DISQUS

AMERICAblog: If today's Congress presided over Watergate

  • KerrynowCampau · 1 year ago
    "Repeatedly funded -- at the White House's insistence -- the Iraq War without conditions;"

    That is the one thing I can't quite wrap my head around. Give the a-hole conditions and let him veto the funding. How hard is that? Very, apparently.
  • unrepentant_expat · 1 year ago
    Well, What did you expect from the voices on Capitulation Hill?
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    That's pretty good!
  • TheOriginalLiz · 1 year ago
    Lack of term limits has created a class of leaches that have no loyalty to anyone but themselves. Their sole interest is to maintain their personal positions of power, regardless of the cost to those who were gullible enough to put them in congress in the first place. And since the American public has abdicated their power so completely (aided by the idiot box among other things), the situation isn't going to change any time soon.
  • mschafer13 · 1 year ago
    It seems that, perhaps, a little bit, slowly, they are starting to grow some semblence of a backbone. Of course, it's years too late and a few billion dollars short, but would we really expect anything less?


    http://liberalretort.blogspot.com/
  • LanceThruster · 1 year ago
    When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -- John F. Kennedy
  • Nigel Elliott · 1 year ago
    Now that's great satire!
  • jcgraham77 · 1 year ago
    It is going to take us to do something about it. Feet on the ground. Signatures. Referendums. Attention away from gay marriage and abortions. When people get hungry and can't feed the children it will be easy. Just wish it would happen sooner.
  • jcgraham77 · 1 year ago
    Not the starving part...the revolution.
  • KerrynowCampau · 1 year ago
    It must be the nature of the US citizenry. Do nothing until crisis time. In the early 90's I was trying to talk to people about our dependence on foreign oil and global warming and was treated like a nut job.

    I often wonder what my ex thinks about things now..........
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    face it: terms limits is NOT the problem - it's a bogus band-aid. the problem is corruption and failure of leadership, lack of involvement by the people. You may claim (wrongly) term limits may help, but like anything, eventually you have to fix the problem, if you want to fix the problem :) to fix this mess:
    1. remove money from the equation.
    2. remove post-job perks.
    3. install secure voting systems
    these are the priorities for our nation. join your local democratic party and fight for them
    nancy is a coward and a fool.
  • TheOriginalLiz · 1 year ago
    I recognize your concerns, but I don't believe we would have a failure of leadership, excessive corruption, and the rest if congressperson weren't a job for life, with a structure built up to facilitate it being as secure and cushy as possible. Until term limits are in place, there is no way to effectively eliminate (as much as humanly possible, never totally) corruption and to encourage effective and visionary leadership.
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    I don't think you actually are responding to my points - you won't eliminate those problems, just spread them out over more politicians. Term-limits is mainly a right-wing talking point. The door is always open for people to compete for office, but not when money is a factor.
  • jcgraham77 · 1 year ago
    Ditto..my rep, Marion Berry, in Arkansas has been there for years...he was responsible for helping introduce rice farmer subsidies--they get a check in the mail yearly for just owning rice ground if it was in their posession when the legislation was passed. That was 20 something years ago and billions of dollars later. And guess who owns thousands of acres of rice ground--you are correct--Marion Berry.
  • red_dwarf · 1 year ago
    We've lost our Democracy. It doesn't get any funnier then that.
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    IndyMac, along with 10 other banks, is being investigated for fraud by the FBI. Many depositors were being turned away by the FDIC, such as those with funds in trust, etc. Lines today were just as long as before.

    Capitulation Hill. Right on, Expat!
  • FunMe · 1 year ago
    28% president

    18% Congress

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25700328/

    Throw out the bums - all of them!
  • hawkseye · 1 year ago
    Great cartoon.
    However, the two situations are different.
    Dems probably had the votes from the beginning re Nixon, but they didn't want the impeachment to look like a partisan Dem process. Judiciary did their hearings over a year and a half (maybe longer) and didn't begin to vote on the articles until a few Repubs began to vote with them and until Nixon's polls were in the tank. Then the "smoking gun" surfaced, and Repubs forced Tricky Dick to resign.
    I'm just guessing, but I imagine current Dems have counted votes and months left on the calendar (since 2006) and decided it was an impossible task.
    I still wish they would hold hearings, even at this late date, for the sake of making important historical points, if nothing else.
    But, I am hopeful the people will insist on war crimes trials.
  • ShirleyGoodnessanMercy · 1 year ago
    I realize that bashing Jimmy Carter is something of a favorite sport for many people in our country. But when it comes to energy conservation and the dismal situation we now find ourselves in regarding foreign oil dependence, and a withering auto industry, Carter's diagnosis and solutions would have largely spared us the pain we're all now feeling.

    Last night, NPR's "Marketplace" ran a few excerpts of Carter's famous "Crisis of Confidence" speech (watch the entire speech here) , and it was striking to realize that if we'd simply followed the former president's 1979 energy blueprint, we'd not be in our current mess. Among the goals Carter laid out that night were:

    --Never use more foreign oil than that which we ourselves produce.
    --Start massive government investment to develop alternative sources of fuel.
    --Mandate that utility companies cut their use of oil by 50%, and switch to alternative fuels.
    --Give $10 billion to strengthen the nation's public transportation system.
    --Drastically raise CAFE standards for US automakers.

    The speech called on Americans to buy energy bonds, so as to take direct ownership in America's energy policy. It advocated personal sacrifice coupled with government action, all of which was ditched by Carter's successor, Ronald Reagan, in favor of the unfettered, free-market approach. That attitude has continued to persist, and was evident in President Bush's address yesterday in which he refused to prod the country into even attempting to conserve.
    To Bush-once an oil man, always an oil man-the only solution is more drilling. Unfortunately, even if we hit a gusher on the first try, more domestically produced oil won't have an effect on current gas prices for may years to come. So here we are, grasping for short-term solutions to problems that always required long-range thinking.

    It's too bad the country didn't follow through with Carter's plan.
  • KerrynowCampau · 1 year ago
    Just think we wouldn't be in Iraq, 9/11 wouldn't have happened, this country would be a lot stronger. I don't think Carter would ever gloat but I hope he feels vindicated.
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    carter installed solar cells on the white house - reagan tore them off. a-hole.
  • ClassAct · 1 year ago
    There's not a dime's worth of difference between the two parties.
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    I have had these wonders. What would happen if we had the people in congress back then....
    Or if we had those in congress back during Watergate in congress today
  • ndtovent · 1 year ago
    That's for damn sure
  • Asterix · 1 year ago
    Nixon should've taken lessons from the Bushies:

    Excutive Privilege is the battle cry!
  • hawkseye · 1 year ago
    Nixon tried to used it, but the Supreme Court disagreed. Today's Supremes might support Chimpy.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    The other difference is that today's members of Congress would have worked with Dick Nixon to wiretap everybody without a warrant.
  • jr · 1 year ago
    they're so afraid of the lobbyists and cable news anchors that they've let Bush turn us into a nation of men instead of a nation of laws
  • kiki · 1 year ago
    The best laugh I've had so far today. Great cartoon, loved it and how true.