DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Our online chat with Cong. DeGette starts at 3pm Eastern

  • Redwoodguy · 1 year ago
    How do you view your's party's use of the media up to now? Many of us out here still consider most Democrats as bumbling or ego-centric, spineless namby-pambies when it comes to effectively using the media and the IMMENSE amount of political ammunition the Republicans are/have given you to make both very compelling arguments to not only inflame the passions of Democrats and Independents everywhere, but to literally hammer them into submission-YET YOU DON'T!!! Why don't you hire some of the best screenwriters known for their expertise in arousing audiences' anger and focusing it very directly on the Republican Party?? Get viewers and voters to literally JUMP OUT OF THEIR SEATS!! Folks are busy just trying to survive and usually don't have the luxury of the time it requires to both do enough research or to follow the twisted logic of the Republicans in order to either logically disavow their assertions or their contemptuous behaviors.
    Then maybe funding for valuable projects like stem cell research wouldn't be stuck in the quagmire of these Republican lies and hypocrasies?
  • Redwoodguy · 1 year ago
    Congresswoman,
    do you think stem cell research will help in the search for a cure to HIV/AIDS? I'm a 28 year survivor and would like to see my grandchildren.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    First off, thank you representative DeGette for the Q&A. You make me proud coming here to Ablog and doing this and I'm not even one of your constituents. .

    Tell us what you know about Jared Polis. I'm happy to see that he'll soon be representing Boulder but I'm curious what you think of him. Give your honest thoughts, we can take it.

    Also, I'm interested in your opinion on the way protesters might be treated at the convention. I have railed on this blog for years about how President Clinton and our government shamed themselves at WTO in 1999. Is Denver going to be different?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Jared Polis, who just won the Democratic primary to represent the 2nd Congressional District here in Colorado, is a dedicated public servant who will work hard for his constituents. I have known him for many years as an internet entrepreneur and also a member of the Colorado State Board of Education.

    As the Dean of Colorado's Congressional delegation, it will be my job to help Jared through the November election and then to secure him good committee assignments and help orient him to the Democratic Caucus. I know he will be a valuable member.

    About the protests at the Convention, I am a strong believer in freedom of speech. I was appalled by the "cages" at the Boston Convention and have urged the Denver mayor and security forces to allow as much free expression as possible, while of course, guaranteeing the security of the event.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    Thanks for the reply. I do hope you take Polis under your wings. Good to hear that.

    As far as the protests go, it is never good when "security forces" attack law abiding citizens. It's good to hear Denver knows this. Thanks again for doing this.
  • sheilerama · 1 year ago
    Congresswoman -- thanks for doing this. I was wondering if you could comment on the state of funding for science research? I work at a major university and experienced, 2nd hand, lack of funding that had already been approved because the research wasn't being done 'in the US for Americans'. Seems as if every part of our govt has been politicized so that even research that American scientists deem relevant for US and others but conducted elsewhere is not worth it.
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    In the last few years, funding for the National Institutes of Health has been flat, which has really hampered research efforts in a whole host of areas. The US has traditionally been the leader in basic research, but unless we commit ourselves to a robust funding level (as well as expanding areas like stem cell research), we run the risk of falling behind the rest of the world, and worse, delaying medical advances.
  • sheilerama · 1 year ago
    Congresswoman, wouldn't you also argue that our economy also relies heavily on new advances - not just medical - in science and technology? Not funding or flat funding for NIH (and also NSF, DOE, etc) kind of means that our govt really isn't interested in growing an economy... I mean, in Boston alone, there are probably 200 brand new Biotech companies that seem to have sprung out of nowhere. All based on research that was done when funding was a little more flush...
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Thanks for joining us today, Congresswoman. I think for starters, why don't you tell folks a little about your book. What is it about, why did you write it, etc?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Thanks John and Joe for hosting me today. I wrote the book because I have become frustrated with the politicization of science by our federal lawmakers. I think voters need to know some of the crazy laws that people try to pass when they are motivated by politics rather than science when looking at policies around sex and reproduction.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Well, we seem to already be getting a number of questions about your book, and other topics of concern of late to Democrats, so why don't you just jump in as you wish.
  • johnpg · 1 year ago
    OFFSHORE DRILLING -- are the Democrats EVER going to stop allowing the right to own the debate?
    WHY are the Dems caving in AGAIN?
    you put up a simple rebuttal -- IT WON'T HELP IN THE SHORT TERM IF AT ALL.
    you run a commercial with video of John McCain telling a tour stop that the idea is mainly psychological.
    when are the Dems ever going to learn??
    we running out of time of losing this presidential election as well as
    this country.
  • houstonray · 1 year ago
    Thank you Congresswoman;

