DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Gluttonous bigot keeps opening big mouth

  • Boycottutah · 1 year ago
    He recently said "I like Pizza, but I am not going to marry one." LOL!
    http://www.opednews.com/articles/Pastor-Rick-Wa...

    He actually did say that. He likes pizza, maybe the pepperoni, salami,and sausage are his favorite toppings.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    [shakes head in disappointment]

    Petty and small guys, petty and small.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 1 year ago
    petty and small are the same thing. how about uppity and small? shrill and small? furious and small?
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    gay is the new black

    petty is the new uppity

    marriage equality is the new riding in the front of the bus

    How DARE we.

    *eyeroll*
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    Good analysis! Thanks!
  • caliny · 1 year ago
    http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0812/21/...
    Barney Frank on Warren, CNN Late Edition
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Next Posting:

    Warren: His breath smells funny.
    Warren: He has funny shoes.
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    as i understand it, he also has a pechant for wearing cowboy hats to press confrences.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    I wonder how many of Warren's sheep are finding their way onto threads critical of their leader.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Or is there an Obama staffer whose job it is to patrol popular web forums and try to turn down the burners.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Yep. Yesterday i was accused of being a Republican.

    I guess today I'm a Saddelback parishioner.

    Jeez. Next thing you know someone will say "it's a gay thing, you wouldn't understand". After they accuse me of being akin to Eichmann or something..
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    To those who object to the "vitriol" on these threads:

    Warren forbids Gay membership in his church and equates Gays with pedophiles. Warren preaches that only followers of his version of Christ will go to heaven. Warren worked to pass Prop 8. Warren opposes settled law guaranteeing a woman's right to abortion.

    Obama chooses Warren to pray at his inauguration.

    Can you hear me now?
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    kettle, this is pot. y know, weight is an issue so many of us struggle with. maybe it'd be good to take it easy on the fat comments.

    http://www.bartnagel.com/images/blog_aravosisJo...
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Gluttony is a sin, as recorded by the same book of nonsense Warren gets his condemnations of homosexuality. Cherry-picking biblical commands is a sin by the same book.
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    the often neglected 11th commandment- "thou shall not cherry pick"
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    http://www.biblegateway.com/keyword/?search=kee...

    Biblegateway search for "keep all my laws"
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    I don't want to walk hand in hand with Warren: I want him to keep his fat paws to himself and acknowledge the rights and humanity of ALL Americans.
  • example · 1 year ago
    Man, in addition to his anti-gay views Rick Warren just comes across as the most smug, self-satisfied jackass imaginable.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Like Nixon about queers at the Bohemian Grove orgy, I'd want to wash my hands pretty damned quick after holding hands with Warren.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    Anyone who needs to proclaim that he loves Muslims and the Gays "for the media" is a self-fetishizing attention whore who really doesn't.
  • example · 1 year ago
    What are you, some kind of neo-con? Syria may have issues but they are definitely a country we should be engaging with.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    What are you, some kind of illiterate? Syria is hardly a "moderate" country. No one said we shouldn't engage with them, but going on a propaganda trip to Syria and talking about how "moderate" they are is nuts.
  • Jay · 1 year ago
    Then let's send the fat bastard a crate full of doughnuts so he can eat himself into a fatal heart attack.
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    "Warren doesn't have a problem, however, with Syrians. He thinks the Syrian government is "moderate" and a model for the world on how to treat Jews. Mind you, Syria is a terror state that is technically still at war with Israel."

    ???

    "In April, 2008, President Assad told a Qatari newspaper that Syria and Israel had been discussing a peace treaty for a year, with Turkey as a go-between. This was confirmed in May, 2008, by a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. As well as a peace treaty, the future of the Golan Heights is being discussed."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syria

    are you just making things up?
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    "Here's a newsflash: contrary to what the US State Department may wish the world to think, Syria is not populated by terrorists, zealots and other bogeymen. In fact, Syrians are among the most friendly and hospitable people in the world, and most visitors to their country end up developing a lifelong infatuation with its gentle charms. "

    http://www.lonelyplanet.com/syria

    lonely planet hates jews, too!
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    Ask Maher Arar all about his lovely expenses-paid vacation in Syria, courtesy of the CIA and the Bush Admin torturers.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    We're obviously talking about the Syrian govt. The Soviet people were nice people too, I met a lot of them, and their government was evil.
  • Church Ladyboi · 1 year ago
    Wouldn't Adam & Eve's children had to engage in incest for anyone to exist beyond them?

    What's that you say?

    God changes laws from time to time?

