-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/palins-alaska-led-us-in-pork.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
11 hours ago · 68 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
12 hours ago · 42 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
3 hours ago · 9 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
14 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
no wonder McKeating5 chose her...
via TPM, this is a nice example of how the internet tubes expose the ugly underbelly of the republicons...spread it around...msm: help yourself.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/212663.php
His thought was that the McCain camp might have actually persuaded the Alaskan legislature to allocated the funds to create and active investigation. Then, per my friends reasoning, Palin could duck and cover under that tired old Republican line, "I cannot comment about an ongoing investigation."
My first thought was, those sneaky bastards. But then I started considering how bad the DNC is missing the opportunity to say, Electing someone ALREADY under investigation is not the change America is wanting it is GOP business as usual.
Anyways, those are my thoughts this morning. Has anyone else had similar ideas?
I hope Harold Ford and the other blowholes have this information when they are on the TV today.
Much of Alaska's federal funding comes through the BIA. All Alaskan natives who are 1/8 native or more receive absolutely free health care regardless of where they live. This is a federal program which has nothing to do with the state. It wouldn't be in place if it were up to state voters.
Alaska is a relatively new state. Much of its infrastructure is still in progress. If you live in the lower 48 and have running water and cross a bridge on your way to your already built hospital or airport, you are benefiting from infrastructure built many years ago. The interstate highway system was built before Alaska was a state. Imagine what that would cost in today's dollars with today's labor and health care costs. Alaskans certainly don't want their beautiful state covered with roads and highways, but there are still a few basics left to be finished. Some people in Fairbanks still get their water from the "water truck."
Alaskans have so far been generous with details about the Palins. Please don't trash our state or our people. We are not all rednecks. Every state has a town like Wasilla somewhere in the state.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200809030006
Talk about eating your cake and having it, too.
http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
1. This would be a good time to re-visit one of my pet projects -- the introduction into the national discourse of a crazy left-wing scheme designed solely to humiliate Republicans (sort of our version of anti-flag-burning or gay marriage). The idea is as simple as it is devastating: Get up a commission to examine which states are net creditors and which are net-debtors to the federal government. (Moynihan used to do this). Then, call for an end to "state welfare" by introducing a bill to forbid any state to get more from the federal government than it pays in. It's more or less nutty (cf. flag-burning), but it's got a lot of potential upside for us.
2. The story of the Palin pick is not yet fully known. There's more to the story than we know. One key element we don't know -- who declined the offer? We know it was offered to Joe and then withdrawn. Was it offered to anyone who declined it?