DISQUS

AMERICAblog: HRC pens letter to Obama over hate brief

  • met00 · 7 months ago
    I am not a constitutional lawyer, nor do I play one on the net. My father was, having appeared before the SCOTUS. IT was at his knee that I learned the key phrase of what he felt constitutional law was. "If you were on the other side, would you feel it is fair?" Not the biblical "do unto others", but a simple statement that fairness was a willingness to be on either side. That the Constitution was about the government keeping playing fields level so that each person had an equal chance to shine and make the most of themselves in our society with one caveat, that they couldn't hurt others or stop them from having that same chance.

    DADT, DOMA, EDNA are all about taking sides. Giving one side advantage over another for behavior that does NOT hurt others.

    As a hetrosexual man with a wife and two wonderful children I see no threat to me or my family by having a neighbor who has decided to live with, marry (or not), and raise a family with a same-gender spouse. This does not threaten my marriage or cause my relationship to have pain. It does not change my sexual preference. It does not do anything to me.

    It's really simple. If I *was* gay would I feel that I am being treated the same way as someone who is "straight"? As long as that answer is "no" then the law is wrong. Like the cop on the street who can watch a person doing 50 in a 45MPH zone, there is a choice on whether to act on the "law" or not to. When the law is a bad law, it is unfair, and the "cop" knows that it is unfair, then they make a judgment call to not enforce the law. In the DADT and DOMA cases the "cop" is Obama. He can choose to take action against bad law by not enforcing or supporting it and asking the legislature to change it while he doesn't enforce it. Or he can enforce bad law.

    Obama has made his choice to enforce bad law. That was HIS choice, and the answer to that is that this constituency should stop supporting him since it is clear that he does not believe that the homosexual community has the same rights as the rest of the taxpaying Americans. Separate, and unequal.

    You (John and others) showed that you can affect change when you shut Dr. Laura down. It is time that the homosexual community let all politicians know that actions speak louder than words. Stop giving money. Stop giving support. Stop coddling them. Hurt them where they live. Find out who is donating money and stop buying their products. Make the politicians feel it in their pocketbooks, the only place that they notice pain. Start looking for electable people that support your agenda of equality. Invite them to speak at your functions. Start funding their campaigns. If this community makes it a big enough issue, causes the current politicians financial pain, and starts grooming their own politicians, then it will be clear that you intend to not only "have a voice", but that stopping you from having one is going to ruin a political career.

    That's how you make the point, not with letters *asking* the President to go to Congress, but demanding that the leadership either do "the right thing" or pay the price.
  • Jay Goldman · 7 months ago
    Beautifully stated. I'm a married heterosexual w/ 2 kids and could not agree more. The cynical republicans continue to use homophobic hatred and fear mongering as a divisive political strategy. Unfortunately, our current president seems to be too concerned with bipartisan consensus to fight for the rights of all Americans. Sorry to say that it looks like the same outcome with health care. He's either too concerned with being reelcted (liked) or not tough enough.
  • cowboyneok · 7 months ago
    Or worse, Obama and some of his advisors have some kind of deep seated fear of others perceiving something they are self conscious about because of their support for us. When someone gay bashes me figuratively or literally, the first thing I do is question their personal motivations. So many times I see they are simply projecting their internalized homophobia. I always bring up my brother as a good example of what happens when you deal with someone totally comfortable with being straight. He could give a rat's ass about gay rights. He just wants everyone to be happy. He doesn't play games with it. Some guy pinches him on the ass at a gay bar, and he laughs and laughs and says, "Damn! WHY can't that happen more in a straight bar? Sorry, buddy, don't swing that way but, gee, thanks for the compliment." Then remarks, "That was funny..." Maybe someone in the White House is fearful if they are too supportive of gay rights someone might make fun of his being a ballet dancer? (and YOU know what THAT means...)

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qnkkIdVB4mw/SUJmG8Rj4...
  • met00 · 7 months ago
    Being comfortable in your own skin is the first thing that one must have in order to be comfortable around others who are different.

    At one point in my life I was friends with a Very fine young lady. She was a bartender and happened to tend bar at a club in LA (West Hollywood) called Peanuts. Most of the time Peanuts was a "lesbian dance club" and it should be noted that my friend was a lesbian. She also was my regular date to the Mark Tapper Forum (where I was a season subscriber) because she loved live theater as much as I.

    One night when she was "stuck for a bar back" she asked me to come down and help. I did, because my friend asked me to. And while I found it terribly frustrating to be there looking at beautiful women who had absolutely no interest in me (I was young and as all young men are, was always "looking") I did actually enjoy helping her out. Over the next two or three years I continued to be on call and at no time did I ever feel my "sexuality" was under threat. Not even on Mondays when it was "tranny night".

    People who are comfortable in their own skin, no matter what that skin is, don't feel a need to be judgmental on others.

