DISQUS

AMERICAblog: House Republicans "delighted" and "elated" and "celebrating" over their zero votes to save the economy

  • renegademom · 10 months ago
    I said in an earlier thread that it seems to me that house members spend their entire terms running for their next term. AND, their constituents have little on which to base their decisions other than posturing, cowtowing to dickbrains like Limbaugh, and personality.

    I think house term limits should be lengthened to four years. Really. Right now all we get is one idiot after another, and the work of actual legislating never gets any attention. They are too concerned with running for re-election 24/7.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    Term limits will create more problems. Picture all current - and many more - politicians termed out, looking for office. Yes they might run for other offices, but soon they'll be on K St or other private business.

    We'll have only the dregs in office. Office will serve only as an internship, few quality candidates will want to put themselves through the ringer for a temporary job.

    Term limits isn't the answer. Changing our politics - we need a Constitutional Registration Rights Amendment - to get more people involved is the way to go.

    Instead of reducing our leadership to the least possible denominator, we should work on increasing our political cultural into a more widespread, universal place.
  • Gridlock · 10 months ago
    So the GOP is spinning this as a victory and the Dems, PER USUAL, are letting them control the message instead of getting on the airwaves and denouncing them for abandoning the nation in favor of childish games like they should be.

    *eyerolls*

    Why does this never change? WHY ARE YOU LETTING THE REPUBLICANS CONTROL THE MESSAGE!??!?!?!?!?! HAVE YOU LEARNED F#CKING NOTHING OVER THE LAST DECADE!?!!?1

    Sorry for my rampant overuse of punctuation, but Jesus Christ on a Crutch with Crab juice, you would think someone over there would clue the fuck in
  • renegademom · 10 months ago
    I don't think that the Republicans control the message. I think they are TRYING to, and I think that the American public has learned a thing or twenty during the recent presidential election. I think the time of "dumbing down" is over. The citizenry has seen what intelligence and ego-less policy planning and positions look like, and we LIKE IT.

    I have absolute confidence that Obama knows exactly what he is doing. And that he is VERY clued in, and that the Democrats in the House and Senate have been informed of the game plan.

    Know hope.
  • Gridlock · 10 months ago
    but the same tactic continues.

    They ARE letting the rethugs control the message. There's no counterpoint to the "GOP stood against massive overspending by Dem gov" meme that they're pushing.

    Nobody is pushing back on the Dem side. They're just doing the usual "well the public will see through gthe GOP games" crap, which is ridiculous. People are STUPID. That's why you need to control the message. It's basic politics!
  • renegademom · 10 months ago
    I think the message is slowly, surely and inexorably being controlled from the bottom up....we won't see it immediately, but "basic politics" is CHANGING. It started with the campaign, and it continues.

    I am holding the space for people NOT being stupid, and for the conversation changing in a fundamental way.

    I hear what you are saying, and I feel your frustration. The pushback will come from US, it won't have to come from the Dem leadership. Look at the People United for Change ad. ......

    I am finally choosing to "flip my switch" from frustration and pessimism to optimism, action and service in my life here in Santa Fe, and in the way I look at the world.
  • renegademom · 10 months ago
    it's rope-a-dope all over again.
  • Lolis · 10 months ago
    I agree. Let the Republicans talk, it only hurts their cause.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    The GOP message is that we need to run for cover, understanding that millions of jobs and homes are the inevitable cost of living in America.

    Their strident tone is resonating because they've been harping this way since Reagan. It is often referred to as 'free market' capitalism - of course the 'market' is free for only as long as the wealthy make their money - and we're taught to accept home, job and life loss as the 'cost of being free.'

    The GOP has nothing left to bank on but its extreme positions, even moderate members are few and sidelined.

    If the GOP 'controls the message' yet continues to lose on bills, elections, appointments, and executive orders, then it fully shows itself to be a regional, or merely oppositional party.
  • GrMtGirl3 · 10 months ago
    I agree with you somewhat but these Republican owned news medias have contributed Big Time. Most are extremely partisan and is one reason I get my news on the Web!
  • pdxprobert · 10 months ago
    Many of the MSM outlets are owned by parent corporations that make money from the Military Industrial Complex... that is why they are very careful not to make commentary that would affect the gravy train...
  • eclare · 10 months ago
    I generally agree with you about the impotence of the dems, but I suspect that this particular Republican message is going to blow up in their faces. The public wants this stimulus. Bragging about how they all voted against it makes Republicans look like completely tone-deaf morons.
  • GrMtGirl3 · 10 months ago
    This is exactly why Obama and team should not be concerned with putting provisions wanted by just Republicans into the stmulus package . . . they have no intention of voting for it no matter what the content. Work on including the best and fastest method aiding the middle class.
  • tropicgirl · 10 months ago
    I don't know why the press is being so cocky in this whole stimulus. Fact is, it probably won't do anything for the economy because it doesn't acknowledge the fact that jobs have been shipped overseas for years now, despite the continual warnings.

    Things will get much worse and I think the republicans will not look too bad soon, unfortunately. If they could get off the tax rebate kick and more into fiscal conservatism people would be behind them and I feel they will retake the senate at least.

    A neo-conservative is just as bad as a neo-liberal. They are into war, corporate greed and overspending. And they have a bad world view.

    The future is for those who divest from the neo-values.
  • Gorgonzola · 10 months ago
    We can't let the MSM media portray the GOP position as a simple difference of opinion. The GOP is intent on destroying the middle class and all the New Deal legislation that brought us decades of prosperity. It has to be made crystal clear that the GOP represents only the top half of one percent of us and those people are swimming in wealth.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    Gorgonzola,

    "...the GOP position [is not] a simple difference of opinion."

    Good point. This isn't simple stupidity on their part. It's an orchestrated obstructionism on the GOP's part. The Republicans have no good ideas for our country.
  • Jay · 10 months ago
    Oh that's just WONDERFUL! I hope they choke on their caviar.
  • Savage8862 · 10 months ago
    The GOP wants to reward their rich friends they want to ruin minorities, middle class, and unions. If I were Obama I would start holding daily press conferences and continue to say that despite his efforts of reaching across the aisle, the Republicans do not seem to want to work for the betterment of the country and American citizens. They just want to play the same old failed games of the past. But Obama is much bigger and brighter than myself and he won't do it. Shame does wonders - look what happened to the Democrats during the Bush/Cheney/Rove years.
  • LisaLV711 · 10 months ago
    AMEN!
  • grandma · 10 months ago
    Republicans just can't stand a Democrat in the White House.....they will do everything in their power to under-mine Obama and the cable news channels are giving them every opportunity to do so.
    ...CNN being one of the worst lately.
  • pdxprobert · 10 months ago
    the corporations rule.. and they are as much a part of the MSM as Rush Limbaugh is the leading force to destroy the Obama presidency and all that was good about the New Deal and anything done to support the people... in corporate trans-America, the people are expendable... at about 500,000 lay offs a month as example... Obama can't fix this problem with corporate domination over policy by himself... he needs the help of the people...
  • uu · 10 months ago
    The Boston Globe had a good picture (#28) of chimpie leaving on the plane.
    http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/01/the_in...

    There are a lot pills (candy??) next to him. Does anyone with a good art program know how to blow that up and see the name on the Rx box?
  • bluestockton · 10 months ago
    Maybe they're Laura's cigarettes. Pickles IS a nicotine addict.
  • paulbot5 · 10 months ago
    You call it a recovery package, I say its death to the dollar
  • pdxprobert · 10 months ago
    Rush Limbaugh is the new face of the Republican Party.. what do you expect from the country's most destructive force on AM radio? Hate radio is now attacking our nation....
  • grandma · 10 months ago
    let's hope they destroy themselves in the process...
  • aquarius2 · 10 months ago
    Limbaugh, like all megalomaniacs, believes he is indestructible. I think he has NO idea of just how smart this new crowd is in Washington.
  • brb915 · 10 months ago
    a2, I'm perfectly delight that they have chosen Limpbowel and Sarah Palin to be the posterchildren of their party------keep trotting these folks out, along with their obstructionist platform, and they will be irrevelant by Valentine's Day
  • bobcat07 · 10 months ago
    Rush has been attacking our country for more than 20 years. Just look at the vitriol that exists, now more than ever. ALL Americans shld be outraged at the behavior of our so-called leaders on the Hill. But politics has become a game of "me,me,me" if they thougt for a moment that the vote they cast against the stimulus wld lose reelection, the wld have been for it. Instead the are partying in VA like it's 1999! Is the stimulus pkg perfect? Not all all! But doing nothing, which we have such a fine example in the last eight years, is NOT the answer. We are going off a cliff and it past time to UNITE as Americans for the greater good of this beloved Country.
  • Indigo · 10 months ago
    The Obstructionist Party obstructs. That's why friends don't let friends vote Obstructionist (formerly Republican).
  • tlsintx · 10 months ago
    these hyper-conservatives are playing to the Palinista fringe
    the GOP is dead
  • aquarius2 · 10 months ago
    It boggles the mind to think these ELECTED lawmakers are "elated" that they voted NO in a block. They have missed the real issue, the economy and a hurting nation. No wonder they have lost the last few elections, they still don't get it, country first and foremost.
  • LisaLV711 · 10 months ago
    I hope they are just as "delighted", "elated" and "celebratory" come 2010 elections and they find they are NOT voted back into office.
  • AdrianBrowne · 10 months ago
    House Republicans + Rush Limbaugh = The One
  • BJohnson · 10 months ago
    What a joke stimulus plan he put together. C'mon - what person in their right mind would spend money to get out of debt. We Americans expect our government to shelter us from everything. Where is the government getting the money for a stimulus package? I'll tell ya - they're gonna print it. Hello out there! Why can't we just print our own money. Ronco should be able to rig something up and we could order by midnight tonight. Let's just remember that Obama has been touting this go for broke plan all through the campaign, now he has to go through with it. It is not going to do a thing to restore confidence. It is simply spreading panic which will further exacerbate the problem. The government need to let this thing run it's course and we are all going to feel the effects. Not until we stop looking to the government to fix it, will it start to get fixed. But hey - if Obama wants to go for it, have at it. This is his idea on how to solve it and it's gonna get passed. Ultimately he will be responsible for the success or failure. I hope it works for the sake of the country.
  • vegasbaby · 10 months ago
    you're an idiot....nobel prize winning economist krugman says we need to spend (that what stimulus is...spending) more to avoid a total global meltdown....
  • CMcC · 10 months ago
    You write, "The government need to let this thing run it's course and we are all going to feel the effects."

