DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Steny Hoyer cut a bad FISA deal with immunity for telecoms on FISA and expects House Dems. to support it. They should oppose it.

  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Steny's revolting...I wish Nancy would expedite a Hoyer fish nap...Those hose socks of Steny's really creep me out...Kinda like Ed McMahon or elitist bankers.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    shit.
    Glenn Greenwald's first two posts today blister congress and Obama! for buckling to the telecom giants...

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/
  • michaelt · 1 year ago
    this is what i'm talking about. where is obama? pelosi and reid aren't going to do anything. wtf?
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    This is immunity for the criminals in the White House. I don't know why the demcratic party has made us fight them, too. It's hard enough to fight the criminal republican party. We have to fight those who should support our position on the issues. It's crazy making. I curse them all.
  • FunMe · 1 year ago
    Why is this bill so complicated?

    There is a law about spying - when spying is needed a simple emergency request should be provided.

    It really is SIMPLE.: Spy on Americans illegally - you broke the law.

    WHY are we still here with the stupid immunity bill. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?

    Whoever votes to protect the telecoms and their asses (sorry for my bad language) should be FIRED in the next election.

    And that includes Democrats!
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    AMDOCS involvement that may come up in trial "discovery" phase??
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Amdocs is an Israeli based telco. Naurus is as well. Covergsys is is based methinks.
  • 1billinnj2 · 1 year ago
    i have e-mailed, called and e-mailed again. why would the dems give this corrupt administration anything. they violate the constitution ever chance they get. i get the standard reply from the new jersey senate and house reps. they seem to all be in the pocket of bush and cheney. how do you stop these crooks. impeachment must happen but war crimes are also now in play.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    How much longer do we have to fight our own party? They're fucking repukes.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    $teny hoyer...
  • jr · 1 year ago
    Hoyer's a fucking coward. He's thinks politics is the special olympics and wants to raise the repubs self esteem
  • michaelt · 1 year ago
    dems are either craven idiots or complicit cowards. the only way we get democrats who fight back is to get new democrats. the ones we got in 2006 were supposed to stop this. what have they done? nothing.

    republicans receive a lot of scorn and rightfully so. the democrat leadership needs to be put in the same category until we can fire them and get people in there that actually care.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    I would rather be fucked by the current repubs who do not pretend to be anything other than slaves to $$$, telcos, military, oil and war, when comared to the the feckless cowards, including Obama if he does not stongly & publicly oppose this measure, that currently comprise the democrat (yes small d on no ic) party and pretend to be about change. DC needs to fall and fall exceptionally hard.

    Where does Bob Barr stand on this issue?
  • Hack · 1 year ago
    It aint just Hoyer.

    The sell-out by the Dems can't even waith for the majority to start acting like Repigs and fucking up the world.

    THIS BY DODD


    Angelo's Angel
    June 19, 2008; Page A14

    Give Senator Christopher Dodd credit for nerve. On Tuesday, the very day he finally admitted knowing that Countrywide Financial regarded him as a "special" customer, the Connecticut Democrat also announced that he was bringing to the Senate floor a housing bailout sure to help lenders like Countrywide.
    [Christopher Dodd]

    How much will Countrywide benefit from Mr. Dodd's rescue? The Senator's plan allows mortgage lenders to dump up to $300 billion of their worst loans on to taxpayers via a new Federal Housing Administration refinancing program, provided the lenders are willing to accept 87% of current market value. The program will be most attractive to lenders and investors holding subprime and slightly-less-risky Alt-A loans made during the height of the housing bubble in 2006 and 2007.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121383295591086...
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Dodd is a slopping fucking pig whore so tuned in and skilled at feeding at the trough of the DC slop paid for by taxpayers, though early in the primary season I may have respected this hopelessly corrupt fop.
  • FunMe · 1 year ago
    Who the heck is HOYER?

    Not only is he selling out Democracy with this illegal spying NON compromise.

    He is also spearheading the efforts to give MORE WAR FUNDS to bush.

    OK, I see here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steny_Hoyer

    He's from Maryland and has been in the House since 1981.
    And he became house majority leader in 2006.

    And he's bee reelected with over 60%. shoot!

