DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Groups upset about Britney Spears doing Holocaust-related film

  • Valentinefrey · 5 months ago
    John, the short answer is Yes. Absolutely. You're wrong. I would argue that the sentimentalization of the murders committed by the Nazis is worse than useless - it's actually dangerous.

    And the long answer: As you won’t learn from sentimental garbage like La Vita e Bella and Schindler's List, the Nazi insanity had its roots, ironically enough, in sentimental garbage; only back then this garbage didn’t take the form of movies, it took the form of the kitsch ersatz tragedies of Wagner. (“Everything was going to be so nice then those nasty little dwarves, i.e., money-grubbing Jews, came and spoiled it for the big blond Germans.”) Melodrama is a fine thing in its place - I enjoy the odd telenovella myself, but transferring the rigid good guy/bad guy paradigm to historical situations is a big fat disaster. The ease with which the Germans were able to see themselves as the good guys in a big stupid melodrama with the Jews as the evil villains, had something to do with the fact that they had been conditioned to do so by historical melodramas.

    Keep in mind that "Holocaust" movies are not made to educate, they're made to make money. They certainly wouldn’t succeed in making money if they taught the lesson that really needs to be taught - that most of the German's weren't comic book villains but an all too normal combination of ignorance and selfishness exacerbated by self-righteousness (they were the heroes of the drama after all) and feelings of persecution - feelings that will be amply represented in any movie audience in any theater in the world. None of us are very far from falling over the moral precipice especially when we are acting in groups; and when it comes to sins of omission – not speaking up when we should – well, we fall off that cliff every day. But to point this out in a movie would be highly unflattering to an audience – we all love to think that in World War II, in that most garish of clashes between good and evil, we would have been on the side of the angels – and if the moral choices of World War II had been as simple as they are depicted in these movies, well then yes, with the exception of a few sadists, we would have been.

    But we know better from our immediate past how most of us would have behaved had we been Germans of the war generation: When faced with the prospect of our "War of Liberation" in Iraq most Americans reacted with support or indifference. In the end the war finally became generally unpopular, not because people thought it was wrong, but because people thought that it wasn’t working. Yet this is an unnecessary war that has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, possibly over a million. The everyday Germans who didn't resist Hitler at least had the excuse that resistance meant possible torture and death - here in the US the worst thing that has routinely happened to demonstrators against the Iraq War is arrest and a few hours detention. In some cases people have been denied their medications while detained; or maybe, in a few cases, been put on the no-fly list. Unjust, unpleasant, inconvenient; but I think we can all agree, not quite the equivalent of what the Germans faced.


    We found out how much worse than useless all these movies were with Iraq War where the pro-war crowd very effectively harnessed the Casablanca mystique: When oh when was the US sleeping giant going to wake up and righteously rid the world of this awful bully? When’s Humphrey Bogart going to do something dammit!

    Britney Spears had her own little “good German” moment in Iraq in Michael Moore’s 9/11 were she’s shown telling Moore in a sulky no-nothing teenager cadence that we should support the President on the war because, you know, he’s the president. Maybe she should be cast in this movie as a German saying that we have to support Hitler’s invasion of Poland because, you know, he’s like the Fuehrer. Somehow I don’t think that line is going to be in the script.

