DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Seems you all got Bill Marriott's attention

  • foxy · 1 year ago
    Join us in Manhattan:
    http://www.gaycenter.org/node/2295


    Prop 8 Protest at the Latter Day Saints (Mormon) Temple in Manhattan
    Event Date
    Wednesday, November 12 2008 : 6:00pm – 8:00pm
    Location

    New York Manhattan Mormon Temple
    125 Columbus Ave at 65th Street
    New York, NY

    See map: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=125+Col...
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    good. wish i could be there in more than spirit.
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    Who would have thought a "temple" in Manhattan at a Central Park West location...I guess those Wall St. types have to have their church close by, though.
  • Older_Wiser · 1 year ago
    The Manhattan New York Temple was the second high-rise temple built by the Church, following the Hong Kong China Temple (1996).

    The Manhattan New York Temple was the second temple built in the state of New York, following the Palmyra New York Temple (2000).

    The Manhattan New York Temple was the third temple built from an existing building, following the Vernal Utah Temple (1997) and the Copenhagen Denmark Temple (2004).

    The widely publicized public open house of the Manhattan New York Temple was attended by over 53,000 guests.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Thanks for the facts. ;) I hope they get a lot of people.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    I wish you the best and sincerely hope you get a lot of people! I'm not gay but I support the protests against the Mormons because I believe that they are of detriment to the values and principles this country was founded on like equality and civil rights. I hope more minority groups come together! I hope that a lot of straight people come stand behind you! I wish I was there... good luck!!
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Over 3,000 people have confirmed they are going on Facebook alone. Also, the GLBT Center sent out an action alert last night, and I've even received emails for some of the sports leagues I'm in about the protest this evening. New Yorkers--get out there and make your voice heard!
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    no more Marriott

    i won't support hate
  • aravir · 1 year ago
    Interesting how the Catholic Church has gotten a pass on this so far.
  • foxy · 1 year ago
    LDS does NOT like the limelite..and Utah it a little closer than the Vatican.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    The Catholics beliefs are a little more mainstream. We kind of know what to expect from the Catholics whereas the Mormons have theological problems in their beliefs, and by problem I mean bigoted. For instance, they think that the Native American Indians skin was turned dark as a punishment from God. They just have a bigger problem when it comes to equality for people because bigotry is so deeply ingrained in their belief system! That's just one small example of how they think that their so much better than everyone and their religion should be imposed on everyone whether their willing or not.

    I live in Utah and they are very "in your face" about their beliefs. They call Native people "lamenites" based on their fairy tale book. They try to legislate their religion on everyone. The Mormon run companies promote male mormon men over anyone whether their qualified for the jobs or not. Their kids are snotty and instructed not to play with any non mormons at school, etc. The list goes on and on and on. So, yeah their hitting a little closer to home with their home grown bigotry.
  • aravir · 1 year ago
    11.1 million Californians are Catholic. 533,000 Californians are Mormon. Forget about the money for a second. What is the likelihood that more Catholics were influenced to vote for Prop 8 by the Catholic Church that others were influenced to vote for Prop 8 by the Mormon Church?
  • isamp · 1 year ago
    I went to high school for one year (1959) in Provo when my parents had to move there for work. Provo High school (right across the street from BYU) had 1212 students, 12 of us were not Mormon. The only good thing about it was there were 11 other students to talk and hang out with. I always try to be understanding of others, but the Mormons make it hard
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Ignorance is bliss or in your case hateful and boring.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Yeah, it's really blissful not believing in fairy tales about how I'm so much more privileged than everyone else so much in fact, that I'm the only one who deserves civil rights.

    Oh wait, that's you.

    Maybe if Mormons would treat non-members with some respect instead of looking down their nose with a rotten sneer and then act like pompous asses then people would be more sympathetic towards them. Just a thought.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    My experience tells me that there are always a few rotten apples in every organization but Mormons are good caring, considerate people who are taught to love and respect everyone.   They are not taught hate, but feel very strongly about protecting the institution of marriage.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    I used to think that too until they did this garbage.
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Purely politically tactical. Mormons are an easier target. Maybe not fair, but that's the way it is.
  • Happy_Housewife · 1 year ago
    And it should be noted that Marriott, and all other hotel and restaurant owners, have profited handsomely from the skill and dedication of their gay and lesbian employees. Back when I was single, I worked at the Minneapolis Marriott, and there were many, many LGBT employees. The most popular restaurant in the hotel was almost entirely staffed by gay men.

    The same was true of the other hotels I worked at (Westin, Sheraton, Four Seasons).

    Oh, and by the way: Marriott, along with the other big name hotels, are one of the biggest distributors of porn in the US. The hotels in the more enlightened cities also have gay porn available. Not that there's anything wrong with porn in my book, but if we're going to try to claim a moral high ground, you gotta expect to be scrutinized.
  • JimRou · 1 year ago
    My partner is a Department Chair at a local University here in Michigan. He is meeting today with a company that is based in Utah, and is trying to sell lab equipment to the University. He is informing them that because of his desire to boycott Utah, he is awarding the contract to another firm.

    He also informed a local Marriott that the University is moving a diversity conference that is scheduled to be held there in the near future - they didn't appreciate the irony of Marriott hosting a conference on diversity, I guess.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    I think it's humorous that people actually think that by attacking LDS affiliated business that you are actually going to change their minds. All your whining, crying and stomping of feet isn't going to change the morals laws that many people of this nation strive to live by. Next thing you guys will be crying about is the right for a man to marry his daughter or some sick thing like that. Good luck with that one.
  • erick28 · 1 year ago
    I agree! I just hope that the LGBT and supporters will stand firm against those who treated us unfairly. We need to fight back and stand our grounds.
  • aravir · 1 year ago
    How about telling Marriot, and other prominent Mormon businessmen that they need to put their money where their mouth is? Tell them to give money to Equality Utah, and to publicly come out in support of the proposals going before the Utah legislature to support civil union. After all, those proposals are tailored to meet precisely the limits that the Mormon Church said publicly it was willing to accept. If those businessmen are not willing to do that, at the very least, then all their protestations are hot air. It's not enough, but it would separate the wheat from the chaff.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    When trouble looms the fascists always put on the sad face while serving up a thin slice of reality atop a huge slab of spin
    Mary-rot would fold without its horde of 'moes going all super anal retentive in their establishments much less the ones paying for service.
    Big Bill can't smell the continental breakfast coffee.
    Mebbe celeb endorsements from Rush, Vannity and post op trannie Mann could steer the winger hillbilly crowd from crashing while parked at rest stops to the nearest family-oriented Mary-rot???
  • Gary SF · 1 year ago
    Once cannot be affiliated with the Mormon church and not be culpable, unless one is 'on the record' for supporting same-sex marriage (and yes, there are many Mormons who do support us - please do not forget this). So the boycott of Marriott Hotels seems appropriate. I think that occasionally, we should target some of their hotels for picketing. Maybe if we coordinated this and picketed 20 hotels across the nation at the same time, we will have Bill's and the church's attention.
  • Neutral · 1 year ago
    I have a Mormon friend who voted for Obama and No on Prop 8, has been very vocal in his opposition to Prop 8 to his friends and family. He doesn't live in Utah, doesn't contribute 10% of his income, but he still identifies as Mormon. He is not a public figure so he can't really "go on record" anywhere except to the people he knows, although he has attended protests. What would you say to someone like him? We have had many talks about it and I haven't really come to any conclusions other than that it's hard to be angry at a Mormon who is right in front of you and is so nice, rational and on your side. He's pretty young still so he doesn't quite understand the complexities of power structures in society and how we are all complicit but he definitely made me think that we should clarify more often who exactly we are fighting. I want every person who donated to Yes on Prop 8 to be called out and boycotted, but I also want nice people like my friend to be left alone. Regardless of how I feel about organized religion, my goal is not to dismantle it or force anyone to denounce it. I just want equality under the law. I mean I definitely believe that me and our other friends are part of why he is on our side, because we were open enough to try to explain the facts to him and it paid off. It makes me wonder if better communication between those who disagree with us is the answer. Is that even possible? Believe me, I am as angry about this as all of you but I don't generally make the best decisions when I am this angry and I can't help thinking that we are using the wrong approach. I am trying to use Obama's example of being strategic rather than emotional to achieve my ultimate goal. Just something to keep in mind...
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Neutral- Feels like we are going to have the same discussion we had last week. Here's my short question: Can any of us be held in any way responsible for the actions of the group we choose to associate with? Your friend, evidently, chooses to identify as being a Mormon--a group with serious, serious, homophobia as one of it's core tenets. At what point do you say to your very nice friend "You really need to think long and hard about your association with this group." We live in a world where there are choices of religion. He does not HAVE to be a member of this one. As a sidenote, I have done quite a bit of research into the LDS and it is highly unlikely that if he does not thithe and is vocal in his opposition to what the Church does, that he is considered a member in good standing. Another note: Before we get carried away with the "There are a lot of Mormons against Prop 8" meme, know that out of 13 MILLION plus Mormons about 300 signed a petition against the Church on the subject.
  • Neutral · 1 year ago
    I guess it's just not all about the Mormons for me. That oversimplifies a larger issue. Like someone said above, what about the Catholics? What about all religious groups who are invested in this nonsense rhetoric about "preserving the sanctity of marriage"? I read a Yes chain letter that was sent around by a Knights of Columbus member to hundreds and hundreds of people, full of crap about protecting children and whatever, and I guarantee that swayed a ton of votes - yet no money changed hands. So I am more mad at people who VOTED for Prop 8 than I am at people who contributed because at the end of the day, I want people to rise above ignorance. I have two people in my own family who voted Yes on Prop 8 and I can't even look at them. They weren't swayed by any Yes ads paid my Mormons, they already believed that BS. So we need to fight the real enemy here, that's my only point.

