DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Paulson unveils biggest change since GOP helped create the financial crisis

  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    What Paulson is proposing is nothing short of a total corporate takeover of the economy--in a word, fascism. The marriage between govt and corporate control will be finally consummated.
  • theWalrus · 1 year ago
    Republicans destroy everything they touch.
  • hector · 1 year ago
    Filed at 10:19 a.m. ET

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration's top housing official, under criminal investigation and intense pressure from Democratic critics, announced Monday he is quitting.

    Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson said his resignation will take effect on April 18. The move comes at a shaky time for the economy and the Bush administration, as the housing industry's crisis has imperiled the nation's credit markets and led to a major economic slowdown.
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-HUD-Chief...
  • hector · 1 year ago
    By MARK SHERMAN
    The Associated Press
    Monday, March 31, 2008; 10:17 AM

    WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday refused to step into a legal fight between the Justice Department and a member of Congress who has been indicted on bribery charges. The court declined to review an appeals court ruling that the FBI reviewed legislative documents in the office of Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., in violation of the Constitution.

    Jefferson has pleaded not guilty to charges of soliciting more than $500,000 in bribes while using his office to broker business deals in Africa. His trial has been delayed indefinitely.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...
  • TomJoad · 1 year ago
    We're in a quandry here. Just like we always have been with Katrina, and FDA, and all the rest. WE the people NEED some regulation, and need it it be sensible, effective, and enforced, with oversight. BUT it will never be any of those things under a Bush (or McCain) administration, because they don't really believe it is the governments place to regulate those things. So they figure, since we have to LOOK like it, we'll do something that puts into place things that can only help our party, and fill our coffers, and enrich our friends.

    We need some regulation (they found this out in the 30's too, Bush the "history major" ought to know that) and the sub-prime is classic example of WHY, but we need to have people do it honestly. We'll never get that with the Sopranos in the white house.
  • AdrianBrowne · 1 year ago
    We've had the shock, and this is the awe.
  • jr · 1 year ago
    This circle jerk by these Ayn Rand cultists is disgusting
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    Abolish the FED.
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    Tom, this proposal simply gives the Federal Reserve more power and strips real govt oversight by established entities, none of which were used by this regime to regulate the housing and capital situations. Wall St. was cut loose to create this horrible situation after Glass-Steagall was repealed in favor of the Gramm-Leach-Billey Act, signed by Clinton, meanwhile, BushCo fiddled...and where the hell have Dems been while this was going on? Why were deposits in commercial banks, insured by the FDIC, subject to the vagaries of investments, etc.put in jeopardy by allowing banks to wear both hats? Now, it seems Paulson wants to subject us to giving those wankers the same protection as banks. I know the Clintons (Chelsea included, she works for one) have a stake in hedge funds, etc and here are trillions of dollars in derivatives out there that are doing things none of us have any idea of. And that's scary.

    Now, all of this may take months, years, to sort out, but I want to see if Dems will have the spine to come up with something that won't subject the hard won wages of most of us to the incredible greed and incompetence of Wall St. and the Fed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley...
  • BLOGGING BITCH! · 1 year ago
    They just want to raid ebay. Think they really want to bust corporate crime? Think they would have sent SWAT into Bear Sterns and then give them hundreds of billions of dollars?

    Wouldn't this kind of unharnassed power be like putting Kissinger in charge of the 9/11 Commission?
  • Andrew · 1 year ago
    Paulsons plan for all intent and purpose is dead on arrival as far as this Congress is concerned. Congress will drag the options put forth by Paulson to the end of the year and byond until a new Administration is in place after the elections and I wouldn't be surprised to see both Paulson as well as Bernanke gone after the administration change over.
    The options that Paulson outlined have already set up potential turf wars between the S.E.C. and the Comptroller of the Currency offices and none of this will do anything to address cureent financial concerns with reagrd to increasing foreclosure rates as well as rising inflation because of ongoing bailouts using tax payer funds while helicopter Ben keeps the printing presses rolling at full speed.
    We're witnessing a financial train wreck in slow motion as consumers continue to have to dig deeper and deeper just to make ends meet and when one stops to think about it, why should the US taxpayer have to bail out banks that make up the Federal Reserve system? There is virtually no over sight of the Fed by Congress and this was one of the greatest heists in American history. The founders knew ( especially Jefferson ) that if the country had a central bank, control of the money supply would get out of hand and this is exactly what has happened. think about it. For every dollar that a bank takes in, they lend out nine. Where do you think all of this money comes from? It's called the printing press and it shouldn't take that much longer for the entire system to fall in on itself while politicians scramble to give more money away in the run up to the elections in the hope that voters will return them to Congress so they can contiune to look the other way while we all continue on our way to the poor house.
  • 1billinnj2 · 1 year ago
    i am always amazed that the republicans screw things up and then want to change the plan so it looks like they are doing the right thing and the stupid democrates go along with the stupid legislation that will bring more stupid problems and make the dems look stupid again and again and again.........................................why do these stupid dems ever acknowledge the repubs. ......................stop the bus, i want to get off.------------------------stupid people. oh, btw, did the dems start impeachment hearings yet----------no-------then they are stupid.
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    A Super Agency. Oh! Well, that'll work. Not. A new super agency along the lines of such super agencies role models as Homeland Security and FEMA? Wait, wait. Maybe that's not the route to go.
    We need a pitbull congress on this one, ripping it to pieces. The problem is a cancer sometimes called Reaganism. Re-regulate the banks that RR turned loose, then review the situation in a year. Surgery is indicated, resurrecting Mercantilism is not.
  • Andrew · 1 year ago
    If anyone is really interested in where this is all going, check out this Bloomberg interview with James Grant. it's an eye opener and information your elected officials hoped you would never see.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?clipSRC=mm...
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    Just to remain updated: the American death count in Iraq is now up to 4010.
  • EdNSted · 1 year ago
    Here's what Business Week said about the Paulson plan yesterday:

    "Let’s see. In the middle of perhaps the greatest financial upheaval since the Great Depression, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson is proposing a change in financial regulations which basically amounts to a big wink to Wall Street. His plan will go nowhere, both for political and practical reasons. In fact, it does not even meet the minimum standard of improving transparency, which would reduce the possibility of a similar crisis in the future. "

    Why the Paulson Plan is DOA
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    Andrew, the horse has already left the barn. How many Dems voted for Gramm-Leach-Bliley? And who the hell signed it? A Democratic president.

    No one in Congress is listening to The People save a few here and there. We have been paying the price for it for years now.

    Did we get impeachment? Even with a Dem president and majority Dems in both houses, we aren't guaranteed anything next year. Watch the filibuster become important again.
  • rhufnek · 1 year ago
    So obviously this was the plan all along - create a crisis to allow the Feds to grab more power.
    Same as the war was part of the plan to allow the NSA to grab more power.

    Say your goodbyes to the Constitution, was great while it lasted.
  • nicho · 1 year ago
    1billinnj2 22 minutes ago

    i am always amazed that the republicans screw things up and then want to change the plan so it looks like they are doing the right thing and the stupid democrates go along with the stupid legislation


    The reason you're so amazed is that you are starting from the false premise that there are significant differences between the Republicans and the Democrats.

    Just remember:

    We have only one political part -- The Corporate Party. It has two right wings -- the Republican right wing and the Democratic right wing.

    At the end of the day, members of both wings will do what their corporate bosses tell them to do.

    Once you understand that, your amazement will cease.
  • Andrew · 1 year ago
    Older & wiser....That's been my point all along. When the common man starts listening to all of this financial talk, their eyes glaze over because they have been so dumbed down over the years. All the consumer is worried about is making ends meet when we should have been rasing holy hell with our elected officials and letting them know that we're not at all pleased with the way things are going. But apathy set in a long time ago and things haven't changed much other than people now asking for help because they got in too deep. Knowing this mess was building up a head a steam several years ago, the bankers got congress to agree to new bankruptcy laws making it harder for individuals to start over with a clean slate. I have also been consistent in my belief that both parties are equally culpable reagrding the mess we find ourselves in today. When the Dems took over Congress last November and Pelosi said the impeachment was off the table, the hand writing was already on the wall. The bottom line to all of this is that the American tax payer will be asked to pay for the bailout of the banks as well as being forced to pay higher prices for everything from food to fuel which are inflationary taxes due to the mismanagement of the countries tax proceeds. Let's go throw another trillion out the window in Iraq rather than worrying about what's going on here at home. At least this seems to be the current mindset of the suits in D.C.
    Like I said, we can all blog to our hearts content, but unless you start shaking the tree a little and writing to your elected officials, those we have elected to do the peoples busniness will continue to steam roll us into financial oblivion. I think may in our country have gotten to the "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore" stage. Now.......What are we the people going to do about it?
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    Andrew, at this point, I'm thinking the people who live out where they can keep a cow, pigs and chickens and a huge garden are going to be the winners in all this. That is, if their property is paid off and they can keep paying their taxes. Most Americans, though, don't even seem to be able to turn on their stoves these day, much less know how to survive a worldwide depression.

    Becoming Amish seems almost attractive...

    : )
  • LeslieB · 1 year ago
    AdrianBrowne 1 hour ago
    We've had the shock, and this is the awe.


    Exactly. The US will be so much easier to pillage under Paulson's plan for even more deregulation and less oversight. In effect, the Fed will have more power to do nothing.
  • Andrew · 1 year ago
    This is simply an unbelivable expansion of FED power into being a regulatory entity in it's own right by being given oversight into all finacial aspects of Insurance companies, Commodity Futures exchanges, Mortgage lenders, basically everything. The fox running the hen house indeed. People should be demanding the abloishment of the Federal Reserve while at the least, those of our esteemed Congressmen and senators that sit in hig ranking positions of verious banking committies should either resign or better yet be tarred an feathered while being run out of D.C. We're getting to that point where a second revolution just may do the trick.
  • Nigel Elliott · 1 year ago
    War criminals regulating banks is not a good idea. We'll be the biggest idiots if we let this corrupt, dumb Bush administration re-write our financial system.
  • Sarah B. · 1 year ago
    Henry Paulson's Cunning Plan:

    Fox, meet Henhouse

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    This whole plan sounds like a crock of shit and I agree with Andrew below that this plan is DOA when it hits congress.