    And like your brother, when I was working Monday and one of the transexuals made a pass at me, I was always complemented. I thanked them, explained that I didn't swing that way, and moved on. In a humerous aside, I did become friends with a few of the "regulars" and kept in touch over the years. Then six years ago when I was at Ceders having a stent placed in my chest I was in the recovery area when one of the old regulars, who was a nurse at CS, showed up and gave me a beautiful orchard (after not having seen me in over 15 years). My wife, who was in the room at the time and didn't know "everything" about my checkered past, thought the whole episode was fantastic. As she stated, after 15 years of being out of touch, people still remember those that treat them with respect.

    And, back on topic, Obama and his White House are not treating the homosexuals in this country with respect. The wa to answer that is not "letters", but action. Positive action to replace an unresponsive government with a responsive one. As I said before. Hit them in the packetbooks, where it hurts the most.
  • cowboyneok · 7 months ago
    Wow, thanks for sharing your life experiences with the LGBT community with me! Also, thanks for being such a good brother to us...
  • Dude in Iowa · 7 months ago
    If you pay attention to the news Pres. Obamam is breaking his word to everyone, nit just gays. He is backing down from Big Energy and Big Health Ins companies. The old addage "There is but 1 party- the money party" is correct. Once in awhile they just change wether it is a demo or repug that represents big money. I'm voting Mickey mouse for every office from here on out.
  • Õ¿Õ · 7 months ago
    He's a profit progressive.
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    "The question is, Mr. President—do you believe that it’s good enough for us?"


    ... no offense, but are they blind as well as stupid? The answer has been a resounding NO.

    Stop waffling, stop asking.

    Start shoving, and start DEMANDING.

    Put their backs up against a fucking wall.

    NOW.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 7 months ago
    nevertheless, this is highly significant coming from Joe Solmonese, the professional "nice gay".
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    Yeah, it's about as threatening as a chihuahua nipping at your heels.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    I'm afraid of chihuahuas. They're a lot meaner than Solomonese.
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    We'll they're certainly more aggressive and irritating.
  • JustAGuy · 7 months ago
    Thank You!

    What are they waiting for? A shot-gun to the face from the Vice President?

    This is supposed to be Pride month... I wish the gay people with access to the Administration would show a little and grow a pair.

    -S
  • Seansmith · 7 months ago
    This is decent but far from enough. I want to see The HRC as Pitbulls yet this letter still reads like a hurt Cocker Spaniel. I'm sorry but this is still way too tame for the beaten that we've taken from this administration. This isn't enough.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    Oh, no. They are as mad as hornets. They just announced that unless something changes and changes quickly, they will not join in the carol sing at Joe Biden's holiday cocktail party. They will move their mouths, but they refuse to sing.
  • mamazboy · 7 months ago
    Props to you, nicho!
  • expedito · 7 months ago
    Wasn't Joe Solomonese recently at a White House meeting with Obama's gay underlings? And didn't he come away pleased at the administration's plan that was too secret for us ordinary gays - suitable to be known only by the Illuminati Gay Elite?

    Come on, Joe! Give us in the Gay Ordinaire community a clue . . . just a small hint. Is this part of the plan that you're so pleased about?
  • RickInSF · 7 months ago
    So, Mr. Joe Solomonese, you're unhappy... But you got to go to all those great secret White House meetings! I'll bet you got some great autographs! How about a secret society decorder ring?

    Now I'll bet you want to have another $30,000-a-Table Recognition Dinner to raise even more MONEY. OOOO...Brad Pitt likes you!

    Joe, I cannot afford your dinners, and I can't play in your "lifstyle". I am a simple Homo Man, living a quiet life. I do not Pay-For-Play to get treated like a human being.

    No more money for the HRC and other ilk, and none for the Democratic Party. But it has always been curious how all of you "players" are able to find me when you want money because you think I will pay to be 'Just-Like-You"!

    How'se it feel now Joe? You're doing a heck-ofa-Job!
  • dcmsufan · 7 months ago
    I agree. I wonder if anybody else gave HRC and the Dems grief at Pride yesterday like I did. All of these groups need to get moving and create action.

    I bet he only wrote the letter because donations were down.
  • Mel · 7 months ago
    Wait! No one gave me a secret decoder ring! Completely unfair.

    Seriously, the main groups are more concerned with access and playing with the big boys than actually getting things done.
  • Mary Morrison · 7 months ago
    Although I am encouraged by Mr. Solomone's letter, but I realize that it might be ignored. What is less likely, is that millions and millions of letters and e-mails to the principals involved would be ignorable. I've started sending my letters today, and will continue to do so. We should go farther than HRC, in my opinion, and demand that the brief in support of DOMA be pulled down. There's no legal reason why that can't be done.
  • rickwla · 7 months ago
    I just sent this to HRC, it was before seeing their letter, but my email to HRC still stands. We need a call to action at all levels.
    -------
    Dear HRC,
    About a year ago I quit my HRC involvement because HRC threw the transgender community under the bus with the respect to the ENDA bill in the last Congress. HRC wanted to play nice in the hopes that we would get rights step-by-step.

