DISQUS

AMERICAblog: The president is back to lecturing us about health care reform

  • PresPlatitudes · 2 months ago
    "Democrats, ya’ll thinkin’ for yourselves. I like that in you, BUT..."

    now replace "democrats" with "women" or "gays," and you'll get some insight into his character. this is precisely the kind of parochial condescension that raises the hackles of my skepticism.
  • Gridlock · 2 months ago
    "A political friend at dinner last night suggested that maybe the White House promised to kill the public option as part of its secret deal with Big Pharma last spring."


    DING DING DING we have a winner
  • philboyd studge · 2 months ago
    We're already pissed that he's not fighting for the public option; can you imagine the rage on the left if it looks like he did something to actively blocked it?
  • Gridlock · 2 months ago
    I think an intense search for this evidence needs to happen, and if it is true.. exposed. Frankly, if he's opposing real reform then he needs to be removed from office along with every Democrat who's enabling him. I don't care if the Republicans get in after, either. Do the same thing to them.

    It's time to play fucking hardball.
  • hrh · 2 months ago
    I've been saying that for weeks. Rahm REALLY doesn't want it; he's thinking of all the corporate cash that will dry up for 2012. And go to the other side. Money is more important than happy voters? Whatever.

    "There's something the President is not telling us." Somebody needs to wake Aravosis up!

  • Gridlock · 2 months ago
    Rahm is a crony, he just does what Obama wants. Obama doesn't want it. Rahm follows orders. Obama is the problem.
  • FunMe · 2 months ago
    But what good is money if the happy voters turn into NO voters?

    1 term Presidency!
  • nicho · 2 months ago
    Why is Obama talking as if "the Democrats" are something he's not a part of? Isn't he the de-facto leader of the party? Why is he talking as if Democrats are some other group? Very strange.
  • NotTimothyGeithner · 2 months ago
    I think he is a bi-partisan ideologue. He literally believes the best path is a perceived middle course. Policy arguments have no merits in his mind. In his mind, he is the President of all Americans not just the Democrats. To him that means he has to do everything thats not unpopular or despised by people who wear ties.
  • naschkatzehussein · 2 months ago
    Maybe he and many others in the government like gridlock. You don't have to commit one way or the other.
  • lafave · 2 months ago
    If that was true, we wouldn't need elections.
  • teammarty · 2 months ago
    Do we??
    Does it matter which wing of the Republicrat Party does their Corporate Masters' bidding?
  • PresPlatitudes · 2 months ago
    i would amend the perceived middle thing and add that obama is risk-averse and will not take any political chances unless absolutely forced: his positions on rendition, torture prosecutions, fisa, etc, all bear this out. he'll paint these positions as down-the-middle, or whatever, but it's really more the case that he doesn't want to risk any political backlash.
  • synical · 2 months ago
    You know, I'd buy that if it weren't for the obvious and total contempt his administration holds for the "left of the left". Aren't they Americans too? How about the majority of Americans who want the public option? Are they any less American than the corporate vampires who don't want it? Or, do the vampires just pay better?

    Pre$ident Change is just another typical politician. Buying elections via corporate capitulations is more important than instituting good policy for the people. When the rest of the public catches on to this massive sellout on their backs it's going to be a electoral bloodbath for the Democratic party regardless of how many corporate dollars are sunk into propping it up. That is unless the economic trickle down spigot starts actually doing any meaningful trickling. Then they might have a prayer of hanging on by the skin of their teeth.

    How inconvenient for President Dry Powder that plans with the PO are less expensive than his precious bipartisan Baucauscare industry gift. Unless we're talking about the cost to the Democratic establishment in lost corporate donations if the PO goes through. Obviously that seems to weigh more on the administration's mind than anything.
  • PresPlatitudes · 2 months ago
    because he fancies himself the teacher, floating above and handing down life lessons.
  • JustAnOldLady · 2 months ago
    Obama is losing support among the 'under 45' crowd who elected him and Dems will feel the pain when they stay home in 2010. Turns out 'HOPE' is only a 4-letter word.
  • Jim P · 2 months ago
    I'm not feeling you here, bro. You have pretty consistently complained that the President is not doing enough, or doing the right thing, to get health insurance reform. Yet,