    No wonder these JERKS in the Democratic Party think they can do whatever they want no matter how CRIMINAL their efforts are.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    Look, that's it for me. Good luck to the rest of you. We've been fighting our own party for over a fucking year now about this and every other goddamn issue. They know how we feel about this so fucking vote against the thing. Fuck it. I will not be voting for any democrat again. I wont vote for anyone.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    This is an example of the loving, peaceful, positive vibes you are sending everywhere?
  • SarainKC · 1 year ago
    Then, in essence, you will be voting FOR
    100 years in Iraq
    Attack on Iraq which will provoke China and Russian to protect their interests
    At LEAST 2 Supreme Court Justices
    Zero chance of any accountability for Bush's war crimes
    Continued deregulation and consolidation of corporate power
    Continued ban on Gay marriage
    Overturn Roe v Wade
    Continued exodus of US jobs overseas
    No change of eliminating the Enron Loophole responsible for the surging gas prices
    Global warming "debate" continues
    etc, etc, etc

    Quit being an idiot!
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    I remember reading somewhere in the Constitution that Congress "shall make no ex-post facto laws"? Wouldn't this qualify as an ex-post facto law?
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    No. The ex-post facto clause applies to penal laws that make conduct once allowed retroactively prohibited. This prevents the criminal prosecution of a person acting lawfully at some point in the future due to an ex-post facto law making the person's past conduct illegal.
  • dad · 1 year ago
    it is not just the republicans we need to change.

    cave.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    The oink oink 'Murkin people deserve McShrub and drilling everywhere. I like Obama so I don't want him to win. The position he wil be placed in is impossible. There is like a convergence of hugely negative trends coming together to form a perfect storm of ruin now for this country. There is nothing he or anyone can to to prevent it.

    I curse them all.
  • JacksonThersites · 1 year ago
    Barack Obama has cut a deal to allow this bill to pass. He is complicit in this travesty, this monumental sell-out. Read Glenn Greenwald http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/. Call the Obama campaign (866) 675-2008 [Dial 6, then 0, on the menu] and tell them if he allows Telecom immunity to pass you will not vote for him in November. Make it that clear. READ GLENN GREENWALD. The woman I spoke to said essentially they were paying very close attention to Glenn's article and this issue. Obama can stop Telecom amnesty with two phone calls. Its that simple. Do it now. And if it passes DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA THE FRACKING SELLOUT.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    You gotta give it to the repukes in their contempt for the American people. And the American people deserve them. It's really a match made in Tiawan.
  • lilybart · 1 year ago
    At the very least, if we gave them immunity, they in turn have to tell what they really did. Immunity for full disclosure. IF there has to be immunity at all.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Mr Obama is something the right cannot understand...He is rational and procedural and he will, if we elect him in the numbers needed, change the old order in which he had to; however briefly compared to some, operate.
    The Democrats, if victorious in November and to secure future victories, really have no choice but to opt for Rooseveltian (Franklin) reforms, modifications, corrections of Bush adlib substitutions and out-right rewriting of federal code.
    The old order, sinking ever so slowly deeper into time’s tar pit, will bellow and scream.
    My only advice: Don’t let kiddies or the squeamish near the tar pit.
    Obama’s decision today (backed up by a transparent accounting) to opt out of public financing wisely reflects this main though subtle story arc of our next President’s successful campaign.
    President Obama, to be successful and create near instant change, has to sweep into office with long coat-tails.
    President Obama and his spokespeople will be able to say and say proudly (as President Bush and his cronies have not) that this new administration is busy doing what the American people ELECTED them to do
    The broken system thrives on the quick and the easy and we would be kidding ourselves to rely exclusively on the potato chips of public discussion as a substitute for the required self study incumbent upon a free voting citizen.
    Talk about not handling the truth…The corps and teevee can’t handle the complex…We, on the other hand, have to.
  • JacksonThersites · 1 year ago
    I REPEAT! Barack Obama has cut a deal to allow this bill to pass. He is complicit in this travesty, this monumental sell-out. Read Glenn Greenwald http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/. Call the Obama campaign (866) 675-2008 [Dial 6, then 0, on the menu] and tell them if he allows Telecom immunity to pass you will not vote for him in November. Make it that clear. READ GLENN GREENWALD. The woman I spoke to said essentially they were paying very close attention to Glenn's article and this issue. Obama can stop Telecom amnesty with two phone calls. Its that simple. Do it now. And if it passes DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA THE FRACKING SELLOUT.
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    evidence? Where did this "deal" get mentioned by the Obama people.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    It feels like everywhere you turn, you're surrounded by raging corrupt criminals run amok.