    As you have now seen with the Obama administration, where has this play nice gotten us? Exactly nowhere and worse. The DOJ's filing in the DOMA case should be the last straw for the LGBT community. It was unforgivable. HRC needs to take decisive action and rally all grass roots groups and the leadership of Congress to fight.

    Partner with progressive blogs such as Americablog, who broke this story, Pam's House Blend, DailyKos, Huffington Post, Towleroad, Courage Campaign, MyDD, Calictics and others for a national call to action. We must not put up with any more delays.

    The DOJ needs to retract that brief or it will set back gay rights for years to come as religious groups and other courts will use it to decide future cases.

    Below is a letter that I sent to the president so you can see the level of outrage that we have over this. I have also forwarded this letter to my congresswoman and senators.
    ---------
    Dear Mr. President,
    I have been following closely your administration's plan for full civil rights for the countless LGBT Americans that supported your campaign with time, energy, and lots of money.

    I am completely offended by your lack of any action or concrete steps to advance the many promises that you made to us during your campaign. I kept hoping that sometime in June, gay pride month, we would finally see some action.

    The Department of Justice's brief filed in the DOMA case on 6/12/09 was the most insulting and demeaning work I have seen in a long time. It was a complete betrayal of the gay community. It was homophobic in the extreme and something I would have expected of the previous administration.

    The LGBT community is up in arms about the contents of that brief and the very need for DOJ to be defending DOMA. We are not stupid. We know that you had a choice in defending this odious law given that many constitutional scholars, including Laurence Tribe, believe at least some sections of DOMA are clearly unconstitutional.

    You took our money, time, and votes and made what are now clearly empty promises. The few statements that we have heard from your administration since the brief was filed have only made things worse since the claims are disingenuous in the extreme. The damage this has done to your relationship with this highly political community is great.

    It has been made worse having happened during gay pride month and on the anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, a court decision that made the marriage of your parents legal across the country.

    We expect leadership from you and your administration. We do not expect bland statements that any progress on our issues is strictly up to Congress or that you must defend all laws, even though we know that DOJ has already decided to not defend other laws since you took office. (e.g., marijuana laws in states that have legalized its medical use).

    We expect to see you take concrete steps this year regarding DOMA, ENDA, and DADT. We will not accept more promises. We will not keep silent any longer. We will not support your administration if you do not take steps to correct the damage that has already been done to the LGBT community.

    You are the leader of the Democratic party and you need to lead on all Democratic policies, especially those related to civil rights given your historic presidency.

    We need to see you address directly the issues that the gay community supports. The DOMA brief needs to be withdrawn. If you do not directly address this whole mess soon, there may be no hope of ever regaining our support. We will support progressive candidates at the local, state, and national level rather than Democrats.
  • FFups · 7 months ago
    Before trashing the HRC too much can we please acknowledge that they did the right thing - at least this one time! :)
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    That's like giving someone an award for showing up at work on time.
  • Õ¿Õ · 7 months ago
    Nah. Something has got to be done.
  • SFNative · 7 months ago
    This is all one giant chess game, and the last few months have all led us to this letter, which is the end of the road we've been traveling on for quite a while. If Obama responds unfavorably, then we know beyond a reasonable doubt that much stronger action should be taken (stop giving to the democratic party, get certain reps voted out of office, etc.). Taking this move before reaching the beyond a reasonable doubt may prove to be very risky for a well-established agency. Sometimes things appear to move slow, but as evidenced by this letter, they have indeed been moving and got to the end of the road.
  • SCLiberal · 7 months ago
    "...what comes next if Obama blows us off?"

    Stay home next election. It will be obvious by then he is content to allow a group of citizens to be treated as 2nd class citizens. That is not acceptable.
  • AlienNationRefugee · 7 months ago
    I have already canceled my recurring monthly contributions. Obviously the sociopathic Republicans represent a greater threat but the Democrats are insane if they think I'm going to contribute to the persecution of homosexuals.
  • MPetrelis · 7 months ago
    what will it take for the HRC leaders to stage a picket at DOJ? i'm beginning to think HRC leaders and staff are afraid of getting gum on their gucci loafers.

    out of the suites. into the streets.

    please:
    http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2009/06/hrc-ngltf...
  • DaveinNorthridge · 7 months ago
    I'm in general agreement with all of the comments. It's a decent start, but I don't know that we'll be able to evaluate it until we see the response, and more important the response to the response. I HOPE the folks in New York and San Francisco are getting their parades ready to constitute a form of protest.

    And yes, serge. NOW!
  • ricardotoronto · 7 months ago
    Said it before, say it again.
    Now that your country's highest office has bluntly laid forth what they think of you, you should all consider moving here to Canada. Same language and almost the same culture. Universal health care is an ingrained right and gay marriage with all the tax and right benefits is law across the land and nobody gives a damn.
  • sobmaz · 7 months ago
    Obama has been so typical so far, in every regard.

