DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Obama still making nice to Lieberman

  • nicho · 1 year ago
    WWTDD? What would Tom Delay do? How tolerant would Delay have been of a turd like Lieberman? That's why Delay was able to keep his caucus together. He was a total sleaze bag and a crook, but he knew what you had to do to herd the cats.
  • sukabi1 · 1 year ago
    I know he's not in jail like he belongs, but where is Tom Delay now? He's not herding his cats in congress.

    You know, it's not that the Delay's and Rove's of this world are smarter... it's that they gather dirt and use blackmail to get what they want... and it works UNTIL folks start actually examining WHAT THEY ARE DOING and START CHALLENGING them on the legality...

    Are you suggesting that's the approach Obama and the Dems need to start taking? Because if it is, it will be only a matter of time before they turn into EXACTLY what is vile about the Repubs...
  • okojo · 1 year ago
    The Democrats are not Tom DeLay.

    If anything Tom DeLay's antics can be learned from the Democrats: controlling all facets of the legislative process can reaps huge amounts of money and success and also went things go bad, a huge amount of scorn and control. Don't try to squash the opposition, no K Street project, no punishing donors for supporting the other party. What happens is the Democrats get s albatross around their neck of the likes of Jack Abramoff...

    Ironically, the person who probably did more to bring Tom DeLay down, was Senator John McCain when he released Abramoff's emails. DeLay was playing a very dangerous game for some time, whether making enemies of McCain and other Republicans.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    i'm trusting Obama to outsmart Lieberman
  • foxy · 1 year ago
    I think you're right. There is something interesting happening here.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 1 year ago
    we gave him a pass on his outreach to homobigots during the primary on the assumption he had a progressive strategy in mind. in for a penny, in for a pound.
  • AtlantaKaren · 1 year ago
    I hate to say it, but this sends a message of weakness from Obama. It's also a real slap to all the people who donated and worked so hard for his election. If Lieberman gets a pass, why should the public work hard on Obama's behalf? I am really confused by this.
  • slappymagoo · 1 year ago
    It could look like a sign of weakness, but then again, it could look like a sign of mercy. I think Lieberman deserves to be ousted, too. In fact, I really think Lieberman should have voluntarily resigned his seat (while I'm at it, I wish for world peace). Let's face it, if you s**t all over a man who becomes your boss, you should at least try to keep a low profile for a while.

    Having said all that, and while worrying that Lieberman is indeed the Republican in Democratic clothing, who will conduct hearings every time Obama sneezes whilst giving Bush a literal get-out-of-jail-free card, I suspect that a: Lieberman is more a paper tiger than anything else. He holds onto his chair like Daffy Duck holding on to that pearl after being shrunk to the size of ant "NO NO NO! DOWN DOWN DOWN! MINE MINE MINE! (I'm rich, I'm a happy miser). He sided with the GOP to feel like a winner, Obama being gracious enough to let him continue to caucus with the Dems will make Joe beam with pride like a bat boy with the Babe-Ruth era Yankees (and he'll be about as meaningful to the team as those glorified mascots were as well). And b: The GOP would've had assuredly called Obama petty and vindictive if he made any overture to Reid that Lieberman should be punished. Now, if the Dems result in stripping Joe of his cushy gig "against Obama's wishes," not only will it make the Dems look kinda sorta braver (for standing up the new and oh-so-worshipped President), but it absolves Obama of blame AND punishes Lieberman, it's the hat trick. But if they opt to accede to Obama's wishes and not punish Lieberman at all...it could look weak, but it could look merciful, and with Obama's approval ratings currently as high as they are, I suspect the narrative will lean more towards "merciful" with everyone but the hard-left.
    Again, I will shed no tears if Joe is banished to Obscurityville, but Obama's message isn't necesarily a sign of weakness. He made some very shrewd moves while running for President, moves that many people on this site didn't agree with, but that worked out for him just fine. If anyone's earned the benefit of the doubt, I'd think it's Obama.
  • paulbot5 · 1 year ago
    Because lieberman, democrats, and republicans are all buddies, they dont care about us I expect Obama to give you a lot more let downs in the future
  • CrprtMpstr · 1 year ago
    I agree with tlsintx. Obama is smarter than Lieberman, and he knows what he's doing here. In fact, I'll tell you what he's doing.