    Anyway, when does the revolution start?
  • Bostonian_Queer_in_Dallas · 1 year ago
    In November, re-elect NO ONE!
  • Hawk · 1 year ago
    Is Glenn Greenwald boycotted on ABlog? He too has this covered and has for a couple weeks.

    "I'd like to underscore the fact that in 2006, when the Congress was controlled by Bill Frist and Denny Hastert, the administration tried to get a bill passed legalizing warrantless eavesdropping and telecom amnesty, but was unable. They had to wait until the Congress was controlled by Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to accomplish that."

    "As noted yesterday, Blue Dog Rep. John Barrow of Georgia has been one of the most enthusiastic enablers of the radical and lawless policies of the Bush administration. When running for re-election, he ran ads accusing his own party of wanting to "cut and run in Iraq," and was one of the 21 Blue Dogs to send a letter to Nancy Pelosi demanding that they be allowed to vote for the Rockefeller/Cheney Senate bill to give warrantless eavesdropping powers to the President and amnesty to lawbreaking telecoms.

    As a result of all of that, Barrow faces a serious primary challenge in July from State Senator Regina Thomas, who decided to run against Barrow due to -- as she told Howie Klein when she announced -- "Barrow's failure to support his constituents against the encroachments of powerful Big Business interests." As Klein noted yesterday, Thomas' positions on both foreign and domestic policy are firmly in line with Barack Obama's views and with the Democratic base in that district, while Barrow has continuously supported the most extremist Bush policies, as he himself proudly boasts.

    Obama just did a radio ad for Barrow...

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/06/...
  • FunMe · 1 year ago
    CALL THIS NUMBER too!

    I just called the Obama campaign and they said they were tracking the calls related to this. I too told them I will not campaign for Obama if he does express outrage against immunity for telecoms who spied on Americans ILLEGALLY.

    CALL! (the lady was really nice but still, express your OUTRAGE)

    "Barack Obama has cut a deal to allow this bill to pass. He is complicit in this travesty, this monumental sell-out. Read Glenn Greenwald http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/. Call the Obama campaign (866) 675-2008 [Dial 6, then 0, on the menu] and tell them if he allows Telecom immunity to pass you will not vote for him in November. Make it that clear. READ GLENN GREENWALD. The woman I spoke to said essentially they were paying very close attention to Glenn's article and this issue. Obama can stop Telecom amnesty with two phone calls. Its that simple. Do it now. And if it passes DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA THE FRACKING SELLOUT."
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    Oh great, another knee-jerk reaction. No wonder the Dem party can't get anywhere, it's full of people who think everything on earth is a simple binary answer.

    So your "solution" to the problem is hold a gun to Obamas head and say think the way I think on this one issue or you get nothing from me? It should also be noted that Obama has come out pretty regularly against telcom immunity. Has something changed? Did Greenwald sight some change in the Obama camps stance because I overlooked it if it was mentioned?
  • michaelt · 1 year ago
    there go the last of my illusions....
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    :::patting michaelt's head:::
  • KingCranky · 1 year ago
    If Obama and the Dems won't stand up for our Constitution and privacy rights-by stripping out all traces of retroactive legal immunity for the telecoms that warrantlessly spied upon, and datamined, their customers, why should any of us voters stand up for them?

    Glenn Greenwald was absolutely right when he asked what's the difference between a Republican run Congress and the Democratic run Congress, especially when it comes to standing up to Bush Jr or holding him accountable for any of his BS and raping of our Constitution.

    The only reason I'm not more infuriated about this Dem cave-in to W is that Bush Jr would still openly break the law no matter how it's written.

    But that's the real irony for the Bush Jr fucktard lackeys, President Obama will get to utilize ALL the unchecked, imperial powers W has grabbed for himself, and something tells me those W sheeple won't be bleating a happy tune when it's their turn under the warrantless-spying microscope.

    So either help roll back those unchecked, imperial powers by election day, or, Bush Jr supporters, don't dare whine when you're on the receiving end of an over-active Executive Branch run by President Obama.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    That's it.

    I officially surrender.