    Conveeeenient!
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    Well, not necessarily. Don't forget that after Cane killed his brother Abel, he was driven out, and he went to live in the land of Nod. And God decided to put a mark upon his head so that the people of Nod would leave him alone. Nevertheless he managed to marry a woman from Nod. So it doesn't really sound like incest. But of course you might ask who these people were that lived in Nod, since Cane's parents were Adam and Eve, and therefore there shouldn't have been any other people around yet. Some theorize that Adam, Eve and Cane lived for thousands of years, and had lots and lots of kids. And by the time Cane wanted to marry, he could easily have picked one of his great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grand nieces to marry. But I think this is just another example of the extremes to which biblical literalists must go to explain the glaring inconsistencies of the bible. My theory is that Cane married a Neanderthal girl, and the evangelicals are their descendants.
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    You crack me up Ritorna, I have to say, some of your posts are so witty they make me laugh out loud. Do let me know when you start your own blog, I'll definitely be a devoted reader.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Christians believe there are convenient loopholes to the most serious biblical laws. They recognize these loopholes as the doorways that open up to them when they want something illicit.
  • NGLTF · 1 year ago
    What really makes me sick are so many self-professed liberals in the media now backing away from gay civil rights. They now speak of gays in a patronizing tone lecturing us to stop acting out (or else the implication is that they will stop supporting us). Here are a couple of calls from KGO that reflect this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXW0q9uifJA&feat...
  • Boycottutah · 1 year ago
    Go to Huffpo, so many libs telling LGBT people to STFU. Sad.
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    Frankly, it's probably time American fags go their own way and fight their own battles.

    So much time has been spent on "assimilating" and "playing nice" and "seeming unthreatening", and yet our "allies" have grown annoyed with our insistent, and wholly overdramatic demand for equality.

    I guess we aren't the cause du jour anymore. Sucks when campy, inoffensive and neutered Will & Grace faggots put down the showtunes, turn off the jokes actually demand action for a change.

    It's just not FUN for straight people, so why should they bother?
  • Vincent · 1 year ago
    How dare LGBT people get upset and throw a hissy fit simply because they want to have human rights.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    To hell with "allies" like that anyways. Most of them are probably the same types that are afraid to proudly proclaim themselves liberal. The same types that probably don't share the same core values over other issues like torture or privacy. Screw them. I don't want them part of any group I'm associated with and I'll do my part to make them uncomfortable and squirm in their own skin.
  • The Tim Channel · 1 year ago
    Self professed liberal? Check.
    ----
    In "the media"? Check. Come on... at least a HALF CHECK you bitches!~
    Liberals grade on a curve and I'm over half, so FULL CHECK.
    ----
    Backing away from gay civil (HUMAN) rights? Not on MY LIFE.

    My homosexual brothers-in-arms, always delightfully quick of thought and limber of emotion, are even more high strung than usuall. "Turn that damn STEREO down, I've got the biggest freakin' hangover from the spiking those Mormons put in my large glass of Prop8erade at the post election party!" is still heard echoing through gayborhoods far beyond California.

    Fact is, this Warren thing has many of my gay friends wound so tight you couldn't drive a needle up their asses with a sledgehammer.

    Some will misplace my sense of irony at offering the following expression as a means of communicating my CONTINUED support of EVEN that which most revile as a subgroup of people, inhuman (because GOD TELLS ME that homosexuality only happened as a result of his eternal blessings and as a test to the humanity of the rest of us I know better.):

    You either stand up for something or you'll bend over for anything.

    Enjoy.
  • dula · 1 year ago
    Thanks Tim for your support. A needle? No problem. A straw? Pour me a drink and we'll talk.
  • The Tim Channel · 1 year ago
    Because some of my best friend are gay, and I can't
    draw above the fourth grade level.

    http://thetimchannel.com/?p=325

    Aspiring young gay artists read helpful hint in first comment.

    Enjoy.
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    Google ads have a sense of humor! At the bottom of this "gluttonous" post they're running Pizza Hut ads.
  • chowderSF · 1 year ago
    Funny, all the new faces showing up here at Ablog.....all pro Warren......he must have sent his 'followers' on a mission.....and here they are.....

    Keep the fire burning John,,,you do important work,,,,,and this issue is VERY important.
  • gary · 1 year ago
    I am NOT pro Warren . . .now I'm sad again.
  • Artie · 1 year ago
    Okay. Is it a temporary glitch, or are we going to moderated (delayed) comments?
  • Gbennett · 1 year ago
    I believe it is time to get on with it. Warren will do the invocation, which is not the end of the world for gays or anyone else. Jerry Brown, CA Atty General, has asked the Supreme Court in CA to void Prop. 8, so it looks like we will win that battle. We as members of the GLBTQ community can show our resilience, fortitude, and equanimity by letting go of this battle but not taking our eyes off the prize. I for one, have not lost hope.

    In fact, Obama was smart enough, probably, to see in advance the eventual outcome of any court challenge to Prop. 8. Clearly, it is unconstitutional for established rights to be rescinded based on a vote of the people. The same thing happened in CO in 1992 when Amendment 2 was passed by a vote of the people to over-turn civil protections for gays and lesbians in Boulder, Aspen and Denver. Amendment 2 was overturned by the US Supreme Court in 1996 on equal protection grounds.

    Obama is trying to reach out to the Evangelicals around areas of common interest (AIDS, global warming, fighting poverty, etc.) It is better to engage them than to ostracize them. By including them in the inaugural, Obama is showing that he (and we!) can rise above the usual fray to seek solutions for us all.