    " We've got the polls on our side, we've finally got momentum on our side after the Teabagger mess in August, and the president himself supported the public option during the campaign, and claims to still support it as the best solution to our health care mess"

    Didn't you think allowing the Senate to go on August break without voting on a bill was a fatal mistake? I'm glad to keep up the pressure on the WH and the Congress, but you gotta admit, for a strategy you have found wanting at almost every turn, things seem to be going pretty well. He said he was going to do this, and he's doing it. Slow and steady -- the Obama way!
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    I'm game. What's going well, exactly? The president's main campaign promise on health care reform, the public option (well, actually he was for single payer too, but he's conveniently forgotten that one all together), is only on life support because all of us have beaten the bejeesus out of the president. Otherwise it would have been dead months ago. His senior staff still says he won't fight for it. They still say he's not going to weigh in on the health care battle over all, because it's not right time.

    Tell us exactly what's going well, and then tell us exactly how we go to this "good" position based on specific White House strategies. Because from what I'm seeing, the only reason we're even in a position to maybe kinda sorta not so clear get a public option is because the rest of us aren't putting up with the White House backing off of its promises.

    I do however appreciate how every time the president, or candidate, screws up, and the Netroots and others beat him into finally fighting back, we're then told how his fighting back was part of the plan all along. Yes, conveniently timed with the moment that his supporters rise up in arms with pitchforks.
  • Maggie Knowles · 2 months ago
    "We The People" will have to keep the pressure on. Why would you think that President Obama will be able to accomplish anything without pressure from "We The People"? It's our job to pressure all of our politicians, in fact, if we want to transform our country, "We The People" have to engage in more numbers and on every issue.

    This is a political game, I trust President Obama, but I know that there are very powerful economic forces resisting change. I hope we reach the tipping point soon, when middle class Americans decide it's time to hit the streets, phones, emails, etc. Maybe not enough of us are in enough pain yet.
  • Start Loving · 2 months ago
    You don't deserve sh*t you whiner. We WILL get Health Care via Pres. Obama when EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT HAS FAILED. We WILL GET A PUBLIC OPTION ***AND*** KEEP MAJORITIES IN THE NEXT ELECTION, unless visionless slugs like you spook the Democrats actually WORKING alongside Pres. Obama and blow the whole thing.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    I raised nearly $50,000 for Obama. What did you do? Now that we've put our penises aside, I'm glad you still have blind hope. It's adorable. And after the rest of us beat the crap out of the administration and the congress, and force the president to keep his promises, you're right, we might end up with a public option. But it won't be because your boyfriend planned to do it all along.
  • elizm22 · 2 months ago
    A side of you I have not seen...and not very attractive.
  • sford713 · 2 months ago
    My sh** for brains Congress Critter, John Culberson, is running a poll on the homepage of his website. Vote for or against H.R. 3200. Only about 134 votes so far with the knuckle draggers in the lead by about 70% to 24%. http://culberson.house.gov You know what to do!!!
  • mark152 · 2 months ago
    Thanks for the link. Those in favor of the health care bill have it now...
  • PresPlatitudes · 2 months ago
    "There's something funny going on here."

    well, it certainly is laughable. i'm waiting for the apologists to insist that this is obama's dogwhistle for secretly rallying behind the public option.

    "Democrats, ya’ll thinkin’ for yourselves. I like that in you, but it’s time for us to make sure that we finish the job here, we are this close and we’ve got to be unified."

    LOL, it reads like the delivered this with his folksy campaign twang. all the smarminess in the world isn't going to transform this into one of the "teachable moments" he so covets. he wants us to be unified behind what exactly? behind whatever he says? LOL, and what is that?

    even when he's being critical/encouraging, he doesn't have to guts not to use abstractions! the guy is both chickenshit and corrupt to the core.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    You'll be glad to see that comment further up. Seriously :)
  • DrWoody · 2 months ago
    The mofo sold us out to get some empty, stupid, spurious, phony 'bipartisanship.'

    He's a gutless fuck!
  • merbex · 2 months ago
    "We have the best chance at reform in a generation, and this White House is trying awfully hard to get the bare minimum with the least possible effort. We deserve to know why."

    Damn right......why would anyone accept a half a loaf when they didn't have to?

