-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/05/slate-rumors-of-more-monicas.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
11 hours ago · 68 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
12 hours ago · 45 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
4 hours ago · 9 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
15 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
The guy's been cheating on his wife ever since they said "I do." Do you really think he stopped after he was out of the White House when he had no problem doing it when he was in the White House?
As soon as he started those book tours to college campuses, I was thinking "Oh man, that sounds like trouble."
i would have left.
what does this say about her judgement.
why hasn't she distanced herself from him?
does she share his views on marriage?
Commonsense would say that if Bill has been messing around all his adult life then, it is hard to believe he suddenly changed and went all faithfull after Monica. Right.
lol.
Here we go:
Voter purging in Indiana districts with African Americans and College Students.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/5/132653/6...
"unzipping" would be more accurate.
I wish the Hillary supporters opened up their brains just a wee bit.
Exactly. And had Hillary left Bill many years ago, would she be a Senator today? Running for President? Some couples have an arrangement. Granted it is not for everybody. Would I put up with someone like Bill to further my career? No f*cking way, but then I am not Hillary.
for over 20 years!
i would have left.
what does this say about her judgement.
why hasn't she distanced herself from him?
does she share his views on marriage?
----
funny, given the shit her marriage is made of, maybe she's just saving the GLBT community from her pain by saying she doesn't support gay marriage?
thanks so much hillary.... not.
.
I think this is one of the reasons I don't want Hillary. I don't want to relive all this crap and I fear huge mountains of new Bill Crap.
I used to be a huge supporter, wanting to go back, have Bill in the White House again, but now, I would rather go to the future with Obama than back in time.
When Bill ran for Prez in '92, an awful lot of us sort of raised an eyebrow..."does he look familiar?"
You can do that math. Bill loves a good lip lock on his one-eyed weasel and the gender, at least in the seventies, was a moot point.
Aren't we sick of these Bush and Clinton families, and the mess they put this country in?
"Carol Felsenthal's new book about Bill Clinton's post-presidential years, Clinton in Exile, is often catty, occasionally malicious, and overly reliant on unnamed sources. It's also pretty boring; when Felsenthal's not muckraking, she's content to trot out newspaper accounts of Clinton's foundation work and his appearances on the guest-speaker circuit. So don't bother reading all 313 pages."
Seems like much ado about nothing.
McCain cheated on his first wife and actually left her for the mistress. I doubt very much his campaign will seek to make marital fidelity an issue.
While he was President of the United States - with a 19 year-old intern and a cigar?
I'm going from memory here, but I believe McCain left his wife after she became disabled and after she waited for him to come home from Nam. It wasn't pretty.
Say what you want about former President Clinton, but when it comes to maintaining a marriage John McCain will not be throwing mud on this issue.
Clinton in 2005 agreed with McCain plan about staying in Iraq longer.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/05/clinto...
If any recent Bill Clinton philandering comes out during the campaign, wouldn't John McCain's history (and keep in mind he, unlike Bill, is a candidate) also then be explored?
So in the general election this might not be as big a deal.
McCain cheated on his first wife and actually left her for the mistress. I doubt very much his campaign will seek to make marital fidelity an issue.
---
true... and to my knowledge, bill has never called hillary a cunt in front of other people.
mccain's temper is going to be the talking point I think... halfway through Cliff's book, mccain is REALLY fucked in the head.
I don't consider Hillary Clinton as a part of an "us". If she steals the nomination I will vote for McCain rather than stay home, just to double up my protest vote. That will be even better than voting for Nader.
And, don't forget the "rumors" that floated for years about Hillary and her fun times. If I'm not mistaken, Anonymous, aka Joe Klein, wrote in "Primary Colors" about her and a key campaign aide in the 92 race. Of course, that was fiction. lol
You're absolutely correct, if this isn't vetted, as Hillary calls it, the 527s etc will have a field day with it should she win the nomination. Let's get it out now.
Not to mention too old to have sex with chicks young enough to be his granddaughters. Eww.
When are we going to start dragging out McCain's Monicas?
This adolescent streak in Bill Clinton will always serve to feed these rumors and make them plausible.
Perhaps that is why Hillary thinks he's crossed the leadership threshold.
Maybe that's her measure of a man.
As far as I know.
Sorry to interrupt the Billary-bashing, much as I enjoy it. Here's some actual news you can have positive input on:
Links to cyclone relief agencies, for those who actually care to do something. Also, links to your "representatives" in Washington, DC.
BURMESE HURRICANE DEATH TOLL HITS 10,000
.
