DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Obama tried to avoid the culture wars - so what did he get? - culture wars

  • Mike · 7 months ago
    John said, "If Obama is going to be blasted no matter what he does for the gay community, then why not do something real and keep his promises. "

    EXACTLY.

    Years ago (almost 19) when my company added sexual orientation to the non-discrimination policies -- the fundies were all over it and protesting that it would lead to the company adding domestic partnership benefits... which it did... and they were all over it again when that happened -- saying we were going to "destroy traditional values and natural families", yada, yada.

    After those two firestorms, when we wanted to add gender identity to our policies -- some in management worried about "backlash". I pointed out to them that we were already firmly in the "satanic" column for the usual suspects, so why not go all-in? So we did.

    Sure enough, there was a minor blip from Bam Bam and Daddy Dobson, but our management's reaction this time was, "You deal with this all the time? Man, we've got to do better."

    So get with the program Obama -- this aint 1993.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    YUP!

    This country has been completely Republicanified. Even the Dems are republicans.

    My 17 yo son, a bagger at Kroger had a propane tank dropped on his toe nearly severing it. The workmans comp claims company (Sedgwick) gives instructions on where he goes to the doctor and what can be treated (antibiotics are not approved even though his toe had to be sewn on). Even though he is on Vicodin for pain they requested that he come back to work (5 days after the accident) to "greet and hand out coupons". They will not even buy him new shoes because "his shoes were used, not new".

    We live in a wealthy are and when we tell our friends and neighbors about this they say "this is what government healthcare would be like"... no, this is what insurance company healthcare is like.
  • Dateline_Molly · 7 months ago
    Difference between Obama and Hillary is Hillary isn't afraid of the Repubs. They were throwing dirt at her for a decade and it rolled off her back. Hillary came right out and said during the primary that Ob wasn't experienced enough and was too naive to take on the Republicans. And she was obviously right.

    Not that Hillary isn't an imperialist warmonger, either. But the Republicans were more afraid of her than they were of Obama. Obama is turning out to be a bug that can be easily crushed by the Republicans.
  • jpjones · 7 months ago
    I hate admitting it, but you are absolutely right. I refused to vote for the imperialist warmonger (her "I'll leave the morality of homosexuality for others to decide" didn't help a bit) but there's no doubt that she would not now be engaged in this pathetic attempt to "bring everyone together" (translation: bow and scrape to the disgraced minority party and do whatever they want). She's totally got the right wing's number. Obama looks more and more like Obambi with every passing day.
  • mml34 · 7 months ago
    i agree dateline.

    say what you want about hillary. BUT, she's smart enough to know that the right-wingers are never satisfied and never back down.

    obama doesn't realize it yet, but despite the knocks that he's taken from the republicans, he's still enjoying the honeymoon. give them another 6 months. maybe then mr. hope and butterflies will realize that he threw many of his supporters (including the gays) under the bus for NOTHING.

    no one who voted for mccain in the 2008 election is going to be voting for obama in 2012. and lots of progressives who forked over money and time for mr. hope and butterflies in 2008 won't in 2012.
  • Dateline_Molly · 7 months ago
    How do you get a visible candidate to run against this clown in 2012. Could Nader get on the Democratic ticket and contend for it? Of course they will completely shut him out, but if Obama keeps going the way he's going, it's possible a contender would have a chance.

    What will take him down is health care. He's going to capitulate on it and we will get something like "mandated insurance" where we are all forced to buy private insurance and then our premiums get raised and our benefits continue to be restricted.
  • Steve · 7 months ago
    Nader? Mr. "gonadal politics"? You've got to be kidding! Although I agree with the criticisms of Obama, why on earth would I trade an inexperienced Democrat who needs to be pushed hard for a rambling old fool who can't get three votes? We need a smart, cunning Democrat, not a buffoon like Nader.

