-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/04/ignoring-800-pound-question-in-room.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
Pennsylvania Democratic Presidential Primary
Pennsylvania: Clinton 47% Obama 44%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/...
There are tons of couples in this country who have had to deal with the issue of fidelity, and some of them break up, some of them stay together, some of them come to an "arrangement", but in each case it's a personal decision. The Clintons are in exactly the same category, and it has nothing to do with any issue that impacts our country or the serious problems we face.
Colbert Report
Stephanopoulos: I’m not going to ask about that conversation; I know you don’t want to talk about it.
She doesn’t want to talk about it. Enough said. Let’s move on. Besides, it would have taken away time from asking Obama this:
Do you think Rev. Wright loves America as much as you do?
He followed up with the equally pressing question “Could God create a rock so heavy that He Himself could not know you’re a secret Muslim?”
Why subject yourself to that in the first place?
No matter what the November elections bring Stephanopoulos will always be remembered as a Clinton and ABC lackey. He will no longer have the credibility he was striving for as an independent moderator. He is owned lock, stock and barrel. MIllions witnessed his performance and both right and left called him on it. So keep spinning George, you made your mark, allbeit a black mark.
It looks like the Clintons have forgotten that it was Hillary who complained during the MSNBC debate, that she was always asked a question first, and even wanted to offer Obama a cushion (like SNL). Bill the romeo, even hinted that people were attacking Hillary because "she is a girl".
Oh those Clintons and their double standards.
The good news is, it looks like her attacks are affecting her more that Obama.
I have already written to ABC a number of times and to a number of different departments, but this time I think that Charlie needs a bit more attention for his own involvement in all of this garbage!
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=80713
What a load of crap, Georgie boy.
Try this one, you pantload, if you want to ask tough questions:
"Why did you vote for the Patriot Act and the Patriot Act II, were you just completely ignorant of the contents of the act (and if so, that would lead to tough question number two, especially in light of how much time was allowed for doing your homework in between I & II) or do you think it's okay to gut the Civil Liberties and Freedom that this country was founded on?"
I could supply the mush brained Georgie Porgie with a host of other just as tough questions, but I doubt he would want to hear them, think about them, and without a doubt would be loathe to ask them.
What a choad.
It's almost impossible for Clinton to win the nomination at this point. She can't afford to "do the smart thing," help her campaign do a bit better, and then lose anyway. She can't afford to let the game come to her. If she's not going to drop out (which is what she ought to do), then she needs to push everything as hard as she can. She needs to make long-odds plays, because only long-odds plays have any chance of resulting in a Clinton win. It's smart, disciplined, rational politics. It's also extremely selfish, but that's another matter.
http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives...
They gave him him.
That was tough
to him.
She's Mommy.
The Gulf War: A First Assessment
....I think that the proposition of going to Baghdad is also fallacious. I think if we were going to remove Saddam Hussein we would have had to go all the way to Baghdad, we would have to commit a lot of force because I do not believe he would wait in the Presidential Palace for us to arrive. I think we'd have had to hunt him down. And once we'd done that and we'd gotten rid of Saddam Hussein and his government, then we'd have had to put another government in its place.
What kind of government? Should it be a Sunni government or Shi'i government or a Kurdish government or Ba'athist regime? Or maybe we want to bring in some of the Islamic fundamentalists? How long would we have had to stay in Baghdad to keep that government in place? What would happen to the government once U.S. forces withdrew? How many casualties should the United States accept in that effort to try to create clarity and stability in a situation that is inherently unstable?...
Featuring Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense
Soref Symposium 1991
uhhh...Which pressures?....Bill's escapades??
Read.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/20...
Again with the super rich Clinton supporters, will it NEVER end? Clinton supporters are ripping into Howard Dean for asking for the superdelegates to decide and decide soon.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com...
George was little.
Now it is the moderators that drive me nuts. What the hell kind of question is it to ask if your pastor loves America? I mean, really what kind of response it that suppose to illicit. It was asked just to bring up the subject AGAIN.
LATEST NEWSWEEK POLL SHOWS OBAMA LEADING HILLARY BY NEARLY 20 POINTS. UNBELIEVABLE. GREAT.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/132721
Whoa...That Newsweek poll is INCONCEIVABLE! LOL
This needs to be addressed and squelched IMMEDIATELY by the Obama campaign, IMHO.
McCain has sent a letter asking for donations and telling the contributors "Hamas wants Obama" The quote is from some whacked out source yet McCain has sent this letter to thousands.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
Why can't these dumbass pundits get that? They think we care more about Hillary will respond to the shocking revelation that some people don't trust her than what she would do to get us some fucking health care???
Stepganopoulos needs to take a year or two off and go live in the real world a while. He needs to go work for minimum wage in Tuscumbia, Mississippi, for a while.
and the other point is, Hillary is happily playing along with the smear crap.
Even though it may not be politically correct, I think it's a legitimate question. Bill Clinton's perjury and Hillary's attempts to cover for him and then create her own lies indicates a lot about their character. I'm in my 30's and it used to be that a serial liar and corrupt schemer like Hillary would not be voted into office. She has too many character flaws and has the highest negative rating of any cadidate. People simply despise her, only she doesn't seem to get it.
Have you been completely honest with your supporters about your position on the Iraq war and Iran?
I'm not sure why, given my gender (male), my orientation (gay), and my candidate (Obama), but I also take offense at suggestions that there's something wrong with Hillary for not leaving Bill despite his obvious marital infidelities over the years. We can't fault John McCain for ditching his less-than-perfect first wife when the 2nd wife showed up gleaming with money and looks, and then fault Hillary for NOT ditching her less-than-perfect first husband, unless you want to parse degrees of imperfection and who "should" be married/stay married to whom and who shouldn't. Which, as a gay man who thinks marriage should be a choice between two adults and not the public, I don't.
So I say Lewinsky questions are off the table, as they should have not been a part of any "special prosecutor" investigation in the first place. I think Pastor Wright questions were NOMINALLY relevant a month ago, but by this point, it's just trying to stoke fire where there is none, so George and Charlie both failed, is the bottom line.
I guess it all depends on your definition of a good marriage. Maybe we should all have your marriage?
SPatrick
Whatever she does, I think she has plenty of self-respect. It's respect from others that she lacks.
If she leaves there will be wild cheering, and she can probably spin that in a self-aggrandizing way.