DISQUS

AMERICAblog: On Vitter: "He'd rather pay a prostitute than pay auto workers."

  • paulbot5 · 1 year ago
    No one mentions the cost of the bailout, how many workers will it screw
  • Robert Phillips · 1 year ago
    And no one ever mentions that the Big Three surviving depends on people buying their cars. No one is going to do that. I get that this is going to put millions out of jobs. But even with the bailout this will only delay that for about six months. And will put the government that much farther into debt.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    United Hookers of America, Local 69, fully supports Sen. "Diaper" Dave Vitter's (R-Fetish Freak) many and varied positions.
  • Ken Clark · 1 year ago
    Maybe some prostitute driving a GM vehicle refused his offers.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    why do GOPers hate the hard-working people of America?

    (the fact the GOPers gave this one to Vitter means they know it's a loser...just like him. )
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    "He'd rather pay a prostitute than pay auto workers."

    finally, a senator i can agree with.
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    I'd like to give Mr. Johnson a big old hug for that bon mot. : )
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    what's the difference between a prostitute and an american made car?

    people are willing to pay for the prostitue
  • John · 1 year ago
    He only used non-union prostitutes so that makes it ok with his wingnut base.
  • Butch1 · 1 year ago
    If this poor excuse for a Senator hasn't been censured due to his illegal crimes of prostitution yet, how can the republicans even think of talking about the morals of others?! Yes, this if the voice of the GOPoo-poo.
  • sumergocognito · 1 year ago
    Vitter may be a sanctimonious hypocrite, but I don't get what's so great about the auto bailout. What's next, the telegraph industry?
  • cosanostradamus · 1 year ago
    .
    Hell, who wouldn't???!!! Those auto-workers have SUCH rough hands! I'd rather have a nice soft hooker ANY day! 'Course, I wouldn't want to drive a car made by ho's. Like that Gremlin. That's the last sex-worker-made automobile I'LL ever buy! (It had a condom-tray instead of an ashtray, and other embarassing stuff.)

    Although the Hyundai's have nice rear ends. I hear they're made by B-girls. Woo-Woo! Or Dae-Woo!

    Now, down in Mexico, they've got virgins right on the cover of Playboy. And they're not maquilladoristas, either. Betchya LOTS of Repukelickin's have gone down south of the border, if ya know what I mean. Que no? Those burrrrros!
    .
  • Nosybear · 1 year ago
    There seems to be a pattern emerging here: The GOPers who think they have a political life ahead of them are "opposing" the bailout so they can tell their base they acted against those pesky UAW members. Meanwhile, the political dead-ender Bush can come in and bail out the auto-makers much as they wanted to begin with - with no strings attached. The anti-union knuckle-draggers have political cover, the CEOs have their money with little or no constraint on it and the Democrats look like a bunch of political losers.

    Brilliant.
  • pdxprobert · 1 year ago
    Constitutionally speaking, The President cannot authorize the distribution of funds or revenue...thats the business of congress... See Article 1, sections 7 and 8... of the U S Constitution... is the constitution relvant still?

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/art1.asp
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    i feel for the union workers. i do. they've earned everything they get, as far as pay and benefits go.

    but that doesn't change the fact that the bailout was a bad move that wouldn't make any difference in the long run. chrysler is done. gm needs to go into bankruptcy and restructure. ford needs to hunker down and get to work on "the next big thing", which is what the foreign car makers have been doing for the past 10 years... that's why they're not going under, because those companies are well managed, and the big three are not.
  • jt307 · 1 year ago
    Only Republicans could make the American auto industry look like victims.

    I have read most of the comments on here regarding the auto bailout. I agree that this is awful, that the repubs are using it to destroy organized labor and weaken a large block of dem voters, without regard to actual people losing more jobs. On that front the fight should wage on.

    I honestly believe though that if this were May, June, July of this year, and gas were at $4+ a gallon, and the big 3 were rolling out there brilliant marketing schemes, like Chrysler's failed guaranteed gas price promo, and the entire world economy hadn't gone in the tank, most of us wouldn't mind if one of them failed. Not because we are cruel people who wish 100K plus lose their jobs, but rather these companies have spent $100's of millions over the years to defeat every progressive movement on the environment, while spending billions to hoodwink the consumer into believing a substandard engineered truck, with more body panels, more plastic, and a touch of chrome and leather is not only worth a $15-30K premuim over the truck frame it is built on, but also safer for your children to ride in. They have taken years away from each and every one of us who would like to pass a planet on to our kids and grandkids that isn't teetering on the brink of extinction. Some will argue that it is management not the workers, but no one in a suit is building the cars.

    The American auto industry could have led the world in alternative fuel vehicles, instead of teasing us with the electric car, then taking it away for destruction. They could have rallied Congress to get us away from our oil, foreign & domestic, dependence, and possibly keep our troops from dying in wars for oil (Irag, I am looking at you). They could be like Toyota, Honda and Volkswagen now, dealing with a horrible buyers market, cutting dividends, and reaching out maybe for a line of credit to strengthen their position, but not sitting on the brink of utter collapse and coming to the people, hat in hand. The UAW and its members share fault, not for looking out for its workers wages, but for not using its strength in the last decade and a half when its workers were doing double shifts to keep up with SUV demand, to create a serious national conversation and push for a more sensible health care system for us all. Instead they entered contract negotiations with the intent on keeping the system the same and bolstering the benefits of members only, of making it appear that they want national health care, but not using the strength of their industry to push that forward, and not demanding that the cars they build, and drive their families in are more efficient.

