-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/07/power-of-song-pete-seeger.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
1 hour ago · 2 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
13 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 30 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/384676.html
Subjects should contain, constitutional law, FISA, why it is important for an individual be under oath when they testify before congress, outing of CIA agent, politics within the justice department, etc.
"If we do (attack) it is going to be a disaster," the Congressman told the Alex Jones show this Thursday.
http://infowars.net/articles/july2008/040708Ron...
McCain says he supports Bush 100%
But I'm also tired of hearing him praised on the media, including spineless Dems whose words don't condemn his racism and homophobia, among other issues. Why is it that progressive ideas can get pummeled in the press (including their proponents) but the elements of fascism and its supporters get a clean pass from the MSM? Oh don't tell me...it's a rhetorical question, of course.
I'm as "plain spoken" in my support of civil liberties and for a progressive US, but nobody gives me or other speakers the "respect" we deserve for truly wanting it, reserving their admiration, indeed their adulation, for absolutely evil and regressive ideologues who would destroy this country.
But I'm also tired of hearing him praised on the media, including spineless Dems whose words don't condemn his racism and homophobia, among other issues. Why is it that progressive ideas can get pummeled in the press (including their proponents) but the elements of fascism and its supporters get a clean pass from the MSM? Oh don't tell me...it's a rhetorical question, of course.
I'm as "plain spoken" in my support of civil liberties and for a progressive US, but nobody gives me or other speakers the "respect" we deserve for truly wanting it, reserving their admiration, indeed their adulation, for absolutely evil and regressive ideologues who would destroy this country.
I read that comment last night and cracked up.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2...
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/columnists/chris...
I guess all fascists aren't alike, though...remember that the Japanese population was interned after Pearl Harbor, but you didn't hear of German-Americans being interned even while German U-boats were busy off the east coast. Hell, the native fascists in this country were free to spout their hate. Don't you think that if those the US has jailed wholesale since 9/11 were all French or British, or a whiter shade of pale, that most would have already been released?
The victims of Katrina were jailed far longer than the ruling Fascists of this country will ever be.
http://www.st94.com/music/2008_08.html
Sad for this country, sad for the world that watches while incipient fascism takes over.
You asked what they will do if there is a draft? What they usually do. If their parents are in a position to keep them out of harm's way like Bush and his family did, that will work, or they will have a sympathetic physician diagnose something like Rush Limpwad had, a cyst on his backside or flat feet or something else to keep them out.
It is always the underprivileged poor or middle-class who become cannon fodder or who cannot afford to go to school to have a deferment. Mr. Cheney and his five deferments ( what a man ) had the gaul to say when asked why he didn't fight in the Vietnam Conflict , " I had more important things to do or was it I had better things to do." I know I wasn't given a chance to make my own decisions on this, why was he? That is rubbing it in the faces of those who fought over there,such as myself , by implying he was better than the rest of us. Boy look at his machismo now. He is such a war hawk when his own ass isn't on the line. Now, there are republicans who did go to war during that time but many of us were drafted to keep the war machine going and 58,000 dead later with hundreds of thousands wounded, are the results of these macho cowards who use other people's kids to hide behind to achieve their goals. War = money and profits and as long as the rich don't have to put their own lives on the line, everything is fine.
Speaking of war songs, the ultimate one in my book was written by Buffy Saint-Marie entitled, " The Universal Soldier." If you're not familiar with it, look it up and listen to the lyrics. They still ring true today. My next favorite would be, Bob Dylan's "Blowin' in the Wind," sung by Peter, Paul & Mary. A real classic.
Another problem for Mr. Dollar is that it will be several months before his actions take effect. Officials with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have informed Bernanke about a plan that would have been unheard-of in the past: a general examination of the US financial system. The IMF’s board of directors has ruled that a so-called Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) is to be carried out in the United States. It is nothing less than an X-ray of the entire US financial system.
As part of the assessment, the Fed, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the major investment banks, mortgage banks and hedge funds will be asked to hand over confidential documents to the IMF team. They will be required to answer the questions they are asked during interviews. Their databases will be subjected to so-called stress tests — worst-case scenarios designed to simulate the broader effects of failures of other major financial institutions or a continuing decline of the dollar.
Under its bylaws, the IMF is charged with the supervision of the international monetary system. Roughly two-thirds of IMF members — but never the United States — have already endured this painful procedure.
For seven years, US President George W. Bush refused to allow the IMF to conduct its assessment. Even now, he has only given the IMF board his consent under one important condition. The review can begin in Bush’s last year in office, but it may not be completed until he has left the White House. This is bad news for the Fed chairman.
When the final report on the risks of the US financial system is released in 2010 — and it is likely to cause a stir internationally — only one of the people in positions of responsiblity today will still be in office: Ben Bernanke.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,151...
Bet you will not ever see an article like this in the MSM….