    I felt the same way when all of the anti-Hillary vitriol was going on here during the primary. It was so unproductive and hysterical and got us nowhere. As I predicted back then, Obama won by a landslide so it was a complete waste of time to freak out about Hillary every five seconds - it created division that still hasn't healed. That time could have been better spent educating people and fighting against Prop 8.

    Bottom line, I am uncomfortable with the level of vitriol that has been displayed on this site since the election. It just seems counter-productive. I am very angry too most mostly I am sad and disheartened and want things to change. I am fine with boycotting large donors to Yes on Prop 8 to send a message but ultimately I am not okay with bashing an entire group because that is no better than what they are doing to us.
  • gwpriester · 1 year ago
    I sent out a couple of e-mails to Utah.com and Utah.gov and both responded. One response said they hoped I would reconsider and the other was more defensive. But both indicated concern. As well they might.
  • foxy · 1 year ago
    I got the same as well. However, the Sundance Festival people didn't bother to reply.
  • Indigo · 1 year ago
    That's nice. Everybody gets good ratings until they don't.

    The Catholics insist that they haven't done anything rude because Catholic Charities does good works. That is not a false claim, they do. The dragging in of one thing to justify willfull malice in another matter is unacceptable. Period.

    Was it the Queen of Hearts who said, "Off with their heads!"?
  • woodka · 1 year ago
    My Mormon friends are all blaming the blacks and hispanics now. They just don't get it. A church that has been discriminated against for years for its us and them attitudes, that completely redefined family and marriage to suit its own purposes, that has discouraged its members for years from marrying outside their faith, that broke the hearts of many of my high school friends by ruining their relationships, that was forced to move to its own state, basically, and still, still, can't understand why people dislike them when they pull this kind of moralistic crap. Get a clue.
  • RonNYC · 1 year ago
    Lest we forget, the Mormons weren't the only ones who hurt us. Blacks voted for this as well and they should be ashamed of that. Is anyone calling blacks (groups, churches, whatever) to task? Are they being asked to explain how this is not like Loving vs Virgina? (I don't know, just asking).

    RON
  • Gary SF · 1 year ago
    The Mormon support for prop 8 is well documented. If I understand the process correctly, the "70%" of blacks that voted for prop 8 is based upon a survey of a few hundred people and then projected statewide. I am pretty sure that in the SF Bay Area, the percent of blacks voting for prop 8 is much lower. Regardless, it was the relentless ads, funded by Mormon donations, that helped their side win by a few points.
  • RonNYC · 1 year ago
    Yes, blame goes to the Mormon church, but blacks and hispanics did the actual voting and they should not be absolved or treated as children. They are adults, like we are, capable of making rationale choices. I doubt the Mormon Church's ads made them vote against their own feelings.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I'm convinced that 70% poll is wrong and for the exact reason you stated Gary.

    And in support of your second point, Alameda county has the highest percentage per capita of blacks of any county in California. Yet Alameda county was one of the strongest voting against 8. I'm certain that poll isn't accurate.
  • dad · 1 year ago
    he should have minded his own business.

    prop h8
  • 1970cs · 1 year ago
    http://www.marriott.com/corporateinfo/culture/h...

    Other brand name hotel chains that are Marriot owned

    Ritz-Carlton
    Towne Place Suites
    Fairfield Inn-Suites
  • woodka · 1 year ago
    Just gave $25 to Equality Utah, too, and encouraged my political list to give as well.

    Gonna mess with my state, I'll mess with theirs.
  • RIPWAMU · 1 year ago
    When it comes right down to it, I must wonder if the way it was constructed wasn't the real problem and why that hasn't been challenged. Like anything on that side, it was misleading. The logical mind may get confused and think Yes really meant No.

    I truly find it hard to believe that a majority of voters who voted for Obama voted Yes on 8. I heard this being talked about on the Gayle King show this morning and it made me think more about it.
  • woodka · 1 year ago
    I don't blame the blacks and hispanics. I blame all those hateful lying ads that Yes on 8 ran.

    And those were funded almost 80% by the Mormons.
  • rand503 · 1 year ago
    Bill Marriott has a LOT of influence in the Mormon church, as you can imagine. And his hotels employe a lot of people, many of whom are gay. (it's the hotel business, afterall!). If we can convince him that being anti-gay is bad for business, you can bet that the church will at least listen to him.

    And at some point, if it gets serious enough, I"m sure they will find another 'revelation' that gays are people too.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Marriage and the family unit is a fundamental of the church which will never change, certainly not in any of our lifetimes. No one man has that kind of influence, please stop fooling yourself.
  • no · 1 year ago
    no it is not

    marriage is a secular thing the licensing and rights of marriage are given to us by the STATES and federal govt

    marriage and family were around a lot longer than your xian religions -- so are you telling me that all the native american people that didn't have religion and churches and xianity never were married either??

    what about me? i didnt get married in a church, dont go to church, am i not married now??

    the CHURCH runs nothing in our govts -- our constitution was very clear on that -- if you want a church running how u live your life, why not go to a really religious country and have at it

    btw, give me your address so i can come by to be sure you're being a good xian at all times or i will ask our govt to deny you rights -- you ever lie? if so, you're a sinner, you're immoral, liars shouldn't be able to be married. god was very specific about bearing false witness ....
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Marriott...Come for the hate...Stay for the porn!
  • barts · 1 year ago
    I'm glad we got Mariott's attention. How soon can we work to get the attention of Templeton Foundation of Philadelphia whose founder's children personally gave over $1.2 Million to Yes on Hate?

    That's an awful lot of dough from one source.
  • Davidusca · 1 year ago
    Woodka, I'm glad to see you sent money to Equality Utah, I'm all over that! I think it's time we started a fund designed just for national passage of gay marriage in all states, and get busy. I too will send some cash to Equality Utah.
  • Shootingstar · 1 year ago
    Marriott Hotels take notice. Neither my wife nor myself have purchased gasoline from Exxon/Mobile in the last two decades due to their criminally inept handling of the Exxon Valdez incident. We will never purchase gas from them again, period. Our feelings, determination and hardheadedness have been so bad that it prevented both of us from even changing our baby's diaper at an Exxon. We drove for another 25 minutes with the worst possible smell imaginable to reach another service station.

    Marriott, I have enjoyed staying in your hotels over the years for business and pleasure. No more. My wife and I will never stay at your hotels until you have a major change in attitude and will publicly renounce the Mormon Church's gross violation of the most basic human rights, the right to pursue happiness.

    Marriott Hotels, welcome to a long list of businesses that are on my boycott list.

    This is how true capitalism works - vote with your wallet. Hit 'em where it hurts.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    It is bigotted to denounce someone for their religious affilitations only. Over half the voters in CA voted for this, you will be a very busy man if you are going to research and boycott every business owner who feels the same way as Marriott. Religious rights and freedoms are what this country was built on, don't hate him for those freedoms.
  • no · 1 year ago
    why the fark do you care

    funny, you say religous rights and freedoms are what this country was built on -- and for someone to not hate someone else for their freedoms and yet you want to take the side of the very people that USE RELIGION to keep others down and deny them THEIR FREEDOMS

    i swear to god, you people are fucking crazy -- it's no wonder u people have to believe in a fairytale to make your lives have meaning
  • barts · 1 year ago
    I'm in a relationship with a foreign national. He is currently here legally, but I can't wait around for gay marraige to materialize. I can't! I'm going to start donating to immigrationequality.org. I think the passage of United American Families Act needs my support and I will now begin to contact members of our newly elected Democratic congress to help pass it.
  • SnowPatrol · 1 year ago
    I understand that this may mean nothing to you but the Gay and Lesbian cause has lost a supporter over their reactions to the passage of Prop 8. I am a pretty laid back kind of person who prefers to let people live however they want to live. There are few types of people that really get under my skin and that is hypocrits. I am amazed at the level of hate coming from the Gay and Lesbian community towards Mormons and other Christians. Since the election I've read many accounts of chants used in their protesting to something akin to "Mormons go back to Utah. Mormons go to hell. Stop the H8." In the very same chant they tell people to stop the hate on 8 they want Mormons to go to hell. This is just a tip of the iceberg. For thousand and thousands of years marriage was a covenant between a man and a woman. In the last couple of decades a small minority of people want to change something that has been around for millenia. When they don't get their way, twice in California's case, then they resort to threats of violence and disturbing the peace. I've even read where threats to taint the food of heterosexual wedding receptions.