    Gay rights aside, why does he need Republican approval for health care reform?

    Democrats have the votes, the American people want it, SHOVE IT DOWN THEIR THROATS!

    It is becoming increasingly clear Obama is more worried about the next election than the United States of America.

    I voted for the guy, was so excited but am really disenchanted.
  • jimstoic · 7 months ago
    Yes, what will we do if we're ignored or placated? The Democrats know most of us don't have anywhere else to turn, politically. Withholding money is a good place to start, but most of us would rather have a Democrat in office than a Republican, even if they both treat us like crap.
  • RickInSF · 7 months ago
    You are applying the Abused Spouse Defense, i.e.: "I know he hit me (many times), but he is ALL I have..."

    Don't be a VICTIM! Stand UP! Say you are not going to be treated this way any longer!
  • MosesZD · 7 months ago
    I told you. I told you he was a spineless jellyfish and that his record, despite the lies of the True Believers" would bear me out. Your response was mocking and derision, along with the rest of the Obama-bots.

    Well, we've seen your change. Capitulating to the right-wing on all kinds of asinine "national security" and "war on terror" bullshit. And a shiv stuck in the back of the GLBT community.

    I'm just waiting for Sotomayor to be true to her Catholic roots are repeal Roe...
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    Wait, what was your choice again?
  • Õ¿Õ · 7 months ago
    Uh, we're angry out here. Enough is ENOUGH. Get rid of DOMA and DADT NOW!
  • Glenn I · 7 months ago
    I no longer believe.

    I wanted to. But I've long been suspicious of words. It's actions that provide meaning. Obama's actions provide the meaning - he does not care about gay people.
  • Roger Evans · 7 months ago
    He doesn't have to "care." He simply needs to keep his promises and stand up for equal justice under the law.
  • serge · 7 months ago
    @gridlock...I think I have to agree with you. When do we want it...? NOW!

    I can live with a statement that makes it clear that we're going to do these *other* things first, but that our commitment to this particular cause is strong and unwavering. But that ain't what seems to be happening.

    I have hope, though. Imagine if it was John McCain...
  • Trev · 7 months ago
    In its annual report, HRC claims to be supported by "hundreds of thousands" of contributors. But in this letter they claim to be representing "millions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people across this country."

    Who the hell are they talking about?

    I do not support HRC and I sincerely hope they are not including me in that "millions." If they are, they are misrepresenting their power and influence to my government.

    Does anybody know exactly who HRC thinks they're representing when they use these numbers? And are they legally allowed to speak on behalf of anyone besides their members.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 7 months ago
    Markos immediately linked to the this thread in his midday open thread. I am reading the comments over there too. I've been pretty disappointed with that community altho markos has been great.
  • Õ¿Õ · 7 months ago
    The hetero "progressives" don't care about us. Only like in a way to feel self-righteous and good about themselves. I learned that the hard way. We've got this far by ourselves.
  • SueinNM · 7 months ago
    That's bull. I'm a hetero woman married 23 years, and I have supported gay rights with my pocketbook. You have more right to speak for all "heteros" than I do for all gays.

    I, for one, am appalled with Obama, and I supported him and worked for his campaign. Women have also experienced discrimination. Do you think I can't have empathy for you just because I'm not just like you? do you really want to turn on you straight allies, people who really believe that gays should have just as much right to marry as straights?

    You're saying, in essence, that it's impossible for straights to be sincere in our beliefs, that we only want to feel "self-righteous." To hell with you and everyone like you.
  • mirth · 7 months ago
    You are very wrong, Õ¿Õ, on all points of your comment.
  • Dan T. · 7 months ago
    Many of them care. But many don't understand the real, visceral impact this has on our lives.

    Our job is to teach them why this can't wait.
  • Valentinefrey · 7 months ago
    Even in a siege, siege mentality doesn't do anyone any good. No, you don't have to be gay to be furious about this. Do you think that straights don't care about their gay friends and family members? Do you think that straights don't grasp the idea that a government that doesn't care about one group's civil rights may not care about theirs? Do you think that straights don't realize what this whole episode indicates about the cynicism of this administration?
  • Skott · 7 months ago
    As a "homo", do you not care about anyone else? I understand the frustration and the call to action, but to cast all "heteros" in that light is simply anger speaking. It is counter-productive. I thank all of my straight family and friends who have supported my quest for equal rights. Without them the struggle would be twice as difficult and much more lonely.
  • kugelschreiber · 7 months ago
    Well done.
  • i420 · 7 months ago
    Still much ado about nothing. I mean really...considering that many people lump incest into the same bucket of interpreted deviant behavior as they do homosexuals...why aren't homosexuals laughing at the super slight comparison while also rallying around that consenting individuals, whether related or not, should be free to have meaningful and or lawfully wedded relationships all they flipping want to?

