DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Rick Warren suggests that Jews, Muslims going to hell

  • Steve_in_CNJ · 11 months ago
    I just read Warren's reaction to the "base's" outrage over at HuffPo, including this:

    "Hopefully individuals passionately expressing opinions from the left and the right will recognize that both of us have shown a commitment to model civility in America."

    My question is when will he go from condemning us to hell to being civil? the mind fairly reels.
  • Ron · 11 months ago
    Likewise, I wouldn't calling barring gay people (who don't "repent" their homosexuality) from his church civil.
  • Ron · 11 months ago
    wouldn't call barring [typo - sorry]
  • hopeless pedant · 11 months ago
    I have changed my mind somewhat on this from not bothered to bothered some, but this is silly.
    Saying that if you are Jewish, Muslim, or any other kind of religious believer other than Christian means you are going to hell is basic doctrine.
    The Pope believes this, the Patriarch of the Greek Orthodox believe this, Episcopalian bishops believe this.
  • Ron · 11 months ago
    And it's reasonable to inform those other parties, as well, that their doctrine is obnoxious and offensive.

    Meanwhile, Rick Warren, in his role in Obama's inauguration, will be implicitly representing America. It's quite fair for American citizens to object, just like we would object to questionable uses of tax money.

    (I wonder: Will taxpayers be paying for Warren's travel, etc. expenses?)
  • Webster · 11 months ago
    Reminder: This is the inauguration for someone who is supposed to represent all of America--whether the citizens be Catholic or Muslim. "American" is the operative word here.
  • HereinDC · 11 months ago
    And I bet he'll accept your $$$ in the donation plate.....eventhough you're going to hell. .
  • vkobaya · 11 months ago
    In his church, camel has hard time getting through the eye of the needle, but the rich man easily glide through lubricated by all his bucks. In fact, his heaven is streets paved with gold and people who wear suits made of money eating off gold dinnerwear if not eating pure gold.

    Jesus taught peace and love, not bigotry, hatred, war ... and greed. Warren would be very surprised if he looked up as he would find the guy who he worships as his god wears red, has horns, hoofs and a tail and carries a pitchfork. Last I recall, Jesus loved the poor and had glowing things to say about the poor.
  • chris · 11 months ago
    Isn't that pretty much standard Christian doctrine though? non-Christians go to hell...I'm not sure how controversial that is.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 11 months ago
    My UU minister is enlightened enough to reassure us that Warren's b.s. is NOT Christian. Ecumenical pastors don't say, much less think, that there is only ONE way to heaven.
  • ChrisSF · 11 months ago
    Yes, it is, at least for evangelicals. "This American Life" just ran a fantastic hour long program on a leading evangelical who has been shunned by his movement as a heretic because he changed his mind and decided than non-Christians weren't going to go to hell.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    You know John, you're starting to look like a pissy whinert.

    Your point has been made, we all know what a retartded asshole Rick Warren is and we all know he not going to be in Obama's cabinet so, for God's sake and your own sanity, MOVE ON!

    It's getting embarrassing.
  • Gridlock · 11 months ago
    How about you sit down, be quiet, and enjoy the seat at the back of the bus.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    I'd love to but your pointy head is blocking the view, so I'l stay in the front.

    Thanks anyway.
  • Will · 11 months ago
    No one is forcing you to come here...
  • Ron the former plumber · 11 months ago
    I strongly disagree with the sentiments expressed here. This is a huge, major deal. It fully deserves the coverage it's getting here and elsewhere. The "no unrepentant gays allowed in our church" matter alone deserves an avalanche of publicity. And it's provoking conversations we need to have about religious vs. civil society, and about human values.

    Keep up the great work, John.
  • Webster · 11 months ago
    Unfortunately the only way to get people's attention sometimes is to stand on their shoes and scream in their face. John has been very effective in doing this in the past (remember "Dr." Laura?). Now is the time to put the pressure on and keep the pressure on.
  • j swift · 11 months ago
    In Warren's narrow little mind, if you are not the right flavor of Christianity you are going to hell. Of course Muslims and Jews are going to hell.
  • vkobaya · 11 months ago
    Of course Muslims and Jews are going to hell.

    Not to mention, Catholics, liberal Protestants like Methodists, Mormons, etc. He thinks God is very exclusive. I'm convinced he also doesn't want Black, Brown, Red or Yellow people polluting his heaven either even if they are "Christian" except of course if they are very rich and donated generously to his church. I think I am going to send the SOB a penny so I go to heaven too. <g>

    How can these people believe that God is as small-minded, bigoted, racist and hateful, not to mention, warlike and murderous as they are? Or that God made His church especially to make people rich and grant them heaven for trampling on other human beings to obtain those worldly goods?
  • TPierce · 11 months ago
    >>"pray that I'll have integrity, humility and generosity."<<

    I don't think the prayers are working.

    I don't get it. What was Obama THINKING?
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Hey A-bloggers:

    Last night, I had a long conversation with one of my pastors, Melinda Foster, of the UCC church in Owasso, Oklahoma. It was very enlightening. I go to several churches. I am a member of an Episcopal Church and two UCC churches in Owasso and Tulsa, OK.