    I was as angry as the next gay person when I heard about the Warren invitation. I wrote a scathing letter on the subject to the editor of my local paper, the Boulder Daily Camera, whih was published on Friday 12/19. Since then, I have come around to see the wisdom of Obama's move, and feel that we as gays can choose another battle.
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    Yes, the wisdom of promoting a prejudiced bigot at the expense of a minority group to score some political points with religious fanatics that hate him regardless.

    So much wisdom! Watch out, Yoda!
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 1 year ago
    obama works in mysterious ways?

    since you seem to be late to the discussion, you get to answer the 2 questions of the week:

    1) which other bigots has obama engaged?
    2) since when does engaging a bigot require anointing him as the nation's pastor in front of a billion people?
  • Vincent · 1 year ago
    You nailed it Steve. So many blinded by a cult-like adoration of Obama answer just like Christianists when their Jesus is questioned. Obama indeed works in mysterious ways. And anyone who questions him is a heretic. Or a racist. Or both.

    Substitute black for gay, and the things Obama and Warren say would be viewed as racist and wrong. Say it against gays and it is just a difference of opinions. Gays are subhuman in the eyes of these people. Obama sees gays as 3/4 human, because he feels that they do not deserve the same rights as heterosexuals.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    America is so accustomed to hearing gays denigrated by pastors that many can't see it as abuse.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Likewise, Americans are so accustomed to the Big Sleep inaction of the past 8 years that to now rouse and finally speak and speak forcefully against wrong is considered subversive.
  • Gbennett · 1 year ago
    1. Obama should engage any bigot that is indeed a real force in our culture. The David Dukes in America are already fringe characters. Warren is not.

    2. Doing a two minute prayer is not annointment as the nation's pastor. Do you even remember who did invocations in the past? I don't and few do.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    1. Warren is highly influential, and was influential in the Prop 8 battle.

    2. Selecting a pastor to give the invocation at the inauguration of the president confers high honor and is viewed as support and validation of the pastor's beliefs and his record.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 1 year ago
    1. Mega-church evangelicals are a fringe. Warren and Duke are both homophobes with a fringe following. But Duke is also a racist. Presumably, that was the only show-stopper.

    2. There is a reason why nobody remembers past inaugural invocations. Obama has made sure this will be the exception, and not in a good way.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Yes, move on. There's only a 48 hour statute of limitations on hatred and bigotry. I guess.
  • Gbennett · 1 year ago
    Hate versus hate is not a great strategy.
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    Correct.

    Maybe they should stop hating us then.

    We didn't start this. We just want equality and to be left alone.

    They attack us every day, and you think it's "time to move on" instead of fighting back?
  • Midlander · 1 year ago
    No more.

    Since Prop. 8, I refuse to "move on."

    Our anger is 1) provoked, and 2) justified.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    But anger vs. hate is.
  • Jim Olson · 1 year ago
    I'm with you, GBennett. I was pissed as hell. But, you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. We should take the larger view here. Warren is one man. Obama is the president for all America.
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    Obama is the president for all of America, and just screwed over 10-15% of it by promoting a prejudiced bigot.

    I guess he just plum forgot about that 10-15% then? If he didn't forget, then he actively threw it under the bus.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    Ask the Log Cabin Republicans how many flies they have caught with honey.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    Yes, I think I see your point. We've expressed our outrage and we've written our letters. And now it's time to see Obama's wisdom and move on. Oh, wait a moment. When Obama chose arch-homophobe Donnie McClurkin to MC the southern gospel tour, we expressed our outrage and wrote letters. And when McClurkin used the event to continue to bash gays, we expressed our outrage and wrote letters. And guess what. Obama has just picked another homophobic pastor to honor. This time it's someone who has not just preached against gays and called them names like pedophiles, he has also worked to pass Prop 8. And this time the preacher will appear before billions at the inauguration to give the invocation. Guess expressing our outrage and writing letters isn't enough.

    Now I'm not saying that Obama wasn't smart enough to see in advance how the court will rule on Prop 8, though legal experts are divided, and many say Prop 8 will stand. But if you're saying that he was smart enough to see that Prop 8 would be overturned because it violates basic constitutional guarantees, then why wasn't he smart enough to chose a minister to honor that didn't work to get Prop 8 passed?

    And finally, since you believe that we should choose another battle, I guess you don't see the revocation of 18,000 marriages as all that important. Nor the loss of marriage rights in the most populous State. And if letting go of this battle appeals to you, then what exactly is the prize you think we should keep our eyes on? Equal rights for gays? No, that can't be it, because marriage is an equal right, and you think we should just move on.
  • RainbowPhoenix · 1 year ago
    I agree that we should be focusing more of our energies elsewhere. However, we should continue to stress how insulting this is to us. Refusal to criticize our leaders when they do something stupid is what got us into the current global crisis. Meanwhile the mormons are suddenly getting a free pass, because all the bloggers are focusing on this.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Can gays chew gum and rub their bellies at the same time? We'll see.
  • RainbowPhoenix · 1 year ago
    We need to if we want to get anywhere.
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    I don't think Warren has to "ban" gays or any other group anymore, like someone said he bans alcoholics, too. He's already said enough to hang his own ass for the rest of his life. Why can't Obama see this?