    It is captured in a quote from Abraham Lincoln, "The best way to destroy an enemy is to make him a friend."

    -Jonathan
  • High Crimes & Misdemeanors · 1 year ago
    I disagree, one cannot say one is smarter on this when you don't know all the facts. We are merely speculating. Also, one only has to remember that Obama supported lieberman in his election bid for the senate and that they are both "buddies" for what ever reason I don't know. It's despicable that it has come to this.

    PROPOSITION 2008: NO TO HARRY REID

    Does anyone know how we get ried sent to pasture as Senate Majority Leader?
  • CrprtMpstr · 1 year ago
    You're right, we can't say that anyone is smarter than the other. We simply can't "know" that.

    But Obama is out-maneuvering him here. If Lieberman is facing giving up his chair-person seat, or worse his seat in the caucus but Obama helps him keep his job, then Lieberman will likely end up with a sense of gratitude towards Obama. There will be a day soon enough when Obama is going to need Lieberman's help in getting some Republicans on board with some major policy changes.

    This is an effective political maneuver on Obama's part. Everyone citing it as a sign of weakness are simply reading too much into it.
  • okojo · 1 year ago
    I don't think Lieberman gives a shit about gratitude. He would had bolted his Senate seat in a minute if McCain won, and demanded Sec Def or a pretty high cabinet position. The guy wants the leverage. He will lose his seniority if he bolted to the Republicans Senate Caucus. Lieberman may have a fight on his hands, given many of the more liberal senators want his head like Dick Durbin and Schumer. (Lieberman made things difficult for Schumer for certain Senate Candidates)

    Offer him another Sub committee chair or tell him to go to the Republicans to seat him
  • nanorich · 1 year ago
    If I was Joe Lieberman and had an ounce of insight, I would not be cheered by those words...

    as a matter of fact, I would be looking over my shoulder a lot...
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    My inside the beltway sources are telling me that RAHM is twisting arms behind the scenes to ensure Lieberman keeps his position.....not difficult to accept that given RAHM and Lieberman's loyalties.
  • nanorich · 1 year ago
    My inside the beltway sources tell me that making assumptions on the basis of surface appearances about the Obama team has never been a really good way to figure out what they are going...

    something anyone who has seriously studied this campaign would know.
  • GordonSmith · 1 year ago
    Seems to me that the best to get Lieberman to vote with the Democratic majority is to keep him where he is with the knowledge that if he bucks the Dems, he'll be working out of a janitor's office and on the Committee to extract Tom Delay's head from his arse.
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    Lets remember that Lieberman bashed Obama, so Obama has more of a right than anyone to decide if this guy should be forgiven (which I do not believe he should). Obama obviously doesn't want to start of his tenure as president with these petty fights within his own party going on, so he is swallowing his pride and doing what he must. Basically it's not worth risking alienating the Senate and wasting political capital over this matter. Obama has bigger things to worry about.
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    I'd have to disagree this is a "petty fight".
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    It is. Dems are not like Repukes. We are not brainless automatons that jump whenever the Democratic party says jump. There are good things that come with that (free thinking and free flow of ideas) and there is some bad that goes along with that (particularly lieberman). Lieberman is a douche bag, but at least he votes party line on most domestic issues. It's not worth Obama wasting political capital over that little pissant.
  • LillaSwede · 1 year ago
    STFU about Lieberman already!
  • johnt66 · 1 year ago
    When are we going to take matter into our own hands, let the people in both houses know we have long memories, and we will be going after Reid and Polesi come election time, they work for us and it's hight time to show them that we can be a tough employer, and sent thousands of e-mail to both houses.
  • stefanzo · 1 year ago
    I know I'm the outlier here, but I don't see this particular issue as a problem.

    I think Lieberman is as despicable, foul, two-faced, mealy-mouthed and more, as they say. But I just think this is a great time for Obama to show mercy (which goes a long way towards building relationships), and a great opportunity for Reid to tie a very tight leash around Lieberman's neck.

    This opinion doesn't make me a traitor to the cause btw, though I'll probably get stepped on for having a non PC thought.
  • Cpeterka · 1 year ago
    I'm also thinking there is a reason.
  • Lolis · 1 year ago
    Just write your senators and ask them to boot Liebermen from Homeland Security. Word is they'll have a secret ballot vote on Tuesday. If they hear from us at a grassroots level, they are more likely to give him the boot.

