-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2009/07/white-supremacists-see-conservative.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
All Comments
http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2009/0...
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fZ1XOkgKuZo/SeebHYHze...
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_hjxbJCi5EGw/Sgh62ht-HDI/A...
I'm sure that Jewish people weren't fond of that. However, you have a LONG way to go to show the 60+ pictures I found in 30 seconds showing no pics that you claim tea parties are :)
The third - well, using the same pic twice doesn't count twice.
Maybe we can get one of their grand wizards to speak at an election event!
*cough*
Kaiser sucks, I was with them for a short time - they were great for colds and routine stuff. But when my mammogram (that if I was British I'd have to wait another 10 years to qualify for) showed a bunch of problems and possible breast cancer, they wanted me to give it 6 months to see what developed. My mother was end stage breast cancer at the time. Luckily it was open enrollment and I switched to BC/BS. I wait for nothing, and I can see any specialist from a podiatrist to a neurosurgeon for $20.
And when somebody brings it up, they get all huffy and proclaim that they love all of God's little creatures. Or that it is the evil liberal media's fault for showing the "crazies" instead of the "normal" white people. Then they ask us to judge their noble, selfless hearts. Unfortunately GOPers, we don't have the proper equipment to judge your heart. We can only render judgments based on what we actually see. And if we see racism, then it might have something to do with the peculiar way in which you run your protests.
The rest of your post is just a bunch of crazy words and fluff you put out there as distraction away from the fact you are uneducated on the topic. I don't love all god's little creatures - hell, God is a figment of people's imagination and I love grilling and eating some of those tasty little creatures :) As for the 'evil liberal media' - isn't there a post right here about a DC paper selling 'access' to the powers to be? And you think they have no bias? That has no logic to it at all.
I found an image of mixed and black protestors in a 30 second search: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_L6pDyjqqsvY/Seuy6sKyI...
oh wait - here's another - towards the bottom:
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/arch...
I didn't look further - I proved my point - there were minorities there. So much for your "NOT ONE MINORITY" - guess you do selective searching.
How does that make the white people who DID show up into racists? Are there any pictures of white people denying entrance to the protests to minorities? Any barricades? Please - try to educate yourself.
I could go to the local predominatly jewish enclave and take pictures and point out that there are no or few gentiles there. Does that mean that the jewish people in the pictures prevented any gentiles from being there?
I could go to the historically black college in my area and take pics of students, almost none of whom are white. Does that mean all those people are racists?
I could go to several areas in Florida and take many pictures of groups of predominately senior citizens. Does that mean that the folks in the pictures are age discriminators?
Do you think any of those protesters might be gay? Left handed? Those are minorities too.
Logic, I know it's a foreign concept to you, but try.
How does white people congregating at a protest over financial bailouts make them racist? Please answer that.
It doesn't get much better than that.
The nutcases from Westboro Baptist Church show up to all sort of public and private events, spreading their 'word' and trying to convert people to their beliefs and deeds. Does that mean that just because they show up, and have that intent, that that is the 'only usefulness' of these events?
Just because white supremacists show up doesn't mean that tea party participants support them or want them there or to be associated with them.
The Tea Parties are about what the government spends our money on - not racism. Ok, you don't like the name or it's historical connotation. The majority of the media picks out the 'worst' of the protesters to show because they have an agenda. I'm all for what the protesters are trying to do and I'm not racist. Have you asked the participants if they are racist or white supremacist? Most are just average citizens trying to make a better life for themselves. People with specific agendas will always pick out the most extreme to try to make their point - doesn't mean much other than that they are manipulative
The name is hilarious, it amazingly escaped the notice of the people 'planning' them (i use that word loosely) and is a perfect target for mockery. It exemplifies how freaking dimwitted the participants and planners are.
The historical connotation is also idiotic, and completely wrong. See the above point. Again, ignorance and stupidity.
Average citizens should educate themselves rather than spend hard earned dollars and time yelling nonsense and holding up signs that are even less cogent.
p.s. I suppose the fact that there was like.. 1 minority (margin of error) at these things amid a sea of cracker-ass crackers didn't seem a bit OFF to you? I had enough friends who went to them and not ONE FUCKING MINORITY was shot or seen.
Please.
Funny - I looked at over 60 images from the tea parties, not a single racist sign, no tinfoil, and no mention of guns - and their 'screaming' was about bailouts and personal responsibility and and socialism.
You are so blinded by hate for anything conservative that you can't see plain images in front of you. Facts - I know - liberals hate facts - but facts they are. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
And right, liberals hate facts while conservatives love them. That's why there's something called Conservapedia, where all the little wingnuts can get their "facts" because wikipedia is too liberal.
