DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Now the Democrats have real "irreparable" problems if Hillary somehow manages to steal the nomination.

  • JayR · 1 year ago
    I've been saying this to the brain trust over at MyDD for months and those geniuses just ignore the issue. Great political analysis coming from that site these days.
  • grandma · 1 year ago
    I totally agree Joe.....

    What exactly can the Democratic leaders do? Who will the Clintons listen to?
    They think they ARE the Democratic party leaders.

    The Super Delegates should quit stalling and commit.
  • grandma · 1 year ago
    The Kitchen Sink Yet to be Thrown

    Hendrik Hertzberg says it well:

    .............The whole Clinton marital soap opera, obviously off limits within the Democratic fold, will offer ample material for what Obama calls “distractions.” To take the most obvious example, the former President’s social life since leaving the White House will become, if not “fair game,” big game—and some of these right-wing dirtbags are already hiring bearers and trying on pith helmets for the safari. Is this a “there” where the Democratic Party really wants to go?

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily...
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    Joe, what is needed is an organized effort by the netroots and Moveon and maybe the Obama supporters on that site to pressure the party to end this and try to pressure the media to stop egging her on. This is very serious. People cannot afford medical, gas and now food. We have a war that may go into Iran if congress doesn't hogtie Cheney and Bush.
    We cannot afford to have this party destroyed and McCain become president. And the clintons cannot be allowed to continue to destroy our nominee because the party lacks a spine. They need to grow one now.
    I say that Americablog talks to other sites like Kos and others and start to organize them and the readers to put some heavy pressure on them.
  • rusty08 · 1 year ago
    vwcat-I agree with you. The media is constantly moving the goal posts for Hillary and she really thinks that by some miracle she will win. It is time this nomination is wrapped up before more damage is done. Also, I fear for Obama's life. The Clintons are desperate and they won't stop at nothing! So many people "mysteriously" died during the Clinton's years, including their body guards and witnesses. I know they are obsessed for power and nothing and no one will stand in their way. They are sick!
  • Andrew A. Gill · 1 year ago
    This is only the half of it.

    The Republicans are also looking at a serious problem after November.

    McCain isn't a theocrat, and he's unlikely to choose a theocrat as a running mate (seeing how he shot down Huckabee).

    This means that the theocrats are probably going to sit at home this November, and bemoan the fact that they can't vote for anyone who agrees with them.

    They had their man in Bush Jr, but even he didn't provide the goods that they've wanted. So McCain won't provide, and the people who claimed to be ``one of them'' were really just stringing them along.

    I've said it before, but I strongly suspect that they will bolt after 2008. They'll form a new party, much like the Progressives around the turn of the century or Wallace's American Independent Party. This party will do nothing and never have a serious chance of electing a president. But it will elect a few representatives. And in doing so, the theocrats will have effectively neutered themselves.

    Now, anyone with ant power in the party will see that this is a colossally dumb thing to do, but with the advent of the internet and places like renewamerica.us, the people who have drunk too much Kool-Aid will have just enough power to make this happen.
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    JayR, it is not in MYDD's interest. They have gone full bore Clinton koolaid route. They verge on the Taylor Marsh psycho binge.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Hillary is headed for the glue factory.

    She must get to know her role, carrying Barrack's water as the junior Senator of New York.
  • RiverRat2 · 1 year ago
    Bill and Hillary Clinton have certainly left a shameful legacy. I'm embarrassed to admit that Matt Drudge and Rush Limbaugh appear to have been right about them all along. Another writer and journalist I really respect is Andrew Sullivan. Back in the 90's he was one of the few with the guts to challenge the Clintons' lies and immoral behavior. The tragedy is that it's too late for Vince Foster and others who cry out for justice. Why were we fooled by the Clinton scum during the 90's?
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    Riverrat, I think many democrats have had their eyes opened to the Clintons this past year and wonder if the gop was right in the 90s. I voted for Bill in 92 but, not in 96. 3rd party. That was when I began to have serious doubts about the Clintons. After Monica and the pardons and renting of the Lincoln bedroom, I was thrilled to see them leave. I thought they were gone for good and Hillary would stay buried in the senate.
    Wish I was right on that.
    Unfortunately, too many democrats still have blinders on about the Clintons and refuse to believe fellow democrats warning them.
  • RiverRat2 · 1 year ago
    Vwcat, something similar happened to me. I was fooled by Clinton in '92, then my eyes were opened after they were involved in scandal after scandal: Whitewater, travelgate, the Vince Foster murder, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, Web Hubbel scandal, Charlie Tre Chinese slush fund, and on and on ...
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    Interesting cut-up of recent Newsweek poll.