    Obama is playing this smart. There has to be strategy involved in this. Lieberman is hated by Democrats and wields no real power but this is getting MSM attention. Obama is looking like the bigger man right now. His "nice guy" strategy won this election, remember? I hate it when bloggers act like they know how to politick better than the best politician in Washington. Do you really think Lieberman can outsmart Obama?
  • michaelt · 1 year ago
    yep.
  • Cpeterka · 1 year ago
    A RUSKIE DON'T TAKE A DUMP WITHOUT A PLAN.
    WE JUST HAVE TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IT IS.

    Maybe he's watched "Hunt for Red October" and "The Godfather" a lot.

    He's no dummy, he's gotta have a reason.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I think all options are being fleshed out. For now I'll trust Obama, Reid, and the rest of the senate leadership to work on it and come up with the best course of action. If it looks like I worry It'll look like after Obama's first 100 days, I hope they learn their lesson and make adjustments.
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    Well, I don't think Obama lets anyone "step all over him." He's got a method, and for now, it's honey, not vinegar, toward LIEberman who will hang himself with his own actions. I think Obama is just giving him a "gentleman's" way out...no need for Obama to shame him, he's already shamed himself enough.
  • lxxf · 1 year ago
    Well, he really has to forgive Joe. How can he possibly reach across the aisle, if he punishes one of his own. I am not so forgiving, I want to strangle the traitor.
  • vwcat · 1 year ago
    It's obvious that with Obama stepping in, he is trying to own Lieberman's ass to make him vote along party lines with his agenda. Lieberman is dead in the party and his career over unless someone saves him. Then, Lieberman is in debt to the one who does save him. Namely the party leader and president.
    Obama wants his agenda passed and he comes out looking great and bi-partisan and willing to work with enemies. Two birds with one stone.
    Obama seems to be setting things up like a chess game.
    Lieberman is just a pawn in it.
  • Kansaskitty · 1 year ago
    I agree with this. I trust Obama to know what he's doing, and I think it is a sign of his strength, not weakness. Obama will own Lieberman's ass and if he steps out of bounds again (which I don't think he will if he gets this reprieve), he will be persona non grata to the President of the United States. Not exactly where a suck-up like Lieberman wants to be.
  • DeppFan · 1 year ago
    Lieberman votes with the Democrats a pantload of the time. On one issue, though, he's a traitor, and it's a huge issue.

    Obama is keeping his friends close, and his enemies closer. I'm OK with that.
  • naschkatzehussein · 1 year ago
    Say what you will, Lieberman still owes the Republican Party for his Senate seat. Get rid of him. I hope this is just Obama taking the high road while letting others like Schumer and Durbin getting the dirty but necessary work done.
  • lauren1959 · 1 year ago
    I'm not a Lieberman fan, but if we have any chance at getting the huge majority that I think we can build over the next four years, and lead this country back into a direction that we can be proud of, we have to learn to turn the other cheek (ironic coming from an agnostic) and move forward. Obama would be a hypocrite if he did not reach out a hand to the other side, even if that's where you think Lieberman is-
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    Raise your hand if you suspect we've been thrown under the bus.
  • Lolis · 1 year ago
    please. is this how it is going to be over the next four years? each individual gets mad because Obama didn't do something exactly how he or she wanted. Lieberman keeping his chairmanship doesn't impact whether or not people will get health insurance, whether or not the Iraq war will end, etc. this is a minor issue in the grand scheme of things.
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    How are things done on your planet?
  • ObamaLover · 1 year ago
    Proof that Obama has backbone: I won't link to it but on a certain site they report that Obama's people leaked private conversations between Obama and Bush about the auto bailout vote in connection with the proposed trade agreement with South America, and apparently Bush officials are furious. This shows you that Obama is not afraid to shit all over a Republican when he needs to.
  • boloboffin · 1 year ago
    The TPM piece says that Obama's statement takes the steam out of efforts to oust Lieberman from his chair. That's not true. Reid not having backbone enough to toss Lieberman is what did it. Foisting it off on the caucus to vote was a lame attempt to make it somebody's else responsibility and led to stupid, stupid drama. Obama is trying to stop THAT, and if Reid can't cowboy up and do his freaking job, then it's over.
  • slappymagoo · 1 year ago
    "Under Alaska's constitution, she couldn't appoint herself, but she could run for the vacated seat."