    Even in this article you say that the Mormons are trying to push their beliefs on others and condemn them for it, yet the gay and lesbian agenda is to push their beliefs on the general public and make the general public accept their lifestyle. That is hypocritical. Sorry, but just like I don't have to accept the Mormon religion I don't have to accept the lifestyle agenda of gays and lesbians.
  • ProgressiveTroll · 1 year ago
    That's ridiculous, you would deny someone their Constitutional and basic human rights because you think they are hypocrits. The Mormon church put a lot of money and time into something that was none of their business. Any anger they are getting is justified. How do you or anyone else know what was the norm for marriage thousands and thousands of years ago, were you around back then??? My religion says we keep up with the science and the times. Our Constitution says all men are created equal and all have the same rights. I support any gay people getting married that want to, I believe in my Constitution and the word of God.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    "word of god", have you ever read the bible? In no uncertain terms has God ever looked kindly upon same sex relationships. Try to spin it whatever way makes you feel better about yourself but dont' try to insinuate that God thinks the gay lifestyle is good.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    There are millions of Christians who disagree with you.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    And there are still thousands of people that believe the holocaust never happened. It doesn't make them right.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Congratulations on knowing what God wants.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    It is laid out very clearly, anyone who was honest with themselves, could find that out on their own.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Glad to see you've solved all of the world's problems.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    I suppose your a crackpot "prophet" who was "chosen" to speak with God and tell us all what he says.

    duh.
  • no · 1 year ago
    so why does "god" look kindly on the THOUSANDS of same-sex relationships that animals, especially mammals have?

    your first mis-belief is that the bible is something we should follow and that their is a god in the first place -- and even if there was, i aint interested

    2ndly and more importantly, AMERICA is NOT A XIAN NATION -- our forefathers SAID SO, it's in our constitution and marriage licenses and the benefits that are given to married couples are not given nor dictated by any CHURCH...

    equal rights are guaranteed under our constitution -- and guess what, i'm sure thousands of gay people fought and died for the very freedoms that our consitution gives haters like yourself....
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I wonder how you would feel if you had your constitutionally protected rights STRIPPED from you.

    We don't need or want your tepid support. Good bye.
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Here's a newsflash for you SnowPatrol. We haven't lost a supporter in you. When you write the kind of things you write in this post it is clear you were NEVER on the side of equal rights for gay and lesbians. You are just another one of the millions out there claiming to be our friend while holding views that are the antithesis of friendship. Just like you cannot claim to be free of racial discrimination while thinking blacks should not marry whites, you cannot claim to be a friend of the GLBT community while denying us equal rights. If you want to be a bigot, fine. Just don't claim we've lost you as a friend while doing it.
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    And I'll bet SnowPatrol thought he was being ingenious with his posting. *Snicker*
  • TampaZeke · 1 year ago
    You're so full of shit I can smell you through my keyboard. You use the language of homophobes "accept their 'lifestyle' and expect me to believe that you were ever a supporter. Yeah, right.

    You are just like the thousands of letters to the editor that come in that say, "I've switched my party affilitation from Democrat to Republican because Obama was so hateful to the war hero John McCain", The only difference is with those asshats a simple review of public records will show that they have been life-long Republicans but with you you can hide in the obscurity of the internet.

    Sorry sweetheart, I'm just not buying it. But just in case you're for real, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
  • foxy · 1 year ago
    I saw a very interesting comment on one of the news channels a couple days ago. Some latino guy called in and said that he felt tricked into voting against gay marriage. He voted Yes, thinking he was supporting gay marriage.

    I think its possible that a lot of "low knowledge" voters might have done the same thing. People may have voted Yes on Prop 8, assuming they were voting Yes on gay marriage. If it is called the "gay marriage amendment", I think it is perfectly plausible that people might make that assumption.

    Its unfortunate, but a few stupid, yet well meaning people may have been the deciding factor.


    Now remember that youtube video below?
  • ProgressiveTroll · 1 year ago
    I wondered about the wording of that myself. Redneck MO isn't California, but I know for years people around here have ended up voting the wrong way on amendments and props because they were confused by the wording.
  • BarbaraGordon · 1 year ago
    Same problem here in FL, where a lot of people did not understand the amendment language.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Ignorance is a bitch.
  • lucky hussein · 1 year ago
    Nice. Go JA, go. This is what a democracy looks like..
  • DAB · 1 year ago
    Sorry, but at this point, you've lost me. I'm gay, think the "yes on Prop 8" was a hateful act, and I'm not happy at all that the Mormon church encouraged its members to donate money to pass it. But they didn't use the members' tithes for this campaign and, unless I see that Bill Marriott gave money specifically to the campaign, I'm not going to punish a business that has a perfect HRC score. Or, for that matter, a state that happens to have a lot of Mormons, for that matter. I think it's fine to boycott the businesses of donors to the Yes campaign -- like that California theater director's -- but blanket indictments of people because they're members of a church or religion is just as bad as the Republican attempts to tie Barack Obama to Jeremiah Wright's most incendiary comments.
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    Fine. If you sleep well in a Marriott with the Book of Mormon tucked into the nightstand next to you, you go right ahead. I'm staying somewhere else and I bet I sleep better than you do.
  • donbux · 1 year ago
    John, you need to take a deep breath and calm down. If you want to ensure that the LDS church doesn't get any of your money, you'd better just drop out of the economy altogether because that's the only way it's going to happen.

    I'll give you an example. I'm a psychologist. Let's say for argument's sake that one of my patients works in the hotel industry. The parent company of his hotel also owns a hotel in Utah. By your logic, because his business "enriches" the parent company, and because through my work with him I help him function better in his job (thereby also enriching the company), not only his hotel but my practice should be boycotted because we're all indirectly helping increase the LDS church's income (that Utah hotel undoubtedly employs Mormons, after all).

    Boycotting Marriott for no other reason than it's head is a Mormon, DESPITE the company's PERFECT RATING in its dealings with LGBT issues, is exactly what you don't want to do in this situation. Here's a guy who's bucking the trend of his church to do what's right: treat us with dignity and fairness. If we punish him despite his business choices, what message does that send to other businesses?

    Again, let's be clear: Bill Marriott didn't donate to Prop 8. Even if he tithes to the LDS church, that money didn't go to Prop 8 either. It was the donations of individual members of the church (as well as of many others) that funded the initiative. Even if Bill Marriott quit the LDS church that apparently wouldn't cut if for you, since as you point out, "people on his staff, who run some of his hotels" contributed to Prop 8. Well, if the new standard for doing business with a company is ironclad proof that not a single employee contributed to Prop 8 (or, I might suggest, voted for it), then good luck with that.

    Make no mistake: there's nobody angrier about what Prop 8 has done to my community than I am. But there are much better and more effective ways of responding than misguided and misdirected boycotts of companies that had nothing to do with its passage. Enough with the histrionics, man. THINK!
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    I think the value in this is that Bill Marriot is a very very powerful man in the Mormon Church. If he has a chat with his powerful pals and says basically "Why on earth did the Church get involved in this.?!!! it might have an impact.
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    And, like every church, not even their invisible Sky-Thingy-in-Charge is more important than what they can fleece from their flocks. If one of the bigger donors starts to get a little crabby about what his/her church has done, it reaches the church's ears and the church gets a little panicky about how they're going to be able to continue to shine the gold statue in the nave.