    Hillary's support from white working people? Forget it. McCain will stomp her among white voters.

    The Dems strength is with minorities and young people, and Obama stomps Hillary there.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/26/19333/5...

    In another post, it's shown that Hillary's "base" isn't a base to win anything, except primaries that include Appalachia.

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/26/133...
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    I read that daily kos article tonight. It was fabulous. Too bad the msm cannot do stuff like that or even read this and understand it.
    Fantastic article.
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    While painting the livingroom today I got to thinking. 3 weeks after the new president is sworn in, the country will celebrate the 200th birthday of Abraham Lincoln.
    This man ran against the establishment and took a beating from the press before he got into the white house. He also inherited a country on the abyss and followed the worst president in history.
    Come the 200th birthday celebration i am sure the new president will be there as he is from Illinois as well and will be following the worst president, just like Lincoln. Only this time, the president will be the coming full circle of what Lincoln began during his presidency. How cool is that.
    Oh, and I live in Illinois.
  • LCR · 1 year ago
    vwcat: "he country will celebrate the 200th birthday of Abraham Lincoln.
    This man ran against the establishment and took a beating from the press before he got into the white house"

    Well said. Abraham Lincoln was one of the most successful and respected Republicans of all times (only exceeded by Ronald Reagan). Lincoln's heroism is why we use his image as one of our icons at Log Cabin. Both Parties can share in his heroic legacy.
  • blackwolf · 1 year ago
    Interesting take on things vwcat! I hope it turns out this way.
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    vwcat
    Riverrat, I think many democrats have had their eyes opened to the Clintons this past year and wonder if the gop was right in the 90s. I voted for Bill in 92 but, not in 96. 3rd party. That was when I began to have serious doubts about the Clintons. After Monica and the pardons and renting of the Lincoln bedroom, I was thrilled to see them leave. I thought they were gone for good and Hillary would stay buried in the senate.

    -----



    Bubba did to Paul Tsongas in the '92 primaries what he's trying to do to Obama now. Just the dirtiest, sleaziest bullshit I ever saw. So I could never vote for him....I voted for Perot in 92 and cast a pity vote for Dole in 96 instead.

    When the Right Wing went after him during his presidency, I just laughed and thought "Karma's a bitch, ain't it Bubba?"

    Sort of forgot about him after Bush came in, because Bush disgusted me even more. But, now, the old feelings are back with a vengeance. Bubba is a dirtbag.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    CNN's hapless political crew

    Indeed, Wolf...
    ;-)
    Anyway, HRC should give a spleen-filled farewell to rival Nixon's 1960 "You won't have Dick Nixon to kick around anymore" gem...

    PS-Very cool wvcat...Obama should take an Inaugural train to DC from Ill... is growing a beard along the way and having a Pinkerton double attending too much to ask???
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    Joe:

    Something I've been considering lately.

    I'm thinking Billary will attempt to assuage black voters by naming Harold Ford as Veep.

    They would almost have to name an african american if they steal the election from Obama, and Harold Ford is another DLCer, so thinks alot like them.

    What you think?
  • ADLEED · 1 year ago
    A number of events have been glossed over for Clinton, her campaign has been destructive since January. I suspect the Democratic Party will not allow her to get the nomination, but the destructive elements will not be repaired. Independent voters matter, if these are lost the game changes.

    Clinton will likely run out of money which will effectively end the primaries, look for less and less campaign activity , and the press to begin taking second looks. At a certain point the MSM does not like to become too stupid , the pundits will run out of steam soon, portions of the blog world are behind the curve as well, and everyone is just TIRED of Clinton.
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    mirth 2 minutes ago 1 point
    Please login to rate.



    BB, I think that's a very good guess for H's VP.

    ----

    Thanks, but someone on Kos just told me Harold's only 38 and the legal age for Veep is 40.

    Oh well, that's good.

    Billary can't try to scam their way into the white house by finding an Obama subsitute.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    As if it isn't already just plain old fun to watch the self-important, preening punditry have their rotten eggy prognostications smeared all over their smiley faces, again...
  • grandma · 1 year ago
    cool....Obama picks up another Super Delegate

    Charlene Fernandez, the newly-elected first vice chairwoman of the Arizona Democratic Party, announced her support tonight for Mr. Obama

    “Senator Barack Obama is strengthening the Democratic Party by bringing in new voters, young and old, into the process,” Ms. Fernandez said in a statement released by the Obama campaign. ” I believe Senator Obama has the best ability to win the White House in November and lead this country forward.”

    Ms. Fernandez was Mr. Obama’ s 241st superdelegate endorsement..

