-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/on-campaign-trip-to-canada-yes-canada.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
12 hours ago · 69 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
13 hours ago · 46 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
4 hours ago · 9 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
The Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting added that if he wins the White House, "have no doubt that America will honor its international commitments - and we will expect the same of others."
----
Ha!
Hope the Obama people have a clear tape of that.
Should make a good commercial for Ohio, Pennsylvania and a few other industrial states.
He will do what he likes and not a single media person gives a shit.
We lost a huge battle with the help of the Dems today with FISA, if that wasn't important enough this is a minor transgression by comparison.
Secondly, he wasn't in the Senate when it passed, hence he wasn't "wildly opposed."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/19...
Your whole comment revolves around the lies the Clinton campaign said about him contact Canada.
I am not stupid he was not in the Senate when Clinton passed the bill. He has never said he was opposed to it in principle but wanted it talk to Harper and modify it if necessary. If you would read what i right it might help with your remarks.
=====
And you disagree with this how?
Then what are you bitching about?
FISA is the next thread down.
/snark
Just after they investigate his blatant violation of campaign finance laws.
There seems to have been quite a few doom and gloom posters here similar to the pre-dis Disqus days but, considering teevee's relentless "breaking his promise" reportage and it's temporary effect on some people, this isn't too unusual.
I'll eat my socks if immunity gets through the Senate
Listen to Turley and then see if you think support of Obama can continue if he votes Yes, with or without immunity:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/06/20/turley...
His entire career he has put political reform at the center of it. In the...legislature, in the Senate, political reform has been the essence of who he has been. And so for him to betray this, to sell out this issue, what won't he sell out?
And it really reveals something about his conscience. It reveals that he has this idealistic side, which is a serious policy side, but he also has a tough Machiavellian side, a political hack side, and he wants to win.
And so, in some ways, this is terrible because it's epic hypocrisy. In some ways, if you want a tough SOB to be your president, he's shown he is a tough S.O.B.
McCain breaking federal campaign law? No, Obama saying he wouldn't take public funds.