    And really x2...until the homosexual lifestyle becomes a unlawful act, as is the 420 lifestyle...ya just don't have anything to harp on about!
  • Seansmith · 7 months ago
    I was going to explain the difference between weed being illegal for everyone is equal, and how marriage/civilian employment/military employment/hate crime laws aren't , but I won't.

    I do believe you're just too high to understand any of it.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 7 months ago
    huh? can we get a troll that can string a couple of coherent thoughts together please?
  • Klad InVermont · 7 months ago
    Guess you never heard of sodomy laws, huh? Put the bong down for a second & read this before saying anything else:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law#United_...
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    I'm sorry, the 420 lifestyle?

    Talk about a choice.

    Homosexuality isn't a lifestyle: it's an orientation. It's not a choice.

    Put down the weed, pick up a book.
  • PeteWa · 7 months ago
    It's people like you that makes everyone think weed makes you stupid.
  • Indigo · 7 months ago
    What does Pam mean "What if Obama blows us off? " He already has.
  • John Aravosis · 7 months ago
    Blows off the letter.
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    He does so at his own peril. That would definitely close the deal, and he would lose his gay and lesbian base support. I'm sure we would drag along many of our straight friends as well. He can sit by watching all of us leave in droves or he can get up and start repairing the damage his unthoughtful choice has caused.
  • Roger Evans · 7 months ago
    Really? Did Clinton lose gay support when he signed those laws in the first place?
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    It's called "fool me once . . ." Some left him but I would guess most held out hope. Those days are over, we are wiser and we will not put up with it this time around. I don't remember even this much talk when DOMA first was signed into law in the gay community as with what happened this past Friday. Obama, vocally, was much more committed to our rights and promised us he would eliminate DADT at least. Bill Clinton, considering the times, wasn't even in favor of civil marriages since it wasn't really thought of being achieved. Times have changed and Obama committed to do these things for our support and vote. Providing a brief this homophobic went well over the line and "we" won't forget it.
  • Dee · 7 months ago
    I'm basically sick and tired of hearing from these people. With all of the serious and pressing issues facing this country, I think it is EXTREMELY selfish for one group of people to think that their particular issue should be priority number one.

    This man has been in office for all of SIX months and is dealing with 2 wars, North Korea threatening nukes, Iran, Pakistan, unemployment off the charts, economy in the toilet, housing crisis, corporations going bankrupt, piracy, healthcare, education, etc. and our little GLBT family is whinning because their particular issue has not yet been put on the front burner.

    As an African-American, believe me when I say that we have a WHOLE LOT of issues and concerns that we would like for the very first Black president to deal with; but we have enough common sense to know that the health and well-being of our country as a whole comes before our own personal issues.

    How about thinking about your country first and yourself second?
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    Perhaps you need a drink from the "colored only" fountain to clear your head before you climb into the back of the bus on your way to the cotton fields?

    You have your rights. We still don't have ours.

    Don't tell us what to feel, think, or say.

    Besides.. we've been putting country first ever since it was formed. We've been told to sit down, shut up, and wait by people like you ever since.

    If you want to wait, there's a bench in the colored section of the restaurant. Maybe we'll swing by and pick you up on the way back from winning.

    Then again, maybe not. Maybe you can just rot there. Oh wait, none of the things I mentioned exist any more because smarter people than you DID NOT WAIT.

    They took what was rightfully theirs, helped by the very people you condemn now.

    Learn your f*cking history.
  • Seansmith · 7 months ago
    Hi Dee, I'm also African-American. And here is what I replied to someone using the "shut up and wait (more)" defense you used here.

    This President has been multitasking from day one and still is while I'm typing this. Nobody's asking him to hand us the world in a day, all we're asking for is action. Especially action that doesn't demean and dismiss our very lives.

    If he were handling every other problem under the American sun but was still, at the very least, advocating for our rights, genuinely congratulating us on our biggest state-by-state victories in history, telling us he hasn't forgotten about us, not inviting homophobic pastors to historic days in all of our lives, not comparing us to child rapist, and being that 'fierce advocate' he so ferociously proclaims to be, maybe then we'd be ok with focusing on every other problem the country faces, as if we don't already (remember, in addition to our civil rights struggle, we're ALSO Americans just like you).
  • SCLiberal · 7 months ago
    A lot of white people felt that way about blacks during the 60s.
  • antichrist · 7 months ago
    Obama is exposing a prejudice towards gays from the black community.
  • dula · 7 months ago
    Yes, I am astounded to learn how much homophobia is coming from Black people. The vast majority of Blacks I meet or read on blogs like HuffingtonPost think Gay Rights are completely different from the Civil Rights Movement. I've learned how small-minded many of them are. In fact I think many of them are getting off on the fact that they had the power to vote against another minority in California...makes them feel real big to do unto others what was done to them. "We had to wait years for our Rights, now we're gonna make damn sure you do too"...If they haven't learned the lessons of discrimination then homophobic Whites never will.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    Screw you. "These people" Yeah, that's not bigoted.