    We are thisclose to getting a public option and he is walking away from it...certainy not pushing for it.....hell if he were still in the Senate he'd be classified as being art of what group? The Centrists? Like Conrad? Like Landreui?

    Beyond frustrating
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    It's incrementalism for incrementalism sake. It's accepting half a loaf when you can have the whole loaf. The best isn't always the enemy of the good. Sometime the good is the enemy of the best, when the best is clearly attainable. And he, or someone near him, should know that. This is very odd what's going on.
  • naschkatzehussein · 2 months ago
    Many support incrementalism in this case, but I say if we just get something small now, e.g., anti-trust laws enforced on the health industry, as opposed to a public option, there will not be another "incremental" step for a long time, maybe another 50 years. If we don't explode before then.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    And most of us will be dead by then.
  • rf7777 · 2 months ago
    The Democrats are in disarray because there is ZERO leadership at the top. (Hint to Obama: that would be YOU!)
  • naschkatzehussein · 2 months ago
    I get a feel from some Democratic leaders, for example Reid, that they don't like this populist flexing of the muscles either. How dare we tell them what we think is good for us.
  • FunMe · 2 months ago
    Reid will be the first to go if there is no public option.

    Next in line if no public option: President Obama.
  • Jan · 2 months ago
    The is change I don't believe in.

    Hope Obama enjoys his first and only term.
  • obamacrat · 2 months ago
    All he has to do is sign the frigging bill. I voted for Democrats, we elected Democrats. Damn it. Man up and act like Democrats for a change. Love that Grayson guy.
  • hrh · 2 months ago
    He's an aberration. Just how did he manage to avoid the spine removal every Democrat goes through in order to take office?
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 2 months ago
    didn't we also get lectured when he betrayed us on telecom immunity and DADT/DOMA? if it's a pattern, your dinner friend was right and we are being betrayed again.
  • timncguy · 2 months ago
    This is very similar to the campaign version of Obama. A listener can read anything they want to into what he says and can therefore envision the Obama the want to envision.

    You could just as easily interpret this statement to mean that he is talking to the blue dogs and the MINORITY of senators that don't support a public option and telling them that when the bill comes out with a public option they better get on board and do what they're told to support it like republicans would.
  • Steve_in_CNJ · 2 months ago
    yes, in isolation, the comments could mean anything you want them to. but in the context of earlier speeches, you have to interpret it to mean 'get ready to accept any crap that comes at you.'
  • timncguy · 2 months ago
    Like I said, interpret the way you want to. I prefer to remind the president of his earlier speech in late July when he said he would not sign a bill that did not contain a robust public option to keep the insurance companies honest. We should play that over and over again on a daily basis just so everyone remembers it.

    I don't believe that politicians are dumb enough to believe that passing a bill like the current senate bill which doesn't cover everyone and adds new requirments to the insurance companies without any cost controls would help them in the next election cycle. As it is, the insurance premiums would go up, not down.

    Without covering eveyone, you lose the opportunity to save the $1,000 they keep telling us is added to each family plan to cover the uninsured.

    Without the competition, the insurance companies will just increase premiums or lower benefits to cover the added costs of eliminating pre-exisiting conditions and annual and lifetime caps.

    The senate is defining a "cadillac" plan as a plan over $8,000. But, it has been reported that the average family insurance plan costs over $12,000. So, how can the senate decide a "cadillac" plan is $8,000 and tax the insurance companies on that which they will just pass along to the customers? Are Baucus, Lincoln, Landrieu, Conrad, Nelson etc stupid enough to think the republicans won't tie that right around their necks in the next election?

    And, without extending the public option to everyone, how do businesses get lower rates for their employees? A business should be able to negotiate with the public option in addition to private insurers to get the best deal for their employees. In fact the most logical way for businesses to offer insurance to their employees would be to offer their employees a pre-determined dollar amount that the employee can then use to buy the policy they want from the national exchange that includes the public option. That way everybody is in a national risk pool of 300 million people and you get the best price by being in the largest pool.
  • rawshiva · 2 months ago
    Maybe he wants to pull a Bush and write in a public option clause via a signing statement after getting a "bi partisan" bill passed. Other than that, you got me.
  • gonzalez · 2 months ago
    What the President and the Senate Democrats have is called "intimidation". They are afraid of what the Republicans and the News medai will say if the fail on the public option. As I said before, these Democrats lack "cojones". The only one in the leadership with guts is Speaker Pelosi.
  • lafave · 2 months ago
    The way Obama is acting, it seems that 2 explanations are available:
    1. Obama is afraid of Republicans and will fold whenever they object to anything.
    2. Obama is a corrupt corporatist.