    This pressure on the religious pocketbook works for me.
  • donbux · 1 year ago
    Then go after the LDS church directly, not someone who's on our side. Targeting Bill Marriott is like looking for your keys under the streetlamp because the light's better there: Marriott might be an easier target, but it's the wrong target.
  • Doostang · 1 year ago
    But yes, you should look for keys under the streetlamp first. And then look elsewhere. Bad analogy.
  • no · 1 year ago
    you are stretching quite a bit there with your analogy -- John is thinking and so are many others -- it's about bringing the issue to light -- i have been boycotting salvation army, mars, boy scouts/girl scouts for years, doesn't seem to be hurting them at all

    and I as a married hetero will be boycotting Marriott too and every other single anti-gay organization or outfit there is

    the message it sends is that when you are in the position of power and stand by and DO NOTHING you are just as guilty of those that do

    i guess everyone should just be quiet, it's not like anybody's civil rights were messed with
  • justmeand3 · 1 year ago
    Wow guys! Your giving the Mormon Church great publicity! And Utah too. They say even bad publicity is good publicity and that's what you've done. The church and Utah are getting a lot of interest from people who disagree with you. Kind of like when people sue the National Enquirer they end up selling more papers. So keep it up, Utah's tourism this year should be better than ever. As well as rising numbers in church membership. Way to go! Keep it up, your doing a great job! Thanks!
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    You know that's a lie magic undie guy. The mormon cult HATES bad publicity. They try so hard to control their image in every way possible.

    Payback's a bitch cult boy!
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    The only hate speech and actions seem to coming from the opponents of prop 8, sour grapes are not pleasant.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Nobody cares whether you think it's pleasant. When your civil rights are gone and your sweet as punch then you'll be able to say something without sounding like the complete fool that coincidentally... um, you are.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    So much hatred and contempt can't be healthy.  Perception is everything.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    As if you'd jump for joy if it was your civil rights being taken away because of someone else's crackpot religion.

    Your a hyprocrite and it's not hatred, it's very well justified anger when a so-called "church" can take away a minority groups civil rights.
  • Verchiel · 1 year ago
    They might be getting "attaboys" from other similarly ignorant bigots, but people tend not to schedule tourism based on the local hate forecast.
  • HoovilleHoo · 1 year ago
    FYI...Mormons are required by the church to give 15% of their income, not 10%. Instead of a tithe it is a fiftithe or something. I have always thought that is the reason for their continued (cancerous) growth throughout the world: they get 5% more from their sheeple than do Christian churches.
  • l81 · 1 year ago
    Where did you get your information? As an active Mormon living in the heart of Salt Lake City, I can assure you that a 15% tithe has never even been suggested. Also, the church does not "require" a 10% tithe. Tithing is completely voluntary and private. I have never been approached by a church leader with the intent to collect my "required" tithe. If I give, I give. If I don't, I don't. It's that simple.
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Lying for the Lord. Another nice Mormon belief: It's okay to tell baldfaced lies or obscure the truth if it protects or furthers the goals of the Mormon Church.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Where is the lie?
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Oh let's give him a list shall we:

    LIES of the LDS Church

    1) Magic hat and rocks
    2) Jews settling in Southern America (genetically disproven with DNA testing)
    3) Magic underwear
    4) That churches will be forced to perform gay marriage
    5) That taking someone's civil rights away and discrimination is "democratic"
    6) That the Jewish faith will REALLY appreciate you baptizing dead holocaust victims
    ...
    Actually I don't have all day so there's a few off the top of my head.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Oh thoses lies.  You forgot:



    1.  Sacrificing virgins

    2.  VooDoo ceremonies in the temples

    3.  Talking white salamanders

    4.  Every mormon has ten wives



    Should I go on?
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    The Salamander letter is a very well documented event where the church did in fact by forged documents from Mark Hoffman because they would have discredited the church (if they had been real) and then they squirreled them away in the church vaults to secret them away from their own congregation.

    It's a fact that the LDS faith was required to renounce polygamy in order to be recognized as a statehood.

    The ceremonies in the temple are a little cultish and weird. (some of them.)

    And, your obviously upset that you can't push your dogma and your religion onto everybody else, which is why your acting so pretentious and pompous.

    Wait until the Supreme Court has their say!
  • HoovilleHoo · 1 year ago
    My brother was a mormon for a year until they freaked him out; that is how I know it. Please, spare me the lecture on tithing not being required. I come from serious biblethumpers, from the "real world of Virginia," and they would scoff at your simple view of tithing. They don't "suggest" anything.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    You need to check you facts before you post. It was 10% when the church started and 10% now, which only proves your ignorance along with most of the other posters
  • HoovilleHoo · 1 year ago
    Check your own facts. My brother was a mormon for a year before leaving because they freaked him out so bad.
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    Your brother and his whole 1 year of supposed membership is misinformed or feeding you a line.  My family has been members for over 100 years and it has always been 10%, end of discussion.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Even if it was... it doesn't make a bit of difference whether it's 10% or 15%. 1% going to take civil rights away from a minority is 1% too much!
  • Notahater · 1 year ago
    One group protecting their rights will always be viewed by the other side by having them stripped away.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Not exactly! That's why the Constitution was crafted so well you see! Laws are supposed to protect rights, if it doensn't protect anyone's rights and ONLY takes them away from a minority group, then it's considered unconstitutional.

    But, don't take my word for it! Let's see what the Supreme Court has to say about it.
  • wooer · 1 year ago
    FYI HoovilleHoo, not true. Mormons are asked to give 10% (not required). Your comment about 15% is completely inaccurate. Get your facts straight!!!!!!
  • Verchiel · 1 year ago
    My upcoming marriage is one these yahoos seem obsessed with defending (from what, I don't know).

    We'll see if it's allowed to be posted in their comments, but as referenced in my message to corporate, though my metro area is home to more than a half-dozen prominent Mariott Hotels, we are making sure none of our business goes to their facilities and that our guests look elsewhere for their lodging.
  • twotontito · 1 year ago
    My letter back to Mr. Marriott...

    Mr. Marriott,
    I believe you have missed the mark on this issue entirely. The reason people are upset with you and your company is NOT because of the way you run your business. It is the church you support and their influence in passing such a hateful proposition.

    I respect the fact that your company has scored well regarding human rights. I believe that is smart business practice, because you want as big of a customer base as possible. It makes sense to include everyone.

    However, what people are disagreeing with is what your church has done, and your lack of resistance to it. You are a successful businessman, and you hold a lot of influence within your church. Any action by you would have been significant. Instead, your inaction has proven to be even more significant.

    If you truly believe in these principles of equality that you run your business with, you should have spoken out against your church's actions. Maybe, you should have even donated to the No on Prop 8 campaign.

    While I respect everyone's religious beliefs, I do not believe that our law should reflect any bias towards one religion or the next. Surely, you can see that the passage of Prop 8 has violated our basic human rights as Americans.

    You have a right to believe what you believe, but your church has decided to try to force their beliefs upon everyone, regardless of their beliefs or religion. And by not doing anything about it, you have shown support for what they have done.

    I cannot support you, or your business, while your church spreads hate and you do nothing about it.

    Sincerely,
    Chris
  • donbux · 1 year ago
    I'd say over the years the Catholic church has been at least as bad for the gay community as the LDS church. Do you propose boycotting all businesses owned and/or operated by, or employing, Catholics? What about the Baptist church? Orthodox Jews? I think you're going to run out of businesses to patronize if this is your standard.
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Don't have to. Target one as an example. May not be fair, but it works.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    "May not be fair, but works" is what the latest vote was telling you!!! WOW funny how that works on our side too
  • paul94611 · 1 year ago
    No one is saying that how someone exercises their rights within the ballot box is at question. Just how they fund those positions that are not agreed with when they own a public enterprise and use the monies gained from that business.
    How many times in our history have folks used the power of peaceful protest, from all ends of the political spectrum, exemplified by a boycott of a business to express displeasure?
    I wish you could understand there is a difference between the individual expression and the business expression. Just as we all have the freedom of choice as to how we exercise our franchise, so we have the choice as to how we spend our money and which businesses we care to engage with.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    I appreciate your very well put statement. I agree with a lot of that which you say. I thank you for your candor and attitude of understanding. My concern is the hurt of those who are gay, or not mormon, and work for marriott that supplies countless jobs for families. I just think it's a rather selfish move to disregaurd all the hard working people who will suffer. But thank you for your words. Good luck to you :)
  • twotontito · 1 year ago
    We were talking about targeting a company who's owner, we believe, has not done his part to stand up to his church and denounce their hateful tactics in getting prop 8 passed.

    You are talking about targeting a group of people who has done nothing wrong, and stripping them of one of the most basic rights in America, the right to marry.

    So you are proud of targeting homosexuals and denying them their fair rights?

    Wow. That is absolutely disgusting.
  • twotontito · 1 year ago
    I agree with DavidinPS..

    With the economy in such bad shape as it already is, do you really think that a company could survive if nearly half their customers stopped coming to them? They would be forced into some kind of action. Either downsizing their business, or doing something to get their customers back.

    The problem with boycotts is not the people who do them, it is the people who don't. If the stakes are high enough, the company will have to fold under the pressure.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    Big, big difference in the case of prop 8.

    The mormons took the commanding lead in fundraising and organizing for prop 8. Every church had donation forms in their foyers. Instructions from the cult leaders were read from the pulpit in EVERY mormon church.