    Asking someone not to kick you in the nuts, as Obama did last week, is not "whining."

    Did I mention Screw You?
  • JohnInTexas · 7 months ago
    You have your rights as an African American, I don't as a gay American. Easy for you to say there's more to be concerned about. And let us not forget, Obama is as much white as he is black, as if either has piddle to do with anything. Civil rights was not just a "particular issue" when it was YOUR particular issue, right?
  • davidinchelseama · 7 months ago
    How about Obama, at the very least, having the decency to not compare our relationships to INCEST?
  • PeteWa · 7 months ago
    Your dismissive, ignorant post astounds me.

    By your own "logic" the civil rights act of 1964 should not have been passed.
  • Beazie · 7 months ago
    Dee,
    Did you read the letter? The examples in there are examples about real human beings. The scenario of long time couples being denied access to their seriously ill or even dying spouses is real and still happening. How can you tolerate that happening to your fellows? It is obscenely wrong. It can not continue. Obama didn't just ignore us as we continued to "whine" He dealt us a direct blow in direct contradiction to his promises. Selfish? Is that what you'd think if your spouse died on some gurney alone while you were barred from seeing them? This is whining? Gay people have spouses fighting in the military dying and risking lives too. He could have chosen differently on this one or at least delegated more wisely.
  • mollymac · 7 months ago
    Why is this such an issue with you? It's like a pissing contest for some reason. My issues are more important than yours! Please, get a reality check and then perhaps you will stop whining about the big disparity between what Blacks suffered and what Gays suffer. And by the way, Obama is half white.
  • BethanyAnne · 7 months ago
    I don't want to flame you Dee, but this is wrong. We've waited and been patient. That didn't work. There was always a reason that we couldn't get full rights "just yet". Really, I know there are other things on the Administration's plates, but that's why there are lots of people there. He had to answer that lawsuit somehow, and the way he did that wasn't what a friend would do.

    I get your frustration, but understand, we've waited. We've been nice. What that got us was being ignored. What many of us realize now is that there will always be some reason to wait. We can't afford to be "realistic" anymore. Congress is big. This administration is big. There's room for our needs, too.
  • Skott · 7 months ago
    Okay, everyone . . . time for us to shut up and take our concerns home. Dee has determined that her priorities are the only ones that should matter. She, alone, has set the agenda for the country. Case closed. Whew! Thank God we have her to set us straight. How dare we speak up for our civil rights. Uppity gay people.
  • JohnL · 7 months ago
    Your comments would make sense if it weren't for the fact that his DOJ actively fought this in court. If the President were too busy with other matters to deal with this, then the DOJ should have not filed ANY brief.
  • Jean-Baptiste Zeller · 7 months ago
    I wonder if the HRC is reacting only because lately they had their pants on fire. More as a token to the gay community to keep the fundraising while throwing a tissue at obama's window saying it'll raise his attention.

    Even wondering now if obama wasn't warned before hand "Look, our base is mad angry at us and if we don't do something they'll bail out on us, cutting -our- fundraising, so no hardship but I got to send you an angry 'brief'."
  • ndtovent · 7 months ago
    so they sent a letter. BFD
  • ndtovent · 7 months ago
    How about HRC and a couple of other large glbt groups actually suing the doj to get the incest referral and a few other derogatory points removed from that brief. A lawsuit might get their attention.
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    That would require doing something concrete. Doing concrete things messes up your gala hair.
  • Jean-Baptiste Zeller · 7 months ago
    Justice 101:
    In briefs you can put whatever bullshit you want in all imunity. If a brief is bad judges are free (and will) ignore it.
  • Gridlock · 7 months ago
    Is any of this being carried by the MSM at all?

    I don't see anything at Salon, nothing on the various talking head channels.. it's like a complete vacuum
  • john · 7 months ago
    Can you add spying, torture,, civil rights of detainees..

    Telling the justice depatment who and who cannot be investigated... in a number of different areas???
  • publicsteele · 7 months ago
    Phone and fax the White House. I've been told that calls and faxes get better attention than emails.