    Will not only stem cell research, but scientific research across the board, be a key part of Prime Time speeches during the convention? It seems that it needs to be an issue that's front and center along with the economy and the war and the environment. In fact, I believe they are all interrelated, more scientific research can lead to new industries, more jobs, etc. I believe the American public is confused a lot of the time about the whole stemcell debate and someone needs to put it out there in front, with real life examples of what research has done for us and more importantly what it CAN do in the future...

    Again, thank you for your time...
  • sheilerama · 1 year ago
    I Agree!! We have (sadly) become a literal people where we only agree upon what's in front of our noses, unless it involves God, of course.
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    I agree that the issues of stem cell research and scientific research in general need to be a part of the discussion next week. I spoke about stem cell legislation at the 2004 Convention and plan to include it in my speech next week at the Convention in Denver.
  • johnpg · 1 year ago
    i should add that, in spite of my frustration, i should thank Cong. DeGette
    for taking the time to do this.
    sorry, that it was not with my original post.
  • JoeSudbay · 1 year ago
    Okay, let’s talk about sex…that sounds weird saying it to a member of Congress…but it is the title of your book…

    I’m interested in the issue of birth control. In the book, you describe the debate about expanding insurance coverage for birth control - an issue that has recently come up in the presidential race. It sounded like Rep. Chris Smith and some of his right wing colleagues really would just prefer to ban birth control. Are there people on Capitol hill who would ban access to contraception?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    There are many examples in my book where far-right members have tried to deny access to birth control. For many years, we gave international HIV/AIDS prevention money to religious organizations which would not provide information about condoms about AIDS prevention. Rep. Smith tried to exclude certain types of birth control methods to be covered in federal employees' insurance plans and exclude birth control pills, IUD's the patch, and others. There are other juicy examples in the book.

    As I say in the forward to the book, I have concluded that many powerful politicians want to ban birth control altogether and think we should have some sort of Christian nation (according to their views) where people should be abstinent until marriage, and then only have sex for procreation. I have not arrived at these conclusions lightly.
  • JoeSudbay · 1 year ago
    Thanks. And, thanks for writing this book....I have arrived at the same conclusion about politicians banning birth control altogether. We've written posts like that for years, like this one: http://www.americablog.com/2006/03/missouri-gop.... I think some people thought we were exaggerating. So your book is vital validation. Collectively, we need to challenge candidates on this issue. McCain already showed he has problems talking about basic birth control...we need real answers from him.

    Again, thanks.
  • cabanaboy · 1 year ago
    Do you really believe that condoms will prevent AIDS infection ? Orare you looking for the opportunities to kick church's butt ? If you expected religious communities to to help out in this issue only by giving out condoms then do it yourself ... you don't need them for that. There is much more in that topic than condoms. And trust me that this is a mit that condom will prevent you from getting AIDS.
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Actually, the scientific data does show that when condoms are used properly they prevent HIV/AIDS infection as well as other STD's.

    Also, the funding I am talking about is federal funding for international programs like the Ugandan ABC program. That effort reversed HIV/AIDS in that country--abstinence, be faithful, and CONDOMS. The US just unilaterally said we would not fund that third prong and so the program didn't work.

    In countries and populations with high HIV/AIDS rates we need to have science-based public health programs.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Off-topic of your book - or maybe this is on topic actually... The fall election is ahead -- many Hillary supporters are threatening to vote for John McCain -- what would you say to them?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Maverick does not mean moderate. John McCain's voting record on choice is 0%. He has also voted against birth control. He is backing away from stem cell research issues. He has voted for ALL of President Bush's judicial nominees, including one who disagreed with a ruling that insurance plans covering prescription drugs, including Viagra, had to cover birth control.