    But would she win? I know Alaska has a strong anti-everyone-else streak. Nonetheless, she's looked like such a dullard over the past few months, even they might want her to just go away.
  • bluestockton · 1 year ago
    Sarah reminds me of the Bushes, Jeb and Dubya, who never served in a legislative body because Bushes have a sense of entitlement. They think they deserve to start at the top (governor and president) rather than pay their dues in a state legislature or Congress and work up from there.

    If Sarah, with her thin resume, truly never blinked when McCain asked her to be his VP, then she too has a huge sense of entitlement and would probably prefer to be the one and only governor of Alaska rather than the 100th senator. Besides, since 1976, except for Poppy Bush and Obama, all the presidents have been ex-governors. She may think she has a better shot at being president if she stays in Alaska.
  • AdrianBrowne · 1 year ago
    Remember, during the campaign, McCain tried to force Obama into:

    Public financing
    Townhall-style debates
    Suspending his campaign

    Obama did none of those things indicating that he's not going to be the Republican's bitch. It might not be exactly analogous right now but it seems to me that he's not afraid of Der Lieberworm.
  • jeffg166 · 1 year ago
    Connecticut will decide Lieberman's fate in 2012.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    THAT would be the best solution!
  • dancinfool · 1 year ago
    Personally, I'd like to see Lieberman run out of the Democratic Party and into oblivion, but perhaps Obama read Sun-tzu, Chinese general & military strategist (~400 BC):

    "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer."

    ~
  • BlueShoes · 1 year ago
    Agreed -- on both counts. This 'Art of War' strategy takes discipline and courage, and I trust Obama to have both of these qualities. Even better if it makes Repugs think the opposition is weak -- they'll not suspect the blow when it comes.

    And it will.
  • dancinfool · 1 year ago
    Yes, thanks. It makes no sense to me to support Obama with all my heart for the last year just to object to one of his first declarations - I think Obama is a lot smarter than even we dirty fucking hippies believe him to be. This is a time to give the man some trust.
  • The Tim Channel · 1 year ago
    Hey John, much as I love you buddy, the problem with unity and discipline is yours in this case. Follow your President. Give him his time in the Rose Garden. I loathe Lieberman and wish him gone, but AT THIS POINT in the game, I am not going to second guess the SMARTEST MAN in politics in my generation. Obama hasn't even made it into office and you're crying like you did back when some homosexual prostitute was posing as a reporter.

    Enjoy.
  • eagleye · 1 year ago
    Obama has a legislative agenda that he wants to advance, and having Lieberman on his side would help. Most of us in the blogosphere would like to see Lieberman marginalized and humiliated, but if we're going to move forward on healthcare and other big issues his vote could be critical. I'm willing to cut Obama a lot of slack and not overanalyze and micro-manage his every move. He ran the most brilliant political campaign in our national history, and I think he's looking at the big picture and trying to move forward. Getting involved in a pissing match with Lieberman only serves to empower Lieberman.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 1 year ago
    allowing lieberman to caucus with us IS getting involved in a pissing match with him.

    the man is ONLY interested in what's good for him... he's also gotta know that he is done after this term. so if he doesn't like a bill, what's to keep him voting with the Dems?

    not advocating the pissing match... but you have to realize that even getting INVOLVED with the man is going to start pissing matches.
  • DAB · 1 year ago
    "the man is ONLY interested in what's good for him"

    I'm no fan of Joe the Traitor, but how does this make him any different than the other 99 members of his club?
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 1 year ago
    point taken... however, most of them will vote with the party they caucus with. lieberman is of the sort that will start censorship proceedings if an Obama staffer gets a j-walking ticket.

    keep an eye on what he says for the next few months... how much does he praise the repugs, and diss the Dems?

    at this point, I bet he'd rather be a repugnican... but he doesn't want to give up the money, staff and power that comes with his comittee seats.

    like I said, he KNOWS he's done in the senate when his term is up... so why should he vote with the Dems?
  • renegademom · 1 year ago
    imho, Obama is merely respecting the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches......