    Spy on me. Make me pay for corporate theft. Make me pay for an illegal war and all its components. Force me to work until the day I die because you've spent all the SS benefits that I helped pay into. Deny me healthcare. Hell, just go ahead and put me on a cattle car to the nearest railhead.

    I even just removed my Obama yard sign as I won't be voting at all. I mean, why fucking even bother? I supported him and now even he won't support us against FISA and the telcoms? I give up. There's not an honest person in the whole of Congress and anything that we do simply does not matter. They pay us nothing but lip service.

    I surrender.
  • PeteWa · 1 year ago
    You moron, Obama still is against Telecom Immunity. Nice job on swallowing the lies and becoming a, to appropriate the wingnuts, "surrender monkey".
    They played you, but you only got played because YOU allowed it.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    You're harshing on my buzz, man.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    I just called the Obama campaign from Jackson's post below and the guy said Obama will not vote for this thing. He said he hopes Obama comes out with a statement soon. And that they were closely monitoring the reaction they were getting and they've been alot of it.
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    I kinda figured that. Seems like a lot of people are posturing here and trying to make it seem like suddenly Obama is pro-immunity. Obama has consistantly voted against telco immunity and unless his position has changed recently, I don't understand why people are making it seem like he's all for it now.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    I told him we would still be watching. I also told him you were his biggest fan on the internets.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    tlh -

    I hope that you're right as well. You know I went whole-heartidly for Obama months ago and have been nothing but an avid supporter both financially and vocally for his campaign. But if he is supporting this, then any hope that I had that he was the one who could save our nation from this travesty is gone and their just wouldn't be another to support. Sorry, but I'm so pissed over this.
  • SarainKC · 1 year ago
    Take a breath, Obama is against this and will be voting NO. As for the public statement- my guess is it will be timed to hit the evening news. Don't forget how shrewed his team is. On something this important, like everything else they do, it will be meticulously orchastrated and executed. Plus, I have a feeling they are working the phones to have some power Senators to satnd together unified in opposition. Trust him. Trust your gut.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    The campaign worker I spoke with earlier said he knew of no forthcoming statement on the immunity bill. I hope for it, but for us to be waiting for one that might not come is defeating.
    If we are going to trust, then we have to trust even when he doesn't meet all of our expectations.
  • SarainKC · 1 year ago
    I wasn't told anything about a statement either, but if Obama is consistent, I think it will happen.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    GG -
    I hope you're right. And yes, Obama better come out against this strong, in front of the cameras and use language that indicates he will fight against this.
  • Hawk · 1 year ago
    It's not really a question of even representing us/me/u, it's about representing the document of record for the U.S.A., if this passes, how could anyone who played a part pledge the Oath?
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    Fun Me -

    I just called the number you provided, and thank you for posting it. Unfortunately the "Obama for America" campaign cannot take any messages at this time, nor can/will they provide an operator to speak to directly. Apparently they have already decided it's best to ignore callers than to vote against immunity for the the telcoms. It figures, I guess...
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    Bull, I just called the number anf got through fine. Have you ever thought that maybe their system is a little overloaded right now with all the knee-jerkers like you calling in?

    Just a thought.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    tlh -

    I gave it four tries and got the same thing each time. Yes, I do understand that they system might overload (not my first trip through the patch). But c'mon, I want to see a public statement. A strong public statement. With that, I would withdraw my surrender. I just want to see a national leader like Sen. Obama take that step and strongly voice opposition to this.
  • ZennButtKicker (tlhwraith) · 1 year ago
    I hear you and your opinion is reasonable.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    i just called Obama's campaign to register my fervent opposition to retroactive immunity...spoke to a live person....

    do it.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    Eighth try and got through to a very nice lady named "Sue". She said that they were tracking comments and would see to it that they were passed along. She did say she didn't know how Sen. Obama would vote but all callers were asking for him to make a public statement.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Thanks. Good to know that callers are asking for a public statement from him.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    dKos has these phone numbers up:

    Call Barack Obama and urge him to make a public statement reiterating his opposition to telco amnesty. His opposition could kill this deal: Phone (202) 224-2854, Fax (202) 228-4260

    Call Steny Hoyer and tell him this is a bad deal: Phone (202) 225-4131, Fax (202) 225-4300

    Call Nancy Pelosi and urge her to pull the bill from the House schedule: Phone (202) 225-4965, Fax (202) 225-8259

    Call your representative and tell them to vote no on the FISA rewrite tomorrow.
  • Õ¿Õ · 1 year ago
    Fuck, here I go again with more calling...
  • Hawk · 1 year ago
    I tried four times and nothing.

