-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/prada-wearing-pope-condemns-love-of.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
More about the Yule Goat
11 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 29 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
How Barack Obama undermined the Obama presidency
5 days ago · 181 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
the NYT article out on Palin talks about one of the library books she wanted removed, even though she hadn't read it...she knew without reading it that it did not belong there...it was titled "Daddy's Roomate" and helped explain homosexuality to children...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/1...
Prada wearing Pope condemns love of money and power
Lipstick wearing pigs do fly!
That would be the PERFECT time to do it... a speech on consumption... Ok, now you'll feel a little better if you relieve yourselves of your coins.... come on you can dig deeper...
Ancient Rome
The Sumptuariae Leges of ancient Rome were various laws passed to prevent inordinate expense (sumptus) in banquets and dress, such as the use of expensive Tyrian purple dye.[4][5] Individual garments were also regulated: ordinary male citizens were allowed to wear the toga virilis only upon reaching the age of political majority.[6] In the early years of the Empire, men were forbidden to wear silk[7], and details of clothing including the number of stripes on the tunic were regulated according to social rank.[7] It was considered the duty of government to put a check upon extravagance in the private expenses of persons,[8] and such restrictions are found in laws attributed to the kings of Rome and in the Twelve Tables. The Roman censors, who were entrusted with the disciplina or cura morum, published the nota censoria. In it was listed the names of everyone found guilty of a luxurious mode of living; a great many instances of this kind are recorded. As the Roman Republic wore on, further such laws were passed; however, towards the end of the Republic they were virtually repealed. Near the end of the Empire, the Emperor Honorius (d. 423) issued a decree prohibiting men from wearing "barbarian" trousers in Rome.[9]
And I heard the other day that Michael Douglas might be playing Liberace in a movie about the palimony case. He's going to get another Oscar!
the woman mccain claims knows more about energy than anybody else in the US fucked up royally during her charlie gibson interview when she claimed alaska supplies 20 percent of the US energy supply.
Not even close:
They produce 14 percent of the oil, or 3 percent of the energy produced domestically; or 2 percent of our total energy consumption.
Dumb snow hillbilly.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/13/184...
Heavens no...Rumor has it that's why the smiling pope was poisoned. Something about wanting to execute Paul VI's will which had something to do with the Fatima letter that also concerned JP II and most especially the rovian cardinal who became Benny XVI...Intrigue-y!
I still envy your Parisian sojourn. And wouldn't mind cruising around Rome either, thinking of all those nasty, self righteous Papists.
So when has the Catholic Church been noted for practising what it preaches? Not in the last 1000 or 1500 years to my knowledge.
http://www.amazon.com/Murder-Vatican-Revolution...
Popes Benedict and John Paul II may have killed Pope John Paul I for being concerned with the well-being of the poor and wanting justice for gay people.