    And anyway, I wouldn't want to touch his bigotry-infested hands...
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    I'm trying to picture Rick Warren walking hand in hand with someone who had gotten his marriage invalidated. As he phones his lawyer to see what legal steps he must take to protect his family and property now that he and his wife are no longer legally married, I'm sure he would say of the person responsible, "Well, we don't see eye to eye on my marriage, but there's no reason we can't hold hands."
  • Cuneifomed · 1 year ago
    Wow... I absolutely hate that Obama has chosen to endorse Warren, but this post is way over the top in my opinion. Victimizing the hefty and Syrians (if you mean Syrian government, say it, or you're no better than the neocons who are quite happy to bomb urban centers) travels a road that leads straight to the kind of hateful speech Warren is guilty of.

    I don't agree with the commenter who claims it's "time to move on." This is exactly the time to express our disgust at Obama's choice. However, there are far more productive ways of doing it.

    This is very disappointing :(
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    It's rather obvious I mean the Syrian government.
  • Dave of the Jungle · 1 year ago
    Why does any religious leader participate in the inauguration?
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    To the point that Warren is likely or not to compromise if his voice is included in any Obama policy debates or decisions, in 2004 he sent "an urgent blast email to hundreds of thousands of evangelicals insisting they base their votes on five non-negotiable issues:

    abortion,

    stem cell research,

    gay marriage,

    human cloning,

    and euthanasia."

    Max Blumenthal writes an illuminating article about Mr Warren:

    America's Pastor has a nice-guy image. But it is belied by what he says on Sundays.
  • NDN · 1 year ago
    As an African American, I was initially embarrassed by the Prop 8 passing, until I ventured onto this site and witnessed the rampant racism on this site. I would not have chosen Warren and I understand your anger, but the vitriol against Barack is truly sad. About a year ago I realized that I had some sort of inferiority complex when it came to whites and other cultures. I always compared myself and my culture to other cultures, but this election has made me mature in so many ways. While I was so busy hoping to be accepted, I never asked myself if the other cultures deserved to be put on the pedestal that I had placed them on. I have learned that no one culture deserves to be on that pedestal We are all flawed.
    My sister is gay and my cousin is gay. My sister has struggled with her homosexuality, but lately she has been bringing her girlfriend around more and I like that because she seems so happy. When she first told our family that she was gay, she said that she loved the way her girlfriend made her feel, like the most beautiful girl in the world. I told her that I knew exactly what she was talking about because that's how my husband makes me feel. I'm sorry that you guys are hurting so bad right now, but I truly see marriage for all in the future.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    And what rampant racism are you seeing here? You mean, we'd accept a homophobe if he were white? Oh wait, he is. So what exactly is your point?
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    Are you deleting these posts John? I honestly haven't been seeing this rampant racism here I've heard about. I certainly wouldn't blame you for deleting racist trash but I don't see what the posters problem is. Would they rather you leave up racist comments?
  • monitor · 1 year ago
    A few, 3 or 4, uber-homophobic comments ("ALL GAYS SHOULD BURN IN HELL") and one calling for Obama to be assassinated have been either deleted or never appeared on a thread. No comment that could even loosely be construed as racist has been deleted or blocked from posting.

    sitemonitor
  • Vincent · 1 year ago
    Any time anyone states that Obama is behaving like a bigot, that person is called a racist. Whenever anyone mentions that there is a problem in the African American community with homophobia that person is called a racist.
  • Midlander · 1 year ago
    These are also generalizations.

    However, I have noticed that some people seem to react to criticism of Obama, even if for good reason, as intrinsically objectionable. (I've noticed that more at Huffington Post.)

    Barack is a human being, not God or a god. He said himself during the campaign, "I am imperfect."

    Clearly. And part of a democracy is for the citizenry to educate its leaders, as well as each other.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 1 year ago
    here's an example of a racist comment, but i agree stuff like this has been extremely rare:
    http://disqus.com/people/4289ecef9684e3d4988260...
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    It is the duty of a patriot to loudly object when a government official screws up. Jefferson, Franklin, or one of those other slave-owning white guys said this. Obama screwed up with the Warren selection. if no one cries "Fowl", how is he to know. Bubble-boy Bush surrounded himself with sycophants who were afraid to tell him anything he didn't want to hear. Is that what you wnat for St. Barack? Welcome to the new world, little kitten. Just keep opening those beautiful eyes to reality and eventually you will be on the Nebuchadnezzar.
  • Bush Bites · 1 year ago
    Sorry, I don't see any racism here.

    If you're going to yell "racism" everytime somebody disagrees with President-elect Obama, people will soon stop taking your views of "racism" seriously.