    The primary fundraiser for catholics was the knights of Colombus. They raised $1 million. Small change compared to the mormons.

    There was a poll out right before the election that had only 1 in 4 mormons in California opposed to removing our civil rights. For people that identified as catholic it was right around 50/50.
  • wooer · 1 year ago
    Not true. There were no donation forms in my church's foyer. There was no letters read from the pulpit. Get your facts straight before you comment!!!!!
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    Oh stop your whining silly cult boy. Here's your facts. From the AP even:

    "During Wednesday's taped satellite broadcast, church leaders asked for 30 members from each California congregation to donate four hours a week to the campaign. They also called on young married couples and single Mormons to use the Internet, text messaging, blogging and other forms of computer technology to help pass the initiative, saying the church has created a new Web site — PreservingMarriage.or g — with materials they can download and post on their own social networking sites.

    Church elder L. Whitney Clayton, who has been working as a liaison between the LDS leaders and the Proposition 8 campaign, said before the event that it was meant to energize Mormons for the weeks remaining before Election Day."


    facts
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    hey scottinsf, it's not a cult. And you call mormons bigots....
    You know, when such ignorance is presented, it pretty much invalidates anything else you say.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I personally have not once called mormons bigots. I've never called mormons racist as some have. Never mentioned polygamy. I haven't called mormons haters or hateful, though I think I've referred to the proposition itself as hateful. You're welcome to go way back in my comments and look. You can't erase comments on Disqus unless you close down your ID, even if they're deleted from Ablog, and if you close down your ID it's still here for all to see. Kind of a cool thing about Disqus.

    What I have said is that the mormon church is a cult that is largely responsible for funding deceptive and misleading ads. Leading to the voters of California passing prop 8, an attempt to amend the constitution and strip away our protected civil rights. And that pisses me off. Is that OK with you? Oh, and I have made fun of your funny underwear.

    I know there are mormons out there that are as outraged as me over this. I hope they do the right thing. Hell, there are republicans that are outraged by it.

    I don't really care if anything I say invalidates anything to you. When the California Supreme Court invalidates this attack on my civil rights I'll quit.
  • Jadvar · 11 months ago
    No letter's read from the pulpit? That's a lie and I think you know it. If you don't know it, you weren't in your church on June 29, 2008. The letter says "(To be read in sacrament meeting on June 29, 2008)"
    and it's signed by the Mormon "prophet" Thomas Monson"

    http://www.affirmation.org/pdf/2008_06_23_first...
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I don't know if anybody has mentioned it yet, but I saw in the news that the theater director for the California Musical Theater in Sacramento has issued a small apology for causing a stir with his support of stripping some of his co-workers and theater patrons of their constitutionally protected civil rights.

    He has now matched that donation with one to the Human Rights Campaign.
  • donbux · 1 year ago
    up to those in the theatre world whether this is good enough for them to feel comfortable working with this guy again. It wouldn't cut it for me, and I'd continue to boycott the guy (not the theatre, just the guy). Others may be more forgiving.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    I see he has now resigned also.
  • MikeinSanJo · 1 year ago
    Okay, this may be a bit tangential to the bigger argument, but seriously... Converting Dead People?

    First - Ewwww...
    Second - Why?
    Third - Who cares? They're dead.

    Sure it's incredibly disrespectful of the individual, their family, and the entire Jewish religion - but going up to a dead Jew and telling him that he's now Mormon...?

    Seems kinda like the republican's relationship with "truth". Calling a redneck neanderthal from Crawford, TX a compassionate conservative doesn't make it so.

    I don't understand the commotion about this, unless we're talking about the broader picture of Mormons using their religion to abuse, harrass, annoy and then crying about why everyone in the world hates their asses.

    Maybe we could go to Mormon graveyards and convert them to scientologists...

    So I'm just wondering...
    .
  • Vanessak69 · 1 year ago
    How timely. I was discussing the idea of a boycott with my Mother last night and the only Mormon business we could think of was Marriott. While I respect what the owner is saying, it is true he is likely tithing and therefore he is supporting boycott measures, albeit perhaps inadvertently. If he wants to make a statement that truly would express his opposition to Prop 8, I suggest stealing a page from Southern Yankee's suggestion to me that he no longer donate to his church and tell them why.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    I called Marriott to let them know I was boycotting them. It was quite apparent that the representative had been trained as to what to say, pointing out that they even have some gay employees ( NO! YOU'RE KIDDING ME!) and how the family that owns the company is separate from the company. No matter how much I tried to get him to admit that that's meaningless because the profits GO to the family he wouldn't.
  • Wesinoregon · 1 year ago
    Every Marriott should get a general form letter notifying them they are being boycotted. A form letter of exact material gets noticed better than individual ones. Who needs them anyway? I think there are plenty of other accommodation around to stay in.
  • DavidinPS · 1 year ago
    Don't bother posting a comment on his website. I did about an hour ago--a very polite dissent, but it is nowhere to be seen.
  • JimRH · 1 year ago
    I posted a comment as well a few hours ago and it's nowhere to be found. If you look at the comments that are there, only 1 or two are mildly against his letter, everyone else's comments seem to gush happy-talk. Anyway, I did email Marriott Corp and told them I'm ending my stays with them (I'm Platinum YTD with 120 nights at Marriott properties). I'm done with them.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    I did the same thing with the same result. I hadn't thought of emailing Marriott though. Sounds like a plan.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    That's a shocker. Religious authoritarians who censor.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    I frankly don't understand your negative attitude about democracy. The people have spoken. No one was paid for their vote! Has it occured to you that the "MAJORITY" of the people voted for it! I think you don't really think what you say before you say it. Because if you did, you would see the democracy is the voice of the people. I did not vote Obama. I do not like anything OBAMA stands for and yet, he is our president elect. Am I setting forth a movement to destroy the united states government because he was elected? NO. I'm not a child that throws a tiff when he doesn't get what he wants when he wants it like you yourself are doing. I am not a Mormon, I'm a Catholic. And for you to go on about the Mormon faith as if they were the only ones voicing out their opinion and damning the great state of utah is wrong. Countless many other religious organizations supported the move against "gay" marriage. GET OVER YOUSELF. Sometimes you don't get what you want. Maybe you should be an adult about it and see that there is much more education the gay community can provide to help your cause in the future. My best regards to you and those who feel hurt by the democratic process. If anything, the mormon church has been extremely tolerant to idea of gay relations. I hope someday you may be happy for being you!
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    And I hope someday you get the facts about this story.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    Take your own advice and quit your whining about our boycott. We can speak with our wallets just like peole can speak with their votes, though they can't so easily in matters of civil rights outside nutty proposition-mad California. Don't like our boycott then start an anti-boycott. No one's stopping you. And I hope YOU are happy being you - a fool, an ignoramus and a bigot without the guts to admit it.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    A fool? Huh! Interesting. Being in your shoes, had proposition 8 not passed, despite my moral beliefs, I would tipped my hat to you and those like you and wished you the best of luck. I would move on with my life and not go after you and yours.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    You would tip your hat to the people who stripped you of your constitutionally protected fundamental rights? I find that beyond belief.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    By the way, people with your petty moral beliefs, which always seem to begin and end with sex, regularly boycott gay friendly companies or even companies that commit the "family values" sin of advertising in our publications - ever hear of Disney, Ford or McDonald's?
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Your full of it! If someone took away your civil rights you'd be hopping mad. What a bunch of BS. If it isn't true then why don't you move to another country where they don't have any rights then? Hypocrite.
  • no · 1 year ago
    and has it occured to YOU to read the 14th amendment of OUR constitution -- WHAT PART OF:

    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    do you NOT understand? lying is immoral, missing church is immoral, stealing is immoral, murder is immoral and YET, liars, people that dont go to church, thieves AND murders can all get married -- funny that??

    what i really pray for -- is one day to start stripping all religious people of their rights and see how much they like it.
  • JafafaHots · 1 year ago
    You don't understand democracy. The majority getting to vote to take away rights to a minority is NOT what democracy is about, is not what it is for. That is why we don't live in a democracy - we live in a republic, a democratic republic. To protect the minorities from the tyranny of the majority.

    By your logic, the south could have voted to keep slavery and it would be OK. By your logic, Jim Crow was just fine, since the majority wanted it... and it was a crime against them that the Govt. sent in troops to allow schools to be desegregated.