    If people realized this, I can't imagine they would want to vote for John McCain. With his Supreme Court appointments, he could set us back 50 years on reproductive rights!!!
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Oh I agree :) McCain is also now in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade. All we need is for him to appoint one new Supreme Court justice for that to happen.
  • JoeSudbay · 1 year ago
    And, let's not forget, Roe is the progeny of Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965. That's the case that found the right to privacy and overturned a Connecticut law that prohibited married couples from using contraceptives. If Roe goes, Griswold isn't far behind.
  • sheilerama · 1 year ago
    Do you think that we who support contraception and choice should do a marketing campaign or something to offset the same old arguments against it?
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Joe stole my question! :)

    Instead:

    What do you think about the (broader than "safe, legal, rare") draft Dem Platform plank on abortion?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    As the co-chair of the Pro-choice caucus in Congress, I support the plank wholeheartedly. For many years, the pro-choice community has said that our first effort should be to prevent unwanted pregnancies. If we had comprehensive pregnancy prevention programs, we would limit the number of abortions, which would benefit all.

    My co-chair, Congresswoman Louise Slaughter and I, are sponsoring comprehensive pregnancy prevention legislation we hope to pass in the next Congress.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Excellent, and thank you for the reply. I wholeheartedly agree with the plank wording.
  • BLOGGING BITCH! · 1 year ago
    I'd like to know how the GOP manages to gain so much ground on the abortion issue when everyone knows they never held a vote to outlaw abortions even when they held the House, Senate and White House. How can this be explained?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Traditionally, members of Congress do not like to talk about topics around sex and reproduction. When the GOP was in control, they had a series of votes on fringe issues like late-term abortion to make the Democrats look extreme. In fact, the Republican leadership is extreme because it not only opposes abortion but even birth control, stem cell research, and many other mainstream issues.

    That's why I wrote this book: to blow the cover off all these policies and urge voters to examine politicians' voting records carefully on a whole host of issues, not just fringe wedge issues.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Your stem cell bill has passed twice and been vetoed twice - why write this now when you have an unfriendly president still in the White House?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    I am writing this book now so we can get a pro-stem cell President in the White House who will reverse the Bush policy and who will also enact reasonable policies around these other issues.

    It is a call to action in the November elections. After 8 years of the Bush White House and 6 years of Republican control of Congress before that, we need to start making proactive policy, not battling to keep the little ground we have.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Do you have any allies among moderate Republicans? Do moderate Republicans even exist any more? And what can we do about conservative Democrats who often seem all too willing to undercut us, especially on social issues?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    I always tell people that moderate Republicans are the heros of my book. It takes a lot of guts to stand up to the Religious Right, because they threaten politicians with primary elections if they don't toe the line. We have about 20-30 Republicans (more on stem cell research) who will usually vote pro-science on these issues.

    Sadly, we also have 20-30 Democrats who vote the wrong way on most of these issues. Some of them do so from personal conviction, but some also vote politically. There are some from really tough districts who always vote the right way. It makes for exciting vote counting on these hard issues.

    It would go a long way to shoring up both Republicans and Democrats in these tough districts if they heard from the vast majority of their constituents who are pro-science. Instead, all they hear from is the National Right to Life Committee and other right-wing groups so the path of least resistance is voting against these policies. If the vast majority would pay attention to these sensitive issues, it would give politicians pause and maybe get us better public policy.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    I think the congresswoman had said she'd have about 30 minutes to spend with us. We're certainly not going to complain if she's able to hang out a little longer. But just in case she can't - perhaps folks can try to get in any remaining questions?
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    John, I'm really enjoying answering the questions. Why don't I just take a couple more and then I'll sign off.
  • the_rebis · 1 year ago
    Rep. DeGette- Slightly off topic- Would you support a presidential debate between Senators Obama and McCain just on the topics of Science and Technology issues? A Colorado senate debate with Udall and Shaffer?
  • houstonray · 1 year ago
    Ditto here, that would be a great thing to push for, the public needs to see how John McCain's religious views and his being beholden to Conservative religious groups and there is no better way than to see him be forced to answer scientific questions.
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    Rep. DeGette... when did the U.S. become so anti-science, and what can be done to reverse the trend? When so much of our military and economic primacy came from our technological and scientific superiority, it's frustrating to see us losing ground to countries in Europe and Asia.
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    As I note in the book, we had a real anti-science wave around the time of the Scopes trials in the 1920's and then our policies got pretty pro-science. The space program and war on cancer had a lot to do with that. Then, when Ronald Reagan became President, the religious right started having more influence, attempting to insert religious values in scientific policies. Some will remember creationism as part of school curriculums, now being touted as "intelligent design." Around the same time, federal funding for abstinence only sex education programs (which the data show don't work) came into being.