    I told her just how frustrated I was with the LGBT community and our ineffective protests. I told her I had suggested a Hunger Strike re: Rick Warren and the Inauguration. By the way, my pastor Melinda Foster (and her husband Toney), have been staunch advocates of human rights, including those of the LGBT community and she did the invocation for the March Against Proposition 8. She is firmly in our camp, and I knew I could confide in her with what I was feeling and pick her brain on the issue. She was the campaign manager of an openly lesbian Democratic nominee for congress, Sue Barton, and I was a researcher on that campaign. We spent lots of time together driving to tiny towns in Western Oklahoma promoting her campaign.

    She told me the only thing she wanted me to consider is what kind of result I wanted. She agreed Rick Warren was a horrible choice, but she thought the hunger strike should be saved for something bigger like some kind of LGBT equal rights legislation or policy Obama would be threatening to veto or not sign. She also said she totally understands why I felt like we needed to go bigger, or do something more effective than the marches and "day without a gay."

    So, I'm going to hold the whole organization of a "Hunger Strike" for something more important, but I am not going to sit back if the LGBT community gets thrown under the bus with any kind of policy Obama has the chance to change. She is in agreement a Hunger Strike, if done the proper way could be effective.

    I want to explain to you, as well, I am not going to consider organizing a "Hunger Strike" unless:

    A. I get a group who would do it with me. This is not about making me famous. I do not need or want to become "famous" for this type or kind of non-violent resistance. This is about giving hope to those young gays and lesbians growing up in places like Red State Oklahoma and / or Utah.
    B. The press would be notified well in advance.
    C. I, and others, will not put their lives on the line for something unless we have a chance of getting a positive outcome.
    D. The group would determine the equality issue would be important enough to put our lives on the line.

    Right now, I'm just trying to think of ways to show others the LGBT means business. Melinda and I both agreed we've seen this play before, and we don't like what we see. We are also in agreement there is no compromising with the religious right. They will take what we give them, but will not compromise on meeting us in the middle.

    She suggested we keep up our letter writing campaigns, and to continue to express our outrage and to even let them know the depth of our anger even has us considering hunger strikes. Obama needs to know just how much our equal rights mean to us. I told her, "Its a matter of life and death because when it comes to those young gays and lesbians growing up without hope, it is." It is just that... a matter of life and death.

    http://www.pinkpanthersblog.com/
  • willnyc · 11 months ago
    At this point, it wouldn't take much for me to be on a hunger strike, since every time I think about Obama and Warren I just want to throw up. I've been nauseous for days over this.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Well, it is a very serious non-violent form of protest and I'd be willing to do it for the right issue. Protection of LGBT civil rights would be enough to get me to do it because I want to send a message to the young gays and lesbians the older LGBT Americans are fighting for them. They deserve hope. They deserve to be able to live more free and enjoy equality we haven't experienced, yet. I'm tired of hearing about LGBT kids who don't make it to adulthood because our society attacks them. Our LGBT kids are beautiful, talented and deserve the same rights as their peers. At 43 years of age, I would lay down my life for them. Granted, I DON'T want to have to do that, but its that important to me.
  • christiekeith · 11 months ago
    Hmmmm, I haven't had enough of this yet. Know when I will?

    When DADT and DOMA are repealed, and I have full legal equality in my state and nation.

    Than I will claim a terrible ennui with the whole gay rights thing.
  • Will · 11 months ago
    John,
    We need you out there on the cable shows. Rachel Maddow is great but Gavin Newsom was off-point and serving his own political interests. Aside from Maddow and Olberman, so far the only reporter that somewhat gets it that I have seen is Andrea Mitchell, but she needs a spokesperson like you who can keep things on point. I wish Jon Stewart was not on break, he is someone that I would say has been a "fierce advocate for glbt rights."
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Have you noticed when Jon Stewart goes on break the proverbially shit always hits the fan? He ALWAYS seems to have to comment on HUGE news in hindsight... Maybe I'm just imagining this but he has missed several HUGE stories while going on "vacation" hasn't he? Is it just me?
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    I thought Gavin did okay. Explain what you mean? I mean, he could have been promoting himself but I didn't see it. I thought Maddow said EVERYTHING I was absolutely seething about. I felt BETTER after she put my anger into words on national cable teevee. It REALLY made me feel better. If it weren't for Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, I don't think I'd watch television cable news anymore.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    I'm supposed to believe that fat bastard thinks he can decide who goes to hell or not based on whether or not they believe in his version of Christianity? Ha!
  • Laur · 11 months ago
    The guy who coined the phrase "moral majority", Paul Weyrich died yesterday. The fundies have lost an important founder of this social/religious movement.

    btw--I never really saw the point of Warren's book "The Purpose-Driven Life". Didn't read it. Also didn't get anything by Joel Olsteen. Maybe it's because I don't go for the religious motivational stuff to begin with.
  • woodnthrifty · 11 months ago
    Warren can't hide his fatness. Gluttony is a SIN. Wouldn't it be fun to see him on celebrity fit club. Have you noticed that Huckabee is gaining his weight back.
  • hollisterwelles · 11 months ago
    The who is anyone who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior...

    Anyone...
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    and who's Jesus Christ would that be? Your's? Mine? Reverand Warren? George W. Bush's?

    I don't recognize the Jesus Christ most Talibangelicals, like Rick Warren, always talk about. The one I believe in is the Jesus Christ who was a political rabble rouser, and socialist who got hung on a cross because he wouldn't suck up to the powerful religious and political leaders of his day.
  • 1billinnj2 · 11 months ago
    we gays have become the new black.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    Bullshit.