    Just remember, if it weren't for Ralph Nader and the Green Party, we would now have a Democratic Chief Justice appointed by President Gore and a Democratic replacement for O'Connor appointed by President Gore--giving us a liberal Supreme Court majority of six votes. We are STILL suffering to this day for that STUPID 2000 stunt, when, by the way, no one on the straight left ever bothered to ask the gay community whether we wanted to throw the election in a hissyfit.

    The Greens would be no better than the Democrats. Instead of making gays take a back seat to health care; the Greens would make gays take a back seat to a lengthy environmental agenda. They are the party of straight environmentalists who intellectually support gay rights but don't really give a damn about the issues.
  • Dateline_Molly · 7 months ago
    That tired excuse that a candidate who you yourself claim couldn't get 3 votes put the Democratic party under in favor of George Bush just doesn't hold water anymore. Try again. That train left the station YEARS ago. If you want to blame the 2000 election on anything, blame it on SCOTUS and the maroons who voted for Bush. And the 60% of the country that doesn't vote at all.

    If the Democratic party is in such a shambles that a guy who can "barely get 3 votes" can shred them to pieces, your party has got bigger fish to fry than Nader. Yeesh.

    There is literally no difference between the 2 parties. Whether you like Nader or not, he's right about that.

    Obama appears to be to the RIGHT of Bush on many of his policies and is certainly more aligned with Repubs than with any "Democratic" platform. Obama worships Reagan for chrissakes. Isn't that a dead giveaway that he's not going to be on the side of what ordinary Americans want and need?!
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    Ok, how about Chomsky or Krugman? How about Michael Moore?

    We had 1 critic of the establishment in the last primary and he was laughed off the stage as an irrelevant cook.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    Which is why the corporatists went to Obama and offered to back him against Hillary. He made a deal with the devil -- and now the devil is collecting on his end of the deal. Obama is not in charge. All the shots in this administration are being called on K Street and Obama is doing what he's told.
  • NotTimothyGeithner · 7 months ago
    Yes, thank-you for not denouncing Obama voters in the primary. We probably deserve it in retrospect.
  • JohnnyInGa · 7 months ago
    I agree -- once she had the power, I think you would have seem more of HRC's idealism in action, instead of the pandering and rhetoric we're getting. I feel like this is going to be four years of "on the job training", with little to show in terms of moving the country really forward on very important issues like healthcare, LGBT rights, infrastructure, climate, etc.
  • Mateo1970 · 7 months ago
    The excuses are beyond absurd. I fully expect the White House to now say that due to MJ's death, the country is in too much emotional turmoil to make and social changes as ending DADT or DOMA. The Republicans are going to play this to the hilt. They still have a lot of dirty tricks up their sleeves like that ad showing the Bible being banned and a silhouette of two nude gay men kissing. We are in for a hell of a ride from these scum.
  • AdamBlast · 7 months ago
    As his opposition to full gay marriage shows, Obama is only our qualified friend. His protestations and campaigning aside, he does not treat us with full dignity or equality, and has shown precious little leadership or true American spirit in his dealings with us.

    Obama has dismayed me with his pandering to the right, to religion, to the military in the oppression of our people. These aren't the only things he's done, just the most personal.

    My support for the Democratic party and this President have suffered grave harm. Had I money to donate, it would go elsewhere. My vote is likely to stray as well.
  • jpjones · 7 months ago
    Obama probably would have gotten away with the Rick Warren bitch-slap and stringing us along for four years if he had just issued a stop-loss on DADT (which we all know the MAJORITY of the country SUPPORTS) and opposed the DOMA lawsuit on the limited grounds that the particular plaintiffs in question lacked standing. Instead he used the DOMA brief to make a direct appeal to the most disgusting - and dangerous - elements in our society. If you want to see what kind of people he's reaching out to, read Ben Smith's thread at Politico regarding the DNC protest last night ("Small protest at Biden event"). http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0609/Sma...
    Be warned - it's abusive as all hell. And these are supposedly better educated and better informed people than the average American. After reading this bile, I'd cut my dick off before I'd vote for Obama again.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    god, us liberals are such pussies. We ask for so god damn little. We will practically support anyone who does not advocate putting us in concentration camps.
  • jpjones · 7 months ago
    Don't give 'em any ideas. Obambi's still trying to sew up the Saddleback Church vote.
  • leliorisen · 7 months ago
    I just looked at some of the comments on Ben Smith's column at Politico and wanted to throw up.