    This is the reason many do not sympathize with striking unions. It is not that non Union workers are solely white collar, or blue collars jealous of the wages and benefits their counterpart receives, rather it is when a group with the ability to push for change and progress doesn't do it. We can all stand up and scream and write to congress and threaten not to buy this, or beg for better environmental that, but when the people building the cars aren't screaming in the conference rooms, and pleading for the r&d departments to turn out efficient cars for them to build, and saying that my brother or neighbor who isn't a UAW man, who works in a factory here, or some other job there and struggles with his health care costs, well he is our voice too and we should make sure that our neighbors have health care options just like we do.

    It is the difference between us going from 3rd world nation to 3rd world nation bombing, killing and torturing people to end terrorism, and us going from 3rd world nation to 3rd world nation building wells for clean water and schools to end terrorism. It is hard for most Americans to look at someone with a pension, and health care, and a job as an average American nowadays. Most of us do not have a lobbying group in Washington, this is why kids get lead filled toys, no lobby group, but when you are "average" and you have the voice of leadership, don't use it to strengthen your own self interests solely, and then come begging everyone else for a bailout when your faulty thinking has led you to the edge of the abyss.
  • wearing out my F key · 1 year ago
    this isn't just an ecconomic hiccup. this crisis is going to go in for some time. businesses who planned for a rainy day, who can change quickly, and find ways to be successful despite the fact the sky is falling- well, they're going to be ok.

    but the dinosaurs, the one's who don't have the vision or the abillity to change is finished.

    it's like the big speech in primary colors, when stanton tells the crowd "your jobs aren't coming back. not ever.' that's tough to hear, but that's where we're at,
  • LKN · 1 year ago
    The prostitute makes a lot more per hour than the autoworker - perhaps the Repubs should insist on pay limits. These guys want pay limits on union workers, but don't make similar demands on the banking industry. They will not even allow limits on what taxpayers pay the drugmakers under medicare.

    The ONLY way the new congress will work is if Democrats make the Repubs filibuster, not just THREATEN to filibuster.
  • Mike_in_the_Tundra · 1 year ago
    You're so right. The Senate needs to return to the filibuster instead of just saying there's enough votes for a filibuster. Remember when the Repugs talked about the nuclear option that would have eliminated the filibuster? I wonder if they would still want to do that.
  • mijita · 1 year ago
    Or insist that prostitutes make only what they charge overseas. I'm sure that would be quite popular with the folks on the right side of the aisle.
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    That's funny. Now, if the prostitutes were to unionize . . . .
  • Bluto · 1 year ago
    Why hasn't the AFL-CIO called for a general strike? Imagine where the Rs would be if the Teamsters, hotel workers, dock workers, communication workers, teachers, first responders threatened to walk in support of their UAW brothers and sisters. It's you vs them folks.
  • ron071 · 1 year ago
    Unfortunately there are too few union workers to strike the anti-labor states where it would have some impact.
  • bill__free · 1 year ago
    Please point out every republican senator that is possible target in 2010. There are some of us that have no senators running in 2010 or we have a dem senator that is "safe" in their re-election. Let's raise money to defeat these idiots and volunteer our time to their opponents campaign.
  • ron071 · 1 year ago
    Hopefully Vitter will be judged accurately and fairly by the working folks of LA. These discredited Southern conservatives are becoming a vanishing breed. It is taking a bit too long for informed Southerners to awaken.
  • Babeouf · 1 year ago
    When its a question of Bankers or workers its the Bankers that are chosen. In a crisis every tinpot leader says "We are all in this together" But only the poor have their lights put out when they can't pay the electricity bill. A union is only as strong as its members . If 'misinformed' they are led to the scrap heap by a tearful procession of Corporate lawyers and Presidents.
  • lothian · 1 year ago
    Writing from Louisiana -- Don't hold your breath -- Vitter will be reelected in 2010. Louisiana was one of the few states in the nation in which the republican vote actually increased from 2004. The young, intelligent, and talented are fleeing the state in droves, moving away from hurricanes and in search of jobs. Some of the idealistic and earnest remain, but are vastly outnumbered by those who get their news exclusively from Fox and Limbaugh. Don't be fooled by Mary Landrieu's reelection; it was a fluke. Her base has moved on to Texas and Georgia. Had the republicans put up a better candidate than John Kennedy, who has made a career out of losing state elections, Landrieu would have been defeated as well. Don't look for enlightenment from Louisiana anytime soon.
  • MsJoanne · 1 year ago
    Read the comments at the NOLA article. Most are favorable to Vitter and like what he did.

    Amazingly stupid comments.

    One especially caught my eye. A guy in a manufacturing capacity whined about union workers making so much more than he does. Apparently, the thought that HE should try to unionize to improve his own lot in life never occurred to him.