    The majority does NOT have the right to vote to limit the rights of minorities just because those rights affect the majority in no way other than to offend their prejudices,

    Try to think this through, if you can. If the majority votes to ban churches, are you OK with that? If the majority votes to take away the right of Catholics to vote, are you ok with that? And don't say it's not a fair comparison - if anything, it's unfair the other way, because Catholicism is chosen - homosexuality is not.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    I really don't think that homosexuals should even be labeled as a group. You keep on talking about minority as if the gays are some kind of people unlike the rest. That's not true. Gays are living a lifestyle. Some were born with desires and they are acting on them. This does not justify calling them a minority. If that was the case, we have a whole lot of minorities to worry about: alcoholics, drug abusers, murders, fornicators, people that like video games, etc. I don't have any stance on whether some gays were born with those desires to be with those of the same gender. I don't know enough to go there. But to consider gays a minority just because they have desires and are acting on them is ridiculous.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    The reason why you think that is because your a bigot. The slave traders also didn't see any reason why black people should be considered a group of people. duh.

    It really makes me sick the people who enjoy all their civil rights and then do anything they can to undermine the constitution. I really think people like you should be deported because you have absolutely no respect for what you have.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    I'm the bigot?? I don't hate gays. I don't even dislike them. I have no reason to. It's sad that you think people like me should be deported when in fact you are trying to defend a principle you call "civil rights". I'm simply standing up for principles and morals that I believe in. I have complete respect for my homosexual associates and they know that standing up for the principles I believe does not mean that I hate homosexuals.
    Now, on another note, I think the greatest mistake that gay-activists have made with this whole thing is to compare this struggle to the struggle of the African-Americans during the 50-60's. You're not winning any African-Americans over with that statement.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Listen, the similarities of the African Americans and the Gays and this issue in particular is because they were also denied civil rights. Yeah, I am trying to defend civil rights. I'm glad you finally caught on to that part at least. How can you say that these people shouldn't be considered "real people" sounds a lot like Hitler during the Holocaust. Let me spell it out for you because you're slow, the similarities are that Hitler also told the people that Jews really aren't a group. Their not people their just substandard beings.

    We have civil rights for a reason. So, that people can't just be like Hitler. They are people who have a choice the same system that allows you to have the choice and they have rights just like you, whether you like it or not according the the US government and I really hope they win in supreme court.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Your really uneducated. I'm sorry to say but this last comment... whew! According to your logic and theory, anything that the majority votes for is fine whether it be slavery or genocide. It's all A-OK as long as everyone voted for it (based on a deceptive campaign) but hey, according to you... this is democracy?

    You are actually helping our argument quite a bit with your comments and posts because even a 6 year old could see the faulty logic with that.

    See above comment everybody! This is why we have to stand up now against bigotry!
  • SeethingMom · 1 year ago
    As the mother of a gay son, and a citizen of another state (Arizona) who chose to deny fellow Arizonans the same rights they enjoy, I have to admit that I have been in an almost catatonic state of depression over the passage of California’s Prop 8 and Arizona’s Prop 102. But sadly, I expected Arizona to pass their hateful Prop 102 since we have such a high number of wingnuts and Mormons here, but I counted on the fairer more progressive citizens of California to lead the way to equality for all, just as they have done in the past. And just to be on the safe side, my husband and I hedged our bets by contributing to the No on 8 campaign in California.

    But I guess we way-underestimated the power of the LDS Church and the wide reach of their money. But now they are going to find out the wide reach of our power and money - and I am not talking about just gays and lesbians. This momma is spittin mad!!

    One of many ways my husband and I will channel our rage is with our pocketbook. We are airline people. Airline people travel. Airline people travel a lot. Airline people employ lots and lots of gays and lesbians. And airline people spend lots of money on hotels and restaurants. And I will make it my life’s mission to educate the airline people on who should and should not get our precious dollars, starting with Marriott hotels.

    And yes I know, Bill Marriott wrote some weak letter trying to save himself from any blame, but that syrupy, “it’s not my fault” letter just does not cut it for me. And nothing short of a strong statement condemning what his church did and a promise that he will fight with both words and money to undo the harm his church has wrought will change my mind. And I will start by putting my money where my mouth is. My husband and I have been Marriott Rewards members for years. NO MORE. Marriott will not see another damn dime from us ever again. We are extremely loyal patrons. But companies have to earn that loyalty. Bill Marriott will need to do more than write letters to get us back.

    The Mormon Church has hurt my family deeply. This is one momma who is spittin mad. No one takes aim at one of my kids with their hate and bigotry and gets away with it – no one!
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    You are not alone SeethingMom! There are millions of people that this has ignited an anger and activism in that are standing up and shouting ENOUGH!

    The mormon church in particular has no idea what they've unleashed.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    Thank you. I wish all gay people were blessed with parents like you and your husband. By the way, American Airlines is very supportive of the gay community.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Thank you SeethingMom! Your support and the support of millions of heterosexuals is truly uplifting. I'm brining many of my straight friends to the rally in New York this evening. I was just as impressed and touched by their willingness to act on my behalf as I am sure your son is of you and your husband.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    You know, you kind of sound like the one full of hate and anger. Good luck with that. You will end up never being satisfied in this life because your hate and anger for a group of people will never pull you out of the misery that you have put yourself in. Again I say, good luck.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    They have a right to be angry, it was their civil rights. Get a clue. And, on the contrary, it will be really satisfying to see the LDS church be defeated when the Supreme Court rules it as unconstitutional.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    Get a clue? So, um, if I want to marry my sister, can I? I mean, it sounds like it's my right....
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    No because then the incest law would take effect which has already been legislated and didn't take away a minority groups civil rights. You know I can argue this point forever. And, I have. All day. SOME religious people just don't get t and I'm just to that point where I have to just admit that there's ignorant assholes in the world.

    If it wasn't for our constitution then there'd be one religion and it would be government and nobody would have a choice. Why would anyone want to devolve to that. WHY? It's like let's all go back to being neanderthal man. Are you kidding me? And, it's the same system that protects you assholes from going and preaching magic hats and rocks and making religion be a money making business and now I can talk to Jesus - do you all think that your religion would prevail? No because you'd all be at war with eachother for power if you ever took down this system that allows you freedom of religion, dipshits!!

    Why are people so hateful why can't everyone sign that petition for constitutional rights. Why?

    But, anyway, I've done my thing and I do take comfort in knowing that when push comes to shove and when religions get really out there, the US government will freakin trump any religion. Believe that! When the Mormons and the Catholics and the whole mess of our society makes our government have to step in then it will be over. finally.

    Oh and to answer your dumb ass question before you can ask it. It's also illegal to rape someone, and screw animals, and marry a 4 year old. (and those laws protect rights and not take them away) There! That's just to pre-empt what you were going to say next.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    They have a right to be angry, it was their civil rights. Get a clue. And, on the contrary, it will be really satisfying to see the LDS church be defeated when the Supreme Court rules it as unconstitutional.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    They have a right to be angry, it was their civil rights. Get a clue. And, on the contrary, it will be really satisfying to see the LDS church be defeated when the Supreme Court rules it as unconstitutional.
  • paul94611 · 1 year ago
    I recall hearing some years ago that a significant portion of the Safeway grocery chain was in LDS friendly hands. Is there any way to check this out?
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    I have been open to the gay movement, despite my moral stand. I have many, many gay and lesbian friends, who some have children, who some live together and who some hate the church. What you have assured me of with your article and the responces of your fellow "for" readers, is that you are just outright not mature to enough to be yourselves despite the norm, in showing such character, there is no way any of you would be fit for the sacredness of marriage. At least none of the bloggers here. The level of immaturity and disrespect for democracy is sureal to say the least. I'm sorry for all you. I wish you could meet my friends, they disagree, but they understand and they live on! May you learn from an attitude like that
  • Webster · 1 year ago
    Head back to your bishop and tell him you've been a good minion.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    In the Catholic church we really don't report to bishops, but i'm the ignoramus
  • paul94611 · 1 year ago
    At least one thing has been made clear. The Catholic church cried mightily when confronted with compensation for the victims of priests sexual misconduct with children, but the church has no problems coming up with the money to judge their follows happiness.
  • no · 1 year ago
    uhh yes, you do -- bishops are in charge of each dioceses -- so your individual churches report to a 'regional manager' of sorts
  • Happy_Housewife · 1 year ago
    Not exactly. If a parish is ran by a religious order (Benedictines, Franciscans, etc) they don't answer to the local Bishop. Certain entities (Catholic worker houses, St. Vincent de Paul, etc) sometimes have only nebulous ties to the diocese.

    It's all very confusing and arcane, as befits an organization from the middle ages ;-)
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    As a Catholic you should be a little more sensitive to majorities stripping the rights away from minorities instead of celebrating it. Your experience in this country wouldn't have been any better than ours if it weren't for our constitutions and the courts they provide for, intended to protect minorities from the tyranny of majorities - a role the California constitution has shirked in allowing this vote.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    No shit.