    Reminds me of something: "Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate." Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury in the 1920s, said that. He continued:
    "It will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more moral life. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up from less competent people.”
  • BJohnson · 10 months ago
    Thanks for the compliment - dolt ... Trying to control the economy is like trying to control the weather. Just like the weather, there are economic storms that roll in. Some of them (like the weather) come from out of nowhere. After the storm passes, we get back to nice weather. Don't forget the money comes from you and me to fund this "Stimulus". Do the math, how much does each household have to give to support 800 billion dollars? Our government doesn't have this kind of money in a cave somewhere.

    So answer this. Where does the money come from to fund the stimulus? Where is the government getting the money to build all these roads? I'm interested to see where you think it comes from. Simple question.
  • RainbowPhoenix · 10 months ago
    Tell that to the people who lived through the great depression, because that's where we're heading if the government doesn't do anything.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    BJ
    "What person in their right mind would spend money to get out of debt."

    It's basic Keynesian economics. Every dollar won't succeed fabulously, but targeted expenditures are the way for us to get going again.

    Note that President Obama has inherited a terrific set of problems and debt. Of course we look back for the origins, but we must also look forward for our solutions and for our people.
  • BJohnson · 10 months ago
    OK - what got us into this mess? People spending money on things they could not afford. Now the lending is all F'd up because banks are scared to give anyone money. I agree that this is Keynesian economics but those principles don' apply to a problem that was created by overspending with high credit risks. I say leave it to the banks. Banks make money by lending money no hoarding it. Sooner or later the will have to start lending and money will start flowing for useful projects not make work infrastructure projects. The biggest thing our government can do right now is reward people for spending their money and reward the people who create and maintain real jobs. I say if you employ 20 people and you hire 5 more, you should pay income tax at a far lower rate than someone who has a regular 9 to 5 job. We need to get the people with the money to put it out there for job growth - not sit on it. If I had a business that had created 50 good paying jobs and I provided 100% health care for all my employees, I should be taxed at a flat 10% rate on my income and the profits of the business. I don't care if it is 1 million dollars. What would it cost the government to take care of these people and pay for their health care. Unfortunatley we have to listen to Joe Biden tell us that these people making over 250,000 dollars are unpatriotic. Only the public sector can solve these problems. All the government can do is hand out "bankies"
  • EmGD · 10 months ago
    It's rare when "fiddling while Rome burns" doesn't quite seem to do someone's actions justice. What are they doing? Holding a weenie roast while Rome burns? Fiddling with a fiddle that shoots out more flames while Rome burns? Burning Rome while Rome burns?

    http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
  • scytherius · 10 months ago
    I guess all the lemmings cheer as they go over the cliff together into the sea. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA These people are amazing.
  • GK · 10 months ago
    I look forward to the attack ads when these bozos try to get re-elected.
  • cereal · 10 months ago
    Typical - they failed and consider it a "victory."

    Seriously, to be a Republican, you have to be a fucking moron.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    Theirs isn't even a Pyrrhic victory. The only claim they can make is their unification. They're neither principled, nor have they increased their bargaining power for the upcoming meeting with the Senate.
  • katie5 · 10 months ago
    I think there's a sneaky agenda here:

    1. the Republicans will work "bipartisan" to get their way on the bills: increase the tax cuts, eliminate "odious" (to them) programs
    2. then vote down the bills, while knowing that they don't have enough votes to derail the stimulus packages

    So they get to have it both ways. They get to have a disproportionate voice in the drafting of the plans AND they get to show their constituents that they're true to their core values. The Nero's of our age.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    katie5,

    Would they be so clandestine. If the GOP is organized as you suggest, the Democrats' (Congress/WH) response will be to stop playing ball.

    It's one thing to accept GOP wants initially, but there won't be much taste for this to continue. The GOP House has already spent its wad, stupidly threatening a more powerful foe. The Senate won't be as reactionary, but it'll be next to impossible for the GOP to regain what capital it held until recently.
  • katie5 · 10 months ago
    I'm not so sure. There's a strong drive on Obama's part to continue the bipartisanship/post-partisanship because, I believe, he really believes in this ideology. A kumbaya or a Rodney King democracy. So I think he will try over and over again to make this work and pressure the House to do the same. We don't know what's going on in this discussions at the WH. There could be lots of promises made and then not kept by the Republicans. But when you're in an abusive, co-enabling relationship, you survive on the promises and not the actual actions. I don't think Obama's sufficiently cynical to abandon his ideology. So I don't think the WH will stop playing ball and I think he'll pressure the House to do the same.

    As to the Senate, you got me. I've never been able to determine what drives these guys. Incumbency alone doesn't begin to get at it.
  • An_American_Karol · 10 months ago
    The remaining Republican House critters represent very red constituents. They can only benefit by putting road blocks in the way of the Democratic majority. The only thing the House can do is not allow the conservatives a voice in what's placed in the bills (hear this Pelosi?)
    Senate is a different story. There are several Senators representing moderate or even progressive states.
  • tigergrrldc · 10 months ago
    The Rush Limpballs Party is morally, ethically, spiritually, and emotionally bankrupt, and idiots to boot. There should be a media blitz showing these idiots being "elated" and "delighted" that they are just sitting by while our country goes down the toilet. There should be tv and radio ads. The few Democrats who are willing to appear on MSM and talk about this should say how the Rush Limpballs Party want to see this country fail. And like someone said down-thread, Obama should be giving press conferences every day saying how dire the situation is and how he would like the members of the Rush Limpballs Party to participate in crafting the solutions beyond tax cuts, but if they continue to refuse, that the Democratic Party will have to move on without them.

    Limpballs/Bible Spice 2012!
  • tcoffey · 10 months ago
    Disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • story · 10 months ago
    the only thing to do is get involved - esp you who have Repub senators. Write them. it takes 5 seconds.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    True. Get involved; register at least one voter, volunteer in at least one precinct, etc. The GOP knows still how to get elected (sometimes), so we are still busy educating ourselves and others.

    We can make the US a better country, electing representatives with a goal of caring and improving our selves can be a major step.
  • Johnny · 10 months ago
    What pieces of shit these people are.
    Americans are suffering to an extent not seen since the great depression, and they don't give a damn.
    They'd rather find a way to benefit from that suffering and play politics instead.
    I wish there really was a God so at least I could sleep at night knowing that one day they'll all burn in hell.
  • Dallen · 10 months ago
    Do me need any further proof of Republican avarice and stupidity? The mean spirited, callous and clueless nature of the current Republican Party should no longer be tolerated by the American people.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    The GOP rests on its few 'victories.' Organizing its caucus - regardless of reasoning - is taken as a win. The leadership displays its poverty by its unwillingness to work with a political foe.

    The only victory the GOP displayed is by showing some chutzpah, there are no good reasons to object so strenuously to this stimulus. This vote will forever be the GOP's defining opposition vote.
  • RjII · 10 months ago
    Congress is as much a proven failure as our largest banks have become. We can only look to our new president for leadership.

    Funny, the GOP is still being held hostage by the same angry old white men. The ignorant, bigoted and mean spirited, led by the old and angry.

    I can only pray they continue to follow the likes of Rush, the ultimate bigot, mean spirited, old angry white man. I can only hope to one day support the rise of Sarah Palin and Saltman in their ranks.
  • suzyku · 10 months ago
    While America faces it's worst financial crisis ever, millions of people out of jobs, millions of houses foreclosed, these stupid, clueless idiots, the nasty, hateful Republicans, play games! My hope is that they are ALL voted out of office or impeached! It's time for a mutiny by this country against the Republicans! Email them, call them, let them know how we feel about their stupidity and putting themselves and their political agenda's first above the country!
  • david · 10 months ago
    Who voted these people into office?

    TERM LIMITS FOR CONGRESS = FRESH IDEAS

    Except Feingold, he can stay.
  • Murillo · 10 months ago
    Precisely why term limits aren't a good idea. You'll have a Feingold, then you'll want an exception.

    Seniority is important; if we have limited Congresspeople then we will have a revolving door of participants, extremely rarely will we have someone competent even to run.

    Instead, concentrate on registration. Make the 18-year-old minimum a goal to aim for. Drivers' licenses are held as goals, so should the voting right. As it is we have occasionally new voters, not educated generations of citizens voting.
  • PippaPasses · 10 months ago
    Unified in Delusion!
  • rumpole · 10 months ago
    I was appalled by this when I read it in the paper this morning. Its one thing to be the "loyal opposition," but that implies that you have other, better, different ideas. These guys are bereft of any ideas and unfortunately, they represent safe, very conservative districts and are playing to their constituents. While we all have some reservations about elements of the economic recovery bill, to be so tone deaf speaks a lot about the Republican party in this millennium.
  • KerrynowCampau · 10 months ago
    Stay classy repukes

    True colors getting more obvious by the day
  • larry · 10 months ago
    We want them to be elated, excited, happy, hard and moist with there actions. I hope the senate does the same. Then the die will be cast for the Grand Old Party to sink slowly but steadily to becoming a regional party and finally the irrelevancy in which they are entitled and are due . They deserve to celebrate, they deserve to slip into oblivion once and for all...thank you Barry Goldwater, thank you Ronald Reagan, and most of all...thanks ever so George Walker Bush. You boys have done what FDR just could not get done.
  • Republican disaster · 10 months ago
    The Republican party is not conservative, they are authoritarian-that is how they governed, and that is predictably how they will govern if they ever get power again.
  • Lippygirl · 10 months ago
    WTF????? Leave the slumber parties for Sasha and Malia, Mr. Obama! Time to pull out some whoop-ass, pleeeeaazzzze! We elected you to fix this not kiss Republican butt. Someone hand him the story of the fox and the scorpion-quick. Damn!
  • sittenpretty · 10 months ago
    they would be well pleased if,all the slackers bought a gun and killed their families like the guy in LA
  • larry · 10 months ago
    Term limits cut both ways. In any case term limits already exist. Its called the ballot box....or touch screen .
  • RitornaVincitor · 10 months ago
    It's interesting that Obama is considering New Hampshire Repuglycan Senator Judd Gregg as Commerce Secretary. If Judd accepts, which he might, since he could lose his reelection bid next year, then Democratic Governor John Lynch would get to pick Gregg's replacement. If Lynch picks a Democrat, and if Al Franken wins his bid for the Senate too, then BINGO. We've got the magic number to shut down the Repuglycan filibuster machine in the Senate.
  • timncguy · 10 months ago
    that's if we canrely on Lieberman to vote with the dems.... good luck with that...
  • RitornaVincitor · 10 months ago
    Just guessing here, but I think Lieberperson may play nice, at least for a while. He's such a smarm. He may have recalculated that he has more of a future if he is Dem friendly. But getting all the real Dems to stick together.... good luck with that...
  • LB · 10 months ago
    Bingo!
  • sittenpretty · 10 months ago
    MERITS REPEATING Rjill

    Funny, the GOP is still being held hostage by the same angry old white men. The ignorant, bigoted and mean spirited, led by the old and angry.
  • joanno · 10 months ago
    Typical short-sighted thinking on their behalf...they are digging their own grave, but because they can't see beyond the tip of their nose, are blind to that.
  • JustAGuy · 10 months ago
    Question:

    Are the Republicans really deluded that their actions will have no repercussions? They've been able to rely on the media not to cover their actions or to spin them to great effect. Why won't the media do the same this time and why won't the Republican base believe it this time?