    he is telling Harry Reid, "it's your call".
  • DAB · 1 year ago
    @AtlantaKaren: I have to disagree. While I, personally, would like to see Lieberman stripped of his committee chairmanship, I don't see any upside in the Obama transition getting involved in Senate committee jockeying. He's trying to establish himself as the President, above the inter- and intraparty squabbles of Congress, so I think he's projecting a position of strength. Everyone knows Obama COULD give the nod to kick Lieberman out of the caucus and they would, so the strength position is magnanimity, not petty retaliation. Obama came to Lieberman's rescue in the 2006 senate campaign, then got the shaft from him in return in 2008, and now is showing that he's not going to get into a back-and-forth with the gentleman from Connecticut, that he's the bigger man (and now in a much bigger job). If Lieberman does retain his committee chair, he knows he does so on probation and will owe the Democrats and Obama for his political survival, because his friend John McCain can't do anything for him now. That situation could help pass a lot more of Obama's agenda in the years ahead than it might if he just goes even further rogue.
  • okojo · 1 year ago
    I am all for bygones be bygones, but Lieberman for the last two years showed he was bitter, felt betrayed and loved being the center of attention.. He definitely didn't let bygones be bygones.

    The main reason I would kicked Lieberman out of the caucus, has nothing to do with his mean words he said to President Elect Obama on the campaign trail or speaking at the Republican National Convention.

    Two Words: Tom Allen

    Lieberman went out of his way to support Susan Collins, even had a fundraiser for her. He pretty much shut down DHS committee as an investigatory arm so he wouldn't embarrass Collins for her piss poor job on oversight, (ie Hurricane Katrina?) He basically stabbed the Democrats in the back over one of their best candidates for Senate, (Compare to gadfly Al Franken) I wouldn't punished for Lieberman words, I would punished him for his actions, and he did many of his actions out of pure spite.

    If the Obama Administration wants to keep him in the caucus, fine. However, they have to deal with him, when is trying to whip up some circular reasoning attack or subpoena an Obama Administration official... I still think Lieberman will be kicked out of the Caucus, whether now or later, because he is only looking out for himself. I just think it is easier and less painful to kick him now, then the brouhaha when they kicked him out for some outrageous betrayal in the future.
  • EmGD · 1 year ago
    I think it's one of those "Sure I want you in the caucus, but darn that Harry Reid and Senate leadership, they just stripped you of your chairmanship. I wouldn't have, but it's out of my control. Still buddies?" deals. I'm betting he wants Lieberman off the committee, but he doesn't want to get bogged down in tossing him or have his fingerprints on it. So he lets the Senate leadership do it and tries to salvage as much as he can out of Lieberman for the future.

    http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
  • EllaDisenchanted · 1 year ago
    Well, if we fire his butt next election than Obama and Reid have NO say.
  • mehrrh · 1 year ago
    Keep your friends close and your enemies closer?
  • bluestockton · 1 year ago
    Or, you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar?
  • Chris From Maine · 1 year ago
    the congressional democrats STILL HAVE NO BALLS.

    They are a bunch of weak cowardly spineless frauds who have no idea what the people who voted for them DEMAND THEY DO.

    KICK TRAITOR JOE OUT! PERIOD. This is not hard.
  • Charles2 · 1 year ago
    You may be dead-on for the Congressional Democrats, but NOT for Obama (or Rahm for that matter). Count me on the side of all those below who think that Obama is working an angle to keep Joe in the caucus, where they need the vote, but in-line.

    I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Rahm sent a fresh fish...
  • DanielJ · 1 year ago
    Obama should offer him a post in his cabinet, nothing major, but something he'd be able to be effective on. That way he'd be out of the Senate, CT would get a true democrat to replace him AND he'd be serving at the pleasure of the administration - i.e. any shenanigans and he'd be booted. A win-win-win for the dems, the Obama admin and the people of CT.
  • bluestockton · 1 year ago
    How about ambassador to Saudi Arabia?
  • heraldsquare · 1 year ago
    Obama said throughout the campaign he'd work with everybody, and now he's proving it. I'm all for it.There's a lot of work to be done; settling scores is way at the bottom of the to-do list.
  • paulbe · 1 year ago
    Lieberman, Rahm, That Treasury pick of his...its shaping up as a Zionists wet dream. Not a promising sign that change is coming.