    Maybe we should stop making flattering little morality tales out of the suffering of people who died three generations ago and pay a little closer attention to the people who are suffering and dying today. Put Britney Spears in a movie about a shallow narcissitic girl who does nothing to bring war criminals to justice. I might even see that.
  • Constant Comment · 5 months ago
    Britney Spears in any movie is just wrong. But then--who knows?--with the Academy now nominating ten films, it may even get a shot at Best Picture.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Argh! is this a travesty or what? As Kieth Olberman noted, now TEN films instead of five get to advertise themselves as best picture nominees. This is yet another sleazy marketing ploy as the Oscars ooze their way into irrelevance and well-justified obscurity. Goodbye little gold penis with a sword, you used to be respectable.
  • Diogenes · 5 months ago
    I'm part Irish, so I want personal veto power of any scripts and/or casting of any movie about the Easter Uprising. Sheesh!
  • scottinsf · 5 months ago
    I tolerated Mick Jagger in Bent.
  • DorothyGale · 5 months ago
    Would you mind if say, I don't know, let's say a fluffy Scientologist played the part of Edna Turnblatt in a remake of Hairspray?
  • brb915 · 5 months ago
    My only query would be the application of a fantasy situation, i.e. going back in time to fall in young love, with a period in history where millions of Jews were summarily snuffed out with the turn of a gas switch. My suggestion to those who are guiding the younger ones in their lives is to see Schindler's List or Life is Beautiful. That will educate them on the Holocaust without the specter of a young female entertainer who probably doesn't have the acting chops to live up to the story of the Holocaust to begin with.
  • Zorba · 5 months ago
    And if the young ones like graphic novels, buy them Maus: A Survivor's Tale by Art Spiegelman- it's excellent. As with the movies mentioned above, though, it's emotionally wrenching, so you have to know how mature the kids are. (Of course, pretty much everything about The Holocaust is going to be emotionally wrenching). Oh, and get them a copy of The Diary of Anne Frank to read, as well.
  • ComradeRutherford · 5 months ago
    You are forgetting one thing: the marketing department has decided that the only-demographic-that-matters, the 18 - 24 year olds, refuse to expose themselves to media made longer ago than yesterday.

    Therefore no one born after 1984 will ever see 'Schindler' or 'Life' and certainly not read Spiegelman's 'Maus'. Jeez, Maus isn't even in color and it was made back when their parents were still having sex - YUCK!

    Yes, the marketing department has issued their ruling. It has been decided that the only hope any WWII film has to be marketed to the Only Demographic That Matters is to have someone like Britney star in it.

    This movie isn't aimed at us old people (over 25)!
  • rf7777 · 5 months ago
    A Back to the Future movie involving Britney and The Holocaust. I don't know about the social outrage, but I am pretty sure somebody somewhere should definitely be fired for coming up with that one.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 5 months ago
    they travel in her Toyota Prius instead of a DeLorean in this one though.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 5 months ago
    The way you start the magic car is by beating on it three times with an umbrella.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Huh? And I thought I knew movies... reference please?
  • kickingleft · 5 months ago
    And they said that all of the originality in Hollywood is gone.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 5 months ago
    could've been worse... imagine how outraged they'd be if it was Perez Hilton instead of Britney falling in love with Eton?

    okay... he has a whole different kind of 'ick' factor and it has nothing to do with being gay.
  • ComradeRutherford · 5 months ago
    You must not have heard, Perez Hilton is playing 'Eton'.
  • Indigo · 5 months ago
    So they want Madonna to play the girl-role?
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 5 months ago
    interesting you should think of her. remember how much argentine nationalists hated seeing her play eva peron? i guess they wanted catherine deneuve.
  • Indigo · 5 months ago
    Ah . . . you saw through my wicked ploy!
  • caphillprof · 5 months ago
    Actually, a story line quite close to this has already been done in a time travel movie/tv show.
  • okojo · 5 months ago
    Bild isn't the greatest news source. Like many tabloids, they try to create news and controversy to help their sales.

    Anyway the article quotes one person from a regional Jewish council. If there were more groups showing outrage, then it should be more newsworthy..
  • DavidDvorkin · 5 months ago
    You are not wrong. Knobloch is an idiot.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 5 months ago
    Non-speaking Cameos by:

    Kevin Federline: vicious concentration camp guard.

    Preston Spears-Federline and Jaden Spears-Federline: two of a crowd children led into "crematorium."

    Jamie-Lynn Spears: young mother who loses her child to disease in transit.
  • Blueflash · 5 months ago
    How about they have her sing "Toxic" to a German Christian or drag Ratzinger back in time too and have her sing it to him? Your love is toxic...
  • Matthew Saroff · 5 months ago
    I think that they are being silly, but I did have a WTF moment about this.

    Think about how you would feel if Britney were cast in a movie about the Stonewall riots.

    You would roll your eyes, and go, "just fracking beautiful," in a sarcastic manner, like I am.
  • AdrianBrowne · 5 months ago
    Why should anyone dictate what someone else's art is or how it's made? It doesn't even make sense from the Jewish organization's point of view -- how do they know what the impact of Britney Spears' participation would be?
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Nobody's dictating anything. Sheesh! when will people learn that criticism is not censorship?
  • MommaKat · 5 months ago
    So what is the objection to Spears, specifically? Yes, it's a terrible time in our history that we cannot afford to forget, and your point about educating young Britney fans about the holocaust is spot on. I'm not sure about the story line, especially with the travel back in time, back to the future for safety bit. I guess we'll see.

