-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/11/tuesday-morning-open-thread_18.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
1 hour ago · 2 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
13 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 30 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
Let's start this change machine by rewarding backstabbers with high level chairmanships.
Obama will regret this. Lieberputz stabbed Clinton in the back when he was president,. I expect him to do the same to Obama.
Barack: Don't say you weren't warned.
Meanwhile, looking the top ad on this page for the Ford "Flex" crossover vehicle which boasts "seating for 7", I was wondering: how many people do you see driving SUV hogs who have more than one passenger, at best? I've seen 4 in one maybe, I say maybe, a couple of times, but even 4 could fit in my little 4 banger quite comfortably.
And Detroit is still turning out Hummers...I've never seen more than one person in those.
I think it's more like "seen and be seen in your SUV" than anything else. Ego rules, and so does trying to best the Joneses, around here, anyway.
Ex-CIA Officials Tied to Rendition Program and Faulty Iraq Intel Tapped to Head Obama’s Intelligence Transition Team
"There is only one political party in the U.S., the Money Party." - Gore Vidal
But shit, and double shit...for me, the honeymoon is over before it begins. I'll just sit by the sidelines from now on.
I mean, is this what Obama means by "bipartisan? that is, naming both Clintonites and Bushites to important positions. Where's the fucking change?
Here's what I don't understnad O_W. Lieberman protected Bush from being investigated - thereby becoming a party to criminal activity - he had a constitutional duty to do so on the oversight committee, which he didn't exercise. Secondly, not only did he campaign against Obama but he called Obama a "Marxist". We could go on. Now, I believe that Obama's strategy of keeping his enemies closer then his friends is workable in principle - but you do not reward someone like Lieberman with a powerful chairmanship in which he has already proven his failure. Better to have let him keep his minor chairmanship or none at all.
That Lieberman paid NO consequences for his traitorous actions speaks volumes about the courage of the Democrats. By cow-towing to one man the Dems has sent a clear signal that they stand on NO principles.
Wise old saying: Don't keep doing the same thing over and over and expect different results.
Question:
Is it time to turn the tables on the far right wing, christian fascist out there by starting a movement to do away with the marriage License in favor of a universal Civil Union License. Thus leaving the question of marriage to the individual churches where it belongs. Some of whom will offer marriage to the community and many who will not.
After all, the reasoning behind the marriage license was the need for an additional revenue and later the need to support the heath of the nation.
It would in fascist solve the problem while also granting equality to all!
Just a through or two...
Support of social tolerance and "live and let live" should be uppermost in all changes like that.
The real reason the Rethuglicans are opposed to saving the auto industry is that the auto industry employs millions and millions of union members and they don't want to see the auto industry survive because the failure of that industry will destroy those unions. Another words, they want to wreck the lives of millions and millions of American workers as it will damage the Democratic party base.
The real reason the Rethuglicans are opposed to saving the auto industry is that the auto industry employs millions and millions of union members and they don't want to see the auto industry survive because the failure of that industry will destroy those unions. Another words, they want to wreck the lives of millions and millions of American workers as it will damage the Democratic party base.
We live among the few, the powerful, the wealthy, sucking up our air we breathe their exhaust. We are not organized for action and must get to it. It should begin with groups of 5 people. forming a PAC. Select a spokesman. 5 spokesmen form a PAC. Interlock
You trying to usurp the 44thPrez's video messaging scheme?
I'm gonna have to learn to do this. But now I gotta buy a camera.
DINO Caucus: "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer."
DEMO Caucus: "Illigitimi carborundi!"
Today we learn whether the DINOs♥ Joe or the DEMOs rule. Either way, the New Depression deepens.
circa 8-9,000 people foreclosed on yesterday, for whatever reasons (we don't have government statistics on that).
Another 32-36,000 by the end of this week's Senate session.
Carry on "Washington" ... (I guess?).
I doubt we will hear one.
----------------------------------------------------------
Obama's First Big Mistake on the Job
Rescuing Joe Lieberman
By DAVE LINDORFF
The word is that Barack Obama, in keeping with his promise of a new post-Bush/Cheney era of “civility in government,” is telling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid not to eject the treacherous Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) from the Democratic caucus.
This is a terrible mistake. Joe Lieberman is a wretched example of a man without principle—a back-stabbing slimeball of a politician whose only allegience, apparently, besides to himself, is to Israel.
Now I don’t want anyone to think I’m some rabid anti-semite. My wife and kids are Jewish, we have good friends who are Israeli, and no, I don’t think the Jews run the media or the country. I do, however, think that Joe Lieberman thinks more about what, in his warped and shriveled worldview, is good for Israel, than about what is good for America.
http://www.counterpunch.com/lindorff11122008.html
I'm a gay man, living with my partner of 3 years in Denver, CO. I was turned onto your blog sight about 6 months ago and have been a rabid reader, checking several times aday, ever since.
I would first like to acknowledge that compared to the various opinions and careers of you who post here...I have a very rudimentary understanding of political processess...but this is what I've been thinking over the last couple of days and I need some guidance.
While I certainly believe in the equality of all and am OUTRAGED at what has happened with Prop 8. in CA, I feel like I need to urge people to simmer down and be patient. I do think that the CA Supreme Court will overturn that travesty of justice.
But more to the point, I hope the people do not turn on Barack Obama in his first term in their zeal to gain marriage equality. So much more needs to be accomplished first, it seems to me. With the economy and the wars...environmental concerns...I'm just worried that if those things don't take priority, so that all the bigots and anti-obama folk out there don't SEE some real change, and then WE turn on him...there could be some serious repercussions mid-term and 4 years down the road.
I'd rather see marriage equality be one of the first issues he tackles in his SECOND term, after a Supreme Court appointee or two, and some major CHANGE under his belt...am I off-base here?
Please advise...thanks
I DO want Obama to allow gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military. That is one positive step he can take to show he means business when it comes to gay civil rights issues. There is no good reason to continue to discriminate against us in the military from serving openly and honestly.