    For some reason, he'd rather be viewed as a coward by the people watching politics, when I suspect it's more of column 2. But maybe it's a little from column 1 and a little from column 2.
  • teammarty · 2 months ago
    Ah, the combination special.
  • Steve · 2 months ago
    It's all very discouraging. And I agree, John - something is definitely missing here in this equation.
  • munjoyfan · 2 months ago
    Look what the insurance companies are doing in anticipatiion of regulation. Just what the credit card companies did: ratchet up income for the short term. I received this from my employer recently. Note: our salaries have been frozen. So this isn't as generous as it may appear.

    While the healthcare debate continues across the country, X remains committed to offering outstanding and affordable health care coverage to all of our employees. This past summer your Benefits Committee spent many hours reviewing costs and carriers. I am pleased to announce that the committee has chosen Cigna as our new medical insurance provider beginning January 1, 2010.

    The 20.3% premium increase proposed by Aetna prompted our decision. By changing carriers we were able to reduce the increase to a point that X will absorb the entire premium increase for next year.



  • philboyd studge · 2 months ago
    My condolences. CIGNA has turned non-payment of covered services into an art form. You have to resubmit over and over, and threaten them over the phone again, and again. They're horrible.
  • Butch1 · 2 months ago
    The writing is on the wall with this administration. We have no strong leaders in Congress to counter this deception.
  • tlsintx · 2 months ago
    he wants to stay above the fray...but he's also an uber controller...

    i think it's all going to work out, it just isn't going to be the cakewalk we expected. we'll have to keep yelling.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    Above the fray? He's not above the fray, he's not even anywhere near the fray. He's a Democrat. He's the president. This is his signature reform of his presidency, he keeps alleging. He needs to pick sides.
  • tlsintx · 2 months ago
    I thinks what he wants more than anything is to say, "YOU achieved healthcare reform with a public option, not me." so let's do it.
  • RobGinChicago · 2 months ago
    Remind him that it was only a quirk in the Illinois Senate rules that allowed him to vote "Present". He's in the big leagues now, and must commit to a position.
  • naschkatzehussein · 2 months ago
    Something is very strange. I woke up this morning to an e-mail from OFA saying that the president joined in on the calling campaign yesterday, but as usual his message was ambiguous, no outright jump onto the public option bandwagon but basically the same message you report about being unified and being close to the goal. It's as if he is hedging his bets and above all weighing the consequences to his political career as opposed to promoting what he thinks is good for the nation.
  • SoLeftImRight · 2 months ago
    I think there were three OFA e-mails on this topic in the last two days. I was fuming when I read them through twice and no mention of a public option. I sent an e-mail on whitehouse.gov saying thanks for telling me about your call-in campaign, but I can't call my representatives to support the "president's plan" because I don't know what that is, and if it doesn't include a robust public option, I DON'T support it. I let them know I sent my own personal notes to my senators and congresswoman, thanks very much (screw the OFA's stupid call-in campaign), to push for reform with a public option, and nothing short of that. Luckily, my senator and rep support that, but it doesn't hurt for them to keep hearing from us!
  • jcro · 2 months ago
    So what do we do?
    It wouldn't be the first time the majority of us were ignored... It would essentially be no different than opposition to the Iraq War, albeit under a different president.
  • silverkjk · 2 months ago
    The commentary I read about this yesterday said that this was addressed to the House, warning them to support a weakened Senate bill rather than pushing for a strong public option.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    I'm sure that's exactly what it is. He's finally getting involved, and his involvement is, as usual, to berate Democrats for trying to actually fulfill his promises. It's just bizarre. There's some piece to the pie that he isn't tell us about.
  • synical · 2 months ago
    The piece of the pie is that he decided that Rahm'$ $lice ta$ted better to him than the now empty campaign promises he whipped up and served to the base and the country. You know, the people who actually vote.