    And I say that as somebody who voted for Obama three times (he's my senator), gave to his campaigns numerous times, and is still a supporter of his, even though I think he blew it this time and needs to realize that.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    It's ok if people express anger or disappointment in Barack. Think of it as respect. They wouldn't be disappointed if they didn't first respect him. Remember that most who post here voted for Barack. And remember that failing to voice a concern simply because someone is black is a form of racism and disrespect.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Tom Minnery at Focus on the Family said, "I think what it does is it underscores the importance of evangelicalism in the country."
  • Gridlock · 1 year ago
    Yes, just what we need to do: encourage religious fundamentalism and bigotry instead of stamping it out.

    Thanks Obama.
  • Asterix · 1 year ago
    "Deadly" sin doesn't mean what many think it does.

    A deadly sin is sin which is relatively minor on first appearance, but serves as a "gateway" sin, leading to more serious misbehavior later. That's why the deadly sins don't include, say, murder or stealing. Catholics in particular believe that part of avoiding sin is avoiding the "near occasion" of sin; that is, engaging in behavior that while not sinful, is risky.

    The proof of this doctrine is Warren himself. He's long past the "deadly sin" stage of gluttony.

    Gandhi had it right, "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.".
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    Kinda reminds me of a little "Christian" college I went to when I had no better sense as a youth. They believed that holding hands was a gateway to sinful and dark passions like fornication and then falling away from the truth and the light. What insidious soul-destructive crap. And they actually expelled students for it. One of the reasons I was able to finally see through the entire Christian myth and the larger mythology of religious structure in general.
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    Here's a quote from the Weimar Republic for folks to ponder:
    "It can't happen here."
  • Bush Bites · 1 year ago
    Kind of funny that Warren talks about what's "natural," when he obviously lives on laboratory-created snack treats.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    Let's, here and now, demolish Warren's supposedly Christian and humanitarian work on AIDS in Africa. He has a purely colonialist attitude to the issue, is in line with the Bush Admin's anti-contraception policies, and has assumed the "White Man's Burden" to "gift" his ministry to the poor, benighted little dark-skinned natives, who so desperately need him and him alone.

    He loves Africans with AIDS like he loves the gays with AIDS: when he can pity and condescend to them and bestow assistance to them on HIS self-aggrandizing terms.
  • Bobbob · 1 year ago
    Dear John,

    I love to read your blog. I have read it since 2004. I agree with most everything you say. I know this Rick Warren thing has pissed you off. Let's just say I feel your pain. But for the Love of God, would you please just drop it? It's been a non-stop bitch fest since it was announced. It's a Prayer. Yes, I know he worked to defeat Prop 8, but he is not the reason it passed. It passed because the anti-Prop 8 people ran a shitty campaign. If you have to be upset with anyone you should be upset with the organizations that ran it.

    Love ya, John. Merry Christmas!
  • JJ · 1 year ago
    I'm so tired of people saying "just drop it," or "we have to choose our fights."

    I am not going to choose my fights. From now on, I am going to fight EVERY TIME I am attacked, dismissed, or kicked in the teeth.
  • Midlander · 1 year ago
    Amen, brother or sister!
  • shell · 1 year ago
    Good for you! I, too, am sick to death of choosing fights. Look at this issue: Obama says he does not agree with all of Warren's thoughts. Yet, he gave him an honored position. Why? Because Warren's followers have been LOUD. Yet, the gays aren't supposed to be loud?

    I am not gay -- I have no idea what percentage homosexuals are of the US population. But I have a hunch that if the truth came out, most Americans would be shocked. If all gays protested this -- and kept screaming about it -- and all other things done against them -- plus all their family members and friends -- plus people like me who have no known gay people in my family -- that would get Obama's attention.

    THIS is why the Democratic Party isn't wimpy, per se -- they act on the wishes of the loudest ones. If you want them to work for you, be loud -- and stay with it. Don't just protest and then just stop after a week.
  • Ohio_Dem · 1 year ago
    THERE YA GO! I completely and totally agree with you. One must stand up against bigots. It's the same as being at a party and hearing a racist joke. Are you going to just pretend to laugh or are you going to say something. Me...I'm going to say something. And I am the same way when it comes to homophobes.

    We don't need to shut up. We NEED to make more noise. This topic should remain front and center, loud and clear from now until the inauguration.
  • Midlander · 1 year ago
    Baloney. Prop 8 passed because people voted for Prop 8, and a definite portion of the people who voted for Prop. 8 were emboldened and egged on by Rick Warren. Watch the ad narrated by Samuel L. Jackson (see YouTube) and tell me if "the anti-Prop 8 people ran a shitty campaign." In any case, I'm tired of blaming the victim, and shying away from blaming the AGGRESSOR. The people who voted for Prop. 8, and especially the people who campaigned for Prop. 8 were aggressors. And Rick Warren was and is, beyond the shadow of a doubt, an aggressor. Obama's giving him the time of day, and especially after the passage of Prop. 8, is unbelievably appalling to me.

    We need more "non-stop bitch fests," not less. I have no plans to stop bitching, myself, until there's equality in all 50 states -- end of story.