    It wasn't just the right-wing bigots that made me ill, but the even more disgusting comments from allegedly African-American straight Democrats.

    However, the thing I find most infuriating is that the Obama administration basically tells us to bend over and we take it and smile. How else to explain the success of last night's fundraiser.

    I am beyond disgusted.

    And, while I am at it...where is the coverage of the attendees? Where are the names? Wasn't this supposed to be a big deal? Wasn't the Blade supposed to be outing those in attendance?

    John, where is the follow-up on this?

    Nothing has changed.

    That is why the Dems can get away with this. They know, when push comes to shove, the entire glbt community is toothless.
  • Indigo · 7 months ago
    Barack Obama is just another Jimmy Carter. He seemed so nice, all that soft-spoken talk just inspired so much confidence. Then he decided to clean up Washington. Raise your hand if you remember his Sunday School teacher speech when he ordered Washington beaureaucrats to "Stop living in sin and get married!"

    One term, that's all that type gets.
  • tigergrrldc · 7 months ago
    I keep telling The Liar that Rick Warren and his people are NOT going to donate money to him and they are NOT going to vote for him! Why alienate the people who WILL donate, volunteer, and vote for you? It makes no sense! No, I won't vote for the Repukes, but I won't vote for him either, if he keeps treating us like this.

    Won't the Dimocrats be surprised when we DON'T go to the polls. Where else are we going to go? At home, sitting on the couch, watching the returns and listening to them say, "But, but, what do you mean we lost?"
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    Perhaps, if everyone wrote in Kuchinich's name for president they would start getting the idea who didn't vote for them.
  • Al · 7 months ago
    The Republicans are being politicians in the worst since of the word. The "Party of No" strategy is no mistake; it is a calculated--though supremely cynical and selfish--race for the bottom. It goes:

    1) Oppose anything associated with Democrats. Good and bad are indifferent. The ONLY consideration is that it comes from Democrats.
    2) Let the Democrats bargain their own policies down to weak, stupid half-actions that will fail by not going far enough to fix real problems.

    Now we come to the pay-off!
    3) Blame the Democrats when the weak, stupid, half-actions fail, because after all, they are the Democrats own plans. "Our hands never touched them. In fact, we said a loud and emphatic: NO!"
    4) Pick up votes from a public angry with ineffectual Democrats.

    It's all the Republicans have left in their deranged lust to returned to power, and they'll stick with it.

    Ergo, reaching out to these people is senseless futility.

    Don't be stupid. Marginalize them; steamroll them. Then when strong, sensible plans succeed, the Republicans are left with absolutely nothing.
  • postdamnit · 7 months ago
    NO GAY RIGHTS, NO GAY $$

    That should be the bottom line for ALL gay's.
  • Stuart · 7 months ago
    Hey - don't go excluding us straight folks who support equality!

    EVERYONE who supports equality should stop giving money until progress is made on these issues.

    To be honest, it's unlikely I would have given much until the 2010 or possibly even the 2012 campaign is in full swing anyway. But when that time rolls around I will certainly be looking at the record on equality issues to decide who is worth donating to. If DADT is still in place then Obama and the DNC won't get a dollar from me.
  • Greensburg · 7 months ago
    He hasn't kept his promises about anything that has any substance, the few advances made were well in the works before the current rock star took office, he just got lucky that he was in position to sign the law, any one sitting in the oval office could have would have done what he has done so far. Very seriously looking at all potential politicians regardless of political affiliation, I have basically thrown away my vote for the last 31 years by voting for the democrats so I really dont feel I will be throwing away my vote by giving it to a green or independent or libertarian or anyone else. The dems have done nothing for me as a gay man and they continue to be nothing but insulting and without testicular fortitude.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    Other than his presidential order on stem cell research, has he done anything that bush wouldn't have done?

    i am done with the Democratic party.
  • Dateline_Molly · 7 months ago
    I've been voting for socialist, communist, and Green party capitalist candidates for 30 years. At least I don't have to walk out of the polls feeling like I need to lie down with a headache, because I voted my conscience.