LOL! That was my thought as well. How far we have fallen if that is a selling point. (not saying YOU meant it in that way)
Monica in the White House as a victimized "Intern," with all the faux-virginal implications the "young, innocent intern" label implied, was untrue. She was NOT an innocent, virginal 19 year old sucking on Bill's one-eyed trouser trout, her virginity having been long lost through fucking for grades in college.
Just so we're clear...
Hillary also has her Monica issue that people are tip toeing around for now.
It looks like you have finally gone over the douche line. And you dare to call Clinton out on saying anything to win. You must be proud to know that you may well have given McCain most of Clintons votes because of this crap. Nice job dumbass.
---
one question... do you hang around the neocon blogs and slam them for bashing hillary?
no?
why not? I mean, John makes the point that these 'rumors' are what the GOP will use on her if/when she gets the nomination... so you're slamming us for pointing out how much baggage they have to use on her??
do you even think once in a while? or are you just on auto-pilot?
.
I say leave Bill and his round heels to the Republicans, I think there is more than enough to defeat Hillary's bid for this nomination.
Who's you're family values candidate, now?
something like that.
How much of it is true? I have no idea. But I'm sure that the truthiness won't matter to the Republican 527's.
Doesn't need to be vetted. The Special Prosecutor Statute has tolled. This is the reason Bush was able to wipe his and Cheney's ass with The Constitution. Hillary knows that the only reason Bill was caught and the charges were trumped up was because they had an ACTUAL Attorney General doing her job. THAT won't e allowed to happen as I hope he/she will be so buisy indicting people from the Bush Administration. We shall se.
So I read on the Huff post that Clinton will, on May 31st, take the nuclear option. Someone in the Democratic Party needs to read to Clinton the agreement she signed with the DNC to abide by their decision to not seat Florida and Michigan. Either Senator Clinton has a very short memory OR she just doesn't care what the hell she does to the Democratic Party.
I think there should be some concession to Florida and Michigan, even though they went against the DNC, but Clinton wants it all. Is this how I want a president to behave, talk out of both sides of their mouth? Not me, I have had almost 8 years of a president that does that.,
Indiana
Clinton by 4-7%
(5.5% to be exact)
North Carolina
Obama by 7-10%
(8.5% to be exact)
(i do not predict that the "f_ck jet" story will be a big factor in tomorrow's results)
Really, you are known by the people you associate with? Try reading Carl Bernstein's article. Old Hillary should be know as a friend to the Black Panthers and the Communist Party. Explain why Hillary's associations are either over looked or just brushed under the rug.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carl-bernstein/th...
We all knew there were Monicas before there even was a Monica. She was the only one that they had hard evidence on. And to think that this guy just stopped being Bill, well, that's just crazy.
Bill has always been a sleeze, but at this point, I'd love for it to all come out about the guy. He crossed the line when it came to his remarks about Obama (and his lies about many a thing) and I'd be glad to see him exposed for the scum he is, once again.
Oops! Forgot to mention, in keeping with your theory about the company you keep, Bill. Yep, if you are known by the company you keep then round heels Bill, who Hillary describes as her best friend, is not a shining example of good company.
That rumor involves Hillary Clinton's very very very close "relationship" with her top female aide and "body person" Huma Abedin.
Who's That Girl? Look here. http://www.lukeford.net/Images/photos/humaabedi...
Why, last April, even the NY Observer floated out an odd gushy puff piece on Huma Abedin with the suggestive title "Hillary's Mystery Woman", saying that "Huma Abedin has become a sort of mythical figure".
The Observer article was peppered with all sorts of hot button words and phrases, "discreet", "Muslim", "No one knows anything about her" etc.
Harpers confirmed the circulation of this "rumour" last November.
And, apparently, it seems that the Washington Press is already totally aware of the Hill and Huma rumor:
http://bigheaddc.com/2007/09/11/hillary-lesbian...
http://slog.thestranger.com/2007/11/hillary_cli...
http://www.nationalscold.com/2008/03/in-depth-r...
Can you imagine the headlines, hand-fed by scurrilous Repug operatives?
"Hillary and her Lesbian Muslim Lover!" -- who spent half of her life in Saudi Arabia!"
And as a Muslim, the Repugs will be all over Abedin's family ties to Al Qaeda.
Now, it's not that most rational-thinking Dems care about or give credence to what goes on behind closed doors with their political leaders' sex lives, or of any silly guilt-by-association allegations to ties with radicals or Muslims , or even just the rumors about such drizzle (unless it's about Barack Obama, right?).
SO, for Dems in general, the frame is not, per se, the allegation that Hillary is a lesbian.