    The Sunday talking-heads certainly haven't changed their tune of late.

    -S
  • Karl · 10 months ago
    Yes, they are deluded, and were all during the campaign. They have no idea what they're doing to those of us who need income to feed and house our families. They make me sick. They act like a bunch of selfish, egotistical, little brats who need a reality check.
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    Karl,

    Trust me on this. If the current plan goes through, you will not see a dollar of it except in higher taxes. The plan is not a stimulus but simply a budget with interest groups in mind.
  • Drew · 10 months ago
    I do not trust you on this. There is no point in cutting taxes when, a., the tax cuts are as likely to be saved by those who fear for their economic future as they would be pumped into the economy, and b., people without employment —— also known as the unemployed — can't very well take advantage of a cut in taxes they cannot pay because they don't have jobs. Enough trickle-down thinking, please ... it defies historical behavior if not logic.
  • VotedForBama · 10 months ago
    And just how do you think these big mean companies will be able to hire the unemployed if they get no tax cuts to stimulate growth?
  • Drew · 10 months ago
    First off, corporations don't stimulate growth on their own ... that's supply- side stupidity. Secondly, tax cuts can't stimulate growth if they're not re-invested into the economy and saved instead, correct? So what's the guarantee that they will be, as opposed to government spending? Crickets, crickets ....
  • timncguy · 10 months ago
    those in th ehouse care about nothing other than the voters of their own districts. And, since the remaining repugs are from very RED districts, this vote won't cost them anything.
  • greyboy31 · 10 months ago
    Will each explain why DO NOTHING is a better option then the bill?

    It is beyond all odds that at least one of 177 doesn't at least believe this bill is better than nothing.

    They knew it would pass. No one should ever vote for people like this, regardless of party!!

    greyboy31
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    Doing nothing I believe beats doing the wrong thing every time...

    Think about it this way:

    What if the "Economic Recovery" plan is a sham labeled as such to benefit key stakeholders? Than to go along with it would benefit the Stakeholders and not the people... and at a cost of $800,000,000,000.00. So when the time comes to actually help the people, we are now in the hole almost all of the $800,000,000,000.00.

    Would it not be better to say no to a plan that is failing to create jobs and push to have a real plan that benefits all?

    I am glad both Democrats (I think 11 of them) and Republicans have done the homework and are standing up for what is right.

    Regardless of party, we do not want our representatives to blindly follow simply because of popularity.
  • Meowse · 10 months ago
    You just perfectly described the bank bailout. Sorry, try again.
  • LB · 10 months ago
    I would disagree with your first statement. If we do nothing, the problem will last longer than if we tried to do something. Actually, the New Deal of the 30's was anything new, it was a expansion of what was being done.

    GW and Cheney are the captains of the titanic. They run into the iceburg and then decide to backup and hit it again two or three more times thinking that the water wouldn't reach the 1 level.

    I saw that on another site.
  • Lippygirl · 10 months ago
    How does punishing the Rethugs in 2010 help the country NOW? It doesn't. I hope that the bull dog Rohm starts chewing on some crotches soon. Obama can be the good cop!
  • sittenpretty · 10 months ago
    they pay old Limpballs,40,000,000.00,thats 40 million PER YEAR,and hannity 30,and BILLO 25 ,to spew their KKK ideas...drugs do make it easier for him to spew,but NO WOMAN can even stand his grossness,just little Dominican poor boys,what a story
  • Bibi · 10 months ago
    They have no more bread. They should eat cake.
    We all know what happen to Marie Antoinette maybe the same will happen to the GOP. Boycott all big corporations. Bank of America, City group, Home Depot to name 3 of the most disgusting ones.
    Obama won and that is what is important.
  • Lynne Gillooly · 10 months ago
    I think Obama should take every dime of tax cuts out of the bill,add in Healthcare for all through the Medicare program and shove it up their butts....
  • RitornaVincitor · 10 months ago
    What the Repuglycans are celebrating is that by sticking together they have shown that they are not completely irrelevant, despite losing power. It remains to be seen if they are right. They calculate that the only relevance they can muster now is to stick together and continue being obstructionists in hope of blocking or modifying change. It's a gamble. In the Senate some of them could start crossing the aisle and voting with the Dems. But if they manage to stick together and block things, then there is the risk that the country will despise them for it and vote out more Repugs next year. But that is by no means a certainty. The GOP would of course blame the Dems for the gridlock, and sometimes the electorate falls for such nonsense out of frustration because things are not getting done. We're either going to have to find a way to work with them to get things done, or we're going to have to convince the voters to vote them out next year. And a lot of GOP Senators up for reelection next year seem safe.
  • mark · 10 months ago
    What are they celebrating? It still passed in the house. What Democrats showed them is that "one monkey don't stop no show". To the Democrats I say if the republicans want to act as if this mess we are in is a game, show them who is in charge. To the republicans I say wait until you want bipartisan support and don't get it and to boot don't have enough repubs to get a bill passed.
  • lthuedk · 10 months ago
    America's moral heavyweights stomp and shriek as their militant corporatist reality crumbles, taking everyone down. How American.

    http://www.light-to-dark.com/unanticipated.html
  • Abby Normal · 10 months ago
    They all drank the celebratory Kool-Aid and Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

    Maybe if the money being spent was not going to any of their districts they'd play a different song.

    When will the dems play hardball? Those guys played for keeps, no mercy.

    Do the dems realize yet they're the ones put in charge now? The American public wanted it that way. They need to do the work of the people.
  • kitkat · 10 months ago
    Are we really surprised?
    Look who they put up to lead their party, can't wait to see the new leader!

    Remember " WE THE PEOPLE"
  • dan · 10 months ago
    If we could tax "stupid" the GOP would single-handedly bring us back to the days of surpluses not seen since the days of Slick Willy.....
  • sittenpretty · 10 months ago
    George Carlin,RIP

    St. George of Carlin said it best -

    "The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, they're an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. They've got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear."
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    Economic Recovery Package - It Is Not

    I have read through the 13 page summary (soon to start on the rest) of the "Economic Recovery" package and it does not sound like a stimulus at all. It sounds more like a budget to me.

    Does anyone else see this? I believe we were told this would be a serious effort to directly create jobs.

    Does anyone else see that this is going to place an unprecidented burden on our future without creating real jobs? I can not be alone on this.

    Read the "Recovery Package". It is nothing of the sort, and I am glad Democrats and Republicans are both taking the stand against a taxation without the representation of the people. Thank you for representing. Please keep standing for the good of the people.
  • cebf · 10 months ago
    Yep, I have read it too and in my opinion you need to read it AGAIN! The Repubs care NOTHING about the people that they represent and if thei constituents are in the southern state they just may turn blue.
  • Wally · 10 months ago
    Ya, I will bet everyone of the repubs who voted NO are like McCain, rich and not affected by the economy. This is clearly class warfare...the haves vs the have nots.
  • Heather · 10 months ago
    I can not believe this here I am no job, scrambling to pay my mortgage so that my family have a roof over their heads, and these bafoons are delighted elated over what? to see the citizens suffer. This is outrageous, they don't care about the people they only care about themselves, they are getting paid and is about time someone in the news media who have the ability to question them, ask them if they are willing to give up a portion of their salaries. This makes me SICK TO MY STOMACH.
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    Heather, if this plan goes through, it will not help you with your mortgage one bit. Instead it is going to increase the burdern on the average home owner. Read the Recovery Economic plan. It is not about stimulus but about padding stakeholder pockets. It is not goint to create jobs like the supporters are promising. Read it and be thankful that there are some trying to stop it.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Elated? Hey the Democrats won! why are you worrying? The GOP can't stop this even if they wanted too. The problem is you want them to help you instead of you helping yourself. I was out of a job, and had to find work too. I took whatever I could get, drop the self loathing and get out there. David has a point since this package won't even be seen for any of us till 2010/11 according to the news. So quit blogging and start searching.
  • Rosie · 10 months ago
    Quit being a poser!!! You are not a democrat. Maybe you're the one who should stop blogging and support your Republican party.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Poser, lol is that it? I am a Democrat. Probably longer than you've been alive. I stood with 11 other Democrats against this package. I support what I think is right, whether it be Demo or Repub. Maybe you should look at the issues instead of the party.
  • Gorgonzola · 10 months ago
    When the country finally wakes up to what the GOP is up to, the repub-fascist Senate caucus will be a dozen rednecks sitting around a big bowl of grits.
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    Oh, that would be awesome. I can't wait till their just a Southern redneck, regional party. Maybe then they'll go the way of the Whigs.
  • MoNews · 10 months ago
    How pathetic! This translates not into partisanship but mob mentality. It seems that there no one considered the needs of their constituents when voting. I hope that they will come to their senses soon.
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    MoNews, what if the mob mentality represents those FOR the plan and not against? Remember that several Democrats are NOT supporting it.

    What if those AGAINST the plan have already come to their senses and are refusing to listen to the mass media?

    Read the "Economic Recovery'. It does not do what everyone is saying it will do.
  • Drew · 10 months ago
    Well doing nothing at all, or worse yet, relying on the old, failed Republican tax-cut policies, is hardly an option. I think this is worth trying.
  • MoNews · 10 months ago
    What I would like to see as we go forward with a economic recovery that neither the Democrats or Republicans vote as a group but based on the facts as they know it. I hope that when our representatives vote that they vote with the best interest of the people they represent guiding their votes.

