

    Barney Frank
    Tammy Baldwin
    2446 Rayburn Building

    Washington DC, 20515


    June 16th.

    Today is our Anniversary. We have been together 39 years. We are discriminated against at every turn by the federal government. The administration has declared war on our community. We need to stop financing our own oppressors.

    We are consistent if small donors to your political career. It is time for action not just platitudes.

    Why would we want to give you another cent if you attend the dinner for Joe Biden, after the administration’s insulting and vicious attack on us? We will encourage every person we know, LGBT and our allies, to stop supporting those who give approval to our oppressors.

    It is time for our leaders and community to show some backbone. We will be watching your actions.

    Furiously,

    Ronald M and Richard D
  • Bleh · 5 months ago
    Obama betrays again.
  • me · 5 months ago
    obama is looking more and more full of shit every day..... another spineless puppet
  • Rachel D · 5 months ago
    Is it any surprise that Obama is a bigot? Just look at who spoke at his inauguration.!

    In their small minds, are all lumped in to one big scary pile labeled 'deviants' - doesn't matter which flavor - and are told repeatedly that we are lucky that we are even allowed to live.

    Only a matter of time before 10% of the population gets scapegoated for bad times caused by the other 90%.

    But where do you go when they start stuffing cattle cars and furnaces with us?

    Gee, did I just equate Obama to Hitler? Well, Politicians are all the same - just like us deviants!

    Either that - or he's really BI, and has done this as a way to distance himself from certain tabloid allegations.

    Either way - homophobia and bigotry win.
  • Rachel D · 5 months ago
    Is it any surprise that Obama is a bigot? Just look at who spoke at his inauguration.!

    In their small minds, are all lumped in to one big scary pile labeled 'deviants' - doesn't matter which flavor - and are told repeatedly that we are lucky that we are even allowed to live.

    Only a matter of time before 10% of the population gets scapegoated for bad times caused by the other 90%.

    But where do you go when they start stuffing cattle cars and furnaces with us?

    Gee, did I just equate Obama to Hitler? Well, Politicians are all the same - just like us deviants!

    Either that - or he's really BI, and has done this as a way to distance himself from certain tabloid allegations.

    Either way - homophobia and bigotry win.
  • mike roberts · 5 months ago
    This is by far the most disgusting thing i have heard as of late. i have been with my partner for seven years and we had great hope that obama would work to undo the great damage that was done by the last bigoted administration.With this new information it seems as though he is following their example just to boost his popularity.put simply he is acting just like those who would only provide rights to rich white men. my partner and i are both offended and hurt, my hopes that this great country willing to try and help other countries better themselves thru civil liberties has shown nothing but a complete refusal to treat its own citizens with the same respect they would treat someone in iraq.If this is the way the american society is going to chose then im not sure i want to be american anymore. which is the saddest thing i have ever felt. i was in the military becuase i choose to serve my country, i dont think you can keep serving a country that dosent care enough about their own values to serve for you.
  • Buddy · 5 months ago
    This is classic politics. Obama backtracks on DOMA, yet is about to announce benefits for fed employees with same-sex partners. With politicians, from Washington to Obama, it's all about doing a balancing act on positions to appeal to the great "middle."

    I read a www.streamingmagazine.com article that was really weird but slightly funny. It was called: "Gays to Get More Rights, at Least the Federal Ones." It was a bit insulting, the way it was written,k but a bit funny.

    Here's the link, too: http://www.streamingmagazine.com/gays-to-get-mo...
  • William Knodel · 5 months ago
    President Obama asked citizens to be forthright & vigilant for our constitutional rights! This recent legal brief certainly shows why we need to do so. Did we learn nothing from our "friend" Bill Clinton who gave us DOMA and DON"T ASK DON"T TELL.Shame on Army Lt. Dan Choi's expullsion from
    the army,and 11 year old Carl Walker-Hoovers death by scuicide(connect the dots) What the Obama administration says about gays matters and has consequences.Shame !!!
    Our President needs to use his articulate voice to educate others..