Honey, liberals LOVE facts. We prefer to live in a world of fact and logic. We don't need to make a "Liberalpedia" so we can get safe, ideologically bent answers devoid of reality to our questions.
Liberals want media to be factual.
Conservatives want media to be conservative.
Get over yourself.
And your point about 20 pages of flickr is? I showed you pics of black and mixed and minority protesters that were claimed here to not even exist. There's those damn pesky FACTS again. Please - show me 20 pages of pics of barricades at tea parties keeping people of color out. Facts and logic - that thing you say you want - yet when I give you fact and logic that opposes your views (pics said to not exist) you can only drop back to name calling. That's your idea of logic? Sounds like a kindergarten playground to me.
Never heard of Conservapedia, but thanks, I'll check it out.
Hmm, then why when faced with facts - actual pictures - you can do nothing but cuss and call names? Is that your idea of countering facts with facts and logic?
I don't need to get over myself, I can back up my statements with facts, and when challenged by those here I can back them up yet again with facts. When you are challenged you respond with 'bitch please'. Wow, you display so much intelligence - as well as such manners.
I still rest my case. I left a margin for error and your PROOF, such as it is, barely scrapes above that.
Thanks for proving my point.
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_hjxbJCi5EGw/Sgh62ht-HDI/A...
i rest my case.
Where were they when the BUSH ADMIN started bailing out the banks?
Obama is doing the same sh*t as bush but NOW there are tea parties protesting where tax dollars go???????
Now a black man is president all you brainiacs care where your tax dollars are spent??????
The fact that you didn't care before (no tea parties) but you do now speaks volumes.
Tea Party is a grassroots organization that is still organizing and finding it's way and leaders - you know - kinda like all the gays here up in arms over Obama are still trying to organize and find leaders.
Try to educate yourself and learn objective facts, not spewing hate based on ignorance.
Frankly, personally, I'd rather spend a trillion dollars on liberating people from a dictator who practiced genocide than spend a trillion dollars trying to spend us out of debt. And yes, I'm for rewarding productive citizens who take care of themselves, and for punishing those that sit on their asses wanting us to provide for them. I have worked hard and sacrificed and don't want anyone 'redistributing' my wealth.
I guess rich folks really were deserving of your hard earned trickle up dollars.
Any condemnation of O by his supporters (seen tons of buyer's remorse here) is seen as exercising their right to free speech, if there's any condemnation of him by his opponents who happen to be white you scream "it's because he's black". Doesn't that make YOU racist? I opposed him because he's bad news - and a liar. YOU are way more caught up in his race than I am.
If Bush could have run for a 3rd term, whether I'd have voted for him or not would depend on who his opponent had been - just like every election I've voted in - sometimes I vote R, sometimes D, sometimes I.
and PS - couldn't find the post that came in my email where you told me to mind my own business. The running of this country IS my business and this is a free speech internet board - so - uh - too bad on you :)
Bwhaaaa Haaaa Haa!!!
Again, the rich thank you for fighting to lower their taxes.
In six months of O's administration my company has laid off workers, frozen any hiring, bypassed even COL adjustments, and cut services. My property taxes jumped 1/3, my electric bill has jumped because my state and county are at a deficit, and I got a measly $13 bucks extra in my pay from his great plans. And now he wants to tax my health care benefits.
You bet I was doing better under Bush. Do I care if the "rich" were doing better? Not really - more power to them. The only people that are going to do better financially under O are the low life's that don't want to work hard, they just want to get their piece of the wealth he wants to 're-distribute' from me, those like me, and those in higher income brackets than me.
And I can tell you, some of those 'rich' folks that O wants to raise taxes on and stick it to - many have moved their money to offshore accounts (tho the gov't is trying hard to stop that) or have hidden it and have every intention of letting go people when the tax increases (personal and business) take effect. And I know several personally that have every intention of making sure the first they let go are O supporters.
Please quit reproducing.
And - I am doing quite - wasn't always, but pulled myself up without any gov't money or bailout.
I'm old enough that I'm no longer reproducing, but I do have two children already. My oldest fell for the left wing bull they teach in colleges these days, until she moved out, had to pay her own bills, had to get a job and pay taxes - she works nights in the busiest ER in the state and sees all the welfare and medicaid leeches and the illegals - suddenly she was a Republican. Even changed her voter registration to Republican. We are so proud of her :)
And no silly hats.
Eichelberger: They’re not being punished. We’re allowing them to exist, and do what every American can do. We’re just not rewarding them with any special designation.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/30/gays-exist/
What a douchebag