DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Savage: "rogue homosexual elements within Homeland Security are engaging in extra-constitutional activity"

  • Rob Mule · 8 months ago
    Savage should get himself a small boat and a grenade launcher and maybe someday he'll become a sugary breakfast cereal...
  • ShirleyGoodnessanMercy · 8 months ago
    Michael Savage, the man whose love letters to Allen Ginsberg met with rejection in the 60's, and he has ranted like a lunatic against gay people ever since.

    Yeah, he definitely needs a good teabagging to become less cranky.
  • An_American_Karol · 8 months ago
    I am really getting concerned with these wackos. These talk show nuts are out to make a buck; that I get, but what happens when some mental case goes over the edge and pulls a Timothy McVeigh?
  • Gary SF · 8 months ago
    I agree. I think it has risen to the 'yelling fire in a crowded theater' level. Oh, I forgot, Hello Karol!
  • An_American_Karol · 8 months ago
    Hi, Gary. How's The City?
  • Gary SF · 8 months ago
    Windy and cold! How about in your neck of the woods?
  • An_American_Karol · 8 months ago
    Very windy. I just got back from Dallas, and my orange blossoms are on the ground, my fence is leaning, and I think I lost a tile or two on the roof.
  • Dr. Edwin Farntem · 8 months ago
    Dude have some tolerance. It's about the gov taxing far too much. Prior to 1900 there was 0% income tax. That was the most prosperous time in our country's history.

    Economics are difficult to understand, so it's not surprising there is confusion, but lower taxes encourage growth.

    Why send your money to washington, to have a bunch of central planners pay themselves a salary, then send it back to you in a way THEY think will help you???

    Keep the money, spend it wisely in your own way, volunteering, charity, for your family, etcetera.

    From a wiser liberal, apparently
  • know your history · 8 months ago
    "Prior to 1900 there was 0% income tax. That was the most prosperous time in our country's history."

    For who? the 19th century - particularly the 19th century from the civil war forward (btw, we had an income tax during the Civil War, Mr. Brainiac) was a horrible time for everyone but the ultra-rich.

    The 1950's, on the other hand, when we taxed the rich at about 90%, was our most prosperous time.

    Jesus, learn some history before you spout off like that.
  • vkobaya · 8 months ago
    Oh, he knows his history alright. He knows the 19th century was the most prosperous time ... for his kind, the greedy, corrupt, thieving, lying robber barons. Much much wealth created to enrich those already wealthy and those willing to abuse common people, steal from them and trample over their Constitutional rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, to say nothing of free speech, freedom of religion, etc.

    This is also one of those guys who still believes in the White man's burden that is they need to enslave the brown races as the brown races are incapable of caring for themselves. That is slavery was only done for the benefit of the slaves.
  • An_American_Karol · 8 months ago
    Explain how our infrastructure will be maintained. Oh, and what was health care back in 1900?
  • Gridlock · 8 months ago
    and roads will be payed for how? health care? defense?

    so you're proposing a nation with no infrastructure, no public transit, no transportation, no military and no food distribution, disaster management, imports/exports...

    wow, sign me right the hell up.

    *eyerolls*
  • RobertSanDimas · 8 months ago
    Hey Dr. Dude. Refresh your history about the distribution of wealth in the USA just prior to 1900. We're repeating that now. Ever been to Newport RI and looked at those mansions? Same thing's being done now.
  • AdrianBrowne · 8 months ago
    Tell Savage that is a Bush-era Homeland Security Report.
  • Rob Mule · 8 months ago
    Rogue Homosexual Elements sounds like the name of the rock band...
  • RainbowPhoenix · 8 months ago
    "Extra-constitutional activity?" Does that phrase actually mean something or is it just something he came up with to make us sound insidious?
  • vkobaya · 8 months ago
    He means trample the Constitution as we had in the Bush administration. That is, gays are out to take away our rights and turn the nation into a gay dictatorship. No, no, Bush didn't try to establish a gay dictatorship, I would say his ambition was more along the lines of a South American tin dictatorship. <g>
  • tlsintx · 8 months ago
    Savage is outing Napolitano and trying to paint her as a threat to the right-wing bigots...

    you watch...Napolitano will soon be targeted by the fox noise nutjobs
  • okojo · 8 months ago
    When I read the headline, I thought Dan Savage was using irony as he cleverly does in his columns...

    Then I saw it was Michael "Mad Dog" Savage, what is new?

    I wouldn't report on him or other Bay Area Reichwing Media personalities, like Melanie Morgan. They are not only delusional, but don't have much gravitas, compare to Boss Limbaugh, or Glenn "can't even read history correctly" Beck.
  • benb · 8 months ago
    The GOP has become a name-calling, anger-provoking radio talk show these days. No wonder Savage is up there with the...ahem....best and brightest of the Republican Party.
  • vkobaya · 8 months ago
    Every time I think my stomach is finally strong enough to listen to this bullshit, they find something even more hateful and bigoted to sicken me again. As far as blaming homosexuals, that is total and uncalled for, scapegoating of the most vile, hateful sort. The threats from the right wing wackos is massive. Look at the gun sales, how they have gone around the bend to the point where they can't keep up with the demand. And then there is the governor of Texas claiming sovereignty for Texas ... isn't that how the Civil War started? Plus, not only is Homeland Security warning of extremist right wing violence, most other police agencies also have similar warnings. Not to mention the hateful charge that Napolitano is gay or that gays are the ones who are gun carrying, swaggering, lying traitors.
  • Jim Olson · 8 months ago
    Gee, thanks for burning *that* image into my brain.
  • Indigo · 8 months ago
    Did he provide examples of "extra-constitutional activity"? and where can I get some?
  • Chris From Maine · 8 months ago
    A guy named "weiner" shouldnt talk too much about homosexual activities if u ask me.
  • mark · 8 months ago
    That old queen Mitch McConnell has shifty eyes, and I definitely wouldn't turn my back to Lindsey Graham, Patrick McHenry or Daid Dreier.

    I have such "icks" now.
  • mark · 8 months ago
    David...typo
  • PippaPasses · 8 months ago
    Anti-gay wingnuts as a threat to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Marvelous. Glad their finally getting the picture!
  • Helen Rainier · 8 months ago
    How in the world would Savage know that there are rogue elements in DHS, much less that they are homosexual? Are these people friends of his and they did a confession or what. I suspect he's talking out his ass.
  • kimbutgar · 8 months ago
    I live in SF and it's so obvious that Savage is a closet homosexual. He used to be gay in the 1960's and got dumped by his lover. Yeah he's married with kids but he never mentions the wife on his show. It's sad that this self loathing closeted homosexual is even on the airwaves. The more he gets unhinged about the gay thing the more obvious it is he is scared of his own feelings!