    I don't know John personally, and don't always agree with him, or his tone, but I think both his statements and his tone about the Warren matter are dead-on appropriate.

    I suspect most of the people who tend think the objections to Rick Warren matter are out of proportion to the situation are not gay. That tells me we (LGBT folk) need to do more educating on the second class citizen experience, and what Prop. 8 has meant to us -- tell our stories, describe our experiences, explain how the world looks through our eyes.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    Of course! If the anti-prop 8 people run a shitty campaign, people are forced to vote yes. Not because they hate gay people. Not because they believe like Rick Warren does. They were forced to vote yes against their will because the No on 8 campaign wasn't good enough. And we should just let it drop that the man who worked so tirelessly to pass Prop 8, and called gays pedophiles, is receiving an enormous honor from the man we worked so hard to elect, while we are left wondering if we will still be married by the time Obama takes office. Thank you for feeling my pain. And since you do, I'm sure you understand why I won't shut up about it as long as Rick Warren becomes the second homophobic minister to be honored by Obama.
  • Midlander · 1 year ago
    RitornaVincitor: I've noticed that your contributions are consistently excellent.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    Hey, I feel the same about yours. Especially this one!
  • Ann · 1 year ago
    John,

    Remember during the primary when you were castigating Hilary Clinton as something akin to Satan's spawn. And she is now part of the new Obama administration, with your support. Please check out Juan Cole's take on Rick Warren. When Barack Obama said on election night that he would be the president of all americans, (warning, radiacal thought) he meant it. And to many Americans, Rick Warren is an inspiration and a hero. And as Juan Cole, who is surely no homophobe, notes, with some reason. One of the things I found most impressive about Obama during the campaign was how he could reach the "better angels" of the right wing in this country. He had David Brooks saying complimentary things about him for God Sake. William F Buckley's son openly supported him. Julie Nixon Eisenhower and Caroline Kennedy and Ron Reagan Jr. and Barry Goldwater's children were among his supporters. Stop and think about that for a minute. I have for a long time thought that Americans of all political and religious stripes have more that unites us than that divides us. I do not believe that inviting Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inaugural is in any way a snub to the GL and TG community. Rather, it is an attempt to reach out to that portion of the American public who do not feel invested in his election and to get them to open their ears for a minute and listen to what he said during the campaign. There is nothing wrong with a future president of the United States seeking to build support among the electorate by getting them, perhaps for the first time, to actually open their ears and listen to what he is saying as opposed to what Fox news says he is saying. I work around people who, during the campaign, had never even stopped to listen to what the man said. They had him built up in their minds as something akin to the anit-christ. So much so that they would not listen to him. I kid you not. I would never suggest that you not stand up for yourself and demand to be treated as any other human being, deserving of respect for what you are and what you have accomplished in life. But on this particular issue, the invocation at the inaugural, I would chill. I believe I understand what he is doing and I approve his message.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    I think you failed to grasp why so many voters switched over to Obama. It wasn't only for his (now proven empty) promises, it was for his silver-tongued consistency and evenness as juxtaposed to McCain's bizarre flopping around and sloppy choices (and of course the mistress of lunacy herself as running mate) -- and a painful, terrorized rush away from anything Republican to anything that seemed not to be another psychopathic destroyer.
  • buddhistMonkey · 1 year ago
    ((( "It wasn't only for his (now proven empty) promises..." )))

    Name an empty Obama promise.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    You know, there are some fine people in the kKK who inspire a lot of people too. Not every member of the KKK wants to see black people killed. Many of them simply don't want to see blacks being treated as equal. It's just a different viewpoint. Perhaps Barack can reach out to those more moderate members of the KKK and bring them together with African Americans. I'm sure we would all applaud his doing so. Of course, we would NEVER contemplate Mr. Obama allowing even one of them to so much as set foot on the podium at his inauguration. And to honor such a bigot by letting him give the invocation? Forget it!! Can you imagine such a thing?! (Hint: Yes you can. You can imagine an outspoken bigot giving the invocation. You can even approve of it.)
  • buddhistMonkey · 1 year ago
    You're smarter and more logical than anyone writing for this site. I feel compelled to shout you down.

    KKK!!! Hitler!!! Gluttonous bigots!!!
  • gymnjim · 1 year ago
    John:

