-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/republican-party-was-secretly-opposing.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
9 hours ago · 62 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
10 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
13 hours ago · 39 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/
Oh what a tangled web they weave.....
Hey, is Paulson still going to be immune from prosecution? Why does Pelosi want that? Is accountability still off the table?
THIS would be an opportunity to be able to clean house, kick out the neocon, rethug criminals (I'd include a couple of Dems too, like Pelosi and Reid) once and for all.
Are the Dems up to it?
I'm not holding my breath...
What Crisis????
This is all a ploy to Hang the DEMS....
Oct. Surprise anyone???
Screw Wall Street.....
This is a big deal and should be exploited as Republicans lost over a trillion dollars to play politics
Anyone, anyone....
Well, last night Rachel said her girlfriend said, "Palin will not be debating Thursday Night"
Hmmmmmm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/30/report...
AND that is just what he is doing to gain attention for his own political gain.. I guess Newtie is considering another run come 2012.
I also found particularly frustrating the "people oppose the bailout" narrative. The LA Times/Bloomberg poll which showed 57% against and 30% in favor was worded something like this: "Should gov't bailout troubled firms or is it not the government's responsibility to aid private business." A Pew poll which read "Should the gov't bailout troubled firms" got a 57% yes response.
http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
Exactly......just caught a few minutes of McCain speaking a bit ago....I don't know who he could possibly encourage or give hope to.....he speaks like he is 100 years old...no enthusiasm, no hope, no McCain.
"I’ve been a bit confused as to how the failure of a bill supported by Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid, and Barack Obama, and a majority of House Democrats, and a majority of Senate Democrats but opposed by a majority of House Republicans could possibly be laid at the feet of Pelosi............"
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008...
Pelosi and Boehner agree on the respective number of members they each will provide to pass the legislation as "bipartisan".
Pelosi more than meets her quota, but Republican votes are still needed. Boehner allows enough of his "guaranteed" yea votes to switch to nay to imperil the passage of the bill, expecting Pelosi to jump in and twist Democratic arms to get the bill passed. I don't know if it is possible under the rules of the House, but perhaps even hold a second vote and pass the bill using the Democratic majority? After all, it's a National Emergency, isn't it?
The blame for a $700 billion bail-out of Wall Street then gets laid at the feet of the Democratic Party and the Republicans try to run the rest of the election as populists looking out for the interests of "Main Street" (where have they been the last two decades?).
Pelosi didn't bite though, and the bill failed.
Now the Republicans are in a double bind: they can't run against a Democratic bail-out because there wasn't one. And they can't call the Democrats "unpatriotic" for not voting for the bail-out because 2/3's of the Democrats voted for the rescue plan and at least 2/3's of the Republicans didn't.
I love it when a plan comes together...not!
Of note is that they couldn't have pulled this off without the co-operation of the managers of these companies who CLAIM to be failing. Maybe they really are, but I'd like to see a forensic accounting done. This may have been years in the making, but $700,000 is a lot of incentive.
Attending to the economy is critical, but passing this bill is not so time critical so as to eliminate proper thought and pursuit of alternate options. The appearance is that this is nothing more than political pandering to get votes in November or to get out of session in time to campaign. Seventy-four Senators just voted yes to a 450-page bill that I seriously doubt they even had time to read. There are countless other options that if we allow the economists of our nation, not just the executive lackeys, time to develop we could come up with a much more acceptable solution. Why is their no transparency in the particulars of the exact issues and specifically how this money will help “Main Street”? The American public is not ignorant we can handle the truth on our financial situation.
Wall Street will right itself; have faith in the greatest country and economic system in the world. We already have a nine trillion dollar debt that my children will have to pay. Congressmen vote “NO” to any bill until we properly review all alternatives.