    Something struck me when I was reading your blog. Last year, during my first year teaching (5th grade), some of my students had to read Number the Stars. Two of the kids in that group told me that their parents had told them the holocaust never happened, and the rest of the group had never heard of it. I was mortified to say the least! We definitely seem to be losing a lot of important history - one of the bets ways to ensure we repeat it.
  • steve04 · 5 months ago
    I wonder if the travel back to the future bit and then being killed would involve Neo-Nazis? If this is historical fiction and it gets the holocaust correct, and draws attention to neo nazi fuckers who kill Britney Spears, that would be awesome. Her fans would watch it, get some historical education and some education about domestic terrorists all at the same time.
  • judybrowni · 5 months ago
    Sounds like the old Hollywood maxim, "Write Yiddish, cast British."

    In other words, Jewish writers, blond (American) WASPs in the part.

    The time-traveling, teen back to Concentration Camp movie you're thinking about starred Kirstin Dunst.

    Okay, alright already, Dunst can, at least, act and there are blond Jews -- but trailer park Britney is more than a bit of a stretch, you must admit.

    And that stunt casting could seriously ruin a dramatic film, but this article also has all the earmarks of a stunt piece, manufacturing an item and then manufacturing the outrage, so it's a toss up.
  • sonofloud · 5 months ago
    I guess Britney isn't "moral" enough for them, unlike the rest of the acting community ;)
  • jenjen64 · 5 months ago
    I can understand the desire to draw in a younger crowd by using a pop icon, but wouldn't it be better to ask someone who is a not as flakey as Ms. Spears? I personally think she has had too much negative publicity and don't think she would be a positive choice for so sensitive a subject.
    Her basic persona/image is, for lack of a better descriptive, one of a sexual nature so I can understand the objection.

    As a Native American I sure as hell wouldn't want her in any movie regarding my heritage. But that's just me.
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    Again I repeat my question, what were people saying when Cher first wanted to do films?
  • jenjen64 · 5 months ago
    No disrespect but Brittany Spears is not in the same class as Cher.
    Don't misunderstand me, I like her music but she has had a lot of negative publicity and made a lot of bad choices. I am not against her because she is not Jewish but rather the stigma attached to her persona. And again, these are just my thoughts on the matter.
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    Believe me, I cannot stand that woman (BS). I'm just saying at the time that Cher got her first few movies she had cheesy pop songs and a cheesy variety show. I don't think anyone would have ever guessed that she would be an Oscar winner. I'm just saying, maybe everyone should chill out and let her have the chance. We all deserve a chance.

    She did just turn her life around and is at the age when a lot of people grow out of that fucked up post-teen phase. I don't like her, but I don't care if she makes a bad movie. That being said, I don't care if she doesn't either. lol. I'm just for giving people an opportunity to prove themselves if they ask for it.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Absolutely. Let her find a good dramatic role and do her best to act the hell out of it. Honestly, I respect the heck out of both Cher and Madonna as strong women who have built amazing lives and careers out of their own grit, talent and character. Kudos to them.

    But I reiterate, the holocaust is no place for the likes of Britney as she is now. Let her do her Silkwood and Mask. Let her make something of herself other than a joke. Then she can do something about the holocaust. But not now.
  • jenjen64 · 5 months ago
    You are right about that. (I remember watching "The Sonny and Cher" show)
    Ms. Spears may have the skill and talent to pull something like this off. I haven't seen anything that she has already been in so I cannot say. Unfortunately, we being the humans we are, have a tendency to associate an individual's public persona and past history(good or bad) with any future endeavors.
    I still wouldn't want to see her in a movie about the Trail of Tears, Anna Mae Aquash, or Wounded Knee, but then again, that's just me.
    :)
  • gaydem · 5 months ago
    I understand your point about exposure and education John, but Brittany Spears?!?

    Awwwww, hell naw! Dat beeyotch can't act!!!