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/26/o...
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Hillary has no problem destroying the democratic party unless they let her steal the election by thwarting and discarding the will of the voters expressed in state after state in grueling and to date meaningful primaries.

    Surprised?

    I am not for she has is a republican deep down inside.
  • tofubo · 1 year ago
    'they' know that a republican can't win in november
    'they' know that a skull&boner needs to be in office
    'they' will do anything to make sure that one does
  • Daniel73 · 1 year ago
    According to you Obama guys and now Clyburn the only votes that should count are the black votes because we don't want to alienate them. Screw us in Michigan and the folks down in Florida but count the black vote. Hey maybe we can count the black votes in both those states and ignore the rest of the population there. Better yet why don't we only count the votes Obama gets. I'm sure we can convince the republican party to go along with this system so that we don't offend your sensitive souls. You guys are so great makes me want to line up and join the coranation of the chosen one.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    A re-vote is needed in Florida and Michigan. Obama should come out for a re-vote ran by and paid for by the DNC if and only if Clinton agrees that the loserr of the pledged delegate count gracefully exits the race.
  • rusty08 · 1 year ago
    A revote would be great but rules are rules. Hillary knew they would not count, now that she has lost the pledged delagates now she wants a revote.
  • Hangtown Danile · 1 year ago
    Be careful of what you say Dan.
    Or you will find yourself labled as one of the following:
    1) A Hillbot.
    2) A republican
    3) A Nazi
    4) A neocon
    5) A racesist
    They love to label those who have the guts to disagree with them.
  • fustigato · 1 year ago
    I suggest as an answer a funny video and song about USA president election...

    on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBrrsq6lu7U
  • ekwhite · 1 year ago
    I love that song!
  • MorgaineSwann · 1 year ago
    It's important to understand that Clyburn is talking about a scorched Earth policy by the Clintons. The perception is that they are willing to destroy Barack so he loses and sets Hillary up for 2012. Even by Clinton standards, that's extreme, but I think they are quite capable of doing it.

    They are about to turn an unlosable election into a loss plus a broken party. They are flagrantly pitting the blacks against the whites in a way even John McCain would find embarassing. This is not the way Democrats should behave. Somebody needs to intervene, fast. Barack could win this thing, but not if the Clinton machine continues on its path of destruction.
  • Chris From Maine · 1 year ago
    no one in the Democratic party has the balls to stand up to Bush, you think they are going to tell Hillary to quit? Yeah right.

    besides, some of them want her to destroy Obama and elect McCain so he can be in charge when the country is ruined forever so they can blame him and run in 2012 with Hillary.
  • Daniel73 · 1 year ago
    So when pitted against each other the white and latino population should simply roll over so as not to offend black people that makes a lot of sense. But I guess that is what you guys want to make of the Democratic party.
  • PJT · 1 year ago
    I do not see ANY way Clinton can win in November.

    An earlier thread mentioned her involvement in pushing a controversial pardon. But a cursory review of all of her problems comes down to one thing: she is a Clinton. As such, she has a CLINTON problem.

    If she snags the nomination, you may as well turn off your television until election night, because the airwaves leading up to it will be nothing a Hellish rerun: a huge rehash of every real or imagined offense committed by either of them. You'll roll your eyes at the things you remember, and cringe at the things you'd forgotten. And it will work, and John McCain (or his VP) will be President.
  • Chris From Maine · 1 year ago
    if Hillary steals the nomination, she might as well call McCain and congratulate him on his victory.

    Obama would not run third party, and I bet he wouldnt run in 2012. I think this experience proves to a lot of people that the American political system is completely broken and we need a new revolution.
  • TheOtherWA · 1 year ago
    Bill Clinton is spending today visiting many small towns in rural Oregon. I hope the Clintons see the damage they're capable of doing and step back from it.
  • Polly_Tics · 1 year ago
    The idea that Hillary (and Bill) have done huge damage to the Party is hardly new, however it seems to come as a revelation to the party now. How on earth could they have had their eyes closed for so long?

    When Bill began his racist tirade in South Carolina about Obama, at first it shocked me, then angered me and finally as it continued it made me revise all of previous support for the man. These two people crave power more obviously than anyone I have seen previously. Sure politicians all crave money power and the status that goes along with the entire deal, but the Clinton's put other folk to shame in their obvious and depraved mounting of a campaign to do "anything".

    I used to actually love Bill Clinton and voted for him twice and jokingly said I would do so for a third time, but I am almost ashamed of those previous good feelings about the man. And I have never been a fan for Hillary as President, but liked her for a local Senate seat. If I had not moved out of NYC when I did, I would have joyfully voted FOR her in the Senate.