    You can hide being gay but even a child can't hide being black. so stop repeating that ridiculous mantra.

    We gays are the new "Gays".
  • Gridlock · 11 months ago
    Really, tell that to every flaming queen
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    Really? A "Flaming Queen" can put on the old Abercrombie & Fitch togs, comb their hair, lose the make-up and blend right in and wander the world unmolested, catch a cab, get lunch on time and not get "profiled" while shopping. Now just make a minor adjustment, change his skin to Black and see what happens.

    Start taking your meds, my friend.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    "lose the make-up" - No, there are lesbians who have been fired in Oklahoma because they "appeared" too masculine. Effeminate gay and straight men who have been fired because they were "perceived" to be gay. It didn't have anything to do with makeup but their mannerisms.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    I don't know a lot of masculine lesbians and effeminate men who can truly hide being gay. They can try to claim they are "effeminate" heterosexuals but they STILL pay a heavy price for it. Everyone knows its true.
  • woodnthrifty · 11 months ago
    Yes, but it easier to tell at a glance, at a distance, in an instant that someone is Black.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    I agree, they do pay a heavy price but the fact is that Blacks pay a heavier price and more often. That includes the women, children, men of all ages. They can't hide it or run from it by disguising their gender.
  • kevinbgoode · 11 months ago
    Apparently you've never heard of the history of lighter-skinned Blacks who could "pass."
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    Right.

    Sorry but I have.

    What are the numbers on the number of Blacks that passed for white? 1 in 10? 1 in 100,000? or 500,000? You have no idea as to what you're talking about.

    No matter how you slice it or dice it, it's a false equivalency to compare the impact of race discrimination against Blacks to gender discrimination. You have no idea as to what you're talking about.
  • red_dwarf · 11 months ago
    Jack - may I suggest you read more. Your shallowness is spilling off the desktop.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Can blacks be fired for the perception they are black? Answer: No they can not.
    Can people be fired simply because they are perceived to be gay or lesbian? Answer: Yes they can. It is LEGAL in many states to do this, so don't tell me they pay a heavier price. Black people have legal recourse. LGBT do not.
  • vkobaya · 11 months ago
    Can blacks be fired for the perception they are black?

    May be illegal, but it only counts if that law is enforced. I assure you that many Blacks are still fired abused and discriminated against on the job. It is also illegal to gun down people for walking while black, but the LAPD has gotten away with one a week in the last month or so not to mention the many, many previous incidents or the fact that Hispanics experience only slightly less brutality from the LAPD, or other police departments. Truth is both racial minorities and gays are both savagely discriminated against despite laws, rules, company manuals, court orders, etc. to the contrary.

    Rather than fight over who suffers the most under discrimination, let's all hold hands, and fight discrimination whereever it rears it's poisonous head. Blacks, Hispanics and other minorities keep telling themselves I'm glad I'm not gay, and gays keep saying they are better than Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, etc. We are all one, all brothers and sisters and the them who are our true enemies are the bigots.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    No, it counts if you can go to court over it. Gay people can not even have their case heard because it is LEGAL to fire them. Big difference. Can gay couples get married? Can black couples or interracial couples get married? Can black couples adopt in every state? Can gay couples adopt in every state? I'm not going to continue to argue this point. Gay people don't have equal civil rights... period... and to say we do is just ignorance.

    I am not saying gays are better than any other minority. I'm just agreeing with those who realize we have FAR LESS civil rights than any other minority. Its quantifiable. To say we have the same rights is just ludicrous. Oh yeah... can we serve openly in the military? Can the rest of American minorities? Just one more quantifiable example...
  • Indigo · 11 months ago
    Wonderful! You've learned your colors! Everyone's very pleased. Now focus on allegories of color. It's a little more complicated but you can do it.
  • kevinbgoode · 11 months ago
    Really now? And we can be treated with a President who believes in marriage segregation, separate-but-equal, and explains away his friendship with heterosupremacist bigots.

    Nope. . .nothin' like bein' black at all.
  • Jackson Thersites · 11 months ago
    Thank you Jack J. This is not the oppression Olympics. Blacks, hispanics, women, jews, lgbt, asians, native americans, italians, irish, atheists... the list goes on and on. It is easier to hate someone that is different than it is to breath!

    We should be joining together and not creating divisions.
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 11 months ago
    Yup...fags are the new ni**ers. Nice. Real nice.
  • PeteWa · 11 months ago
    Any "heaven" that would have Rick Warren or his ilk is no place I'd want to be.
  • KerrynowCampau · 11 months ago
    That is exactly what I was thinking

    Who would want to spend eternity with that jack*ss
  • vkobaya · 11 months ago
    Any "heaven" that would have Rick Warren or his ilk is no place I'd want to be.