It's how a key element of this dumbass rumor will be received by Hillary's strongest supporters - Older Women who will hear about it repeatedly as it is pounded day in and day out by the Rethugs and the MSM:
That this once-wronged woman by Bill -- this wife -- this 60 year old woman who shares such empathy with her solid base of Older Women. Supporters, is, well....
Cheating on her husband.
(With a woman).
As far as I know. {cough}.
True but the difference is Obama did not drag up associates of Clinton's as a campaign issue. IF and that is a big if, Hillary gets the nomination, I think the Republicans are going to have a field day. There is much about Hillary not yet discovered or at least not yet published.
How do we know if it is true if it hasn't been vetted exactly.
And the point is, Hillary has not been vetted.
My comment below is about the Media and how they will be fully complicit in the mainstream laundering of this crap in the general election, about a "story" they already have heard.
They're just waiting for their cue, to play their part in this ridiculous narrative.
Remember, Harpers -- a mainstream media organization -- chose to bring the mere "discussion that a rumor extisted" in into the light of day, under the guise/cover of a story about the Right v.s. Left political "dirty tricks" game playing (in the Palmetto State).
The "pretext" the writer tried to use to justify the mere mentioning of the Hillary/Huma Abedin rumor was that, quote: "(I)t's not just Republicans who play rough in South Carolina, and then linking to a story about Mitt Romney and his campaign.
YET -- if you click the link about the "it's not just Republicans" link in their Huma story, it lead to a far more cynical than titillating story title ("Making Mitt Romney:
How to fabricate a conservative") -- about a rather benign non-rumor-based piece about Mitt Romney.
So here we see a Harpers writer stretching to great lengths to find a reason and a way to bring it into the light of day into the mainstream. So there it sits, ready to be "legitimately" referred to by the MSM (looking for cover) -- in the general election -- (if Hillary's the Dem nominee) IF and WHEN the Repugs slither it out via their operatives who, in their role as "anonymous sources", whisper into their respective "journalist" ear.
The MSM and dear dear Charlie Gibson will, with great ease, "report" that it's "all over the internet" that Hillary Clinton is... dot dot dot. The same pretext he used to trot out the Ayers "association" to Obama to 11 million viewers during the last ABC News Dem "Debate".
There's a reason the REPUGS have not pushed this one really hard to the point of it surfacing now.
Chances are they are simply sitting tight, keeping their powder verrrry dry, waiting and praying (see: Rush Limbaugh/Operation Chaos, Bill Kristol, David Frum, Joe Scarborough, Newt Gingrich and Richard Mellon Scaife) that Hillary Clinton becomes the Dem opponent (in an election year where the scales tip completely AGAINST a Republican win) so that they can unload their biggest, dirtiest most disgusting ammunition -- stuff they have already long ago collected and compiled -- good, bad OR fabricated for the past 8 years since Clinton stepped into politics by becoming a Senator and signaling her likely intention to run for President in 2008.
And the media, will oblige the beast that is The Might Wurlitzer, and simply "act" -- no, "report" on the numerous of "internet posts", "anonymous sources", as well as refer to the previously published Harpers story, and ramp things up by quoting those NYObserver quotes on Ms. Abedin's mysteriousness ("No one knows anything about her") and be further blitzfaxed as well as fueled by a barrage of BlackBerry messages.
Come on! Look how many comments a post like this gets as opposed to Chris's economic posts or AJ's Iraq posts. ;-)
She is not really credible, but she adds fuel to the fire, baby.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZyM_yqKiBM
Q: What was their [Ron Burkle and Bill Clinton] relationship primary based on?
A: The relationship between those two was primarily based upon sex and money.
Zing!
is Bill making ladies faint at campaign events because he's already , uhhhmmmm , known them in a Biblical way ?
Just askin'
Is this supposed to be a biography or another opus by Jackie Collins?
If Hillary had just refused that blow job in the oval office, none of this would be relevant!
LOSERS :<(
This is NEWS?
Come on! Look how many comments a post like this gets as opposed to Chris's economic posts or AJ's Iraq posts. ;-)
Yes, that's what I'VE been wondering!
I always thought she went that way...
Hillary's friends and associates and history have not been brushed under the rug. Your comment is proof of that. What I said was that most of the folks didn't know Obama at all, and we are now getting to know him.
Let's face it, Hillary has been in the limelight for a long long long long time. The folks know a lot about her.
"Just like Obama's minister, what does this have to do with what the candidate wants to accomplish?"
Not a thing. However, no one really knew anything about Obama before he decided to run for POTUS. This run up to the nomination has been good for the folks, in that we have learned more about him thru his associations. I always told my kids that "You will be known by the people you associate with".