DISQUS

AMERICAblog: The myth of meritocracy, blogosphere edition

  • ChicagoKid · 1 year ago
    VERY effective anti-McSame ad.

    http://www.progressivemediausa.org/
  • ChicagoKid · 1 year ago
    Sorry, but I found a few even better links regarding the McSam's wife recipe/stolen drugs story.

    http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1994-09-08/news/...

    http://wonkette.com/379911/cindy-mccain-also-st...

    http://wonkette.com/politics/dept'-of-two-for-t...
    She's quite a person...NOT!
  • Left of the Hill · 1 year ago
    Definitely true. The more and more I've become involved in politics offline, the more I've noticed my readership numbers increase.
  • maggiePA08 · 1 year ago
    Wow A.J. I am really enjoying your thought provoking meritocracy series. Thanks and looking forward to future editions.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Rather than a meritocracy, we have, as we speak, a Confederacy of Dunces...a mano a mano rule via corporate food chain. Like kudzu, Rasputin and athlete's foot, the xerox'ed corporate bureaucracy is relentless and practically undying. Severe pruning after repotting demanded...
  • Filo · 1 year ago
    ". Like kudzu, Rasputin and athlete's foot, the xerox'ed corporate bureaucracy is relentless and practically undying."

    lol

    It's like The Blob.
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    AJ, I've known about "meritocracy" since I was a kid. I watched the better off kids go to college back in the late 50s and there was little money if a poor kid wanted to go. It's always been this way. The more money you have, the more "merit" you have, and it applies across the board. Even in the area of scholarships, I scored high on the National Merit, but was offered a pittance for school, unlike some of the better off kids. It would have meant working full time for living expenses and most college students didn't work back then. It was all paper and pen, study, attendance and if you were serious, hard classes with papers being more than one primary and two secondary sources, as is the case in many college level classes these days (it may have changed since I took college level courses in the mid-70s--I sure hope so).

    I've known people whose parents donated a bldg, or a department chair, and had no problem getting in, even though they were lousy students.

    One thing about the internet, though, it doesn't judge you by how much money you have. I've never been kicked off a blog because I'm poor!
  • Andrew · 1 year ago
    AJ...Your right on a lot of counts, but the really great thing about blogs is that everyone and anyone can have an equal voice. What strikes me the most about blogs is something that I had learned in an ethics class in college a long time ago. Even if there were just two people left on the face of the earth, they would probably find something to argue about and it wouldn't really make a difference whether one had some societal advantage over the other. it's just the way we're built. people believe what they believe and those thoughts are a direct by product of our upbringing. Money or not, this venue can give all an opportunity to vent their spleen on a wide range of issues regardless of social class.
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    Always thought John was either very cagey or very lucky in landing the "Americablog" name.
  • John Aravosis · 1 year ago
    Well, I grabbed it as a poke in the eye to the right, and I was lucky to get the .org but the .com was already purchased by someone else. A very nice reader was apparently approached by the republicans, who were trying to buy the .com of my name from, he sold it to me instead for a fair price. Was he making the story up about the republican buyers? Maybe, but I don't think so. And in any case, we'd become big enough at that point that he deserved a good price for the name - he didn't buy it to screw us, the name was already purchased before I created the blog, so he deserved the price. And he got it :-)
  • Bush_Bites · 1 year ago
    I missed the point, didn't I?

    LOL.
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    How many of those "legacy" students paid thousands to have papers written for them? Remember the story of one of the Walton grandchildren (I believe it was) whose name was removed from a stadium when it was revealed she paid her roommate all that money to do so? Yet, she also graduated...which begs the question, do the rich really do any work of their own?
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    McCain and Clinton and their henchmen and stooges like Ferraro, as well as pundits like Kristol and Matthews, and much of the MSM don't really believe in meritocracy--except for middle-class whites. They demonstrate it when they use racialized coding to call Obama "elitist" and his wife "arrogant." Deep-down they want and need to regard and type African-Americans like the "uppity" and "dicty" Obamas reduced to retrograde forms of black identity: shufflin' and mumblin' Stepin' Fetchit and servile, head-handkerchief-wearin' Butterfly McQueen. Then they're in their place...
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    It is clear that inchoate forces have attempted to create trans-generational modern power as old pre-industrial European royal houses once intentionally plotted through blood relatives and toadies.
    I’ve noticed a few last names of pimply-faced C-SPIN visitors from congressional newspapers to suspect the latest generation of old Beltway media looms…
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    pundits like Kristol and Matthews, and much of the MSM don't really believe in meritocracy