    I very seriously doubt you need to worry about spending eternity associating with Rick Warren unless you are headed for the other place. <g>
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 11 months ago
    Obama and Warren: Pissing off the following Americans:

    Gays
    Lesbians
    Pro-Choice Women
    Transgendered
    Bisexual
    Jews
    Muslims
    Non-believers
    Buddhists
    Sikhs


    Well, 46% of America would be happy with Obama and Warren. Maybe the mainstream media is right: Obama is really a moderate Republican after all.
  • Boycottutah · 11 months ago
    He is liberal with issues such as affirmative action and abortion, but very, very, consevative on all other social issues.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    We need to stop calling them "social issues." They are CIVIL RIGHTS issues. Big difference.
  • woodnthrifty · 11 months ago
    Obama is a pragmatist. You can't just shove gay marriage down the throat of an ignorant "middle class" person with the equivalent of a third grade education. Social changes take generations......just look at Black people and how prejudice is still alive and well. What's so great about marriage anyway? Are you gays that anxious to pay alimony and divorce lawyers?

    Obama, I hope will get civil partners rights which could be written in a way better than traditional marriage. Please liberals don't be like the Repugs and jump at the first opportunity to hate. It's just an invocation and a Trojan Horse to get cooperation from the 3rd grade mentality wingnuts.
  • Boycottutah · 11 months ago
    Wow. Just Wow. Obama is not stupid. He knew exactly what message he would be sending the LBGT Community. Obama is telling us that we are less than human, that we deserve fewer rights than humans. He ignores the Constitution (equal protection) and instead thumps the Bible telling us that our relationships do not deserve the rights and protections of marriage because "God is in the mix".

    Barry has been in love with this man for years. He even writes about him in his book . How could we have been so stupid to fall for his lies?!?! This is worse than what the Republicans have done to us, because at least they are honest about hating us. Obama hates LGBT people, (thinking one is less than human is nothing less than hatred) but he loves our votes, our volunteer hours and energy, and most of all he loves our money. I suggest anyone getting hit up for cash from Downlowbama should tell him exactly what you think. No Mo Money Barry!!!

    We have been duped and screwed by Obama. I hope the Obama cultists will finally wake up from the Kool-Aid buzz!
  • Laur · 11 months ago
    Ah, but at least he didn't say "God DAMN America"--when a conservative evangelical espouses actual un-American values, such as his working for the passage of Prop 8, and anti-reproductive choice agenda, that doesn't raise eyebrows?

    Seems to me that the president-elect (who has Rev. Lowery doing the closing benediction) is the one who is being inclusive.

    Even though I'm not religious, it would have been nice if he'd asked Rev. Welton Gaddy instead. But Rev. Gaddy, is a separation of church & state sort of a guy.
  • timncguy · 11 months ago
    there is a difference in being inclusive and including a raging BIGOT.

    If Obama is being inclusive, where is the racist and anti-semite included in the inauguration festivities. They aren't included becuase eveyone KNOWS those are wrong.

    The problem here is that Obama is willing to accept anti-gay religious dogma as a valid point of view to be discussed. What he needs to do is to stand up and say that it isn't valid. Just like racism wasn't a valid point of view even though it was justified by religious dogma. And bans on inter-racial marriage were not valid points of view even though they were justified using religious beliefs.

    Look back in history and find all the examples of the religous beliefs that were used against the "other" people in society. One by one those religious beliefs have been tossed out. The anti-gay bigotry will be tossed out as well. Why should it take as long this time to get rid of it? We have a long history to look back on and realize that religious bigotry is always proved to be wrong headed. Why do we have to keep fighting the same fight with religious supporters. Likely because they still believe in their hearts that the racism was right and the bans on inter-racial marriage were right but they have finally learned to stop voicing those views in public. They know they can still get away with anti-gay speak without taking a hit for it.
  • Laur · 11 months ago
    I wasn't making myself clear, which is my fault. I really don't agree with having Warren do the invocation, and it is because of his anti-gay, anti-women's reproductive choice attitudes. As for the anti-semitic inclusion, well, apparently Warren has that covered, too. Gays are not the only group that gets slammed by some of these fundamentalists--Warren's attitudes about Jews and Muslims and others who are not adherents to his brand of Christianity are not unique. That doesn't make it acceptable.

    The fact is that intolerance is still very much woven into the preachings of some of the evangelicals. It is wrong, and it dies hard, because some of that intolerance is cherished deep in the heart of many people who might be otherwise decent, who pass it along to their children, along with the rest of their values, and it is reinforced by pastors like Warren.

    Preaching intolerance from the pulpit is abuse. You're right about the religious leaders getting away with too much. And you're right about those who have learned not to voice their views openly in public. There were/are still people who don't openly express their racism in public for a long time, until they found the opportunity at rallies for McCain/Palin this past election season.

    It is still necessary to call it out.

    I'm still disappointed that Obama wants Warren to do the invocation, even if I think he was trying to demonstrate a spirit of inclusion. I still am mystified by the choice, and still wonder if it was seen as a way of distancing himself from association with Rev. Wright.
  • Will · 11 months ago
    Let's try and get constructive here, generate some new ideas. What about approaching Rev. Joseph Lowery about not participating in the inauguration if it is not fully respectful of civil rights for all people?
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 11 months ago
    Oh puh-fucking-leez. We're going to Hell? Really. Girlfriend, Hell was defined by some very queeny clerics in the Vatican early on so as to control the unwashed masses into tithing their hard labored money to keep the queeny clerics in Prada shoes and taffeta chasuables. And all the Protestant delineations of that crap, like your Warren white trash Baptist style mega church cum Broadway Jesus Show is all about that same basic tithing system. Keep ignorant little people sending in monies to keep YOU and your ilk in the finery you've come to expect. That is all Christianity has become. A true tithing scam. And frankly I would like to see someone in Congress start going after your goddamned tax exempt status. The United States, by law, is a FUCKING SECULAR NATION. Now be on your way.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Yea, before that it was Sheol... the Jews believed in Sheol and it wasn't HELL FIRE and BRIMSTONE it was just a place everyone went to after they died...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheol
  • red_dwarf · 11 months ago
    Boston - what an eloquent display of verbal enlightenment!
  • PippaPasses · 11 months ago
    You'd better hurry up, Barry! Because we're poised, poised! to cancel our Inaugural reservations . . .
  • timncguy · 11 months ago
    Who cares what any individual religion says about anything? Any specific religious dogma is totally irrelevant in any discussion about anyone's civil rights. PERIOD

