-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/07/indymac-failure-could-cost-taxpayers-4.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
More about the Yule Goat
12 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 29 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
How Barack Obama undermined the Obama presidency
5 days ago · 181 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
Bush won't let the high rollers suffer; they'll get their money and Bush will just add it on to your grandkid's debt.
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here we go!!
Nothing left to lose...
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (November 12, 1999), is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.
One of the effects of the repeal was to allow commercial and investment banks to consolidate. Several economists and analysts have criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis.[6][7]
The 1933 Glass-Steagall Act separated commercial and investment banking after excessive risk- taking contributed to the Great Depression.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass-Steagall_Act
None of these people know what they're doing--oh wait, yes they do.
And we pay.
'His rotty ?
Freud would be proud.
I don't think so. Sociopaths don't recognize their own failures. Why he remains on board at UBS, I have no idea.
And Britain has its troubles as well.
Is this just greed and not caring about each other?
Even third world countries know that Bush & Co. went to Iraq for oil.
If I had over a $100,000 and lost money, I think I'd want to squeeze it out of their CEO, who made over $2.4 million last year, and the board of directors who oversaw the fiasco.
We are reaping the harvest of the Repub economic plan. Yet watch the hearings on C-Span (most recently the formaldahyde-soaked trailers for victims of Katrina) and you'll still see the Repubs bowing, scraping and worshipping before their corporate gods (who they represent so well). It's a lot like someone defending the pirates, instead of the people who were victimized.
I will never forget.
http://www.picturehistory.com/images/products/0...
You never change your socks;
and little streams of alcohol
come trickling down the rocks...
etc.....
Thank God I decided to vote for Gore as I was walking to the polling place.
(Thing is, when Bush said we should be a "humbler" nation and not go around nation building...he made a lot of sense. Too bad he went nuts as soon as he got power. I also liked his CO2 trading plan, which he also killed once he got in office. But I always thought his Social Security privatization scheme was a plan to kill Social Security, which was one reason I ended up voting for Gore.)
Another example of how you do not even hold a candle to Joe, John and AJ. If you are going to write about the economy, at LEAST be factually correct.
So, we have Indimac and Fanny May in the shit.
What about Burrnie Mac?