    As I said that was then...

    The question now is what to do about the situation. Now if the Democrats didn't have the balls to oppose the GOP on War, Torture, Civil Rights, FISA, Impeachment et al; than how on earth can we expect them to take the bull by the horns NOW?
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    Polly

    "The question now is what to do about the situation. Now if the Democrats didn't have the balls to oppose the GOP on War, Torture, Civil Rights, FISA, Impeachment et al; than how on earth can we expect them to take the bull by the horns NOW?"
    ____________________________________________________________________


    That is a very good question.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    tbhull

    Do you think a re-vote is the right answer? So much has happened since the FL and MI primaries that I don't think it would be right. I don't know what the answer is but this I know, Hillary has used a lot of negativity that just might be very hard for Obama to overcome in Florida.
  • MelindaRose · 1 year ago
    Being from Arkansas, both Clintons have always had a racist streak. I think people are only now finally seeing how bigoted they really are in their dirty attacks on Obama. It will be interesting to see if once she has to inevitably concede, her racist supporters will flock to John McCain or Bob Barr if he runs as the Libertarian.
  • MelindaRose · 1 year ago
    If this doesn't blow your mind, I don't know what will: After Rush Limbaugh endorsed Hillary, Bill Clinton guest-hosted his despicable hate radio program and used this GOP platform to attack Obama with Rove-style dirty tactics: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily...
  • Hangtown Danile · 1 year ago
    I have said this before but I don't mind repeating myself for slow learners.
    Bill Clintoneonie AKA Wild Bill, the sleekmister, et al.
    HAS NEVER BEEN ON THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW!
    Rush loves to do an imitation of his voice and he dose it quite a lot.
    I do hope you listen to his show.
    Maybe you will even learn by reverse osmosis.
    I have e-mailed him concerning his(Rush's) name being dropped on this blog maybe he will do a whole show in Clintoons voice. I don't think so however .
  • hawkseye · 1 year ago
    Why can't Hillary put this away?
  • Hangtown Danile · 1 year ago
    What exactly can the Democratic leaders do? Who will the Clintons listen to?
    They think they ARE the Democratic party leaders.
    The Clintons ARE the Democrat party leaders. Why do any of you think that they are going to sit down and shut up when they think that they have this nation in there pocket?
    Why don't YOU just tell Oboma to shut up and let the experenced candidates tell you what is right and how to do everything.
    You still don't get it do you?
    There is no way short of somebody putting Hillery down as in for a dirt nap that she is going to stop her run for the white house.
    I fully expect her to run as an independent if she dose not win just to shit on Obomas chance so she can try to run vs. McCain in 2012.
    There is nothing she has not done for power.
    Nothing she will not do for power.
    She feels a grater feeling of entitlement than all of the welfare cases in the USA added together.
    No place have I ever seen a person with more greed or artifice anyplace in the world.
  • mf_roe · 1 year ago
    Bill Clinton's greatest skill has always been the ability to take it an order of magnitude farther than anyone else would dare go. Psychopathic is a good way to understand it. Remember his "I feel YOUR pain" mantra. He doesn't feel bound by the limits most people use to gage their actions. He understands this in terms of most people being inferior to him in terms of achieving success. His ego doesn't care what you think, he want be stopped with reason. His Kryptonite is exposure of all the hidden records of his administration, BJ's weren't the only f***ing around that happened in his Oval Office, threats of the Dems supporting investigations would focus his mind quicker than any other threat.
  • JansonWills · 1 year ago
    I don't see Billary running as an Independent when she finally gives up her jihad. I suspect she will plead with McCrazy for his VP slot. She has always had more in common with the Repiglicans than Dems.
  • cowboyneok · 1 year ago
    Wow, that Bush is just a barrel of laughs, Busboy. This nation would be far better off if we had a President instead of a wannabe comedian.
  • cowboyneok · 1 year ago
    Wow, its almost as if Bill and HIllary intended to "march us off the cliff" if they didn't get their way, huh? Almost as if that was their plan from the very beginning. They either pick us or we destroy the party.
  • Bubbles · 1 year ago
    What I don't understand is why the Black Caucus doesn't take the Clintons out to the wood shed.

    They should tell her that if she either manages to steal the nomination (the only way she can get it now) or continues to undermine Obama's candidacy that they will be pronounced persona non grata and that black stalking horse candidates will be placed in every election they ever run in again, be it: President, Senator, Governor or Dog Catcher. The Clintons have no political future (or past) without black support.