    We are a nation of laws and just because some of those laws happen to coincide with some religious positions on som eissues doesn't mean those laws were based on those religious rules.

    Christians who constantly CLAIM that our constitution, bill of rights and laws are based on Christian values are misinformed and should be reminded of that at every opportunity.

    Just because we have laws against murder and the Bible also says thou shall not kill, doesn't mean one was derived from the other.

    If marriage laws were based on Christian dogma, the state couldn't issue a marriage license to a divorced Catholic or an atheist. But, those licenses are issued every day.
  • Older_Wiser · 11 months ago
    What a smug, arrogant SOB...his church is all about Rick Warren, no one else. He's rich, so he has power over others who have given up their freedom to an intellectually challenged gold digger. Even the first sentence of the first chapter of his "best selling" book states: "It's not about you."

    But he has no power over me. I'd never believe anything so fucking foolish as an "afterlife" anyway. I have one life, like everyone else, nothing else, and I've lived it according to my own standards, not those who believe they have the right to dictate the way I live with their myths and superstitions.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Well, I DO believe in an afterlife, but I'm not going to let some smug, fat bastard try to convince me to believe in his version. I can imagine my own, thank you very much. I also don't believe in some angry, hateful G-d who is going to reward the fat bastard in the Hawaiian shirt but make the rest of us swim in a lake of fire.
  • mirele · 11 months ago
    Don't forget, John, this also includes those sects that don't fit Warren's criteria for being "Christian." At the top of the list would be the Mormons (but they were happy to take Mormon money for Prop 8). Also included would be Jehovah's Witnesses, Apostolic (Oneness) Pentecostals and (at least to some) Seventh-day Adventists. Anyone who is a member of what Warren and friends would define as a "cult" is outside the Christian camp and destined for a fiery eternity (at least according to him).

    BLECH!
  • pdxprobert · 11 months ago
    That grown adults believe such things is beyond me... virgin births, resurrections, heaven, hell...Why do people throw all common sense out the window when it comes to religion based myths, fables and farce...

    and to think that a majority of our population expects our elected reps to believe such rubbish or else they are unelectable....

    If I had a friend named Bob and he was imaginary but he talked to me and kept me safe if I prayed to him, people would call me disturbed or mentally ill, but change that imaginary being to a person named God and all of a sudden I become the most trustworthy person and someone other believers can trust... Bob bless America....

    If I were going to be forced to express faith in something, I'd choose Santa Claus... I don't think anybody has ever been killed in the name of Santa Claus... or said that Santa told them to do this or that heinous crime...
  • Ruttle · 11 months ago
    I'm with you on this. I cannot understand how anyone believes these tales. But in reaction to this thread in general, I would say that all christians must share this view - that belief in christ is necessary for salvation - otherwise, well, you are not a christian lol. But hey, its a big tent cult I guess.
  • renegademom · 11 months ago
    actually.....no....i belong to a Christian Church (United Church of Christ) that ordains gay and lesbian ministers, routinely does "weddings", has a large lgbt membership, marches in our local gay pride parade, does interfaith projects with muslims, jews, buddhists and catholics, and uses bible teachings as ALLEGORY for living in love.

    love is all there is.
  • Ruttle · 11 months ago
    lol Thats not a christian church - you've joined a social club. Its beyond me how you can even pretend to believe this god business when you can ignore your 'sacred' texts with such ease. Either the bible is the word of your god or its not. Which is it going to be? If it is not, then why waste your time? You can practice love without resorting to religion. In fact, I would argue you could be even more effective if you dropped the paper thin commitment to your bible.
  • red_dwarf · 11 months ago
    Here's the way I look at it. You have 2 choices. You can believe a sheephearder sitting around 2,000 years ago picking his ass and eating mushrooms dreaming up this religious bullshit, or you can believe the hubble telescope.

    If there is a God, we cannot know it. If there is a creator, then who created him? Has infinity passed already? Why are we here? Better to worry about whether the fish are biting - we are humans, and if there is a God, he didn't give us the brainpower to look past the big bang. Maybe we'll meet 'em someday in the future - but that'll have to wait.