    They just don't get it. They can't understand why people could possibly be angry that they had their constitutionally protected rights taken away.
  • paul94611 · 1 year ago
    Let me try and understand this...
    Are you saying that the free expression of choice as to how someone chooses to spend their money is immature and disrespectful?
    As a 100% disabled veteran I ask you, "Who the heck are you to determine my fitness of marriage?"
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    It's not what you say, it's how you say it. This is stomping of your feet!!! It is like a hissy fit! VERY VERY IMATURE. Why not a press confrence, asking the "SOURCES" to explain? and not only the lds church, but ask my catholic church to explain, or the jewish religion. Bring them to jury, not the hard working men and women of this land
  • no · 1 year ago
    again, who are you to tell people how to act and react -- funny how you say you're 'pro gay movement' despite your MORAL stand -- this has nothing to do with your morals or someone else's morals -- it has to do with basic civil rights guaranteed to EVERY FUCKING AMERICAN.

    and just because you have gay friends doesnt' mean you know what it is like to be gay -- YOU came here and posted YOUR opinion -- nothing more.... you dont get to dictate who is mature or immature enough to be married based on your MORALS... sounds like you're the one that needs to grow up and mature.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    This coming from someone who refers to a righteously indignant mother of a gay son as MOMMA! What a joker.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    I'm honestly curious. How did you explain to your gay friends with children that you have a moral objection to their being a family, and that you voted to strip them of their fundamental constitutional right be treated as such? My follow up would be to your friends as to why they would expose their children to someone who believes their family unit should not exist.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    No, it's the disrespect of the principles of equality and civil rights for everyone with all different belief systems evidenced by a Church that funds a campaign that was deceptive to voters i.e. the whole lie about Church's being forced to marry gay couples that was immature.

    Maybe people don't think your fit for the "sacredness" of marriage, did you ever think about that? What if someone came along and told you the same thing based on their cooky "religion".
  • Apt604 · 1 year ago
    In other words, forget his 100% HRC rating, we're going after him because we "suspect" he donates to his church. Shouldn't we be boycotting all businesses run by members of the Catholic Church, as well? And I suspect that black churches were against us too, judging from the exit polls, so you know what we've gotta do about their members . . .

    But just one question: where does it end?
  • no · 1 year ago
    where did it end with denying blacks basic civil and human rights???

    where does it end indeed -- it ends when people in america stop trying to deny other americans equal rights -- DUH??
  • Schmedlap · 1 year ago
    Why not look into other Mormon businesses as well, like Albertson's or Overstock.com? If one is not a Mormon and is in management in those businesses, that person eventually will hit the Moroni ceiling -- all, or disproportionate numbers of Mormons in the upper levels of management. BYU must have a terrific MBA program.
  • RitornaVincitor · 1 year ago
    That's right, John. Let's boycott Marriott. He is a major donor to the Mormon church. If he doesn't like it, let him put pressure on his Church to stop using his money to fund hate.
  • StarSpangled · 1 year ago
    John, you should start a boycott of the State of California for exercising their right to vote!
  • Verchiel · 1 year ago
    Bigotry wrapped up in the flag. Classic.

    Move along, troll.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    Ok. I took the time to understand the law, and read the law that was proposed. Had the gay community been ok with the legality of gay marriage, meaning being able to be married, and to have the same rights as all other married couples do, the law would have passed. The Churches wouldn't have gotten involved, we'd have thousands of gay weddings this weekend!!! Where the gay community went wrong, is by not just leaving it a legal matter they had to drag religions into it. Let me explain, had the law passed, as it was set forth and written, it would have meant that a mormon bishop or catholic priest could not turn down marrying a gay couple despite their moral religious backbone. I understand know why they churches put forth so much effort in passing the bill, because it would have put an unconstitutional burdan on their religious rights. NOW, to the gay community, I say push on. Fight the fight. Have your voice heard, use your right of freedom of speech and voice out your stance, be understanding, but don't give up. I'm a learned man today. You will have your time to scream your joy of union soon enough, buy like I did, educate yourselves. Understand fully what has gone on. It's not a victory over gay marriage, it's a victory over constitutional religious rights. The Mormons did what they had to do to be able to keep and uphold their moral belief system. I conclude with my understanding and observence of the preserverence of the gay community. As I have studied the mormons, they once too were shunned, and outcast and prosecuted, but they are who they are know because of those struggles. To all of you and my close friends as well, press on. The LDS church is better then mine when it comes to being tolerant of the gay community. Good luck to all :)
  • Verchiel · 1 year ago
    You keep saying "the law would've passed." It doesn't sound as if you understand the ballot measure. It DID pass. It was not about "legalizing marriage," but amending the state constitution to limit marriage to one man and onw woman.

    Please cite any passage of the previously existing law that related, not to the issuance of marriage licenses, but would have mandated religious groups to perform a ceremony.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    You are almost there JJ13. In no way can a Church be forced to marry people. They are protected by the First Amendment, one of the strongest protections in our Constitution. For a very real example you will be able to see clearly, just look at your own Catholic Church. Your Church has not been (nor will it ever be) forced to marry people who are not confirmed Catholics, correct? That is because a church has the right to practice their religion as they see fit, which includes limiting marriage to previously unmarried Catholics who have complied with the requirements of the Catholic Sacrament of Marraige (that eliminates a lot of straight people who we both agree do have the right to get married!). Now, wait for it--this is the exact point why so many here are upset at the Mormon Church. They funded a media campaign that made this legally incorrect argument about religions being "forced" to marry gay people. You can see how some people would be easily tricked into thinking it was a fact!

    Here's how civil marriage typically works (keep in mind marriage is regulated by each state, so there are 50 sets of rules). The State requires the parties to sign the marriage contract and have a ceremony memoralizing the contract (sort of like a real estate closing). That is it! That is all we are talking about here. People can have their ceremony before a justice of the peace or on the beach with their friends, or what ever they want. It is entirely up to the parties whether they want to make the ceremony memoralizing the wedding religious in nature as there is absolutely no legal requirement that a marriage be religious. If they do wish to have a religious ceremony due to their own beliefs or traditions, then they have to comply with whatever rules and regulations the church in which they wish to be wed requires.

    You are beginning to see the clearer picture here. I encourage you to keep learning about the issue.
  • watchington · 1 year ago
    John -- not rocket science here -- pull one of your nasties. Review the Marriott cancellation policy, have us all make reservations and cancel at the last minute explaining we learned that Bill Marriott gives money to the Mormon Church, which is a bigoted organization, and we're gay. After a few days of that, he'll have to do a hell of lot more than issue a lame ass press release.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    i unfortunatly chose to take a stance in the wrong place. Even though I felt like I have grown and understood more. In the constituion it states Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Note the part that state "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"!!! Due process was taken. The people of California....Mormons, Jews, Muslin, Atheist all have spoken on the route they would like their society to go. I can honestly see this not being the case in a few years. By punishing others, you are only "Forcing" your issue rather then helping people truly understand. DUE PROCESS HAS TAKEN PLACE. ACCEPT IT FOR RIGHT NOW. You're not struck down, and you will live on to fight another day.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Oh, JJ13. You were just doing so well a minute ago.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    My stance off sympathy and tolerance is in part they way most people feel. Don't hate cause I don't
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Listen, friend. I've said nothing about hating you. In fact, I think I've been trying to explain facts to you in a very understanding way because you do not seem to have a complete handle on what you are commenting on. Your last post is a bit disappointing because your post below shows signs of you understanding the issue on a higher or more complete level. I have no opinion on your thoughts on the matter. I'm interested in the legal argument being made on both sides.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    Yeah, but do you see a problem with "mob mentality". If everyone could get together and vote on the civil rights of a minority group, even though due process was taken, it is still an abomination to the constitution. So, the Supreme Court will have to come in and override it if it's found unconstitutional. Also, due process.
  • StarSpangled · 1 year ago
    http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates/2007/09/state_...