    OBAMA IS A LIAR. It was clear from his position on health care during the primary that he planned to throw ordinary Americans under the bus on this issue. He had a stupid unintelligible corporate backed health care plan. It was clear he planned to continue imperialist policies abroad by throwing billions at the war machine to continue killing innocent people in the Middle East.

    But he outright LIED on his positions about LGBT issues. HE'S A LIAR. It's unconscionable how these issues are playing out with his administration.
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 7 months ago
    there is nothing 'cultured' about the religious right.

    we need to find a new term for this 'war'. how about 'holy-roller mudslinging contest'?
  • FunMe · 7 months ago
    They (most DC politicians who live in a bubble) really have no idea who were are.

    We are smart. We have lots of time to help with elections. We have $$$ money.

    Did I mention that we have $$$$$ money $$$$$?

    We have more money as a voting bloc than some others. And yet they think we are stupid. Guess what? The DC polticians are the ones who are stupid. They are going to PERMANENTLY lose us as VOTERS with $$$ money if they refuse to advance our civil rights.

    This whole notion of "where are they going to go" no longer flies. We probably will not vote for the GOP. But it doesn't mean we will vote for the Democrats who continue to treat us as 2nd class citizens.

    If the Democrats continue this shitty behavior toward the GLBT community, they will lose elections. And they will have no one to blame but themselves.

    Oh well ... la dee da.
  • lileasy · 7 months ago
    Sadly, the community is not cohesive. The $1m brought in at last night's gala demonstrates that. There are folks in the community who are going to give their $$$$$ regardless. I wonder how many will show up for the October March?
  • FunMe · 7 months ago
    Good point.

    So how do we get community unity?
  • ndtovent · 7 months ago
    Good question, and it's baffled me for years. Our community is so diverse, it's a wonder we've been able to organize ANY kind of movement over the years.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    you wont if you mean that there will be 100% support. As long as an individual can profit, they will sell out their "group". This is the nature of humanity.
  • nycwill · 7 months ago
    i work in a business where i come into contact with lots of very, very wealthy, "a-list" gays, some of whom are even friends, and sadly, they couldn't care less about this stuff. many of them don't even know what's going on w/DOMA and DADT.
    what i find w/them generally speaking, is an attitude of, "i got mine (my condo, my mercedes, my house in the hamptons, my much younger boyfriend) with no help from anyone. why should i help you?"
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    I wondered who the traitors were who helped raise one million dollars?
  • rextrek1 · 7 months ago
    I have no doubt (my guess) its ol' Rahm Emmanuel...telling/advising him to USE kid gloves with the "Faggots"...they'l get you in trouble with the religiosu right. (now I can't positively say its him, but he comes off as a homophobe to me)
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 7 months ago
    I don't get it really... getting in trouble with the religious right is like a rally cry for progressives everywhere.

    why pander to the 20% when the other 80% are PRO change?
  • Indigo · 7 months ago
    It's an internalized thing with that old queen!
  • caphillprof · 7 months ago
    The "culture war" is a creation of the Christofascist right as they try to drag the country back to a fictitious time. That culture war will be fought on the right whatever Obama does or does not do.

    Another fiction is bipartisanship, which in truth only exists when both sides of the aisle agree to sell the country down the river--think NAFTA. Republicans define bipartisanship as Democrats caving to Republican positions. Democrats define it the same way but won't use the verb "cave."