    He's fully in the arms of the corporate-loving DLC now and that means dick for the average citizen. Survive on the crumbs because until this DLC hacktacular snake oil salesman is tossed out by a furious
    "anybody but Obama" electorate that's all the average American is going to get. Crumbs.

    That is, unless Congress gets their act together and pushes back. Excuse me a moment.

    Bwahahahaha, Congress getting their act together...that's a good one. Bwahahaha!

    Ahem. More sell-out mediocrity from the Democratic Party. This country so needs another choice. Both major parties are abject failures in regards to serving the public.
  • naschkatzehussein · 2 months ago
    There is a sharp observation by a writer on FDL, David Dayan, that in his remarks to OFA, Obama kept defending the "bill you least like", the Baucus bill. The half a loaf defense. That is not a good omen.
  • lafave · 2 months ago
    Who is the enemy, the Democrat who stands with the majority of his party in wanting a robust public option, or the Democrat who wants to give away what a majority of the other Democrats want? It couldn't possibly be the post-partisan golden child.
  • Indigo · 2 months ago
    "There's something the President is not telling us."

    Maybe it has to do with the 35 million dollars the US Chamber of Commerce spent last quarter.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    But the advg isn't working, the polls are still on our side.
  • teammarty · 2 months ago
    But increasingly less so. Support for the PO in polls I've seen show support dropping from a high of 77% to 57%. There are polls out there with different #'s but the momentum is with the Pres and the Blue Dogs.

    Get ready to cough up $10,000 for nothing.
  • Indigo · 2 months ago
    True point.
  • Õ¿Õ · 2 months ago
    Hey, we need our civil rights over here.
  • Gregory Lyons · 2 months ago
    Been missing you!
  • Griffon · 2 months ago
    Rather than acting as a committed democrat, Obama is behaving like a 'Mr. Rogers Republican.'

    Can you say, "Faustian?"
  • John · 2 months ago
    "We're missing something here"

    My guess is that 5-6 conservative Senate Democrats (see: scumbags) have pledged to him with 100% assurity that they will join a Republican filibuster for any bill with a strong public option in it - despite being pushed continuously (behind the scenes) for the last 3 months.

    With that information in hand, he pushes for compromise.
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    John, I just don't buy it. It's incredibly dangerous for a member of congress, of the president's own party, to tell the president, on what supposedly is the hallmark of his presidency, that they're gonna vote with the republicans to kill it. All Obama has to say is "don't you dare" - with a few more specific threats and/or enticements thrown in- and he'd have every single Democratic vote. This isn't the way Washington works, presidents not having the power to get their own party in line at the beginning of their administration right after an election when they're doing well (were doing well) in the polls. I'm sorry. I know the White House is trying to sell everyone this line about how weak and insignificant the president is vis-a-vis the big bad congress, but honestly, they're preying on your guys' lack of knowledge about how this town works. The president is ridiculously powerful, this president especially, and especially with his own party. He could snap his fingers and get whatever he wants.
  • ninjakiller · 2 months ago
    If it's true and the final bill doesn't have a public option due to Obama's pressure, he'll go down in flames like Jimmy Carter. I will not vote for him if there isn't a public option.
  • Gregory Lyons · 2 months ago
    If you don't like Obama's blah-blah, there's nothing to like.
  • ezpz · 2 months ago
    We're not missing anything unless we choose not to see what's right in front of us. It's pretty clear that Obama promised the industries, both pharma and sickness insurance, that there would be NO public option...

    Robert Reich:

    "...Big Pharma and big insurance hate the public insurance option even more than they hate big Medicare discounts. And although the President has sounded as if he would welcome it, political operatives in the White House have quietly reassured the industries that it won't be included in the final bill. At most, the bill would allow the formation of non-profit "cooperatives" that wouldn't have the scale or authority to squeeze the profits of private industry, or a "trigger" ..."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/the-...
  • JohnnyG · 2 months ago
    It's bad enough that we're not getting the PO, but Obama better not get away with keeping his fingerprints off of it too. It's going to be infuriating if Obama's smoke and mirrors support for the PO is enough to convince the airhead mainstream to continue to deny his duplicity. He knows how unsophisticated his audience is, and how easy it is to pull the wool over their glazed eyes.
  • JohnnyG · 2 months ago
    Obama's health care plan:

