-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/palin-next-jfk.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
12 hours ago · 69 comments
-
Can you find the one pet?
3 hours ago · 11 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
13 hours ago · 48 comments
-
A dog named Boo
9 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
16 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
This calls for a family intervention from the Christian Fundamentalists.
The entire economy was wrecked by MBAs, and we're supposed to look up to them?
(Not that Sarah even achieved that level of mediocrity.)
And John McCain's background is not the same?
Duh.
I bet the GOPer convention give Obama an even bigger bounce!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/01/opini...
He's more stubborn than Bush.
We just have to keep digging and piling this stuff up.
Then, the party will just walk away from McCain and leave him to face his hellish election night alone.
I'll pass on that one thanks.
http://www.akip.org/faqs.html
Canada my ass, it's Alaska's Gas!"
Menu:
Home
Contact
Introduction
Platform
Issues
Goals
History
Memorial
Forum
Bylaws
Support AIP
Membership
Meetings
Join the AIP
Statehood Primer
Alaskan Anthem
Treaties
Photo Gallery
AIP Store
Basic Questions
Links
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALASKAN INDEPENDENCE
Q: What is the Alaskan Independence Party?
A: An Alaskan political party whose members advocate a range of solutions to the conflicts between federal and local authority; from advocacy for state's rights, through a return to territorial status, all the way to complete independence and nationhood status for Alaska.
Q: Aren't most Alaskan Independence Party members a bunch of radicals and Kooks?
A: The party has its share of individualists, in the grand Alaskan tradition. No longer a fringe party, the A.I.P. is a viable third party with a serious mission and qualified candidates for elected offices.
Q: If Alaska became independent, wouldn't we lose a lot of federal money?
A: No. If Alaska returned to territorial status, most federal money would still be available. If Alaska were to attain complete independence, its revenues from oil and other natural resources would far exceed the amounts currently received from the federal government, at our current level of resource utilization.
Q: If Alaska were independent, what would happen to my social security check, federal pension, or military retirement?
A: People receive these checks around the world, regardless of their place of residence. In most cases eligibility for such checks would not be effected by Alaskan independence.
Q: If Alaska became independent, would U.S. military bases leave?
A: The strategic location of Alaska would indicate that it would serve U.S. interests to maintain a presence in Alaska. The military are good neighbors. There would be no compelling reason for the military to leave Alaska.
Q: Didn't we vote for statehood already?
A: The vote for statehood was invalid because the people were not presented with the range of options available to them. Further, the federal government has since breached the contract for statehood on numerous occasions in over a dozen serious and substantial instances.
Q: Under independence, what would happen to all the federal controls and regulations?
A: We believe that controls should be exerted by the lowest possible governmental unit. The people of Alaska can better decide what controls need to be in place than can bureaucrats in Washington. Specific local regulation might be either more or less restrictive than current federal regulation. The point is that it will be our regulation, not Washington's.
Q: Would I lose my U.S. citizenship?
A: Depending on the form of independence, several forms of citizenship would be possible, including the retention of U.S. citizenship or dual citizenship. However, considering the moral, educational, and economic decay of the U.S., Alaskans' who hold themselves to a higher standard might very well decide to at least maintain an arm's length distance from a country in decline.
Q: What will happen to major U.S. stores such as Sears, Safeway, and McDonald's?
A: Any company which found it profitable to sell in Alaska would remain. Without the constraints of the deteriorating U.S. economy, and with the enormous wealth of Alaska, international as well as local companies will prosper.
She apparently quit when she decided to run for mayor and destroy her hometown--her husband likely quit at the same time, but didn't join the Repubs like she did (which is why he's currently unaffiliated).
However, she does apparently still addresses the group and is sympatico with its members.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/1/4231...
Oh my God.
Sarah just hired herself a lawyer.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/1/1727...
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!!!!!!!!!
In this election, Joe Biden is proving the low-key, stable, drama-free vice presidential candidate who basically does his job and stays out of the news.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/31/ad-bid...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/palin-...
With the announcement that her daughter is pregnant, she has changed the entire RNC into PRO CHOICE and PRO PRIVACY advocates. Including republican surrogate reporters like Dana Bash and Andrea Mitchell.
All of a sudden we are told to mind our own business. That this is a matter for the family and they deserve PRIVACY. We are also told that Bristol Palin made the right CHOICE!!!
So there you have it. REPUBLICANS=PRO CHOICE AND PRO PRIVACY!!!! At least for Bristol Palin.
Wouldn't McCain have a perfectly good reason to see the results of an extensive physical for the person he's going to nominate to be VP? Isn't that BASIC standard operating procedure?
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-B...
How could it have been worse than Katrina?... Oh, much smaller storm, maybe.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#26486142
Palin spokesman : Palin is more qualified then John McCain.
You know I go from laughing to angry back and forth all day. I WANT to be the VP, I've raised children, know how to manage a checkbook, been a member of the PTA, a Scout den mother. Granted my budgets were not as big as Palin's BUT by McCain's standards I qualify.
I surprised that McAllister didn't choke on his own vomit as he was mouthing this nonsense.
Sometimes ya gotta wonder if we're really being presented with the nation's best and brightest for this election.
"My understanding is that Gov. Palin’s town, Wassilla, has I think 50 employees. We've got 2500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe 12 million dollars a year – we have a budget of about three times that just for the month...Our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the past couple of years and certainly in terms of the legislation I’ve passed in the past couple of years, post-Katrina."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/01...
Although, as Karen Walker would say, "Honey, we talked about this".