    At that point, Hillary would fold her cards and quietly walk away from the table. Hillary's not an idiot. She knows she's lost this one. What she's now running for is 2012. That means she's trying to ensure that Obama doesn't win the General in Novemeber. It just so happens that her 2012 strategy requires that she look like she still has an 08 strategy.

    The African American vote is the most cohesive voting block in the United States. There's no reason that they don't use it. They don't need to play the victim here. That should be Hillary's role.
  • mf_roe · 1 year ago
    Busboy

    Check this
    http://obeygiant.com
  • mf_roe · 1 year ago
    Hillary inviting Barack to debate
    http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//...
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    I thought I read that Bill Clinton was indeed on Rush's show however that particular day was a day Rush took off. I could be wrong.
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    It's funny to see Liberals finally tire of the Clinton's. They were in office for 8 years racking up scandal after scandal that Liberals either explained away or simply ignored. It did not matter to you that Monica was only a few years older than his daughter and soiling the oval office, literally. It did not matter that a President swore in a court of law to tell the truth then didn't. You said that perjury is no big deal and that everyone lies about sex. You were silent when Hillary fired the entire travel office, killing the long term careers of dozens of nonpartisan government employees so she could hire her cronies. You said nothing when she magically turned a few bucks into hundreds of thousands of dollars in the highly speculative cattle futures market. At the time futures market experts said what she did was impossible, but that did not matter to you. It did not matter that she illegally secured classified FBI files on Republicans so she could build her enemies list, and back it up with classified dirt on them. It did not matter that Hillary was under court orders to produce her Rose law firm billing records, but hid them for years in the white house. And Liberals said nothing when Bill sold Presidential pardons to some nasty criminals on the way out the door. But now that you've found someone you like better, you finally throw the Clinton's under the bus.

    History will be hard on the Clinton's and the Liberals who ignored their crimes for the sake of power.
  • Polly_Tics · 1 year ago
    DickJones 32 minutes ago
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although many of us have changed our minds about the integrity (or lack thereof) of both Clinton's, in no way does that mean that many of the bogus "supposed" crimes of which they were accused were real. Please, most of us can hold differing opinions on a subject in our heads while chewing gum and walking at the same time; not everything the lunatic right claimed was real then nor now.
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    Of course not all of the things the Clinton's were accused of were true. However, I used the word "scandal" not crimes and the things that I mentioned did happen and can be researched. Hillary DID destroy the careers of the white house travel office employees. Many of them had served many presidents during their tenure. She then appointed her cronies to those positions. It happened. People were destroyed and the left said NOTHING! She did hide and withhold the Rose law firm billing records for years. She did gather FBI files on Republicans. Prove this to yourself. Google "Craig Livingstone" or search Wikipedia for "Filegate".

    Just because you ignored these things at the time, they still happened. At least you found your voice now that a Republican is in office.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    I think in the general scheme of things, history will show the alleged crimes of the Clintons will just be a blip compared to the known crimes of George W. Bush. I don't know ,but lying to people to take a country to war, approving torture, wiretapping phones, having a justice department that serves political needs rather than justice, placing our economy trillions in debt, and using over 700 signing statements is probably going to go down in history as the worst times in America and these are just the obvious crimes. All of these things caused irreversible damage to the citizens of this country. I don't think lying about a blow job comes even close, not that I am saying it was the right thing to do. You know when Dems defended Bill Clinton it was nothing compared to Republicans walking in lock step to Bush. So both parties have a tendency to protect their own, that is just the way it is. But for the life of me, I cannot figure out why anyone would approve of this current president.

    As far as throwing the Clintons off the bus, I don't think so. There are plenty of Dems who prefer Senator Clinton. This site leans toward Senator Obama. MyDD leans towards Senator Clinton. It is a tough race and people want their candidate to win. I am sure over at MyDD you will find plenty of praise for Senator Clinton.
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    Oh please! "Lying to take the country to war". That is a silly cliche. The United States was attacked in New York and Bush acted. Every major government was in basic agreement that Saadam was building WMD's. Saadam himself was pushing that line in an effort to hold Iran at bay. He was also given many opportunities to prove that he was not building WMD's but needed the world to believe that he had that military capability. Saadam may have been bluffing but he certainly did all he could do to convince the world that he had WMD's. Iraq was and is the best opportunity to build a pro-western democracy in the middle east and it's proximity to Iran makes it even more important. Iraq was invaded for several reasons, WMD's was only one reason. "wiretapping phones", another cliche. The only phones that were monitored were foreign calls from suspected terrorists and they were listened to by powerful computers. You are trying to paint a picture of spooks listening to your phone calls and that is just silly and disingenuous. You say Bush approved torture. Nobody has been tortured. Having a little watter poured over your face for 2 or 3 minutes is not torture. It's uncomfortable as hell, but it's not torture. It's also very effective at getting important information in times of war. Your concern about the national debt is also funny. The United States has been running deficits and adding to the debt limit for many decades. I agree that Bush spent too much money but that is hardly illegal. Just because you don't think lying about blowjobs is a big deal, it's still perjury and that is a felony. It does not matter what the lie is about.