    <EG>
  • fabularasa · 5 months ago
    John, I don't think you're wrong; it's just a different perspective. For most of the world, the Holocaust is an extremely important historical event. For many Jews, it is a sacred event, and those who died are martyrs. So popularization feels not so much like education as trivialization. Actually. . . anything within a 50-mile radius of Britney Spears feels like trivialization.
  • Jophus · 5 months ago
    Just out of curiosity, what were people saying when Cher wanted to first start doing movies? I would bet against Spears with every possession, but let her make the movie. If the film sucks, it sucks. Jews or Germans don't have the exclusive rights to history.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Well yeah, but Cher wasn't trying to attach herself to a massively iconic and serious issue that resonates with the souls of millions of people around the world (or am I totally mis-reading the message of Mask?)
  • Mum48 · 5 months ago
    Also, Cher had/has a great voice, and is actually an excellent actress - Silkwood, Mask, Moonstruck, The Witches of Eastwick, Tea with Mussolini.
  • A2900 · 5 months ago
    Nope, you are right -- and I'm Jewish. And I'm no fan of hers. But there is an old tradition in the movie industry of using Jewish writers and blond, pretty actors/actresses.
  • GoBlue · 5 months ago
    If a German actor can play a Jew, and a Jewish actor can play a Nazi--and while I can't think of examples off the top of my head, I'm sure it's been done--why not.
  • clincher · 5 months ago
    Hogan's Heroes: Werner Klemperer (Jewish actor) as Colonel Klink (Nazi character).
  • Al · 5 months ago
    Also Sgt. Shultz-- actor John Banner was a Jew, as well.

    Rumour had it that Klemperer was personally responsible for the dimension of Klink that he is a complete buffoon whose schemes never NEVER work out. That was his personal revenge for forcing his family to flee Germany in the 30s.

    Totally fascinating man, actually. I wish he'd been gay! LOL
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Well, nobody's perfect. ;-)
  • thisistom · 5 months ago
    Here's an analogy: What if Eminem was cast to play Harvey Milk? It'd be nice if his fans were made aware of a significant figure in the gay rights struggle, but . . . Eminem?
  • sonofloud · 5 months ago
    I've never heard Britney Spears say anything anti Jewish like Mel Gibson did.
    Eminem has certainly made anti gay comments.
  • steve04 · 5 months ago
    Yeah, that analogy sucks. I'm sure Britney has jewish agents, and as pointed out above, the holocaust also involved the deaths of gays, gypsies, physically deformed, Polish, and a variety of other types of people.

    Plus which, it's not clear that her character is jewish or not. Inter-religious marriages do happen, and jewish culture groups don't get to say that they deserve no screen time.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    It's not about anti-semitism and I would certainly never accuse Britney of being an anti-semite. I've never heard anything of the sort about her.

    It's about gravity, seriousness and respect. All qualities which Ms. Spears lacks in abundance. If she wants to climb out of the land of air-headed bimbos and garner some respect, that's fine. Remake 'Silkwood' for gosh sake. Or Dead Poets' Society. Hey just try to do one serious dramatic role and don't totally fuck it up. Just don't try to remake your public image on the backs of millions of dead people.

    As one writer above noted, this story may be entirely untrue or blown of proportion. If that's true, I'm sorry. But this commentary applies to any unserious person who decides to do a holocaust picture. Sorry, the deaths of millions is not your ticket to respectability.
  • slappymagoo · 5 months ago
    First of all, the ABC News article reports that Spears is "Reportedly" reading the script (insert "who's reading it TO her" joke here). What they're NOT reporting on is who is reporting that Spears is "reportedly" reading the script. It could just as easily be a gag conceived by a morning DJ in Des Moines that got lost in translation in a game of "Telephone" to be a fact. It could just as easily be someone from Spears' camp floating this trial balloon to see if people would be willing to take Spears seriously as an actress. It could ALSO also just as easily be Spears herself somehow getting her hands ON the script and indeed READING the script, without actually being offered the part by anyone connected to the movie. So if you're the type of person who WOULD be offended by someone like Spears contemplating performing in something potentially this weighty...chill.