    We should not rely on mass media for our knowledge of these matters. We need to do some independent research so that when it is time to go to the polls again we will be educated and send people to Washington that will look our for all of us.
  • Frank King · 10 months ago
    When one person is delusional, it is called insanity, when many are delusional, it is called the republican party. We are in the midst of the 2nd terrible republican induced economic depression which appears to be far more involved and deeper than the previous one. The majority of Americans and even the republican governors know the need for the stimulus to be acted upon immediately, but apparently, arrogance, obstructionism, partisan politics based on ideology trump the best interests of the American people and their children. These idiots have grown tiresome and annoying.
  • grf67 · 10 months ago
    What great Americans. At a time when the country needs solutions, the republicans have no solutions and are reveling in their own obstructionism. Well, the country doesn't need them and can take care of that in 2010.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    You know, there were 11 Democrats that voted against the bill. No mention of this anywhere in the Times or Post. Also keep in mind that 46% of the voters voted Republican....
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    THANK YOU CDS2.

    No one is reporting that not all Democrats are behind this.

    Could it be that the "Economic Recovery' plan is nothing of the sort?
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    it's a 'spending' plan. It has very little to do with Stimulus.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    The Democrats are using economic fear tactics much as Bush used terrorism fear. I didn't buy his, and I don't buy theirs either.

    They are using this economic fear to pass every spending agenda they could ever think of.

    You partisan Democrats must have quickly forgotten what heavy taxes and regulation did for America in the 70s.

    Extend unemployment, help the elderly, get a handle on out-of-control spending, and help improve America's standing in the world community.

    That is what we (myself included) elected Obama for.
  • Charlie M · 10 months ago
    Geez - I have never before seen such a bunch of dunces as those that have submitted comments to this post. To say that the Republicans are to blame for the economy is incredibly naive and childish. And for the people who are out of work and trying to pay their past due mortgage, etc., you have somehow bought into a leftist fantasy that you will be saved. This "Stimulus" package is nothing more than an expansion of government spending not seen in more than 40 years.
  • theyak · 10 months ago
    And that has been needed for more than the last 20. And for those out of work, I'm sorry that we can't get more sooner. Hopefully this will get you back to work soon, and back to providing for your families. If you live in a district with a GOP rep, we will do our best to keep any of this money out of your district.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Millions of bucks to study honey bees will not get us back to work soon. Millions to improve ATV trails will not get us back to work soon. etc...etc...etc.... This bill has more pork in it than Iowa.
  • Mister Wu · 10 months ago
    Tell that to an Almond farmer or a tomato harvester. Worker bees supply billions to the economy in pollinated food crops and honey. And they have been dying from mysterious diseases.
  • timncguy · 10 months ago
    The repugs that remain in the congress (not senate) are all from very saf RED districts. Their constituents are likely PLEASED with their votes as they likely agree with their stated positions.

    They will have no trouble getting re-elected based on this vote.
  • Frank King · 10 months ago
    The republicans have no qualms about wasting $600 billion on their phony war, borrowing trillions from China, Japan et al, letting Bush spend recklessy creating deficits and a huge national debt and leaving the natiion to languish in a severe depression. In a dialogue heard on "Hardball" between Jim Kramer and Chris Matthews they jokingly referred to the $825 billion stimulus as a sham because what is needed is two trillion dollars in stimulus as it relates to the GDP. After listening to them, I agree. Let that sink in on the republicans.
  • Patricia Van Cleve · 10 months ago
    And while Rome burned, Nero fiddled........
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    Although I don't agree with your assesment, I LOVE this comment.

    Very whitty... Bravo.
  • Ishmael22 · 10 months ago
    In a week where 100K Americans (as announced) lost their jobs And tax cuts is the answer for these unemployed who pay no tax at all? This is so '01 et seq. God willing, we have turned that corner.
  • Stephanie · 10 months ago
    2010 is very close and the ReNOicans will pay.
  • Tom in San Jose · 10 months ago
    I know a number of Republicans that are embarrassed to death because of what the House Republicans have done. The sad thing is that none of them are willing to pick up the telephone and call their Representative to exprecc their displeasure. It seems to me that the Republican Part should change it's symbol from the elephant to a SHEEP (or maybe a pig).
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    I know a number of Republicans who think that their party did the right thing as well.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Seems to me that it ought to be" House Republicans and 11 Democrats".
  • cebf · 10 months ago
    At least the house dems were voting their conscience (I hope). No one can convince me that not ONE Republican did not think that he/she should vote for the bill. This "lockstep" partisan voting is why we ar where we are today.
  • Drew · 10 months ago
    If anything, it shows that at least there is some independence of thought in the ranks of the Democrats. The Republican are there for their party ideology and access to power -- nothing more.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    Yes, you are correct, for the past 8 years the Dem's have voted lockstep, and that's why we are where we are.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    You can't convince me that all of the Republicans were simply following sut either. I am sure that some of the actually think it is wrong.
  • Bubbafrom Okeechobee · 10 months ago
    I still do not understand why the Republicans are being mollycoddled still. I listened to a GOP talking head describe how more tax cuts, less government spending and less regulation of free markets will ultimately help the economy. Is that just what the GOP and the Bush administration run on for the last eight years ? Now the American economy and that of the whole world is in th toilet. The GOP has nothing at all to be proud of, and furthermore this is why the GOP is sitting with the world's economy. In the toilet. There comes a time that after eight years of failed, disasterous policies, that any action in any direction is better than what the GOP has done for the world since 2000.
  • DavidAmir · 10 months ago
    Bubbafrom,

    To say that the Republicans brought down the world economy in 8 years might not be all together true. Don't you feel that is attributing a little to much power to people some agree to be inept?

    I think what we are seeing is the payout for uncontrolled spending, i.e. greed. Remember that greed never brings long lasting positive results... only destruction.

    And it was the greed of far too many, many of which live right next door or down the street.

    Also remember that this country was founded on the principle that federal government should be restrained, state and local government empowered, and personal government essential. We must govern our own actions first.
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    Absolutely! It's the definition of insanity to keep doing the same thing while expecting a different result.
  • Drew · 10 months ago
    >>>>> To say that the Republicans are to blame for the economy is incredibly naive and childish.

    Well who the hell would you say is responsible, Charlie M? After 8 years of a Republican executive and 12 of the last 14 years spent under a Republican legislature, you want to blame what, the weather? It was the Republicans who insisted on tax-cut, trickle-down largess to keep the economy moving. You know what the rich did? Trickled down just enough to line their pockets most effectively and not a penny more, using the rest buy themselves corporate jets, gold shitters and a place in line for the government bailout. Now, the Republicans want more of the same. BS, to the wilderness with you!
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    AMEN!
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    Amen..to Drew, NOT CDS2.

    Hey CDS2, ever heard of a Presidential Veto? Guess who used it all the time during those two years? Having trouble? Let me help you. Your retarded ex-President BUSH!!
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Can ya name anything the De m's did since 2006? They were in power for 2 years. What happened? Nothing, except the lowest approval rating in the history of Congress.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    PS. This whole thing started with Fannie and Freddie, and who touted Fannie and Freddie? Dodd and Franks. Put the blame where it belongs for this mess. They should be in jail.
  • Ken Eissner · 10 months ago
    No, it started thirty plus years ago with Voodoo economics. Deregulation and privatization of everything.
    Wall street run amok. Actually , Allen Greenspan can take some blame also. Right, he was suprised the markets didn't regulate themselves. Get real!!
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    So, Socialism is the answer? Yes, Greenspan can take a lot of the blame, but it came to a head with the Democrats (Dodd and Franks specificially) demanding that banks lend money to people that could not repay the debt. The cause of todays problems can be traced directly to the home mortgage business. Until we solve that problem, nothing will be solved.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    30 plus years ago... I thought Clinton made it all better.

    Fannie and Freddie was the last straw. This wasn't the Republicans fault. It wasn't the Democrats fault. It was the Americans fault.

    Our buy now - pay later attitude has caught up with us. We wined and dines and bought fancy cars. Well now the real estate market fell. The Chineese called and they want their money back.
  • hein · 10 months ago
    How soon they forget...before Fannie and Freddie there was Enron and our pal Ken Lay and his henchmen. Don't overlook Bernie Ebbers either. All enabled quite nicely by lowered taxes on the rich and slack regulation. Make no mistake...corporations and even small businesses can be every bit as bureaucratic as any government run operation...and are further subject to the whims and whiles of their management.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    You people are so partisan and bitter. You talk about the Republicans.

    You can't even acknowledge that greedy Americans (irrespective of their party) caused MUCH of this. You expect that the Government could have and should have a role in preventing people from being greedy and stupid.

    If one million or so Americans would have actually thought about the home they were buying, we probably wouldn't be in this mess. Greedy mortgage companies offering predatory loans. Stupid buyers making such a HUGE decision as buying a home and claiming ignorance.

    How many of you had banks and financial services companies in their 401ks. How many of you had Exxon and Halliburton? I did.

    This is our fault. All of us. Both Democrat and Republican.
  • jpeads · 10 months ago
    These Gopers are completely insane and don't give a fig about this country. It was always thus. I am sure their big donors will be right there along with them hoping to drag us all down in their leaky boat. Forget about them. Lets be Americans and act like it.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Big donors...who, oprah, clooney, and oh yes and the rest of hollywood. Give me a break, and how can they drag us down. Once again, the Dems have the house, senage and the WH. They have enough votes to win with out any GOP. So what are you whining about?.... if it fails? Oh that's right then the Dems are to blame since no GOP's voted for it so far.
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    NCdemocrat, I somehow seriously doubt you are, in fact, a NC Democrat. You're right that the Dems should just take out all Republican, tax-cuts for the rich, concessions, and just own this thing, since they're obviously not going to get Republican support anyway. However, I think what people are complaining about is their utter lack of interest in what happens to this country. Yes, the stimulus will pass without them. However, it's kind of F-up how indifferent they are too what people are going through all over this country. Whether or not the stimulus passes, people do have a reason to complain about THAT.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    I am a Democrat from NC I'm on the side of the 11 that voted against. Like I told Amada you can believe what you want.
  • phillydem · 10 months ago
    The most interesting thing about the vote on HR1 and the GOP "alternative" is that about 30 Rs voted against their own "alternative" then proceeded to vote against HR1 itself.

