-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/07/thursday-morning-open-thread_10.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
10 hours ago · 62 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
11 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Carmela vs. my nephew Anthony
2 hours ago · 8 comments
-
Is it time to abolish the filibuster?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
13 hours ago · 39 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
I always hated the post Reagan years because when something was going well in the economy, of course it was Reagan's policies that did it, even 10 years out of office...I wonder how they'll spin the post Bush years?
quit in 2004 over Dubbya's bullshit. Recently he was laughing his ass off
because the party SO wanted the religious right white trash fundies to vote
GOP year after year UNTIL one of them had the audacity of actually thinking
he could run for office...Mike Huckabee. For years he kept saying that
inviting in this southern trailer trash...he called them "KMart Republicans"
...would eventually kill the GOP.
He got it just about right I think but it took a while. The Kmart Klan hates
McSame.
What's going to happen is a huge spike in violence and then a massive population crash.
I really don't know how much more of the dumb I can take.
Oh man, how much lower can people take religion?
I don't think there's any question where he's at on FISA.
(Ah, its a secret?!)
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/scripts/printer_fr...
OLBERMANN: Senator Obama‘s position on this confuses me. He loathes the telecom immunity, he says that he would fight it immediately and he would monitor it carefully as president. The vote though is next week. He better do that part of the fight quick. If this gets in through the Senate, there‘s no way to get it out again, is there? I mean, the history of this nation in terms of lost civil liberties is pretty bad about restoring them.
DEAN: Well, I spent a lot of time reading that bill today, and it‘s a very poorly-drafted bill. One of the things that is not clear is whether it‘s not possible later to go after the telecoms for criminal liability. And that is something that Obama has said during this campaign he would do, unlike prior presidents who come in and really give their predecessor a pass, he said, “I won‘t do that.” And that might be why he‘s just sitting back saying, “Well, I‘m going to let this go through. But that doesn‘t mean I‘m going to give the telecoms a pass.” I would love it if he gets up on the Senate floor and says, “I‘m keeping that option open.”
OLBERMANN: In other words, let the private suits drop and get somebody in there who‘ll actually use the laws that still exist to prosecute and make the actual statement and maybe throw a few people in jail.
DEAN: Exactly. And it looks to me, as I read this bill and talk to a number of people in Washington familiar with the bill, some who are involved in the negotiations, and they say, “You know - we just didn‘t think about this issue.” So, as it goes to the Senate, maybe Obama‘s got a shot to take, you know, a future look at this thing and not let them have the pass that they think they‘re getting.
OLBERMANN: That would be a nice symmetry to that—that everybody had been so lulled into a sense of complacency because of the Bush success on this that they‘ve left out anything that protected anybody legally, if you had a president who actually believed in the Constitution....
I think we are seeing alot more "divide and conquer" tactics these days...or backpedaling as the case may be.
It sounds like Clinton donors are used to having their asses kissed, and they can't understand Obama's methods of operation.
But tensions were apparently high enough that the Obama campaign felt the need to address them. In a separate interview, a major Clinton fundraiser said a small number of her compatriots continue to feel upset about their diminished status.
"For better or worse, the Clinton people are used to being courted, and the Obama folks have just a different philosophy," said the donor. "Some of the Clinton people have gotten demanding. Some of them wanted titles, and I think that is totally inappropriate. Why should any Clinton person get to jump ahead of any Obama folks? They want jobs, they want recognition, they want to be in the paper. They want to be considered for an ambassadorship. It is all about ego."
The one-time Clinton backer added: "I happen to think the Obama folks are right. Politicians should not have to spend so much time pandering to the bundlers or donors. But if you are used to that kind of treatment, one might misinterpret that as not caring about their needs."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/09/obama-...
Secondly, it doesn't matter who Jesus votes for... its not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes.
and finally, if you really want to know, ask W. God seems to talk to him alot and I'm sure he would tell you Jesus would vote for John W. McBush.
Thanks for keeping this blog up. I am starting to wonder if YOU are a McCain spy. I am starting to see a trend. Lots of people thought that Obama was the real thing. So much so that they trusted him to do the right thing. They are saying that they are not voting for Big Love now. So thanks from the wingnuts! Keep up the good work! You may just get McCain in the White House yet. You can expect the untraceable payment to be on the way, as soon as McCain is in the Oval Office.