    President Bush will be remembered by historians as a President who went to war against organized terror and beat the hell out of them and prevented additional attacks to this country. Iraq will be left to John McCain and he will not surrender Iraq to terrorist.
  • Polly_Tics · 1 year ago
    DickJones 18 minutes ago
    -------------------------------------------------------------------

    Oh look, Dick Jones endorses TORTURE. Yes, Dick, this government use to sentence people and send them to prison IF they tortured anyone, as is the case for the Hague. Waterboarding is torture, like it or not and I am quite sure that somewhere down the line, Bush and his cronies will be looked into by the Hague.

    The idea that OUR own country tortures people and tries to SPIN away the actual crime is horrific, embarrassing and has taken its toll on our standing within the world view.

    Please oh God, Oh God, do not allow a Republican to take the controls again! The damage done to this nation will take years and years of work to PERHAPS be able to get our beloved country back to where it once was.
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    That's right, Dick Jones DOES endorse the 5 minute procedure of pouring a bucket of water on the bad guys face to gain vital information necessary to win a global war. Dick Jones is also in favor of throwing water balloons at them and squirting them with the garden hose if that helps. Dick Jones is not as "sensitive" as you. Every American military pilot is waterboarded as a part of their training. They laugh at this argument. Waterboarding is uncomfortable but clearly not torture.

    America's standing in the world? Oh please. Most of the world could give a flying crap and the liberal governments of France and Germany have been replaced by conservative pro-American governments. Our standing in the world is just fine. Really what you are saying is that other liberals throughout the world also think that waterboarding is mean. So what.
  • Polly_Tics · 1 year ago
    Aquarius,

    Hello again. Please, do you also post over at Huffington Post as Aquarius 2001? If so I just became a fan.
  • GrahamCrackerDC · 1 year ago
    " Now the Democrats have real "irreparable" problems if Hillary somehow manages to steal the nomination. "

    It's unlikely she will "steal" the nomination. She won't do anything dishonest or illegal to get the nomination.

    But she will get it.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    Polly

    No, I always post as aquarius2, never felt the need to change identities Hmm, I will have to check that out. I really dislike the posting over at Huff, same at dkos. Love the articles but find it too much of a headache to post.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    GrahamCrackerDC

    Oh I really hope you are wrong about her getting the nomination. As far as "stealing" the nomination, I really hate when people say that. You can't "steal" it if it is according to the rules, that is just the way it is. Now I can say IF she gets the nomination I will really dislike the way she went about it but hey we created the Super Delegates and until that is changed nobody can "steal" the nomination.
  • constantcomment · 1 year ago
    if you don't like the rules for nominating the democratic candidate, well the work to change them. but use the word steal is disingenuous.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    I am not surprise a Clinton fllower vierws the truth as disingenuous.

    The mantra of steal the election, discarding, ignoring and thwarting the will of the voters will incesssantly continue because the are true, despit all the bitching, whiiing and moaning coming from the Clinton camp. Word spin will not steal the truth either. Just get used to these words.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Correction:

    I am not surprised a Clinton follower views the truth as disingenuous.