    We need a list of these representatives who apparently don't want to do anything about the economy.
  • suzyku · 10 months ago
    Boner and his lapdog Cantor are fools. The rethug party has been reduced to "sheep" following their bad leaders and not having enough guts to speak up or speak out for what is really good for this country! I hope they will all be rewarded by being voted out of office! They have no strategy, no ideas and the majority of this country is plain old sick and tired of them and the stupid games they continue to play. They have learned nothing!
  • Frank King · 10 months ago
    One republican commented that just because masssive debt, reckless spending and out of control borrowing ocurred during the Bush years, there is no need to continue the pattern in the present and for the future. It took some mental dysfunction on his part to connect the two conditions. I wold ask him how do we get out of the current dilemma if private financial institutions, banks, corporations, businesses and the public at large are headed into receivership, bankruptcy or are just plain going broke. Where is the country to seek help if not with Keynesian "pump priming"?
  • eddiepat · 10 months ago
    If Boehner's mother was on her deathbed dying of starvation and a democrat offered her bread to save her life, you can be sure Boehner would try to stop it. Such is his deranged mind.
  • Julie · 10 months ago
    Folks, email your representatives. Let them know how you really feel. I think they all could use a field trip day back to their districts. I think they'd find that they're not quite as "elated" as the politicians are. Get involved - it only takes a minute, let them know where you stand.
  • Marcelle · 10 months ago
    Are these men or boy sitting in their clubhouse with a sign that reads no girls allowed????
  • NVdem · 10 months ago
    I think the lesson for all is to take back the concessions the Pres made to the GOP and read this for what it is: they won't compromise because they are too arrogant.

    Condoms for EVERYONE!!!
  • duchessofbilgewater · 10 months ago
    I agree! What's the point of Obama going to Capitol Hill, something George Bush sure never did, if they have already made a little secret pack in their clubhouse to vote against the bill? Why would they ask for and get concessions, yet still vote against it? All they are doing is showing how small-minded, unpatriotic and bitter they are. I will do anything to help them lose more seats next time around!
  • stonejaxx · 10 months ago
    Exactly! Take it out!

    How about beefing up urban, regional and high speed rail?...almost anything infrastructure will work or even Healthcare (as per Krugman in today's NYT)
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Arrogant, that's funny. Why should you care about the GOP? You have enough votes to pass it. If you're so sure this package will work...pass it. The GOP can't do anything. If it doesn't pass then the Dems killed it. The liberal Dems are afraid that if it does pass and fails, they are the only ones to blame. Though they will blame Bush for this too.
  • Amanda · 10 months ago
    You aren't a Democrat. You are just claiming it. The words in this comment alone support my theory.

    "You have enough votes to pass it."
    "If it doesn't pass then the Dems killed it."

    Reading some of your other comments also support this theory. Or have you changed registration to Republican and not your screen name?
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    BS yes I am, but I'm with the 11 Dems who voted against it. I don't believe this is the correct direction. You can believe what you want it's a free country.
  • kram · 10 months ago
    I would prefer to have those 11 American aristocracy supporters join the repukes. Who needs them? Go join the right wing fascist goon squad.
  • seriously · 10 months ago
    Poor babies...they should all go to Iraq for a 'time out' from the rest of us...sheesh...
  • DAWN · 10 months ago
    OF COURSE THEY'RE ELATED THEY HAVE NOT CLUE.
  • Alexandra · 10 months ago
    All I can say is -- while the Republicans are celebrating doing nothing to help WORKING Americans keep their families fed, the rest of us are storing memories of what the "new" Republican Party is accomplishing. So far, it just looks like pouting to me. But when it's time to cast a vote again...I'll remember. If they can't help We The People to keep our jobs, why should we help them they keep theirs?
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Actually tax cut's would add to your paycheck since (the government) wouldn't be taking as much. Also if companies didn't have to pay higher taxes, they could hire more. Or the Democrats will use this money in 2010/11 nearly 2 years (cnn stated that) away and you may see something...I've lost faith with my own party.
  • Tunde · 10 months ago
    Name one time that companies have hired more because they paid less taxes. Companies hire based on demand for their product, not because they pay less taxes. Please study some economics and stop listening to CNN.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    you must have been asleep in the 90's.
  • wow · 10 months ago
    Clinton raised taxes. That is one of the reasons the republicans regained control over the house and senate during the midterm elections. That is also why Bush had room to cut taxes. He cut the taxes that Clinton raised because he said we didn't need budget surpluses. Look where that has gotten us.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    I know he raised taxes, who cut them before so that the 90's were prosperous? Some tax cuts are immediate, some take time. During the 90's heyday due to lower taxes companies expanded and oh yes hired. When Clinton raised taxes the bubble burst not too long after that. So you made my point. And Tunde, I don't watch CNN and yes supply and demand is the simplistic response, but if demand is down, why? people don't have money right? if, say their company didn't have to take as much out for taxes then people would have more money to buy stuff. Simplistic I know but true. You can always take the view of the darkside, and live in fear. I choose not to.
  • ltyler01 · 10 months ago
    You seem to forget there was a recession During the Bush I years. Obama is offering tax cuts for those earning less then $250,000
  • ltyler01 · 10 months ago
    Er..Clinton raised taxes.
  • ltyler01 · 10 months ago
    If there is no demand....there is no supply. Econ 101.
  • wow · 10 months ago
    Giving a business who is cutting its workforce a tax cut is not going to cuase them to reinstate the lost jobs. They will simply reinvest that money in different ways to further strenghten the company. Given the current economic climate, most people presented with a slight uptick in money find ways to store it away for unknown future expenditures. It will take years for companies who have downsized to begin to expand their workforce again. Cutting jobs is only the first step to cutting their overhead. A company who is cutting their workforce is in trouble. Tax cuts are a drop in the bucket. Also, if you don't have a job like myself, a tax cut doesn't add anything to my cofers since I am not being taxed.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    Well drop that cut into my bucket. You mention years, do you honestly think this package is going to be less than that? My company reinvests to expand, not to horde. As for cutting jobs as the first step, well simple economics shows that if they didn't have to pay the government as much they'd have more cash on hand to pay employees. Also it will help you find a job, if companies have more money. Your argument is mute since you have nothing to base it on. If companies make money the economy grows, agree, if the economy grows companies expand = hire. Most people just want a free handout and the need to stick it to someone.
  • kram · 10 months ago
    You don't know what your talking about!

    Companies where making the largest profits in their history a few short years ago, and all they did was outsource/offshore millions upon millions of jobs-after paying the CEO class thier billions in bonuses.

    You are either a complete fool, have been in a coma for the last eight years, or must think you are on a Rush Limbaugh website.
  • bluetxdem · 10 months ago
    Wow you're an idiot. You're going to b*tch on one hand about the national debt but you're going to cut the govt's revenue through tax cuts? I take it you failed math.
    Secondly, corporations used to pay 34% of our national budget, they now pay 7%. That means that working class people, the ever shrinking middle-class, is footing the bill for it. This is why we now have an income disparity greater than what is seen in Russia and something we haven't seen since the 1920's.
    Ignorance must be bliss.
  • Len · 10 months ago
    It's dumb to think that if you give corporations tax breaks that they would hire more. That's the biggest and dumbest assumption I've ever heard. Corporations would either pocke the money to pad their stock prices or the CEO's would give themselves hefty bonuses. No jobs would be created.
  • alexis_d · 10 months ago
    History has proven the "lower taxes = more jobs" premise wrong.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    Let me ask you one question: If you were going to start up a new business, and you lived in New York, would you start that business in New York State, or Texas? Keep thism in mind: NY has one of the highest corporate income tax....Texas has none.
  • alexis_d · 10 months ago
    Funny you should ask. I own a NY State LLC, incorporated two years ago. Business is booming.

    Also, you couldn't pay me enough to live in Texas.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    I'm happy for you, and wish you continued good luck. However, with what's going on in NYC, and the rest of the state, watch out.
  • kram · 10 months ago
    Nice try, but read some historical data. Companies have had their taxes cut by 67% since the 70's, yet they have outsourced and eliminated millions upon millions of jobs! I don't know what right wing B.S. site you got this "nugget" from, but take a look around you at our current state, and think about our tax policies over the years, and its obvious you couldn't be more wrong! Simple logic should tell you so.

    Also, when the repukes give you a few measley bucks in tax cuts, (while the millionaires get millions in tax cuts), those few measley bucks end up costing you much more in the long run. People lose their jobs, (privatization is nothing but another front in the war on working people), by eliminating working class jobs that pay a liveable wage.

    When all those jobs are lost, your property teaxes have to go up, and then their are fewer people to buy your house - which loses thousands in value. And all for a grubby $200 tax cut.

    Furthermore, who cares what in the hell the tax rate is, IF YOU DON'T HAVE A JOB!
  • glenda missouri · 10 months ago
    That's ok. We can let them know in 2010 what we think of them.
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    The GOP are not victorious, the Democrats are. So why is everyone concerned with them? The Democrats don't need their votes to pass this package. Even when you win you still whine. If you're so upset with the GOP then you have no confidence in your party. Remember Obama said it ..." I won" The only reason you're upset with the GOP is that you want to be able blame them if the package doesn't work.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Bravo !
  • alexis_d · 10 months ago
    I believe it was Saxby Chambliss who wins the "first Republican to say something I agree with" award for saying his party is "in desperate need of adult supersion."
  • walkonsatisfied · 10 months ago
    He should start with himself - the racist.
  • alexis_d · 10 months ago
    Yeah, I'm not a big fan of him either.
  • claudia Sabin · 10 months ago
    they had their chance for the last 8 years and look at the condition this country is in. let's vote every single one of them out of office.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Correction....the last 2 years have been in the control of the Democrats.
  • Ken Eissner · 10 months ago
    I think Bush as been in office for 8 years, right! Repubs controled congress for 6 of the last 8 years, and the Dems didn't really have a majority in the Senate and only a small one in the Congress, and most of the new Dem members of congress where Repub. lite.
  • Gene · 10 months ago
    Yes, but what is not mentioned is in those two years the Republicans have filibustered more times than ever before.
  • bongstradamus · 10 months ago
    They've suffered two devastating electoral defeats in a row, their policies over the last 8 years have led to the next great depression and 2 deadly wars that remain unresolved and a growing threat in one of the most volatile regions in the world and yet they somehow think they still have all the answers to save America.

    Dubya's left, but I find I'm still disgusted.
  • Sophie · 10 months ago
    Absolutely! And to top it all off, I read today that they (Rethuglicans) are now claiming that if the stimulus bill doesn't work within 6 months, that that will mean they were right all along and Americans will forget all about how Republican policies led us into this and blame Obama.
    SIX MONTHS!!
    They're completely delusional.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    Do you really think the Democrats are innocent in this? Are you really that stupid?

    The Senate finance committee headed by Barney Frank was ordering Fannie and Freddie to increase their holding in sub-prime mortgages. Their intent was to increase home ownership among less forunate Americans. This is a noble effort, but it was wrong.