    Comments: 202-456-1111
    Switchboard: 202-456-1414
    FAX: 202-456-2461
  • cowboyneok · 7 months ago
    I just tried calling and they are closed right now... damn, gonna have to make the call tomorrow! I will, though.
  • So Left I'm Right · 7 months ago
    What is the threat, exactly? I think it's nice that HRC issued a somewhat strongly worded letter, but the problem with all of this is that there is no effective threat. Are we going to throw our lot in with the Republican scum who explicitly hate us and support this kind of legislation? No, of course not. A threat to stay home and close the checkbooks, as a collective (someone once referred to a gay "community"), with documentation of just how much gay money and votes these national level politicians depend on, might make a difference, but HRC saying send some legislation to the Hill or else...or else what? Not going to be effective unless backed up with more mass action.
  • dula · 7 months ago
    Yeah I'm completely done with Obama and the filthy Democratic Party. Green across the board for me and let the chips fall where they may. The LBGTs should not be the martyrs for the Democratic Party.
  • ScottLanter · 7 months ago
    HRC are supposedly the ones who negotiated all the 'deals' with Obama in the first place. Something is very suspicious that they are now criticizing Obama when they dropped the ball in the first place. Joe Solmonese has embarrassed the whole glbt community with such pitiful results for all the money they suck up.
  • Paul · 7 months ago
    The HRC is kind of like this letter: it's important that they exist, but what do they actually accomplish? I can't think of a single victory they've secured. They continue to be completely without teeth.
  • SFNative · 7 months ago
    HRC has actually done a lot of things that unfortunately goes unnoticed, but the stagnation of civil rights on a federal level doesn't make them look better for sure. I have a feeling that this HRC letter is a strong message to Obama that things may change soon depending on Obama's response. It was an adult and candid letter signifying an end of the road of sorts, and I have a small feeling that the LGBT civil rights movement is going to see some very interesting developments in the next few months.
  • Paul · 7 months ago
    Besides writing stern letters and posturing, I'd like to know what the HRC has actually done for the LGBT community. They lobby but nothing comes of it. Sure, they raise funds to help support individuals, but on a national level, they've been largely ineffective.

    I agree with other sentiments suggesting individuals need to make the effort to contact legislators instead of sitting on their laurels waiting for the HRC to swoop in with criticisms and "pressure."
  • thromulese · 7 months ago
    another day

    another obama campaign promise broken

    this is NOT the man i voted for.

    this is bush jr. light.
  • JeepTreats · 7 months ago
    Very lite because for all his one million faults, Bush pushed his agenda. Anyone see the Bill Maher clip on Obama?:

    http://tinyurl.com/ndtu4f

    By the way, I hate George Bush.
  • offspring · 7 months ago
    hrc is part of the problem they have no damn teeth, of course we are helping with the just wait attitude, and oh lets march hell screw marching we need to be in their face, we need to ask the republicans if they want us hell i have heard more positive crap about us from the repubs, I am a human being I have waited for many years, telling me that my worth has to wait or that it isnt the time for me to be treated equal in this country is sickening
  • erip · 7 months ago
    How about if we stop complaining about HRC. I am not a supporter but at least they made a statement. How about each of us, EVERYONE single one of us take the amount of time we take here to complain about HRC and Obama, and actually pick up the phone or write an email or fax to the democrats that represent us (or even a repuke if they represent us) and let them know that we are not happy with this and will not donate one single dime until they do something to keep the promises they made.
    As Wanda Sykes might say we got jacked by two minorities in the White House. We have a half white guy for a president and his closest ally is an orthodox jewish guy. Neither of them seem to care about our civil rights.. ironic isn't it? Maybe we need to start making some noise with them and not just here
  • mirth · 7 months ago
    Y'know, erip, if you did more than a drive by and stayed long enough to look through the threads, you would read the diverse and decisive actions many of us are taking right now, some of which you mention, as well as affirming an intent to withhold our $ in the future if this administration continues to fault on campaign promises.

    Which is not to suggest that the emotion and info sharing and action planning and resolve expressed on dynamic blogs lacks value.
  • erip · 7 months ago
    Dude, i am not going to get into personal attacks.. i am here way more than for a "drive by".. I am simply noting that we spend way too much time "eating our own", offering lots of criticism without sufficient action. Dynamic discussion is a great thing, but simply complaining does nothing. Many of the posts were just trashing HRC. While i am not necessarily a fan of theirs, i am simply stating that its time for our community to stop being nice and waiting patiently, and start taking action that is more constructive than simply trashing each other, which happens way too often.
  • mirth · 7 months ago
    That seemed to you like a personal attack? Why? Because I addressed my comment "personally" to you?

    LIMH
  • daydreamer · 7 months ago
    For all those who are angry with BHO for not advocating loud enough for the LGBTQ community are fast enough, did you vote for a 4 month term or 4 years? He still has 3 1/2 years to keep his promise. Give him a chance to do it. In the past election all the states that had gay marriage on the ballot, the citizens voted it down. Why is that? Is there as much support for gay marriage has the community is suggesting? I do not want the republicans to use this as a wedge issue and undermine all the other important things that need to be accomplished by this administration and we wind up getting nothing done.
  • shriekingviolet · 7 months ago
    I think you're completely missing the point. I see comments just like this every time parts of the progressive base get upset over something the Obama administration has done, and it always surprises me that they can't tell that people are upset to the level that they are not by what campaign promises haven't been fulfilled yet but what's being done on those issues while we're waiting. I'm sure there are people who are disappointed that appealing grossly discriminatory policies like DADT and DOMA aren't a higher priority for the administration. But if that was all, you wouldn't see even a quarter of the upset. It's what they are choosing to do in the meantime. The contents of the memo that HRC was addressing were hugely offensive and parts blatantly homophobic. It was an unnecessary response even if the Obama administration was right that they were legally obligated to defend DOMA in court (which they're not). In that brief, they basically undermined a lot of the argument the Obama administration would ever want to employ should they follow through on this particular campaign promise. How can Obama and his surrogates credibly go out and tell the country that DOMA unfairly discriminates against the LGBT community and their families, as well as does them undue harm if his own Justice department is telling the courts that that is not the case? How can he tell Congress and the Pentagon that DADT is an unreasonable and irrational policy that dismisses people on grounds that have no affect on their ability to serve their country or the state of the military at large if the Justice department writes opinions saying the opposite?