    The mantra of "steal" the nomination, "discarding", "ignoring" and "thwarting" the will of the voters will incesssantly continue because they are true, despite all the bitching, whining and moaning coming from the Clinton camp. Word spin will not steal the truth either. Just get used to these words.
  • dommyluc · 1 year ago
    It's funny how the more she talks about her "electability", the less electable she becomes. If Hillary doesn't pull off a stunning 75%+ upset in the upcoming primaries, I have a feeling that insiders in the Democratic Party are going to start politically knee-capping her, which they would have done already to anyone else who doesn't have the last name "Clinton". If Obama was pulling this shit, he would have been tossed off to the netherlands like Zell Miller. Oh, and fuck Florida. The best thing that could happen to the Dems is winning the 2008 election without the Idiot State that has caused so much of our problems in the first place. They will go for McCain anyway, because otherwise Baby Jesus will cry and Fidel Castro will attack Boca Raton. And Obama should raise hell if the votes are counted in FL and MI since he was not even on the ballot - unless, of course, Hillary agress to give up her votes and delegates she won in Pennsylvania and California. That sounds like an even swap. Of course, I don't know if divine right royalty can even consider a fair compromise like us mere mortals. The only thing keeping Hillary alive is the complicit, Republican-loving media. But one good thing can be said: the more they cover and praise her, the more people realize they can't stand or trust her. She has become one 24/7 lying machine. It's Bill Clinton all over again. Time to change the channel.
  • jr · 1 year ago
    "I'm having a great time at the Connecticut For Lieberman ice cream social"-Hillary's email newsletter
  • Bluestocking · 1 year ago
    I agree that it would potentially be disastrous for the Democratic Party to select Clinton as the nominee, and not solely because it would mean that the superdelegates have decided that the popular vote essentially doesn't matter. What I most fear is that this would potentially drive a substantial number of Democratic voters away -- either towards McCain or potentially away from the election altogether (since it's not entirely clear that Nader is actually following through on his stated intent to run and is not getting very much attention anyway). The fact is that we might as well hand the election to McCain on a silver platter right after the Convention and not even bother waiting for November if a majority of Democrats for whatever reason choose not to unite behind the nominee -- since quite a few Clinton voters have also threatened to vote for McCain if Clinton is not chosen as the nominee.

    If we do not want the Democratic Party to become fractured -- which will not only result in certain defeat in this election, but potentially future elections as well -- then we need to make it absolutely clear in the next few months that the party and the country are more important than either of the two candidates, because that's potentially what's at stake here. We've already had to spend the last seven years dealing with a President and a cadre of his supporters who view the administration as being above the law and their interests as being considerably more important than those of the people and the country as a whole. WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER LEADER LIKE THAT -- hell, I'm not entirely confident that our country could even *survive* it. This country is in desperate need of change, and there's no question that McCain will not provide it. Unfortunately, it seems possible that Clinton won't either -- odds are that she won't even get the chance at this stage, because it seems likely that she'd lose the election to McCain even in a fair fight (since we can't entirely rule out the "wild card" of electronic voting machines without paper trails, and especially not after the latest shenanigans from the Republicans). If we want to have a prayer of winning the election in November and seeing change in this country, it's absolutely vital that the majority of Democrats be willing to support the nominee regardless of the outcome. Of course, it would be preferable if Clinton were to withdraw from the process now -- but we all know that this isn't going to happen, and it unfortunately still doesn't rule out the possibility that a wrench has already been thrown into the works.
  • troqua · 1 year ago
    I think we've reached the point where both voters and supers have wearied of the whole thing. She's down, she's back, she's out, she's got a chance, the tide has turned. No reasonable person can look at the current state of the primaries and conclude that she has a chance based on numbers, so now the standard becomes this one of "momentum." She's won a couple of races in recent weeks and calls that momentum, but neither win was a blowout. After all, she was expected to win PA with a far larger margin going in. Her only hope is there is something bigger than Wright out there, because Wright simply has not stuck except among those who were looking for an acceptable reason not to vote for the Black candidate. They weren't going to vote for him anyway, but now they can justify their votes.

    If she gets the nomination, it will be stealing it based on specious arguments about his character, rather than going by the rules or honoring the will of the people. If that happens, and I am increasingly seeing how it could happen, the party changes forever. Frankly, I don't want to be a member of a DLC dominated party, where rules and fairness mean nothing. It is too much like the GOP.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    DickJones

    OMG in heaven. Perhaps I should have been more clear but I thought is was understood that I meant Iraq, Bush lied to take this country to war in Iraq. I have no problems with his going to Afghanistan but Iraq is way off base to say it was because we were attacked in New York!!!! Further, if Bush was so adamant about wiping out terrorism where the hell did Ben Ladin go, you do remember who he is don't you?

    And this comment from you just boggles my mind "Nobody has been tortured. Having a little watter poured over your face for 2 or 3 minutes is not torture. It's uncomfortable as hell, but it's not torture." Obviously you have not read the reports on torture.