    This same Senate finance committee has oversight over the SEC. You kow, the agency that dropped the ball with lack of oversight?

    You people have such narrow minded views as to the REAL casues of our problems.

    We did this to ourselves! People were making absolutely stupid financial decisions. Did Bush sign tha mortgage agreement on an adjustable ARM for $500,000 to a guy that works at McDonald's? I don't think so.

    None of you were complaining about Wall Street in the 90s when stocks were fliying high. Not even when they surged massively after 9/11 up through 2007.

    People were two years from retirement with all of their assets in stocks. They were openingn e-trade accounts with their kids' college funds.

    We had a buy now - pay tomorrow attitude as does our Government. We all got drunk on cheap credit and a rising Dow. Now we have a hangover.

    There is a HUGE amount of blame for ALL Americans.
  • WildBeanSidhe · 10 months ago
    I love it when people use absolutes.

    I'm sure that ALL Americans aren't to blame. There are plenty of people like me, with no retirement account, no investments and no mortgage. Some of us actually live within our means. My husband and I are laughing at the people who kept insisting we should buy a house. We rent someone else's bad investment - all of the benefits, none of the downside.

    You're right, here in Southern California, I can't tell you how many people I have seen making $40k a year and thought they could afford a $700k house.

    It's all GREED. Not ALL of us suffer from it, but ALL of us will surely pay for it.
  • kram · 10 months ago
    You mean the 90's? When Clinton left a balanced budget to the idiot Bush and his republican band of theives.

    Sure, democrats may have done a few dumb things, but the destruction of America was (and is) the sole responsibility of REPUBLICAN'S!

    Don't try to blame it on us. Why is it repukes never ever want to take resposibility for their idiotic, disastrous policies?

    Working people were seeing reduced wages under Bush the fascist, while his CEO cronies were making billions in bonuses. Please, get a clue!
  • Lynn · 10 months ago
    Do you think that they are all giving their special hand signs and wearing their gang jackets at the retreat?? What is next? A drive by shooting?
  • MNUSA · 10 months ago
    They'll never learn. I've been hearing that the only Repubs left are the ultra, extreme right wing ones. They must be from districts populated by CEOs, racists and the fanatical religious right. Time to elect some reasonable people.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    Don't get too cocky in writing off the Republican party my Democrat friend.

    The Dems had wider margins in both the house and senate at different times in the late 70s, 80s and early 90s. They even held the White House at times too.

    I can tell you that theyre were MANY Republicans who voted for Obama and/or stayed home. Couple that with a HUGE African American turnout and you get what we had in November. Despite this, most of the newly elected Democrats BARELY WON.

    One thing is for certain. There won't be droves of African Americans and youth voters in 2010 or even in 2012.

    Party fortunes can change on a dime.
  • Len · 10 months ago
    And you know this..how?
  • kram · 10 months ago
    After the republicans destroyed the economy in the 20's, two generations of Americans never trusted them again! For 60 years they were in the wilderness. \

    Now, after just 12 years of their political lunacy once again, the people have seen more than enough, and the GOPer's will be in the wilderness for two more generations or longer (with the changing demographics in this country).

    So long GOP, don't let the door hit ya' on the way out!
  • Whiterim · 10 months ago
    There's a simple explanation for every Republican in the House to reject the Stimulus Bill...they were all obeying the declaration of the new head of the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh. This was manifested when Rep. Gingrey retracted and begged forgiveness from Limbaugh for daring to suggest that Limbaugh's previous commentary should not influence House Republicans. Fearing the wrath of self professed drug addict Rush Limbaugh, Gingrey realized that Limbaugh holds sway over Republican Representatives. With Limbaugh's reach into any and all Republican districts, he can influence primary elections by going negative on anyone who dares suggest that Limbaugh was incorrect on anything he may have said on his radio broadcast. So, you fellow Republican sheep, there's no need to vote for a new Chairman, you already have one by the self proclaimed voice of the Republican Party.
  • Doug · 10 months ago
    The Republicans all voted against it because they could. This is now entirely on the shoulders of the Democrats and the White House.

    I know is may be hard for some of you to believe, but some of us Republicans just think it is a dumb idea.

    Most of you poeple actually drink the Kool-aid that the Democrats have been pushing. They are using economic fear just as Bush used fear of terrorism.

    There are many of us who believe you don't need to spend gobs of money to solve this. Increased regulation and time will fix much of the economy.
  • Len · 10 months ago
    The problem with your theory is that Republicans don't want more regulation, they want less regulation. we haven't heard one solution from them other than cut taxes. Cutting individual citizens taxes doen't create jobs. the truth is they have no ideas.
  • ltyler01 · 10 months ago
    What about the millions of people who currently have no income, are losing their homes. A lot of us out here are desperate. This ain't kool-aid...this is real. Real people are being affected.

    So how much time are we expected to wait. $18bil for Wall Street...? And we're supposed to keep waiting??
  • Diane · 10 months ago
    Why are these people's constituents not up in arms? Why are there no news reports interviewing people from these constituencies to find out what they think about their reps doing this to them? Maybe then they'd wake up and realize who they're working for.
  • tyranny response team · 10 months ago
    Who cares about the politics. How come no one is talking about how this stimulus package will work? It won't. All of you posters have no idea what is even in the package. All you know is that the blonde on tv with pretty eyes and nice teeth told you it is a good thing. You strapped on your sheeple hat and off the cliff you go. Study history. Study the laughable TARP bailout. Look at what is actually in the pacjage and then tell me how you think it will help our economy. If creating more debt was the answer to our problems we would have never had a aproblem in the first place. Nevermind, go back to sleep and ignore this crazy post. You don't need to think. Go back to sleep. All will be well. You will enjoy the bread lines.
  • Resonable voter · 10 months ago
    so you say it won't work and claim we're sleeping. What's your proof? Where's your evidence? Just like the republicans who've shot themselves in the collective foot, you only have negative things to say and no real cited evidence to back it up. Are you going to claim it's coming from the (nonexistant) CBO report, or did Rush call you and tell you?
  • MyVoice · 10 months ago
    I was thinking the same thing- the lovely nonexistant CBO report. They have to have some sort of reasoning even if it does not exist.
  • Dev · 10 months ago
    The package has a four prong solution - one is funding public works projects to improve US infrastructure and immediately put people to work. Two is to give financial room for banks to lend to businesses and restore confidence in our financial markets. Three is to lift pressure off of states with budget problems (that's why so many GOP governors support the bailout,),and four is to give tax breaks to working poor and middle class families. This is obviously a simple description of the bill. The stimulus package certainly isn't perfect, and I hope more details are given about exactly how money for "public works projects" are spent as to hopefully eliminate potential pork. But the general consensus among economists is that some kind of stimulus is needed in conjunction with other measures to jump start the economy (Even one of Mccain's former economic advisers is in favor of the bill.)
  • greysells2 · 10 months ago
    The other point is how quickly the stimulus money is spent.
  • Rich Williams · 10 months ago
    The only Republicans still in office are right-wing die hards in "safe" districts. They only seem to care about their "base", and Republicans, as a group, have never shown they care about citizens who are not part of their base. Not a surprise they would slap away President Obama's open hand.

    Time to make them the "No" party. No soup for them!
  • Lena · 10 months ago
    Let me get this right. Is the GOP declaring war against the economy/
  • alvin · 10 months ago
    No, the GOP is declaring war on the middle and working classes. Actually, they are waging a clandestine war against the middle and working classes. Have been for years. I say clandestine because they are quick to tar Demos and others as class-warfare-mongers anytime someone mentions taxing or otherwise having the upperclasses contribute more to the system they so readily take advantage of.
  • MaryKathO · 10 months ago
    in case you MISSED it 'NCdemocrat' just how will it be possible to CUT TAXES if someone is not employed, does not earn a salary and has no PAYCHECK to take those taxes from? If they lose their homes to foreclosure, where will the PROPERTY taxes come from? If they lose their jobs, where will the F.I.C.A. and payroll taxes come from? Have you even bothered to think this thing through? Apparently NOT!!
  • NCdemocrat · 10 months ago
    I love it when people YELL. lol Well unemployment is also taxed, if you didn't know, so at the very least you can keep that money. And yes I thought this through when I was UNEMPLOYED. I don't live beyond my means...some people do. That 's not the Governments fault. And as you pointed out; you want property tax and payroll tax. why? Have "you" bothered to think this through?
  • Rhonda · 10 months ago
    In my state (California) unemployment is not automatically taxed. You have to mark a box if you want 10% to come out of your check). You receive two checks a month at a 1/3 of your normal salary. So, most people do not opt to have 10% taken when they are living on a 1/3 less. Most people like me work a temporary job (which is also deducted from your bi-weekly unemployment earnings) but the weekly paycheck fills the gaps of unemployment. Now, the temporary jobs are dry so for people like me whose unemployment benefits will end soon and there's no job to fill that "gap" should we root for a tax cut or some relief?
  • fred fep · 10 months ago
    It is hilarious how little the Republicans even believe their own nonsense. If they did they wouldn't be rooting for Obama's plan to fail, they would expect it to fail. But they don't have a clue because they have no ideas at all what to do, as cutting taxes in the distant future that possibly wouldn't be owed anyway, that is hardly any plan at all.

    If they truly believed that what they incorrectly call "socialism" is a failed idea, theyw ouldn't have to hope it fails. That is just pedestrian and rather dated politics. If the media would grow up they would report the Republicans as childish, meaningless, anachronistic and Rush treasonous. Hoping we fail , he should be fined big time by the FCC for his anti-American bullbleep.
  • each1touc1 · 10 months ago
    When everyone said that TARP won't work that Bush wanted no one had a problem with it and voted for it. I believe that the GOP should've voted with the President. This is why part of the reason they lost the white house and congress etc.. You can be a GOP and still change and have new ideals without changing your principles. If GOP stay on the track they are on we will never get back the White House. If everything passes and things begain to change trust me it will be more than eight years before we get back in charge.
  • Maggie · 10 months ago
    This wasn't a vote against the stimulus - it was a vote against Obama. The GOP is still frustrated that they lost in a big way and will do anything to take the momentum away from Obama.
  • greysells2 · 10 months ago
    That would be childish now, wouldn't it?
  • alvin · 10 months ago
    The Republicans are confusing, as they have for a good 14 years, their wants with the needs of the country. In as much as it is a vote against Obama, it is a vote against the country. When Obama sat with House and Senate Republicans the other day, he was saying lets talk,lets air our concerns and see what we can come up with. The Republicans don't seem to understand this. They want their way and nothing else. They don't seem to understand that you have to make a convincing argument for or against, and that they have not done so. You expect that kind of behavior from a toddler. Bipartisanship has never been about that kind of childishness.
  • Matteo · 10 months ago
    Let them continue to behave in this spiteful and immature manner and wait for the 2010 congressional elections.
  • dixieluke · 10 months ago
    I think Stephen Colbert had it right in last night's, "Word." Republicans should stand by their principles and refuse any of the Stimulus money for their districts.
  • Subterfugitive · 10 months ago
    So one of the nation's most outspoken hate-mongers says "Jump" and the GOP asks, "How high?"