    Could you please press the button to release all the people that have better things to do. Clearly you have chained them to this post against their will.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    I guess you can't imagine what it must be like to be preached against every day of the week, and disrespected, and lied about, and victimized, a voted against, and un-married, and forced to watch the cheerleader deliver the invocation at the inauguration of the man you enthusiastically supported.
  • gymnjim · 1 year ago
    Actually I can. I am on your side. The post was in response to all the complaints that we shouldn't be wasting our time on this.
  • skteoievtehr · 1 year ago
    I'm also really pissed off that Obama invited Warren to this historic event, but I dare say your rants against Warren are entering the realm of Warren-esque hatred. I mean, criticize the man for his ignorance and lack of compassion, but calling attention to his weight is immature and unprofessional. Let's not conduct ourselves in a manner unbefitting the seriousness of the cause. Also, it's not exactly good policy to generalize about an entire nation (i.e. Syria) in the way that you have. Some say Americans are anti-Muslim or "Muslim haters," which certainly doesn't describe you or me or most everyone I know, and likewise I doubt it if all Syrians are "Jew haters." Not a very enlightened thing to say. If your arguments are intelligent and professional, there's a better chance that Obama and his people will take notice. Don't let your anger cloud your judgment.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    No, calling attention to Warren's gluttony is calling attention to his religious hypocrisy, for cherry picking which biblical injunctions he respects and which he chooses to ignore because they may be a little inconvenient for him. Nothing immature or unprofessional about it at all.
  • Millicent · 1 year ago
    As to your remarks about Obama and his people ..., listen, Obama and his people don't give a flying fuk about what gays think about his betrayal of them. He had every opportunity to know well in advance how we would feel because he pulled a similar stunt during his campaign. The upshot of Obama's feeling is that he doesn't give a shit about how we feel because we're a captive voting block. What he does care about in his cynical, canny politician's brain is what evangenitals feel about it, that maybe some of them that don't feel they have a home will come live with him -- at least till a better evangenital fit comes along for them.
  • JJ · 1 year ago
    "...but calling attention to his weight is immature and unprofessional." -- I disagree.

    Warren uses passages from scripture to condemn gay people, so why should we not also point out his gluttony? Fair is fair.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    He can call us pedophiles and we can't call him a slob? Who makes these rules?
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    You see, it always starts out this way.

    First, a group of people deny another group of people equal rights and access to the law through legislation. Then, they decide they don't want us around their families because of our way of life. Then they decide they don't want to deal with you in business and begin enacting laws about how you conduct business.
    Then they decide they don't have to care for you in hospital because of their strong religious beliefs. Then you "become a burden to society"and someone should do something. That burden then has to be placed somewhere away from others delicate sensibilities.

    And then someone has to come up with a final solution to the problem.

    It has been that way throughout time. Warren and his beliefs are dangerous as they have already crossed at least three of those steps. Warren's divinity school chum was Professional Xtian Mike Huckabee who only a few short years ago called for people with AIDS to be "put somewhere". I am unwilling to simply sit down and shut up. Not now, not ever.
  • buddhistMonkey · 1 year ago
    ((( "I mean, criticize the man for his ignorance and lack of compassion, but calling attention to his weight is immature and unprofessional." )))

    This is exactly why the criticisms of Rick Warren on this site no longer have any merit. Once you enter the realm of fat jokes and name-calling, you've left your credibility far behind. No one will be quoting AmericaBlog on CNN except as a counter-example of childish and hate-filled liberals who despise Obama's call for inclusivity. This sort of crap makes us all look bad.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Yes. Again thank you for echoing my comments and sentiments way more eloquently than I have..

    And lets hope some of the more unhinged don't start calling you a Republican or Warren plant as well for it.
  • Chris P · 1 year ago
    I just wrote an e-mail to about 20 people that I could find with a "@saddleback.net" address pointing out that homosexuality is natural in the animal world. Deliberately working to take away people's rights is the purest form of bigotry. Implying that homosexuality leads to child abuse, polygamy and incest when that is exactly what church members have done is obscene.

    All I read in the New Testament pointed to Jesus being accepting of all people. Apparently these people cannot read.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Yes. Thank you. If we're discussing CHRISTIANITY and not right wing megachurches than I think this distinction needs to be made clear. Since I've already grown weary of not only the big 'anti-obama the outed gay hater' talk around here but the indictment of Christianity as a whole for the misrepresentations of some.
  • will este · 1 year ago
    Chris, this is not a bible issue... this is a constituional issue... so please focus..
    on this and pass it along
  • Will · 1 year ago
    There are a lot of comments from new people suddenly showing up here. Certainly Team Obama is aware of AmericaBlog, and John was quoted in one of Rachel Maddow's pieces. It seems a pretty obvious strategy would be to post the sort of "time to move on, nothing to see here" comments if you wanted to diffuse the situation.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Yes. It's all one big anti-gay conspiracy.

    [/sarcasm]

    Speaking of course as the Warren plant/Republican plant I've already been accused of being these past few days and not the hard charging liberal, neocon fighting , Democratic cause as well as gay issues supporter for decades now, of course..

    So I guess I'll enjoy the new Obama era while the gay conspiratorial part of AmericaBlog sulks in the corner.
  • Ohio_Dem · 1 year ago
    Reading and posting your disapproval non-stop on AmericaBlog seems a strange way of enjoying the new Obama era.
  • ekwhite · 1 year ago
    What is the emphasis on Warren's weight? Is it OK to be bigoted against overweight people?
  • RainbowPhoenix · 1 year ago
    It's about the hipocrisy of this "christian" so obviously partaking in one of the seven deadly sins.
  • shell · 1 year ago
    Read John's whole piece! The last sentence is: HERE IS WHY IT'S RELEVANT THAT INTOLERANT BIGOT RICK WARREN IS A GLUTTON.