    Thanks for joining me in this chat today. I hope you have a chance to look at the book and get inspired to hold politicians accountable as the election approaches. Look for me at the Convention!!

    Best regards, Diana
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    You're right, but how do we convince the dimwits?
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    We're not going to convince them until we force change in the press. IMO, it isn't silence from Obama that is the problem. If he responds, which he continuously does, and the dopes don't learn of his response, then what good is it? It is the mainstream media that perpetuates the dumbed-down dialog. THEY are what's wrong. They should be our target.
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    I think that's part of it -- and I am sorry the Representative didn't have enough time to address that part of my question, because I prefer to focus on "what next?" rather than lament too much about "what happened".

    It's really important to me personally as I worked to support a science program in higher education for much of my professional life, and I saw firsthand how important the research was, and how tough it became when research funding was cut, and what was left came with more and more strings attached.

    From lowered expectations in grade school, to fewer good teachers and classes in higher grades all the way through college... through bad or nonexistent science reporting... to the general disrespect scientists now get... to the way the religionists have muddied the waters about science... it's a mess. And it has very real, very dire consequences for the strength of our nation.

    The best new jobs, the best new technologies, the best weapons for defense, cures for diseases... so much depends on having strong science education and an infrastructure that supports scientific research. If we don't fix this problem, and soon, our country will definitely fall behind other nations in several ways.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Your's is a good comment and I agree with it except for the loss of an independent press being only part of the problem. It is ALL of the problem. Until factual and thorough reporting is restored, ignorance will prevail. Support for scientific thought and advance cannot happen as long as we are satisfied with entertainment sandwiched between commercials and as long as we allow idiots and bigots to decide the dialog. We have the power to force change, but we are thus far unwilling to use it.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    I'm ordering your book right now.
  • DianaDeGette · 1 year ago
    Excellent!
  • BLOGGING BITCH! · 1 year ago
    Do Dems ever stop to consider that maybe "working with" The President on most issues is exactly what we don't want?

    To date, the man has offered up nothing but civil rights erosions and taking care of Big Money. If nothing else, what could anyone possibly find GOOD in George Bush after Katrina?

    The man has no fear of God whatsoever.
  • the_rebis · 1 year ago
    How can he fear god? He has a direct and personal relationship with his god.
  • BLOGGING BITCH! · 1 year ago
    I can't help but wonder if the entire GOP agrees with Limbaugh as far as all women with caner (and are currently undergioing chemo) should be giving oral whether they want to or not. I've never read that in The Bible. So, if Tony Snow had been gay......

    Oh never mind.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Elvis has the left the building :-) Thanks so much for joining us Congreswoman. And thanks everyone else for joining in with so many questions. Joe and I are definitely going to reach out to more members of Congress and candidates to do these.
  • BLOGGING BITCH! · 1 year ago
    Definately a treat!
  • ComradeRutherford · 1 year ago
    No question. Just thanks for coming on here and doing this.
  • JoeSudbay · 1 year ago
    Thanks to Rep. DeGette and everyone else. This was great and really got me thinking. We need to get John McCain on-the-record about birth control. He wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. Is Griswold next?

    We also need to do more of these chats. We're going to talk to a couple of congressional candidates about joining us, too.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    Yes. Thank you. We need more of this.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    This was awesome! Thanks John and Joe for setting up this chat. Diana DeGette says all the right things and she is my new hero.