    Having said that, and reading some of the comment son this thread (including my own snarkiness), I think what would worry someone like Knoblauch, more than the possibility of Spears being in a movie like this, is the reaction of rotten little bastards like us. Making snide comments about her while in a movie that takes place in Nazi Germany can easily translate into people making fun of the Holocaust, imagining her singing "If You Seek Amy" in front of people lined up for the gas showers thinking it's a wet t-shirt contest and the like. The perception of Spears as a ditz means people wouldn't take the project seriously, even if she wound up putting forth a good performance.

    But then again, they worried the same way about Jerry Lewis making "The Day the Clown Cried" and look how well THAT turned out...oh, wait...never mind...
  • letonyc · 5 months ago
    If Britney turns the role down, I hope they get Paris Hilton to play it. Paris is SUCH a better actress. And maybe Perez Hilton can play the Nazi. I am sure no one would be offend by them.
  • Dave of the Jungle · 5 months ago
    I am entirely incapable of dissociating Britney Spears' face from the word 'airhead' and thus, she can never function as an actress in my subjective universe.
  • miller415 · 5 months ago
    I am jewish and I don't understand the outrage. I agree with Mr. A. that if the Britney Fans see the movie and learn the evils of fascism and nazism, then it will be well worth it.
  • AdrianBrowne · 5 months ago
    Sometimes directors release info like this as a way of drumming up interest in a project.
  • Milli · 5 months ago
    Its kind of like a Jeff Gannon type playing the role of Harvey Milk?

    Yes, this casting is absurd, but no, it shouldn't have to be "cleared" with anyone just because its about the Holocaust. People are free to make really really bad movies about sensitive subjects if they so wish. Besides, no one is going to be nominating this for an Academy Award. Its not going to be up there with "Life is Beautiful". The movie will fade into obscurity like all bad movies do.........
  • clincher · 5 months ago
    I am Jewish, and I don't really understand the complaint of the Central Council either. The only sense I can make of it is that the organization gains publicity by generating controversy where in fact little or none really exists.
  • Jim · 5 months ago
    You may not be Jewish, but the Nazis collected and exterminated gays, too. 11 million people were executed in the Holocaust. 6 million of them were Jewish. Far too often I hear the 6 million number repeated as if the other 5 million don't matter.

    I'm with you on the movie. It may end up being fluff, but it will educate and the positives probably outweigh the negatives.
  • Paul · 5 months ago
    If you take it back a bit further, you'll find they were making the 6 million claim during World War One as well. It didn't sell then, but a good product will always find a market.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Umm. Excuse me? Are you suggesting the holocaust didn't happen? Cause that's what your comment sounds like. Can you explain yourself?
  • ms elyse · 5 months ago
    I find the use of the word "claim" highly offensive.
  • Mum48 · 5 months ago
    Who is the "they" that you are talking about? I can't find anything in any reliable source that backs up what I think you are saying. And to use the words "claim" and "good product" with reference to the Holocaust is pretty damn offensive.
  • KISSman · 5 months ago
    Sounds like some people just love to complain. There's nothing unethical about this film. Heck, the guy gets saved! There are a lot of historical moments where people have died and Hollywood exploits them all.

    The main 'problem' is that it's Britney Spears who they believe will bring mockery to the Holocaust. Regardless, it should be up to the movie-going audience to decide if it's their cup of tea or not and not some groups who want to poo-poo it.
  • MsJoanne · 5 months ago
    I would think this would open much as Jessica Simpson's (I think it was her, at least) last flick...first night: $<2000.00. Ouch.

    I see the same fate for Ms. Spears. But hey, good luck with the kiddies! If it gets them some interest in anything historical, that's a good thing in my eyes.
  • ms elyse · 5 months ago
    I completely agree with you. I also wonder how people know she will make a mockery of something that hasn't even been made yet.
  • Marshall Y. · 5 months ago
    I suppose a parallel situation for Catholics/Christians would be Madonna portraying the Virgin Mary. Putting aside the fact that she is a horrible actress and musician, it's her off screen antics that destroy the credibility of any serious role she plays. I guess I understand their concerns, although personally I think it's a little bit rich.
  • MsJoanne · 5 months ago
    Some of her music isn't half bad, but she has to have the worst voice in pop music. When I was out in the boonies of NY/NJ a couple of weeks ago, she was all over the FM dial (no satellite radio on them rentals) and as I was flipping around, some decent upbeat song would come on and then, WHAM! Brittany sings. ICK.

