-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/04/ny-times-acknowledges-mccains-campaign.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
13 hours ago · 69 comments
-
Can you find the one pet?
3 hours ago · 11 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
14 hours ago · 48 comments
-
A dog named Boo
9 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
16 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
better pander harder, my friend.
missing a "'t"
WTF??
CAN'T opt out, right?
and Obama should nip this in the bud by coming out with a statement along the lines of "earlier in this race I said if I were the nominee I would sit down with Sen McSame and discuss both of us limiting ourselves to public financing in the general election. considering that the Repugs in the Senate have continued to block a functioning FEC and Sen McSame has shown himself incapable of following the laws already in place that he's agreed to, I feel that he's not to be trusted on this very important issue of keeping special interest money out of politics. I, on the other hand, have instructed my staff to return any donations for the general election over a voluntary cap of $500 and feel that the people have more right to be heard in Washington than the big money fat cats"
I suppose I should be happy that they even mention it. But "he initially sought those public matching funds" so understates what actually happened as to be misleading and inaccurate. He didn't just "seek" the funds. He actually signed a legally binding agreement for them.
It's like the difference between asking someone out on a date and marrying them.
whoever waives the most money gets him...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/us/politics/1...
It's confusing to imagine how the Republicans can present themselves as the pro-business party. Maybe I don't know what they mean when they say, "business." Money smarts isn't it. Market smarts isn't it. Financial integrity isn't it. What is it if not razzamatazz?
---
good point... but then, neoconservatism changed EVERYTHING they actually stood for.
smaller government? yeah right...
fiscal responsability? they spend like rich teenagers with Daddy's Amex Platinum card.
there isn't any of the 'old' GOP left in the party anymore... rather than having a 3rd party, the neocon party latched onto the coattails of the republican party and claimed it for its own.
or an easier way to look at what happened to the old GOP... sometimes sleeping with hookers gives you STDs that are almost impossible to get rid of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMokHZ_35qY
Why isn't this Obama's or Clinton's slogan?
Obama would be a fool to give up the very real advantage he has from milllions of small donors--that's real public financing. As opposed to Senator Loophole's charades.
IN GENERAL, and I would like to speak on behalf of GENARATION Y, this could POSSIBLY BE one of the WORST presidential candidate pools ever. See what America’s Youth is saying about each of the candidates, what they have done for the campaigns and for OUR future at YourThreeCents.com.