    Religion was a brokered power move to control the masses for the benefit of the selfish rat bastard elite.
  • pdxprobert · 11 months ago
    I was born innocent (fuck that original sin bullshit) and raised Catholic.. weve got several get out of going to hell options... confession is one and purgatory is the other in case we die without confessing our sins... that's as long as our sins arent mortal in nature, then I think its straight to hell... I can see how kids can believe this nonsense, but to hear grown adults that are judges, policeman, politicians, brain surgeons, scientists, lawyers, mathemeticians, et al express and hold these beliefs to be true... makes me wonder if a great deal of our population might be certifiably loony.... I became an ex-catholic after I left home and started thinking for myself...
  • jrh · 11 months ago
    Don't forget those idol-worshiping Catholics!
  • Humdrum · 11 months ago
    I'm sure many of you would have thought Christ was a pretty civil, welcoming man as well, what with his whole "I am the way, the truth, and the life ... no man cometh unto the father but by me" bit.
  • Indigo · 11 months ago
    Fascinating but true: some people have so little education that they believe that crap.
  • Older_Wiser · 11 months ago
    I'd rather be financially embarassed than to have to admit something that showed me to be a complete fool. Just try to tell an employer that you aren't a believer around here, though. You'd probably never eat again. Besides, everyone thinks everyone else goes to church--they just assume it. ; )
  • Indigo · 11 months ago
    "I have my own religion" is my standard response to busybody inquiries. In fact, I practice Zen Buddhism but that's none of their business because they're just looking for an argument. I like to add that I'm morally opposed to all forms of Satanism, especially biblebeltery. That helps keep the Holiday card list short. :-)
  • Gorgonzola · 11 months ago
    If god is really omnicient and all powerful, why would he send geek like Rick Warren to deliver his message?
  • samiinh · 11 months ago
    Because Rich Warren made up his god, like all men do. He's a delusional flake.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    While your here kicking and screaming about how Obama somehow screwed you by giving Rick Warren a podium (as a gay man I see nothing wrong with this, after all Satan must be exposed and Obama is reaching out to ALL Americans as he said he would), why haven't you vented your collective fury on Rev. Warren and his church? Why have you written him, circled his church in protest or petitioned him to withdraw from speaking? I'm sure he has more GLBT members of his congregation that even he realizes.

    If not, why? I have so you absolutely have no excuse not to unless it's because you find Obama an easyr target.

    There are more GLBT citizens in California alone than there are in 10 Rick Warren mega-churches and we have the power to force him to gracefully bow out. You may not realize this but Rev. Warren not close to being the biggest church in Cali, Rick Warren is far from being a power broker and chosing him for a national public just might be the beginning of the end for him. Public scrutiny can be a killer.

    What about it?

    It's time to stop acting like spoiled high-school girls angry because the hot jock didn't give you tongue when he kissed you and MOVE ON.
  • Gary SF · 11 months ago
    Uh, it isn't the size of his church - it is the size of his influence. He is a best-selling author, seen on Oprah and others. Oh, and your sexist analogy leads me to say to go fuck yourself.
  • Jack J. · 11 months ago
    Sorry Gary ., his influence barely extends out of his church, he has too many competitors to be effective as a power broker. Shuler has more on the ground influence. As far as being a best selling author, so is Bill O'reilly and as for being on Oprah, you can be on too if you showed both ends of your ass like you're doing now.

    Sexist analogy? Hey, if the skirt fits, wear it, Muffin.
  • Gary SF · 11 months ago
    Best selling author has no influence? Why do you think that Obama invited him? Again, go fuck yourself, troll.
  • Indigo · 11 months ago
    Oprah? Aha! It would save a lot of grief to invite Oprah to give the invocation. Controversial, why not?. Understandable, you bet. Soothing, reassuring, and somehow sweet? That too.
  • Gary SF · 11 months ago
    BREAKING: Prop. 8 sponsors seek to nullify 18K gay marriages

    The sponsors of Proposition 8 asked the California Supreme Court on Friday to nullify the marriages of the estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who exchanged vows before voters approved the ballot initiative that outlawed gay unions.

    The Yes on 8 campaign filed a brief arguing that because the new law holds that only marriages between a man and a woman are recognized or valid in California, the state can no longer recognize the existing same-sex unions.

    "Proposition 8's brevity is matched by its clarity. There are no conditional clauses, exceptions, exemptions or exclusions," reads the brief co-written by Pepperdine University law school dean Kenneth Starr, the former independent counsel who investigated President Bill Clinton.


    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/...

    The Yes on 8 people said that they didn't want to do this. They also said they didn't want to create a law to remove all domestic partner benefits. Why should we believe anything that they say?
  • samiinh · 11 months ago
    Something that should be pissing us off more than the Warren thing is the fact that Goldman Sachs who received a 10 billion dollar bailout from the government....iow, taxpayers, is paying out almost 11 billion in Bonus Money!! Morgan Stanley, 10 billion bailout...2 billion in bonuses. This is grand theft!
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    One thing that we are doing that is a big mistake is we are allowing conservatives to define our CIVIL RIGHTS as "social issues." Well then, segregation was a "social issue." No, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CIVIL RIGHTS. Start calling it what it is. To say it is a social issue diminishes the importance of the rights we are talking about. For instance, imagine being described as a pastor who is liberal on affirmative action and abortion but against Civil Rights issues, instead of "social issues." It makes a big difference and the conservative Talibangelicals are great at substituting words to make their bigotry acceptable. Do NOT let them.
  • samiinh · 11 months ago
    From the NYTimes:
    Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

    December 19, 2008
    In a First, Gay Rights Are Pressed at the U.N.
    By NEIL MACFARQUHAR

    UNITED NATIONS — An unprecedented declaration seeking to decriminalize homosexuality won the support of 66 countries in the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, but opponents criticized it as an attempt to legitimize pedophilia and other “deplorable acts.”