    And yes, anti-gay measures did pass all over the country this past election, but they passed in large part due to the sort of stunts the Obama administration is pulling now. Supposed LGBT allies in government let the right define the debate, framing the issue so that people are left with the impression that gay and lesbian Americans are so much different from them and are seeking special rights. Then the people who know that not to be true not only barely put up a fight when the debate goes on, they use the rights' language and arguments while governing to avoid taking a stand. So it's not just that people "aren't ready" for these reforms. The government, left, right and center, reinforces the most regressive part of the population and makes it worse.

    You can't tell people to just be patient and believe that things will happen by the end of the term if Obama & co. spend the meantime reinforcing the roadblocks to progress. That's unfair, and perhaps a tad naive.
  • jimstoic · 7 months ago
    Exactlly. It's not what the administration hasn't done; it's what they have done.
  • condew · 7 months ago
    I was miffed with the gay community for not being patient; I can see the need for a politician to choose the right time for everything he does. But to let a Bush holdover write a brief like this is a betrayal plain and simple, and makes me wonder if bailing out the banks instead of the homeowners was not a similar betrayal. Is healthcare reform going to be as superficial as credit card reform? Is Obama turning into Bill Clinton?
  • Chaya · 7 months ago
    You should visit whitehouse.gov again. Obama no longer supports repealing DOMA. It's in there, go read it. He now says he is against a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, that's all. The same as Bush during his first term. By his second term (God forbid), he will support a constitutional amendment.
  • pseudolus · 7 months ago
    I just the othre day de-fanned Obama on Facebook. He has about 6.4 million fans. Imagine if about 1/2 million of those people de-fanned him? Do you think he'd get the message? (I mean - all the loss of potential donors . . .)
  • Abagail Adams · 7 months ago
    Type your comment here. I support LGBT issues. I have heard many reason that the bible is against it. I have yet to find anyone able to tell me where. Jesus asked his apostles to leave their work and follow him. If he was such a supporter of marriage between heterosexuals what about the wives and children of those men? A single woman would not be able to support the family. If not taken in by family they would be on the streets. Not exactly a "defense of marriage act". A recent Dr. Phil program, that I caught 2AM, had a pitch battle between those supporting gay marriage and those against. At one point Dr Phil turned to a woman who was against and asked how a married gay couple would affect her marriage. The woman was stopped and could only look blankly back at him.
    If that could be shown nationally, it may make some think twice. I was glad the letter went beyond just the marriage issue and showed how unjust our social, financial and religous systems are. With the younger people seeing the issues in a more enlightened way this will be resolved favorably. We must keep the issues out there.
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    As a long time democrat and gay man who totally believed and supported Obama, I now have only one thing to say to him.

    F*U*

    Good luck with the rest of your F*ing presidency.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    What do you mean we have nowhere else to go? WAKE UP AND START VOTING LIBERTARIAN. If enough of us have the (guts) to do it, it will make a difference.
  • mtumba djibouti · 7 months ago
    HRC ends its letter to obama saying "IF we are your equal..."

    News flash - we ARE obama's equal and it's past time for him to recognize it. And it's way past time for gays to continue to blindly support democrats with total loyalty while we get nothing in return. We're talking about civil rights here - not the desert menu!

    Justice delayed is justice Denied.
  • BRUCELEIMSIDOR · 7 months ago
    HRC had, of course, no choice but to write a protest letter, but the letter it wrote was fawning and ineffectual. It practically begs the President to reconsider because we gays are such nice people and good citizens. Does that mean that people who are not so nice, or perhaps not as committed citizens deserve to be deprived of their rights? Our humanity is not dependent upon our personal qualities. The Constitution speaks of "unalienable rights"--- whether we behave ourselves or not!

    More important, the letter has no teeth in it. There is no suggestion of any consequences if the administration does not reverse itself on this issue. There is no reason why the letter could not have said that the HRC could no longer encourage financial contributions to the Democratic party if it continues to deny gay people their rights. We may have to vote Democratic, since the prospect of a Republican majority in Congress or a Republican administration is too horrible to imagine. But working for the party, or contributing financially--- certain not. The gay community's power lies in its financial clout as much in its numbers.