    But it is how they justify themselves. Listen closely and you will hear their success-laden resumes buried in nearly everything they say.
    The NYT Magazine story caught this aspect of Tweety and nearly all TV types in hideous perfection.
  • devis1 · 1 year ago
    Yesterday I watched the documentary 'Blog Wars' on The Sundance Channel and it was uplifting to what was otherwise a rather depressing day. Can't think of anything intelligent to add to your post except to say thanks for what you do.
  • MorgaineSwann · 1 year ago
    I love it when people point to Markos as a sign of diversity. How many waves of women have been excluded from his site? Three now? He's a sexist ass, but he's connected to Joe Trippi so everybody hangs on his every word and acts surprised when he sells out the women who help make his site what it is. It all dies down, everybody's happy and the next time it's expedient for him to back an anti-choice candidate over a pro-choice alternative, or bash a female candidate, women will be up in arms and leave in droves and start other sites all over again. At this point, it's becoming a co-dependent relationship, but they keep going back and the other boy bloggers keep defending his behavior.

    It's most decidedly not a meritocracy. It has more to do with money and proximity than anything. The biggest blogs are in or around DC and NYC and have strong ties to politics. The major bloggers have the money and the access to attend conferences and make TV appearances. You get the most attention if you are male and talk exclusively about politics several times a day. If you are female, you'd better be young and good-looking. Heaven forbid people get the idea that you write about "women's issues" because then you become invisible to the big boys. (No one has yet explained to me how an issue that affects 54% of the population is unimportant, but that's the way they get treated.) Bloggers who can't make a living from their blogs are second class citizens no matter what they do.

    If you work for a living you'd better be a journalist, political operative, lawyer, or something impressive. Education isn't enough - you have to be from an impressive school, too. If you have a regular job, or worse, you're disabled, no one will pay any attention to you except a few women and a couple of anti-feminist or racist or xenophobic or homophobic men who stalk you and occasionally threaten you. They're lots of fun. My stalkers have included a member of the National Guard - I know this because he used his official email - and someone who worked in a Sheriff's office, who also used an "official" email address.

    I there's anything about you that's not "mainstream" you'll be just as marginalized as you would in real life, and the Progressive blog community is vehemently prejudiced about things like religion, gender, and race. They say they're not, but they kid themselves. The sad part of it is that there actually is diversity out here, and the majority of bloggers are women of every description, but you'll never see that reflected in the major outlets.
  • SociologistTina · 1 year ago
    You perhaps have no idea how grateful I am to you for saying and posting this.
  • jon · 1 year ago
    Excellent post on an important topic. Something to keep in mind is that the well-known "power law" distribution of sites on the web reflects "rich get richer" dynamics -- even if we were starting from a position of equality, which as you point out we're not.

    A couple of things I'd add to MorgaineSwann's excellent comment: even if it's not intended as sexist or misogynist, the confrontational and flaming discourse of much of the progressive blogosphere tends to marginalize women [see for example Herring's 2001 paper on Gender and Power in Online Communications, just as relevant in the blogosphere as on Usenet].

    Also, women of color are almost completely excluded from the "mainstream" blogospheres (and didn't even make your list of diverse examples: a latino guy, unracially attributed woman, and gay guy), let alone having their views further percolate to the mainstream media. What's especially disappointing is that so many progressives and feminists seem unwilling to acknowledge this problem, let alone do anything about it.

    What I see happening here is straight out of Freire's "Pedagogy of the oppressed": people in a potentially-liberating situation instead recreating the conditions of oppression. Unequal starting points in terms of access, connections, time (= money), credentials, etc., make the problem more acute.

    The good news is that many different voices are out there -- high quality, covering a much broader set of issues from a lot more perspectives than you get from "the usual suspects". As a blog reader, it's more work to find them -- but well worth it. As an occasional blogger, I remind myself to link to them as well as the better-known sites. It's really too bad that so few professional bloggers and journalists do the same.