-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2009/03/roubini-sees-another-stock-drop-large.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
9 hours ago · 62 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
10 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
13 hours ago · 39 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
We can guess but don't yet know which banks are insolvent. Isn't this what the stress tests are all about? Or is that just a cover, some sort of bandaid?
And, does the US government have the legal authority to take control of an AIG or Citibank? Tim Geithner asked for that authority this week.
Like everyone else, I would like for the nightmare to be over already. But, it seems to me that the hand is being played, the pieces necessary to deal with the crises are being put into place.
The fix is in for bank reporting next month, imo. Not suprised if we get a stock rally then. The 'stress tests' are getting post-poned, watered-down maybe, but I don't think will be held back forever. and it looks like mark-to-market accounting will come in later this year.
imo, we should just support the bogus mortgages themselves until we can de-leverage this house of cards bit by bit. but, under that scenario, the market crashes, bank stockholders get nailed, and no fun for hedge funds. oh well, imo, let it happen...since I think it will eventually.
I'm starting to see commercials for GMAC bank CD's on the teevee. Didn't they just apply for bank status? Weird times.
markets always rebound before the fundamentals...
and we're seeing good signs in housing, bank lending, etc.
We might see another down blip, but we have probably seen the bottom. Some stocks are trading at fractions of their value.
"Since I am not acquainted with any black bankers, I can only say that this part of humanity that is the major victim of the world crisis, these people should pay for the crisis? I cannot accept that. If the G20 becomes a meeting just to set another meeting, we'll be discredited and the crisis can deepen."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politic...
More big banks will go 'belly up,' economic guru warns
Investors 'way too optimistic'
By Michael Patterson and Maithreyi Seetharaman,
Bloomberg March 26, 2009
U.S. stocks will fall and the government will nationalize more banks as the economy contracts through the end of 2009, said Nouriel Roubini,
We exchange private debt for public, but the public debt must be paid somehow. Wages are remaining depressed; there's no credit to be extended because the middle class is borrowed out.
Where's the fundamental change--the thing that's going to get people back to work doing something other than shuffling paper around or flipping burgers? What is it that the US will be able to sell the world?
Markets usually turn up about six months in advance of a turnaround, and that says October, which is about right.
One of the best things about the end of this crisis will be not having to listen to the ubiquitous Roubini anymore.