    Sure. That's going to end well...
  • rextrek · 10 months ago
    Boner was only TOO happy to attend Obama's cocktail party.....Glug Glug Glug!
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    I would bet that Obama could still get 80% approval on this bill if they left the tax cuts as they are, and spent the rest on the infrastructure...road construction, bridge building...etc...etc..., and cleaned out all the garbage that Polosi put in...aka....Honey Bee studies...water park in Florida...SUV trail improvements...etc...etc...etc`... If they get rid of the pork, and get serious about creating jobs, 80% approval would be easy.
  • mwestorca · 10 months ago
    Do you want crops to grow? If so you better do something about the disappearance of honey bees or our fields will become sterile and unproductive. What's with you people? Don't you ever see the big picture? Did you ever hear of FDR's WPA or the Civilian Conservation Corps? They helped people get back to work, benefited society at large and we are still enjoying the fruits of the labor of those people who were employed on projects that look a like SUV trail improvements, etc.
  • Mike_G · 10 months ago
    Yes, but do they wear coats and ties in their office, adorned with flag pins? Are their powdered wigs perfumed appropriately with the latest scents from Siam and the Dutch East Indies?
    That's the most important issue here at the Court of Versailles.
  • sigh · 10 months ago
    Bipartisanship, like deficit spending, are a spectre to be raised against Democrats, they do not apply to Republicans.
  • PoliticalPinball · 10 months ago
    For the districts of those members of the House who voted No on the stimulus: A massive drive has begun to restrict stimulus funds to the districts represented by House members who opposed the stimulus. Accordingly, Please call your representatives to voice your support to eliminate the oppositional led districts from the distribution of stimulus funds. Even those who live in a opposition district, like myself.
  • Rita · 10 months ago
    I think the restriction is great. If you don't agree, then you don't reap the rewards. It's as plain and simple as that. If this happens, let's see how many Republicans get re-elected. I'm sure not many.
  • NeilFreedom · 10 months ago
    The Repubiican House members are so intent on opposing Obama, that they will gladly put the country at risk to achieve their non-specific goals. These morons had 8 years to try their economic theories of tax cuts to the rich while fighting two wars, and, gee, how did that turn out?

    The thing that they don't seem to get is that the American people have spoken and they lost! Instead of doing what they know is right, they are taking positions that support the red-necks in their home districts. They have cushy jobs in DC and are scared to death of losing them.
  • Mike · 10 months ago
    It turn out that these "idiots" are/were very smart thieves. They were 'allowed' (so far) to get away with trillions of dollars in a historically unprecedented wealth-transfer.

    They are not supporting the red-necks - They are supporting "the-very-few" that support them.

    And can you guess who 'allowed' the "incompetent" theft?

    And, so far, still is 'allowing' the theft to continue?
  • Lisa Crum-Freund · 10 months ago
    i didn't even know that obama was talking about republicans when he said that thing about 'unclenching' in the inauguration speech.
  • OhioMSN · 10 months ago
    I am from Ohio. Tuesday a father of 2 killed his wife, his 5 and 8 year old children an himself in an apparent murders-suicide. This following the father in California who murdered his wife and 5 children and then killed himself. In both cases the men had lost their jobs. Not everyone who suffers in this economic crisis will resort to such extreme and sad measures. However I wonder if the Republicans in all their celebrating wonder about their constitsuents that may actually be desperate and in need of the help this stimulus bill wil provide. The Bill's not perfect. Of course it isin't. It is at least a positive effort. All the Republicans have offerede is opposition for the sake of saying "NO". Wake up!!! People are dying. As a country we have always cared about and helped our neighbors. If the Inidans hadn't helped the settlers that first winter they would have DIED and there would be no Unitede States of America. We need to help our neighbors. I have a Master's Degree in Nursing. I am recession-proof! That doesn't mean I don't care about and have compassion for my fellow Americans who may be in need at this time.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    Just remove the pork. This bill has more pork in it that Iowa.
  • Tired · 10 months ago
    You think you're recession proof? Tell that to the doctors and nurses in Zimbabwe. They just released the 5, 10, 20 and 50 trillion dollar notes last week. Even if they get paid they have no money for medicine or medical supplies.
  • AUDREY · 10 months ago
    I PURPOSE THAT ANYONE WHO DOES NOT VOTE FOR THE STIMULUS BILL DOES NOT GET ANY OF ITS BENEFITS IN THEIR DISTRICT
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    it's not a stimulus package, it's a spending bill.
  • coolbeans · 10 months ago
    Audrey, I would certainly agree provided none of my tax money went to these ridiculous spending projects. So, you have certain areas (districts) getting as much funding as that particular area can afford.....sounds good to me.

    You can't have taxation without representation (I know it's funny but it does sound good). I'd certainly like to be able to decide where my tax dollars are spent.
  • BRG · 10 months ago
    I think it is time fo the Republicans to wake the "F" up. This is not 1985 and The United States is no longer the leader in producing goods. We (and I mean Democrats and Republicans) are in trouble. Jobs are disappearing every single day, homes are lost, families are killing themselves because they are believing that there is no hope and once again we have lines drawn in the sand. Democrats need to stop adding pork to their bills and Republican need to stop the "tax break" talk. First off, if you have 8 million Americans unemployed, how is a tax break going to benefit them. They aren't paying any taxes? The government is getting zero dollars from those Americans who aren't working so how again does a tax break benefit them? Not to be bias Democrats need to stop spreading the money to pork projects like "Planned Parenthood" It does not benefit me. Yes it benefit others who can use it but not everyone. Give me and other Americans that money so that we can put it to good use.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    At last a sane post. However, a tax break for small business's would create jobs, as long as we could find a way to get some money into the hands of middle class (those making under $75,000) Americans. The rich don't need any more tax breaks, but to increase their taxes (on the folks that create the jobs) is shooting ourselves in the foot. One more thing: we need to do what is necessary to allow the banks to start lending again. This is going to cost a lot of money....money we don't need to spend on a water park in Miami.
  • BRG · 10 months ago
    CDS, like you and most Americans we all want tax breaks. Lord knows I hate paying taxes but I have be a realist. There is no money flow toward the middle class. Something has to be done becasue this is not just a US problem. This is a world-wide problem that is going to keep circling the globe until someone step up and find a way to correct this slide. Hopefully, it will be the United States but beware of Russia and China. They are ready to step up. Are we?
  • possiblefuture · 10 months ago
    I'm a small business owner and I don't know any small businesses whose purpose is to create jobs. If we didn't need employees to make a profit, we wouldn't hire them. Employees make a contract with us to provide services we need for an agreed-upon fee. Most small business owners are not rich and raising taxes on people with taxable incomes over $250,000 will not come close to touching 90% of small business owners (up to $6.5 million in gross revenue according to SBA). People who live from paycheck to paycheck are the ones who will be immediately spending money from a tax cut, not saving it like rich people would do.
  • coolbeans · 10 months ago
    I reckon I fall into that ole rich category. 'cept I've had to take a substantial cut in pay (no profits) 40%. Now I know you will not feel sorry for me - neither I, you but the fact is what's good for the goose is good gander (I personally haven't had a paycheck in 7 months) I believe tax breaks for businesses get more bang for the buck. Case in point: consider that a business works on a margin of say 20% (that's pretty funny but everyone seems to think businesses are raking in dough). If you sell your product or service for a dollar, then you receive 20 cents to spend as you wish. If however you save a dollar on expenses, then you have the whole dollar saved to spend as you wish. What I see in the business world is that we're desperate to grow, buy new equipment, hire new employees but WE DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO DO THAT!

    I also agree that individuals should get a tax break (no matter what they make - there's that all men created equal sort of thing. Chances are that the guys/gals earning over $250k are working many more hours and taking many more risk.

    Spend money on tangible needs but don't waste it on items that should be addressed in regular budgets - and please don't crush us with this debt!!!!
  • bluetxdem · 10 months ago
    We had tax cuts for 8 years and it didn't do jack sh*t. Tax cuts don't do anything for business when you don't have consumers with enough freaking money to buy any of the products!!!
  • MyVoice · 10 months ago
    I think we should return to the tax code of Ronald Reagan- their favorite Prez. coolbeans says he/she has not received a paycheck in 7 months hmmmm then why are tax cuts going to help his/her bottom line? You are taxed on profits not losses. Businesses try to make the best profit from the least amount of employees- plain and simple.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    The purpose of any business should be to create profits. However, in the process they create jobs. Allow a small business owner (posibly like yourself) to keep more of his/her money, chances are he'she will try to expand the business therefore creating more jobs. Take more money from a business owner, they will either raise prices, or cut spending, both of which are bad for the economy.
  • CognitoErgoSum · 10 months ago
    Do you know what "pork" is? "Pork," also known as earmarks are simply money that members of Congress request for their districts for projects whose funding hadn't been requested by any federal agency. That's all it is. Some of it is for stupid stuff that doesn't generate a lot of economic activity, but much of the funds provide valuable, living-wage jobs for the those who work on the projects. In turn those wages are spent and the economy hums along. Money only value when it's circulated by consumers and a rising tide lifts all boats FROM THE BOTTOM.
  • mwestorca · 10 months ago
    The "contraception" aid in the stimulus bill was meant to send money to states to help them pay for health care (contraception was a small part of the whole plan) so that states didn't have to raise state taxes to avoid cutting health care, offsetting the federal tax cuts. So it does benefit everyone - it's not pork. It's good sense. And anyone who would like to see fewer abortions and spread of disease should welcome availability of contraception.
  • Rita Townsend · 10 months ago
    You say that Planned Parenthood doesn't benefit you, but it does. It benefits everyone. There are so many babies born from young uneducated mothers in which the fathers are not involved and pay no support. These mothers end up on welfare and pregnant again. The babies grow up with little hope of becoming successful adults. So what does this mean? We spend more money on welfare providing food for these people. Eventually we end up spending tax dollors to house them in the jail cells that become their homes. All of this can be prevented if affordable contraceptives and counceling are provided for young (and all) people. Spending money for this could prevent so many unwanted pregnancies and abortions. People who think that this is not important amaze me. Until all who are against this are willing to take in every unwanted child and care for them financially, we have no other choice than to support Planned Parenthood's help. Think about it and look at the big picture!!!! Go to the mall and look around... you will see so many young teenagers luging around a small infant or child. It can be prevented if only people would wise up and open their eyes to reality. It will save money in the long run.
  • anne owens · 10 months ago
    THis is really sad. I am ashamed and pitying of those people who are so out of touch with the needs of ordinary Americans.
  • matt · 10 months ago
    You can lead or follow not both, these people are asked to lead. Should the republican members decide to lead with there democratic members, our Senate could once again start to lead the rest of the countries in the world.
  • kazport · 10 months ago
    They should be elated. We finally said No means No. I highly doubt that if any american who has a shread of knowledge read this stimulus they would vote for it. Its not an anti-obama vote. Its more like a no spending needed vote.
    Nancy Pelosi will have to restuff the turkey and take some ornaments off the tree if they want a bi-partisan bill passed
  • alvin · 10 months ago
    That's not the sense I'm getting about their response. A legitimate No would have to explain why Keynesian economics don't work and show how the massive tax cuts in 2001 have made us better off. Until then, they are not joining the conversation but playing an obstructionist role. The country cannot afford that right now.
  • Gary · 10 months ago
    1. Will any of the trillions bring back the manufacturing jobs? The jobs that Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton allowed to be sent away.