    DON'T GET SICK

    and if you do get sick

    DIE QUICKLY
  • vkobaya · 2 months ago
    Indians would say he speaks with forked tongue. Mafiosos would say he speaks out of both sides of his mouth. I know which side I think he is on. Very seriously doubt we will get true reform on any issue nor will he keep his campaign promises including "Change we can believe in." I voted for him, believed him, bought into his rhetoric and still believe he is probably the most intelligent man to ever hold the presidency. But am so disappointed in his lack of ethics, courage, character, integrity, and honor. Something is very, very, very wrong with that man.
  • mark152 · 2 months ago
    "It's becoming increasingly clear that the President has no intention of including a real public option for everyone in the final bill. If he did, he would publicly push for it."

    Riiiiiight, John. Maybe your political expertize is dated and obsolete as everyone knows that if Obama comes out publicly and hard for the public option, then it would be dead for sure.... I've cut and pasted your reply to me from the last time I questioned your policial acumen to save you the time you should otherwise devote to figuring this out...

    "Yeah, that's why I've won so many battles against so many big politicians and big corporations, because I don't know politics. You on the other hand..."
  • John Aravosis · 2 months ago
    Right, so maybe he should pretend he doesn't care about the public option, have his spokesmen tell the Hill he doesn't care, have the Hill go public and beg him to get involved, having his WH support the one bill in the entire congress that does the least and is the most conservative and doesn't have a public option, all because that's not the bill he wants.

    I'm sorry, but that's absolutely ludicrous.
  • mark152 · 2 months ago
    It would be ludicrous if what you say was true. It would also be a great episode of 'The Office'.
  • ezpz · 2 months ago
    That "y'all" part went right through me - like nails on a chalkboard. Trying to be all folksy in NYC? Is he kidding or what?
  • mikeoliphant · 2 months ago
    I am a health insurance agent in Utah and run two websites that sell insurance www.benefitsmanager.net and www.dentalinsuranceutah.com. I mention this because in Utah it would be great to have a guaranteed public option to put people that the private insurers will decline for health conditions. Plus the way Weiner discribes the public option, it will be priced competitively. So what this means in my industry (I've been at it 18 years) is that all my unhealthy clients that get charged more or declined can be put onto the public option now. All my healthy clients can stay on the private option. Hmmmmm follow me yet???? How long can the public option stay affordable?? Who is going to pay for the losses of a big sick pool of people....taxpayers?????
  • Pearl Volkov · 2 months ago
    I think the answer is who President Obama owes his allegiances to. He is and was heavily subsidized financially by money interests, as we know of some deals he has made with the health insurers, and who knows what goes on behind the scenes.
    It is becoming obvious judging by the many appointments he has made that he is not a progressive man and that his personal success story reveals his need to succeed in the all American dream which is currently very tarnished.
    He also is not a real leader or fighter which is an unpleasant surprise since he is undeniably highly intelligent and informed and at present, we need a strong, couragious man in control who is willing to take chances and risks for the better good.
    He has been handed an almost impossible scenario which solution lies with brave change away from the status quo which he is not up to executing.
    A great pity since his weaknesses may well lose him another term, prolong the current chaos and lose him the opportunity of being a truly historic president. As a result many of us do not trust what he is presenting to us and a case in point is the whole health care mess.
  • pearlvolkov · 2 months ago
    I think the answer is who President Obama owes his allegiances to. He is and was heavily subsidized financially by money interests, as we know of some deals he has made with the health insurers, and who knows what goes on behind the scenes.
    It is becoming obvious judging by the many appointments he has made that he is not a progressive man and that his personal success story reveals his need to succeed in the all American dream which is currently very tarnished.
    He also is not a real leader or fighter which is an unpleasant surprise since he is undeniably highly intelligent and informed and at present, we need a strong, couragious man in control who is willing to take chances and risks for the better good.
    He has been handed an almost impossible scenario which solution lies with brave change away from the status quo which he is not up to executing.
    A great pity since his weaknesses may well lose him another term, prolong the current chaos and lose him the opportunity of being a truly historic president. As a result many of us do not trust what he is presenting to us and a case in point is the whole health care mess.
  • cokids · 2 months ago
    Strange there are apparently no comments yet. I agree with ameriblog. What gives? I for one WANT a public option and will be very angry with the President and Congress if we don't get one!