DISQUS

ChicagoKid · 1 year ago

How many of Lush Limpbaugh's ditto-shit-heads will help SHRILLARY in Indiana? They will be the difference if Obama barely loses.

How come the media hasn't really talked about SHRILLARY'S wins in state where rethuglicans cross over to vote for kaos.

tlsintx · 1 year ago

ChicagoKid 11 minutes ago-

limpballs is just trying to keep his ratings up. among other things.
i don't think the dittodorks could keep their assignments straight...
they don't call it operation chaos for nothing!

sittenpretty · 1 year ago

my mom is 89,every year she gets a new Jag she drivers herself,id like to see them TRY to stop her,...in 04 she waited 4 hrs on line noSHIITE

aquarius2 · 1 year ago

Has anyone ever been part of an exit poll?

Busboy · 1 year ago

I wrapped my Maserati around one once in PA.... ;).......

jr · 1 year ago

economic Jim Crow on the march

LunaStick · 1 year ago

Bayh got turned away too. LOL! He went to the wrong place.

Early Indiana numbers in, all areas hillary is supposed to do well in so no worries yet.

tlsintx · 1 year ago

Busboy 12 minutes ago

busboy, that seems a bit archaic, don't you think?
the nuns should vote. especially the 80 and 90 year old nuns.

mike31c · 1 year ago

H.. in SF spouted:
"There is enough monkey business with voting. Requiring an ID eliminates one potential for fraud."

Yup, like the Bush administration and the 2000 election right?

Except, and outside of Faux news lies, even the Supreme Court recognized there was NOT A SINGLE instance of PROVEN voter fraud because someone did or did NOT have an ID card. Sorry but that's a lame excuse to exclude voters.

shanobama · 1 year ago

Hope Alito and Roberts and that other Catholic SOB on the Supreme Court have to go to mass and repent, repent for their sins.

Basta*ds.

Gary SF · 1 year ago

Oh and they would have voted for "nun of the above" anyway, so it is no big loss.

Busboy · 1 year ago

This could be a blessing. 80 and 90 year old nuns should have their eyes on other than politics.

Gary SF · 1 year ago

I guess I am the only "progressive" that supports the voter ID laws. These laws should have to be implemented a full 6 months before an election and a fund established to publicize the requirement and to help people get IDs. There is enough monkey business with voting. Requiring an ID eliminates one potential for fraud.

Busboy · 1 year ago

mike31c, you just signed onto bullshit.

Gary SF · 1 year ago

mike31c - yes, agreeing that ID should be required to vote makes me a Bush supporter. I see you have the 'binary thinking' birth defect too - if it isn't blue, it has to be red. There has never been a case of ID abuse in voting? I guess you have never been to Chicago. They have even had dead people voting there. And Chicago is not the only place where abuses happen. Bush stole the election in 2000? Probably. But that doesn't change the fact that there are other abuses, too. Grow up. By your way of thinking, we can't fix the malfunctioning car radio because the the door lock is broken.

shanobama · 1 year ago

I think you should have to show ID one time-when you register to vote, or change parties.

Then simply sign your name on the voter rolls to vote. I do not see how this could create any opportunity for fraud.