    I often wondered who the 27%--30% people were that consistently give Bush positive ratings and here you are. I don't feel like looking up the recent findings of a group of leading historians that said the Bush president will probably be looked at in future years as one of the worst in the history of the USA. I am guessing you didn't read that?
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    There is really not much point continuing on with you and this discussion if you insist on puking out the "Bush Lied" cliches. You pull that silly argument like a gun and ignore the fact that many governments also thought that the WMD's program was more advanced than it was. Saadam himself was doing all that he could do to convince the world that he had the weapons as a way to keep Iran, Iraq's sworn enemy at bay. You ignore that fact that Iraq threw out the U.N. weapon inspectors. You conveniently forget the daily anti-aircraft rocket fire on the American planes who were enforcing the U.N. mandated no-fly zone. As I said, Iraq was invaded for MANY reasons, WMD's was only one. The left sound like naive children when they chant their "Bush-lied" mantra. The funny thing is that none of this will matter in a few years when Iraq is stabilized and rebuilt. President Bush will be remembered by history as the man who invaded Iraq and set the people free. The image of the purple stained fingers of the proud new voters will be the enduring image of the time. That's what bugs the left.
  • constantcomment · 1 year ago
    tbhull: you'd be well advised to remember thw words of w b yeats:....................The Leaders of the Crowd
    They must to keep their certainty accuse
    All that are different of a base intent;
    Pull down established honour; hawk for news
    Whatever their loose phantasy invent
    And murmur it with bated breath, as though
    The abounding gutter had been Helicon
    Or calumny a song. How can they know
    Truth flourishes where the student's lamp has shone,
    And there alone, that have no solitude?
    So the crowd come they care not what may come.
    They have loud music, hope every day renewed
    And heartier loves; that lamp is from the tomb.
  • Viceroy · 1 year ago
    Oh, Obama will get the nomination all right, but it won't be worth much. Everyone in the Democratic party will make approbriate noises, but large numbers of leaders, and huge numbers of voters will sit it out, or go over to McCain (as they indicated they would do in the polling in Pennsylvania) The Clinton machine is no myth, and this nonsense that Obama is going to somehow singlehandedly change the nature of the electorate is straight out of OZ. If he is so uniquely appealing, why can't he knock Hillary out? And if he can't "change the electorate" to the point where he can knock Hillary out within the liberal confines of the Democratic Party, how is he going to "change the electorate" to overcome the race issue etc., and knock McCain out.? Bottom line: Obama = McGovern (except that McGovern was actually qualified to be president)
  • DickJones · 1 year ago
    Good point Viceroy, but in addition to McGovern, there was Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis. All good liberals who went down in embarrassing defeat. The kids who support Obama and post here have no historical reference and don't know what a bloodbath this election will be.
  • blackwolf · 1 year ago
    Viceroy: You're stuck in a vaccum, one that has been programmed and sanctioned by the Reupublican party. We've finally reached a juncture where we have a canidate that can bring about change. The real change is in the "perception" that change can happen.

    You're stuck on what you think an uneducated class of what a largely uneducated class of White Americans will do. These are different times, and if America is willing to continue down a path of destruction--rather than vote for a qualified man candidate of color--then it deserves the destruction just up ahead.
  • Swami_Binkinanda · 1 year ago
    Keep in mind that Dick Jones, as VP at Omni Consumer Products, is not a disinterested party or fair and capable judge of what is good, evil, right or wrong-only what is profitable in the immediate quarter. Who cares if the ED 209 kills schoolchildren due to a software glitch-the contracts for maintenance and spare parts are worth billions to the company over the next 10 quarters with military and overseas sales destined to quadruple the civilian program-who cares if it works?
    Dick Jones got his in the movie Robocop, which appears to be more prophetic than fantastic every time it shows up on television. Destroying brand America to save it doesn't work, and feeding the amoral philosophical shift this country has taken will only accelerate the feedback loop that brings us as a nation into being the caricatured monster the Soviets propagandized us as. Philistines too lazy to commit our own genocides.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    BB, I think that's a very good guess for H's VP.
  • Busboy · 1 year ago
    Here's Bush making jibes at himself and the candidates at the correspondents dinner today:

    "Senator McCain's not here," Bush said of GOP nominee-in-waiting John McCain. "He probably wanted to distance himself from me a little bit. You know, he's not alone. Jenna's moving out too."
    Bush then referred to scandals that have dogged the campaigns of the two remaining Democratic candidates, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, in explaining their absence: "Hillary Clinton couldn't get in because of sniper fire and Senator Obama's at church."
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Excellent, Joe, and I would go farther to say if she somehow gets the nom, then the "irreparable damage" is to more than just the Dem Party. We citizens are grasping at the hope, the potential, of Obama. Remove that and not much is left to this broken country. Certainly we will not break the stranglehold of the Neos, both red and blue. Certainly we will not have the spirit to do what is necessary to alter the direction we are headed. We lose this chance...phuckit.
  • Busboy · 1 year ago
    Has anyone heard what the big brouhaha is about over some posters that say "Obey Obama"?
  • Busboy · 1 year ago
    mf_roe, A hat tip to you. I am impressed by your encyclopedic knowledge. Thanks, I never would have figured it out...