    The United States refused to support the nonbinding measure, as did Russia, China, the Roman Catholic Church and members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The Holy See’s observer mission issued a statement saying that the declaration “challenges existing human rights norms.”
  • Indigo · 11 months ago
    existing? among Catholics, perhaps.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    "The United States refused to support the nonbinding measure..."

    because if they did they would have to say bad things about that Freedom Loving Iraq where gays and lesbians are being killed for being part of the LGBT community!
  • nogo postal · 11 months ago
    Get pissed off...
    Maybe you were not pissed off enough during
    8 years of Bush...but now that you are Really..really
    ..pissed off...
    What creative...non-violent..political theater...on 1/20 ..in either your town or DC..can you come up with?
    Ya gotta make it public....
    I do believe an outpouring of creative expression will send a message.

    You can either dream your dream...
    or work yer dream..
  • red_dwarf · 11 months ago
    You can leave a message for the Obama Transistion team --> (click here)

    I just wrote to them and told them that Homophobia is NEVER acceptable, and that 1 week ago I had high hopes in Obama, but now I cannot stand to look at his face. I don't like cowards, I never had. Anyway, drop 'em a line and let 'em know how you feel.
  • Jackson Thersites · 11 months ago
    From the Obama Transition Team's talking points memo on Rick Warren:

    • As he's said again and again, the President-elect is committed to bringing together all sides of the faith discussion in search of common ground. That's the only way we'll be able to unite this country with the resolve and common purpose necessary to solve the challenges we face.

    Nailed That One.
  • red_dwarf · 11 months ago
    I have NO ground to give to homophobic bigots.

    Jack-hammered that one.
  • Jackson Thersites · 11 months ago
    Did you miss the irony I intended?
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    I think every LGBT person needs to go see the movie, "MILK" and then decide what they are willing to do in order to move our community and civil rights forward. I keep thinking about Harvey Milk stating, "We have to give them hope." Yes we do. We have to give that next generation of LGBT kids hope. I don't want those kids to experience the hell I did growing up. It was so bad, I repressed my sexual orientation until I was in my twenties, and even then I lost my job in the military over it, etc. I was gay bashed... There were so many negative experiences in my life, doled out by a homophobic American society, that I don't want to see other LGBT kids have to experience growing up. There are other cultures who are more gay friendly than America, and I want America to live up to its promise for ALL citizens... not just the heterosexual KKKristian Talibangelicals.
  • RitornaVincitor · 11 months ago
    Beautifully put, Cowboy. I feel the same way.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Thanks! ;)
  • RitornaVincitor · 11 months ago
    Well, let's see. Carl Sagan once estimated that a total of 55 billion "people" have lived. By people he meant modern homo sapiens. Since most of them lived before Christ, and since most of those living in the last 2000 years were not Christians, that means that hell must contain well over 50 billion people. Of course, we're all HOMO sapiens, so the civil and welcoming Rev. Warren must think nobody goes to heaven.
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Good one, "Ritorna." No HOMO's in Rick Warren's heaven and THAT includes HOMO-sapiens. Snicker...
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    Where did the Neanderthals go when they died?
  • Larry · 11 months ago
    wow! i'm going to hell! oh, crap! i better shape and accept jesus post haste! rick warren is an ignorant moron and obama has really screwed up on this one...
  • dcastro · 11 months ago
    John: Yes, there is no way that Rick Warren should be allowed to be involved in ANY way with the inauguration. That is clear. And yes, it helps define the intolerance of the man when he basically says that those who don't accept Christ are going to hell. But here's the dirty little secret (or maybe not so secret) thing about other people's hells - they don't exist. Each religion claims that they are the One True Path but doesn't that mean that all the others are false? I've chosen atheism and no believer of any religion has the power to send me anywhere after I'm dead. And certainly not to a place that is of their own devising, that to me is as made-up as Oz and just as unreal. So Rick Warren can go to hell. He just can't send me there.
  • LawMichigander · 11 months ago
    Well John when you think of an authentic temple/church, the name saddleback comes to mind. You know schools founded by radio/tv preachers are very authentic, the gold standard of God.
  • Steve · 11 months ago
    My giant invisible friend
    My giant invisible friend
    He knows all about you
    He knows everything that you do
    My giant invisible friend
  • Steve · 11 months ago
    Oh, yeah... This is the crap that evangelicals believe. All of it is preposterous.
    Three thousand years of monotheism. Not a shred of rational evidence.
  • Michael · 11 months ago
    For those of us who believe, not evidence is needed. For those who choose not to believe, no evidence will suffice
  • cowboyneok · 11 months ago
    I just sent this over at Change.gov - Transition - picked "Inauguration"

    http://change.gov/page/content/contact/

    "Re: Rick Warren and LGBT community

    I just want to say I am extremely disappointed by the choice of someone who says that I can not be a member of his church unless I repent of my sexual orientation.

    I am MORE than disappointed. In fact, I even deliberated with my UCC pastor on organizing a HUNGER STRIKE in Tulsa, Oklahoma to get President Elect Obama to reconsider his choice. I am a member of three separate churches - St. Andrews Episcopal, and two United Church of Christ churches in Tulsa and Owasso, Oklahoma.