    If you read that, why would you ask such a question?
  • buddhistMonkey · 1 year ago
    ((( "Is it OK to be bigoted against overweight people?" )))

    Just so long as they're not gay.
  • whomod · 1 year ago
    Careful. Someone might accuse you of being a Warren plant.
    Or a Republican.

    I've already been accused of that for calling this what it is. Petty and stupid.

    It seems gay is the new unhinged around here.
  • Milli · 1 year ago
    I'm gay and fat. Guess I'm going to hell.
  • dula · 1 year ago
    Me too...but first I'm going to IHOP.
  • bbock · 1 year ago
    Twice as fast, apparently.
  • NGLTF · 1 year ago
    It was interesting on the NBC interview how Rick Warren actually giggled when he spoke of being overweight. It was stunning. Here is a man fighting to annul actual existing marriages of thousands of gays and tear their families apart. Yet he just giggles about his own sin. The interviewer should have asked him if it was OK for the voters to strip him of rights because of his sinful lifestyle choice.
  • will este · 1 year ago
    Well John... Look you are right on this issue... what is a shame at this point is that you are a bigot and so is 75% of you partners... i have asked a number of times that you not become the ones you are fighting...but you have.... its nasty and not in the direction i would like to help you all move forward... shame on you for allowing this on your web site.... you want to move forward... yet you move the cause back ... and you John allow it.... disgraceful...
  • bbock · 1 year ago
    I have a modest proposal. We should pass a law forbidding fat people to be married or being around our impressionable children. After all, they are not a protected class. Being fat is a life-style choice. Gluttony is a sin and we should not reward it. They are weak-willed and lazy. They have to use handicap parking and go around the mall in motor-scooters. They could go on a diet and lose weight and learn to keep it off, if they weren't so self-involved and obsessed with self-gratification.

    Some people are so fat that they can't have children, and marriage is just for making babies. And fat people have no business having children because they will corrupt children with oversized portions, fatty fast foods, Twinkies, and Ding-Dongs. We must protect our children from the influences of fat people. They shouldn't teach in schools because children might learn the wrong things from them.

    Some people say being fat isn't their fault. It's genetic. But that doesn't make sense if Darwin was right. Because many fat people can't even cary their own weight when walking. In ancient times, they would have to hunt for their own food, and if they were so fat, they couldn't catch anything to eat. Of course then they wouldn't be so fat. But who believes in Darwin anyway.

    Join with me in banning fat people.

    Or not. But think of the children! Oh, the children! Those fat little children!
  • Ann · 1 year ago
    Funny you should mention it. I'm currently reading a book by Morris Dees of the Southern Poverty Law Center. It is chilling to say the least. This is a man who has taken on the KKK with the one thing they are the most afraid of, the law and the light of day. A man whose life and whose family have been threatened many times by the KKK and I can safely say that he would never compare Rick Warren to the KKK. And, no, there are no inspiring people in the KKK. They mostly have a screw loose. Several screws loose. Example - The 'Grand Wizard' sitting across the table from Morris Dees during a deposition mouthing the words over and over again, "You die. You die". He happened to have a gun with him at the time. This was in the 1980s. The book is A Season for Justice, The Life and Times of Civil Rights Lawyer Morris Dees. Check it out if you really want to know how ridiculous your comparison is. The question is not whether you are justified in being angry and pissed off. No one says you are not. The question is how you achieve what you want to achieve, which I would assume is acceptance and equality and progress. I believe that Obama is looking at the early years of the Clinton presidency as instructive here. Remember the controversy over gays in the military. Clinton's stand was laudable and one could even say unavoidable given the policies put in place by Bush the elder with respect to gays in the military. But it gave the likes of Jerry Falwell and Newt Gingrich an openning to attack him before the country had a real sense of who he was. The GOP took control of Congress and for the rest of his administration Bill Clinton was forced to play defense. All that he could have accomplished for the country and for gays was diminished by the fact that he had to spend a lot of time just keeping them at bay while they attacked. Now that these very same people have trashed the country so badly, I believe Obama sees his success as president as critical to bringing the country back and I believe he is right. To that end, he needs the support of everyone, including evangelicals. No one is saying you should not fight against things like proposition 8. But for the love of heaven keep it rational and compelling and don't attack people who are on your side. Or for being fat.
  • brian · 1 year ago
    Your attacks are just getting out of hand. You don't sound rational. Please keep the discourse civil, you're just giving the left a bad name and not helping our cause.
  • aussiebrat · 1 year ago
    obama is elected now do you think he gives a crap about anyone. IN america you have the right to fight for your right, no matter what the issue, I think under his admistration this won't be the first or the last time that someone is going to be outraged, If obama thinks divide and conquer is going to work, sorry about your bad luck, cause we will always fight for our cause no matter what it maybe. I'm am not gay but give it all you got and good luck
  • aussiebrat · 1 year ago
    one more thing just wait until obama wants to take the guns away, sheesh thats going to be a ripper fight right there