    2. How can any one in their right conscience put onto the backs of future Americans, that are not even born yet, the cost of fixing the screw-ups of others?
  • Jay Johnson · 10 months ago
    Gary, as to point #2: Are you referring to the years that Republicans ran two branches of government and took a Clinton surplus and turned it into a multi-billion dollar deficit?
  • labman57 · 10 months ago
    I can see all of the GOP members of the House now--cloistered in a room together, giggling and snickering with perverse glee and placing an offering of double cheeseburgers at the foot of a life-sized poster of Rush Limbaugh.
  • TJ · 10 months ago
    And what can we expect, anything different? No. They have gone from dysfunction to nonfunction. I say to the Dems, just forge ahead, push through whatever it takes to save this country and her people, and leave them in the dust. Have courage.
  • jbrig · 10 months ago
    They lost theire collective mind

    http://www.ucubd.com/Index.aspx?id=1072&cid=d01...
  • Dan · 10 months ago
    Republicans used to have more statesmanship; more professionalism. They also used to be about fiscal conservativism. Future Republican Presidents will find it difficult beating W's deficit spending, the record high having been held by Ronald Reagan. After the last 8 years, they suddenly care about spending too much?! And it's a cause for celebration to have solidarity in partisanship, hailing a radical right-voice ENTERTAINER as their leader?! I can't remember the name of the author, but in 2003 he put forth the idea that the Republicans were trying to spend so much money that the government would no longer be able to fund exisitng programs(i.e. New Deal programs, entitlements, etc.), and would end them. The more time, and events like these, that pass, I 've had to keep wondering if the Republican Party actually wanted/wants this financial meltdown. Not saying this is the case, simply that I've not been able to dispell this possibility.
  • ROB · 10 months ago
    Keep it up, Republicans. After the next mid-terms (2010), the Dems will have a 200 vote majority in the House and a filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate.

    Gotta love how these moronic Republicans keep shooting themselves in the feet and propelling themselves ever closer to political obilivion and marginalization.

    Republicans - the entire Congressional delegation of them don't have the collective IQ of a sack of rocks.

    In a decade from now, there'll be more registered Green Party members in the U.S. than registered Republicans. AND WON'T THAT BE A GLORIOUS DAY FOR AMERICA!
  • Ignatz Farquad · 10 months ago
    Haven't you figured it out by now: REPUBLICANS ARE SCUM.
  • Eileen Hawk · 10 months ago
    They can just go on down to willie Wanka's chocolate factory while I hit the streets and look for a job.
  • mally · 10 months ago
    i fear that all of that tanning has fried boener's brain..mally
  • GoForIt · 10 months ago
    This is a basic economics formula accepted by most economists. $1.00 in infrastructure/job creation equals $1.50 in stimulus for the economy. $1.00 in tax cuts equals $0.75 in stimulus for the economy.

    Look at history and the tax cuts during the Great Depression did virtually nothing. Government spending is what got us out of that mess but it took time.
  • CDS · 10 months ago
    WW11 is what got us out of the great depression. FDR's spending on the New Deal did almost nothing. It took a war.
  • Rick · 10 months ago
    BUT we have been fighting TWO WARS, since BUSH got into office and bush getting EVERYTHING he asked for to fight the war, WHY then do we have the largest defiCITt ever, and the WORST recession-depression since HOOVER?
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    Iraq and Afghanistan are small battles compared to WW11. The entire country was united behind our effort in WW11. Every citizen of the USA suffered tremendously during the war effort. It is common knowledge that the effort expanded on the part of the poeple of the USA is what brought us out of the depression.
  • Rick · 9 months ago
    Yes,
    Spending in general, be it on spending for roads and bridges or for Tanks and bullets,
    it is spending non-the less, NOT TAXCUT. It was also asking people to sacrifice, The military produced arms almost at cost, thereby stretching what dollar can buy, and also PROSECUTING WAR PROFITEERING!.
    What you have today is wasting the dollar with NO BID CONTRACTS, Military industrial complex is ripping off the Govt. Instead of war Tax, he gave TAX CUT that went mostly to RICH.
  • sebert · 10 months ago
    How about secession next? "South's Gonna Do It Again"
  • Ed · 10 months ago
    Basically, they're probably going to be on the wrong side of history, and they're celebrating how awesome it will be to kill their party for 40 years?
  • MyVoice · 10 months ago
    @CDS- Hmmmmm- deficit spending had nothing to do with getting us out of the depression. Seems only the war did that in your view. Funny how it was deficit spending that financed that war and created jobs. If war was the only way out of the depression then we should be doing wonderful with 2 wars right now.
  • CDS2 · 10 months ago
    The USA citizen brought us out of the great depression with their efforts and united front in WW11. The difference today is that the people want the government to bring us out of this recession. A totally different mind set. And, deficit spending did not get us out of the depression, and massive government spending now will not get us out of this recession. It will take sacrifice on all of our parts. Sacrifice that I don't think most people are willing to make.
  • MyVoice · 10 months ago
    What paid for the ships, planes, tanks, and ammunition, let alone the paychecks of American soldiers for the war? Did the US government have all that extra cash to pay for this? No, it relied on deficit spending paid for later with the taxes from the jobs created.
  • Carol · 10 months ago
    How pathetic.
  • Frank King · 10 months ago
    The Bush administration and his cronies in and out of congress left us with bank failures, mortgage foreclosures, high unemployment, galactic federal debt, budget deficits, a phony war leading us to bankruptcy and a sorely divided nation. The republicans still have the gall, arrogance and defunct ideology that have caused their 2nd serious economic depression want to dictate the terms of a recovery. If ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.
  • Ron1951 · 10 months ago
    I'll bet that their constituents sitting in cold homes with no power are just so pleased that their representatives voted against the infrastructure improvements that would prevent this from happening again.
  • Barbara · 10 months ago
    Pleased because they are behaving like little kids?
  • Trina · 10 months ago
    The Republicans are like a group of high school girls, --acting out against the new girl after she was elected homecoming queen.
  • RGH47 · 9 months ago
    Here's a letter I sent to the House Republican "leadership"

    Dear Dishonorable Representatives:

    “You’re either with us or you’re against us.” Isn’t that what your president said when he was talking about fighting against terror? Apparently, in the war against the largest financial crisis since the Great Depression (and perhaps in our country’s history) all 178 Republican members of the House are against us. At least the terrorists that struck this country on 9/11 admitted they are out to destroy America. The Republican members of the House are worse than the 9/11 terrorists in that you cover yourselves in the American flag and then vote against the interests of the country.

    You are cowards, have no interest in finding common solutions to problems and still believe in the failed policies of the last eight years. History will surely judge President George W. Bush to be the worst President this country has ever had. History will also surely judge that the Republican members of the 111th Congress have demonstrated the only thing you are interested in is pandering to your base, which seems to consist of Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh.

    YOU LOST THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND GOT YOUR BUTTS KICKED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE COUNTRY IN NOVEMBER OF 2008!

    Are you this stupid? President Obama, unlike his predecessor actually asked for your input and support when he really didn’t have to. In case you still don’t get it, you do not have a majority in the House or Senate. You have demonstrated your willingness to give tax cuts to the rich and let the average working person to figure it our on our own; you have lied to the American public on such issues as torture, the war, the original “bailout” to the banks and Wall Street; and have total and complete disregard for anything that does not pander to the every shrinking “base” of right wing lunatics that you rely upon to be re-elected
    I find you people disgusting, your actions reprehensible and can only hope that in 2010, after President Obama’s economic policies have shown that they, in fact, are working, the people of your districts will vote all of you out of office. I hate your divisiveness, your complete and total disregard for anyone that does not march in lock step to your failed policies and your continued efforts to divide this nation. You are completely shameless and traitors.

    If I thought for a moment that the reason all of you voted against President Obama’s stimulus package was based on some rational thought process, or that President Obama completely ignored items you wanted in the package, I could understand the vote. However, your vote was based purely on politics, your own self-interests and you don’t give a damn about this country. I would like to point out that tax cuts are not the only solution to this problem. After eight years of supporting record deficit spending on the part of President Bush, all of you are now all up in arms about trying to do anything other than tax cuts because “our children are going to have to pay for it”. This is disingenuous and demonstrates, once again, your complete failure to lead in a time of crisis.

    In particular, you Mr. Boehner, are egotistical (for no apparent reason), self-centered and have the leadership abilities of a crow bar. I wrote you last week in an effort to convey my hope that you would be a true leader and I thanked you for your service to this country. I was wrong – you are a disservice to this country.

    I realize that none of you care about what I think and probably won’t even see this letter – I don’t care. Having written it and expressed my thoughts to you, I am a significantly better person than any you, because I take the time to let you know how I feel and none of you will have the guts to respond.

    With complete and utter repugnance,
  • welfare · 9 months ago
    It wouldn't be so bad if they just called it what it is, which is "welfare". I don't know how $198 million for Fillipino WWII vets stimulates the economy.