    The problem with John's argument is that, if the administration were trying to avoid heating up the "culture war," then why in the hell did it go out of its way to malign and degrade gay marriages in that DOMA brief?

    We not only do not have an apology, we do not even have the facts. We don't know how it happened and why it happened and who was with us and who was against us. The brief remains unexplained.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    Bingo -- the so-called "culture wars" are as phony as O'Reilly's "war on Christmas." Most people in the country don't give a rat's ass -- until they're told that they give a rat's ass and they hear it 24/7 from the corporate media and from their Sunday morning charlatans.

    The "culture wars" are just another diversion and phony division to distract us while the corporatists rob us blind.

    This country is going to be fucked until the 95 percent of us at the bottom of the pile realize that we're all in it together and that the bad guys are the other five percent who are stealing all our money and laughing at us.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 7 months ago
    aint... never.... gonna... happen! We had a chance in this election, but the people elected were lying to us. NO CHANGE.
  • HereinDC · 7 months ago
    "...if you just give the gays a little....."

    Oh Pleeeeeezzzee...

    You know most gays are size queens.

    LOL
  • Soundboy_jeff_meanie · 7 months ago
    seriously... if there are two things I really hate, they're size queens and small dicks.
  • jpjones · 7 months ago
    Thanks, Jeff, for a desperately needed laugh!
  • sonofloud · 7 months ago
    Obama thinks by denying gays he increases his support from the so called "centerists" or "moderates". So to him it is useful to deny us equality.
    Will this ever change?
    Not until Obama thinks it does him more harm than good.
    So what's the best way for our community to make him think that?
    I know what is not the best way......following the status quo and allowing the Democrats to treat us this way.
  • mtiffany · 7 months ago
    I think the larger problem is that the Democrats don't seem to understand that the "culture wars" is as real a war as the Cold War. It is a struggle for ideological superiority and the Republicans are playing to win and they are winning. They made the word "liberal" an insult and now we have to use the word "progressive."
  • Mike_in_the_Tundra · 7 months ago
    I need to go off topic here. I have been trying to call my representatives office all day in order to ask him to cosponsor The Reuniting Families Act. All I get is a message that all circuits are busy. That's never happened before. Is there something special happening in D.C. today?
  • johnnyk · 7 months ago
    At this point all I am asking for is an explanation as to why the anti-GLBT right wing invocations of incest and child-marriage had to be used in the DOMA brief. It read no different than a Bush DoJ document. But even blubbering, baffling Barney Frank likes it, sees nothing wrong with it. He is angry at us for being angry with that damnable brief. The afterglow from the night of last Nov. 4 has certainly vanished.
  • trinu · 7 months ago
    That's funny. I' don't remember Frank giving the brief his blessing. In fact I remember he CONDEMNED it (sorry, I can't remember the exact words). If you want to blame someone, blame the White House and congresss as a whole, but NOT Frank specifically.
  • nicho · 7 months ago
    Frank condemned it -- at first. Then, he reversed himself 180 degrees and said it was just fine. No problem at all.
  • JohnnyG · 7 months ago
    Frank is a total apologist for the Obama administration now. Listen to his interview with Michelangelo Signorile yesterday. He's mad at the protesters, not the DOMA brief, which he completely defends.

    http://www.signorile.com/2009/06/barney-frank-i...
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    Frank is an idiot and deserves to be voted out of office for this last stunt. He's either drinking the kool-aid or has lost his mind.
  • Butch1 · 7 months ago
    Making decisions is hard work for the president.
  • leliorisen · 7 months ago
    Is it me, or does everything Obama does on social issues seem so last century?

    This is 'change?'
  • Angela · 7 months ago
    True!
  • Lepanto · 7 months ago
    Well, let's see...gay marriage is not a issue only for the Republicans, but also for many Democrats.
  • James · 7 months ago
    But, but, John you said Obama was our friend and could do no wrong.