    I think John is right on. Anything which can even pique the interest of a younger person is worthy.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    Oh! Ack! Yeah... that would be creepy too.
  • jenjen64 · 5 months ago
    Remember the flak (sp) Madonna received for her "Like a Prayer" video?
  • JohnNation · 5 months ago
    Oh for heaven's sake... Miss Spears may be a pop star and all that baggage that goes with it, but why should anyone care if she's going to make a movie about the Holocaust or any other subject?

    Now if she makes a movie about going back in time to find the Holocaust didn't happen, I'd be pissed.

    So until then, as Bill Cosby would say... "have a Coke and a smile and STFU."
  • mirth · 5 months ago
    "So until then, as Bill Cosby would say... "have a Coke and a smile and STFU."

    ...while drugging young women and sexually assaulting them.
  • JohnNation · 5 months ago
    Say what?!
  • mirth · 5 months ago
  • MattNYC · 5 months ago
    John--per usual--you're not wrong ;)

    I agree with your angle regarding getting the younger set to learn history. Frankly, the plot sounds atrocious and I am sure she won't knock over any critics with her performance, but I still think the woman quoted was being over-the-top with her comments.
  • CaptainFrogbert · 5 months ago
    No John you're not wrong, and I mostly agree with you... but.. Britney? Eww.

    As a Jew I just somehow feel a little creepy about Britney Spears being an advocate for my history. I would object as much to say, Ashton Kutcher or Paris Hilton doing the same thing.

    But overall I don't object that much. Just... eww.

    You know, it feels a bit like when Tom Cruise decided that the way to get street cred after all the crazy was to play the guy that tried to kill Hitler. Sorry Tom: Fail!
  • Schmedlap · 5 months ago
    If all we want is to attract the younger generation why don't we tell them that she and her male co-star will copulate on camera with no holds barred. Britney Spears for God's sake? I am not Jewish and it pisses me off to have such an immoral airhead having anything to do with such a serious subject. Her playing that role only tends to trivialize the Holocaust.
  • erip · 5 months ago
    "groups" are in business to make noise and complaints about anything related to their issues. Filmakers are in business to make money.
    As a jew i am more insulted at the jewish religion's (and every other religions") homophobic activities, than I am about a no talent bimbo playing a serious role in a serious movie.
    If the filmakers are stupid enough (or smart enought) to think that casting Britney spears in this type of project will be profitable for them, then so be it. As a consumer, every member of the council has the right not to purchase a ticket. However, who are they to decide how a for profit corporation choses to attempt to create a movie project?
    Seems as though all these religious groups (and republican parties) need to spend more time deciding who they are and what they want their message to be
  • Scott · 5 months ago
    Basically the next 'Titanic' - but a million times more annoying.

    Maybe Britney will also have her own "Love Theme" like Celine Dion - except it'll be a dance remix, with malnourished and beaten backup dancers in the music video.
  • cweinbl · 5 months ago
    What's important is that we teach our children the truth about the Holocaust. Whether someone made a poor casting decision is virtually irrelevant.

    I wrote about the Holocaust because I felt it critical to discount Holocaust deniers. These mendacious historical revisers desire only one thing - to finish that which Hitler began with the Jewish people. There are many vulnerable individuals whose weak minds can be turned into hatred of minorities. It happened in 20th Century Europe. It can happen again. If we had learned from the Holocaust, we would not have witnessed Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda or Darfur. Prejudice continues. Someone has to stop the blind hatred.

    "Jacob's Courage" is a tender coming of age love story of two young adults living in Salzburg at the time when the Nazi war machine enters Austria. This historical novel presents accurate scenes and situations of Jews in ghettos and concentration camps, with particular attention to Theresienstadt and Auschwitz. It explores the dazzling beauty of passionate love and enduring bravery in a lurid world where the innocent are murdered. From despair, to unforgettable moments of chaste beauty, "Jacob’s Courage" examines a constellation of emotions during a time of incomprehensible brutality.

    The worst characterization of the human experience is revealed through religious, ethnic, gender or racial prejudice. Only when we learn to value the differences among us will humankind move forward into a bright future. If we fail to learn this lesson, only darkness remains for our progeny.