    My pastor suggested contacting your transition team and letting you know the depth of our community's anger. She said you need to know we have even considered such a dire non-violent protest as a "Hunger Strike" but she did have me reconsider. She said the Hunger Strike should be saved for any kind of back tracking on important LGBT issues the Obama Administration decides they will not implement.

    I had an extremely hard time growing up as a gay American in Oklahoma in the 1970-1980's. I am not willing to watch the next generation experience the same unfair, unjust and totally unacceptable treatment I experienced. I want to give the next generation hope, and at 43 years of age, I AM WILLING to join a group of people to lay down my life for the next generation of LGBT Americans. It is time for us to receive the same rights the rest of America enjoys. This is not a question of "social issues," either. It is CIVIL RIGHTS and we shouldn't even have to ASK for those rights.

    I hope it doesn't take a group of LGBT actually having to organize a Hunger Strike in order to realize our Civil Rights, but this is one gay man WHO WILL DO IT, and I will follow the tenets of Ghandi / Martin Luther King and continue to use non-violent techniques to see that the next generation has HOPE. I sincerely hope it doesn't come to that. Trust me, I like to eat just as much as the next man, but I will not hesitate to follow through with dire non-violent action if it becomes necessary.

    I worked tirelessly for the Obama campaign in Tulsa, Oklahoma. I am also the Vice Chair of the Democratic Party in Delaware County, OK and an Executive Board member for Oklahoma Congressional District 2 of the Oklahoma Democratic Party Veterans Committee. I am plugged in politically, and I WILL be watching to ensure the promises of equality and civil rights for my LGBT community are fulfilled.

    Thank you.

    -Timothy Beauchamp"
  • Josh · 11 months ago
    I've been a reader for over a year now, but never felt compelled to comment until now. I'm a Christian (Southern Baptist and everything) who voted for Obama, so I know what it's like to get it from both sides. I get told I'm "not a real Christian" by my fellow church members and I'm consistently called a hate-mongering idiot from people like Mr. Aravosis here. You know it kind of defeats the purpose to call for tolerance only to turn around and berate people who hold slightly differently positions than you, right? Not all Christians agree with all of Rick Warren's beliefs.

    That being said, most Christians do agree on one thing: that Christ is the only way to heaven. It's kind of in the title of the religion. Jesus said in scripture that, "I am the way, the truth and the life. No man comes to the Father except through me." In other words, yes, most of us believe that those who don't accept Christ go to hell. Don't be pissed at Christians for that. Be pissed at Jesus.
  • Ruttle · 11 months ago
    "Slightly" different?
  • Scott · 11 months ago
    "In other words, yes, most of us believe that those who don't accept Christ go to hell. Don't be pissed at Christians for that. Be pissed at Jesus."
    *********

    And this is the smarmy "born again'er" shit that's thankfully destroying the kooky "christians" in name only.

    As a non-religious person, I don't appreciate being told I'm going to hell. Stop forcing your lifestyle and nutball fairy tales on people who aren't religious.
  • Michael · 11 months ago
    I couldn't have said it better myself
  • CitizenX · 11 months ago
    Make no mistake, if you have not accepted Jesus as your P E R S O N A L savior (born again) you are going to hell. The is basic fundie belief. There is not tolerance on their part. NONE AT ALL.
  • stymie · 11 months ago
    Perhaps what Obama did was to catapult the issue to front & center, so the rest of the public that sit around and watch the world go by without a clue start to understand just what nuts are out there in right wing land. Perhaps then sane individuals like yourself (are you one?) will reach out to help them back to sanity, civility, morality, and Godliness.
  • AdmNaismith · 11 months ago
    If the definition of Hell is the separation of a person from God (forget Bosch and his stupid comic books), I'm in Hell right now and I'm not really feeling it. I don;t feel the godness, and my life is pretty complete without it.

    I find the belief in invisible cloud people and all of their attendant pettyness (I created you and gave you free will, but if you don't worship me I'll stamp my little feet!) something I can do without in my life. I don't take this kind of passive-aggressive crap from my friends, and I expect my gods to act more maturely than the average three-year old.
  • Jennifer · 11 months ago
    I couldn't care less. Obama is prez, not this dude. Quick, don't look it up, who was the guy who presided over Clinton's? Ha, didn't think so. I think we ought to take the religious crap out of it altogether. So there. <grin>
  • Ruttle · 11 months ago
    I think it was Billy Graham - but - I agree religion should be taken out of anything related to government. I guess you could care less though. Otherwise you would not have made the effort to post.
  • roberto · 11 months ago
    The initial outrage was from and on behalf of the gay/lesbian community. But the more we learn of this man's beliefs and teachings, it is clear that the Warren invitation is an insult to the majority of people. Of course, ignorance and bigotry usually is.
  • cwzilla · 11 months ago
    hEY SATAN will come on a nd rapture these idiots already.. or are u just as digusted and dont want anything to do with them either??
  • Jimmy · 11 months ago
    I'm no fan of Warren; in fact, he makes me a little nauseous, but is the idea of non-Christians going to hell such a surprising idea coming from an evangelical minister. If you believe the Bible is the word of God then you have to believe in Revelations and that fun chapter is pretty explicit about who will end up burning in eternal damnation. This is not a shockingly new idea from Christians. There are many reasons to dislike Rick Warren and his ilk, but this is just more of the same from these types.