    Will try again though.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Thanks for the phone numbers of both Obama's campaign and his DC office. I called both; no one available to answer. However, you can leave a message at the DC #, 202-224-2854.
  • Ben Dover · 1 year ago
    Mirth -
    Don't give up, it took me 8 tries before I finally got through. Good to see you.
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Always good to read your comments.

    Earlier I had the same reaction as you: ready to give up. That's how tense we all are.

    Now go put that sign back in your yard! :)
  • Hawk · 1 year ago
    UPDATE III: Sen. Russ Feingold courteously answers the last question I just posed:

    The proposed FISA deal is not a compromise; it is a capitulation. . . . The House and Senate should not be taking up this bill, which effectively guarantees immunity for telecom companies alleged to have participated in the President's illegal program, and which fails to protect the privacy of law-abiding Americans at home.

    Allowing courts to review the question of immunity is meaningless when the same legislation essentially requires the court to grant immunity. And under this bill, the government can still sweep up and keep the international communications of innocent Americans in the U.S. with no connection to suspected terrorists, with very few safeguards to protect against abuse of this power.

    Meanwhile, has anyone seen Barack Obama?
    The two presumptive presidential nominees have differed over the issue. A senior aide to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., recently indicated the senator would support granting immunity to the phone companies. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was among the most vocal opponents of immunity in the Senate debate last year. . . .

    A spokesman for the Obama campaign didn't return phone calls or emails seeking comment for this article.

    If Obama remains missing much longer, it may be necessary to issue an Amber Alert for him.

    Finally, D-Day reports that the House leadership is working to vote tomorrow on the war funding bill and the FISA "compromise" at the same time. As he puts it: "The final indignity. Funding for endless war AND etching out the 4th Amendment will be combined into the same bill to force enough compliance from [Blue Dogs] to get this bill passed." Did I mention that the Democrats currently control both houses of Congress?
  • mirth · 1 year ago
    Finally able to talk with an Obama worker. Obama will vote against the immunity bill. This worker said he did not know who Glenn Greenwald is, had not read the post, did not know if Obama was aware of the post, and did not know if Obama plans a public statement about what Greenwald writes.
  • tlsintx · 1 year ago
    excellent.
    i talked to a young woman answering the phone in Steny Hoyer's office...she sounded harassed. after i hung up i wished i'd thought to offer her some encouragement like... hang in there, it's not your fault Steny Hoyer's an idiot.
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    The current slate of dems in Coingerss need to go. This further proves the one party two faces theory. All of these assholes are bought and paid for.

    It is now time for Obama to show leadership and stop this invasive government shit train in its tracks by blocking it in the Senate. If Obama goes silently on this one he loses a substantial amount of credibility.
  • gwpriester · 1 year ago
    Hoyer and the entire congress are nothing but sell outs.
  • SarainKC · 1 year ago
    Got through to Obama and Speaker Pelosi's offices. Still haven't gotten through to Hoyer, but will keep trying. I'd like to use my message to remind him of Al Wynn in case he needs a refresher on what happens to fraudulent Dems. Steny can kiss his career goodbye. We will not forget this.
  • Poopyman · 1 year ago
    I tried calling Hoyer's DC office, but they weren't taking calls and the mailbox was full. Heh!

    Not to be denied, I called the Greenbelt office (301-474-0119) and a real human woman answered. After I gave her my name and address (I really am in Hoyer's district), I told her that if FISA with telecom immunity passes I will dedicate myself to putting Hoyer out of office. She sounded kind of downbeat - or beat down - btw. So be nice.

    Also, I've had problems pulling up FDL this afternoon, although I'm not ready to start yelling about DOS just yet.

    Anyway, especially if you live in MD's 5th CD, give the above number a call and let 'em know how you feel.
  • bjohnm · 1 year ago
    I hate to pull out my tin foil hat this late in the day, but this just seems strange to me. The Republicans couldn't get an immunity bill to pass, and all of a sudden the Democrats are passing it. Makes me wonder...is it at all possible that maybe the Administration was listening in on some Democratic Congressional conversations, and got some dirt? Just wondering....