    The homosexual agenda against freedom of religion: tax exempt status stripped from Methodist property in NJ.
  • JJ13 · 1 year ago
    Tough crowd huh!? ha
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    It is a tough crowd JJ13. We are talking about very tough issues with very real concequences for very real people and their children. Distinctions must be made between fact patterns. It is absolutely false that gay and lesbian's fundamental right to marriage in any way infringes on any religion's ability to control the practice of their faith within the scope of their religion.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    Ocean Grove was not a Church, but rather property owned by the Methodist Church that was designed to function as an open meeting place for the public. The Methodists injected their religious beliefs on who could gather in this "public space" and were dealt with accordingly by the State. This is a complete Red Herring and has nothing to do with marriage equality.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    Nothing you say is credible once you've tipped your hand with the phrase "the homosexual agenda". You think we're unfamiliar with right wing buzzwords meant to scare people? Post this on Fox's, Dobson's or Limbaugh's websites. Don't waste your time here.
  • usagi · 1 year ago
    Individuals deciding not to stay at the hotel are all very well and good, but don't forget to check with your professional organizations (especially if their non-discrimination rules include sexual orientation) and tell them you as a member will boycott their professional meetings if they're held at Marriott properties. That's where their money comes from, not individuals.
  • DeadeyeDickCheney · 1 year ago
    I'm a wee bit concerned about boycotting Marriott just because Bill Marriott is Mormon. I can understand it, but I worry that it could lead to a backlash against individual Mormons. Replace 'Mormon' with 'Jew" or 'African-American' or 'Gay' and maybe it's easier to see. I think that it might be better to go after the church itself. For example, apparently non-Mormons are not allowed into Mormon churches--at least during services. I'd heard that from a co-worker whose ste-daughter married a Mormon in a Mormon temple in LA. She and her husband had to wait outside, along with all of the other non-Mormons, until the ceremony was over. What about passing propositions in states like California that deny tax-exempt status to churches that aren't open to anyone during services? Are there any other idiosyncrasies of Mormonism that could be turned into ballot initiatives in non-Mormon majority states? Just an idea, and perhaps not a very good one, but one never knows, do one?
  • StarSpangled · 1 year ago
    Thank you for filing your comment as supporting evidence of my previous comment: "The homosexual agenda against freedom of religion: tax exempt status stripped from Methodist property in NJ."
  • DeadeyeDickCheney · 1 year ago
    I think it would be more accurate to call it fighting back against organized religion's agenda against human rights.
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    The IRS wouldn't be taking away their tax exempt status unless they were acting as a political organization, in which case they should be paying taxes. Why should they get a free ride?

    If that were the case any business at all could say they were a religion and not pay taxes. Yeah we're the religion of retail sales....
  • Chrissy · 1 year ago
    To quote Topher: Ocean Grove was not a Church, but rather property owned by the Methodist Church that was designed to function as an open meeting place for the public. The Methodists injected their religious beliefs on who could gather in this "public space" and were dealt with accordingly by the State. This is a complete Red Herring and has nothing to do with marriage equality.
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    No one's boycotting Marriott because the family that owns it is Mormon. We're boycotting it because that family gave money, a lot of it, in support of Prop. 8 and they'd be just as worthy of a boycott if they were Jewish or Hindu or Zoroastrians. This is about gay people not giving money to businesses that turn around and use that money against us. It's a simple matter of standing up for oneself. And as I posted below religious right organizations boycott gay friendly businesses all the time.
  • Steven · 1 year ago
    Why do you think that the Marriot family gave money in support of Prop 8? The donation records are public and do not include the Marriotts.
  • wooer · 1 year ago
    Wow. What a load of crap. I am Mormon and I was not given any donation forms or told to donate. I love how people are so willing to make up lies. Get over it!
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    You must not be a very active participant in your Church. This is from the LDS website.

    http://newsroom.lds.org/ldsnewsroom/eng/comment...

    "We ask that you do all you can to support the proposed constitutional amendment by donating of your means and time to assure that marriage in California is legally defined as being between a man and a woman. Our best efforts are required to preserve the sacred institution of marriage. "
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    No. You are the liar. But then again doesn't your cult teach that it's OK to lie if it advances the church? I pointed this out to one of your Borg brethren downthread but for your enjoyment I'll post it again. From the AP:

    "During Wednesday's taped satellite broadcast, church leaders asked for 30 members from each California congregation to donate four hours a week to the campaign. They also called on young married couples and single Mormons to use the Internet, text messaging, blogging and other forms of computer technology to help pass the initiative, saying the church has created a new Web site — PreservingMarriage.or g — with materials they can download and post on their own social networking sites.

    Church elder L. Whitney Clayton, who has been working as a liaison between the LDS leaders and the Proposition 8 campaign, said before the event that it was meant to energize Mormons for the weeks remaining before Election Day."


    facts
  • ThingsComeUndone · 1 year ago
    Yes hit the Mormons where it hurts Money.
  • JimRH · 1 year ago
    you all need to click on the link to the letter from Bill Marriott and get a load of the obviously slanted and censored comments, including some in red that are responses on behalf of Bill Marriott. Obviously this has stirred up a hornets nest at Marriott-land.
  • wrennrose · 1 year ago
    The only power in this country is currency. We are capitalists. Any LGBT who goes to Marriort, Courtyard Inn, travels to Utah (for any reason) or spends their money with any business, organization etc. that has Mormon or Catholic (the major supporters of Prop 8) owners, officers, executives is spending money which is going against their own self-interest.

    This is the first year that I will not give to KGO Thanksgiving Charities, since the recipients are Catholic organizations.

    In this country Money talks.

    Equality for all is part of the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution.

    All is fair in love and war. And politics, in which these two religious organizations are not supposed to participate. I am not LGBT but believe in equality for all. Thus I am boycotting by not spending money in Utah, at Marriott, Courtyare Inn, donating to Catholic organizations, etc.

    If the Mormons and Catholics want to organize against equality let them pay the price.
  • Robertjay · 1 year ago
    are you going to do this to companies that have LDS employees as well? How about catholic employees? I mean, to be technical, wouldn't giving money to those companies be "spending money which is going against your own self-interest"? I'm sorry. I'm not mocking your plan, I just don't see this being the most effective way of getting what you want. AS for the market, all this is going to do is split it. Gay-activists will be supporting more liberal companies and conservatives will be supporting more conservative companies. Plus I don't think that boycotting Utah or companies affiliated with mormons is going to really effect them too much. I'm pretty sure members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and some of the Catholic congregations are pretty used to persecutions. Once again, I'm not mocking your plan. I respect your right to voice your opinion, but just thought I'd let you it may not work to that degree that you plan.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    I'm not sure what your history is since you've only started posting here today (although I think I may have an idea given your "persecution" comment), but perhaps you should either refresh your memory or learn about the blog you are posting on. John A is extremely experienced in leading boycotts to proven results. So, thank you for your opinion, but I think this community is already mobilized.

    As an aside, don't you think the fact that Mr. Marriott himself issued a statement over this speaks at least somewhat to his concern that a boycott may be effective?
  • Antinous · 1 year ago
    I am through with Marriott, one of the places I have always stayed when traveling, I will make other choices from now on. I want nothing to do with anything that closely tied to the Mormon church.
  • StarSpangled · 1 year ago
    Question: Does the Constitution preserve my right to marry my sister? What if I'd like to marry my neighbor Keith, as well as my friend Sara?
  • Blueflash · 1 year ago
    Star - Just come out already. Real straight men just aren't that interested in this whole subject.
  • Topher · 1 year ago
    The Constitution prevents the State from denying your equal protection under the law without a compelling state interest, if that denial is based on a constitutionally protected class. If the denial is not based on a protected class, then the state only has to be reasonable in their denial of equal protection. Gays and lesbians are a protected class under the California Constitution, as already determined by the California Supreme Court. People involved in incest and polygamists are not a protected class in California. Therefore, the State of California would only have to be reasonable in their denial of marriage rights. Can you think of any (non-religious) reasons why incest and polygamy should not be permitted? Genetically defective children? Overwhelmingly complex system needed to dissolve the property and custody issues in a multiple party divorce?
  • gwyneth · 1 year ago
    No because then the incest law would take effect which has already been legislated and didn't take away a minority groups civil rights. You know I can argue this point forever. And, I have. All day. SOME religious people just don't get t and I'm just to that point where I have to just admit that there's ignorant assholes in the world.

    Oh and to answer your dumb ass question before you can ask it. It's also illegal to rape someone, and screw animals, and marry a 4 year old. (and those laws protect rights and not take them away) There! That's just to pre-empt what you were going to say next.
  • scottinsf · 1 year ago
    gwyneth and Topher already answered your question perfectly, but I just want to add that you and your sister are already guaranteed certain familial rights that proposition 8 tries to take away from gay and lesbian families.
  • smallhandff · 1 year ago
    Do we start boycotting any & all Mormons? How much of Brandon, "Killers" Flowers income has been tithed by his Mormon Church? Will Brandon lose his gay fans over this? This might push gays back in the closet, closet Killers fans.
  • Steven · 1 year ago
    I really struggle to understand the rationale of a boycott of Marriott. Marriott is a publicly-held company with hundreds of shareholders and thousands of employees, many of which are bound to be gay themselves, who would bear the brunt of a boycott, not Mr. Marriott. How does jeopardizing jobs of average Americans serve our cause? And where does it end? If we are prepared to boycott a huge, gay-friendly company because of its President's religious affiliation, who else it to be included? Polls showed that the majority of black voters supported Prop 8- are we to boycott, all black-owned businesses, the NAACP, the NBA?? Christian, Jewish and Muslim religions have historically been unsupportive of homosexuality- are we to boycott any company whose executives are members of these churches? Am I alone in recognizing the irony of discriminating against whole groups of people in retaliation for the discrimination of a whole group of people?