-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/will-today-mark-decline-of-hedge-funds.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3119 comments · 727 points
-
tlsintx
4299 comments · 283 points
-
Indigo
5434 comments · 587 points
-
John Aravosis
2689 comments · 933 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
13 hours ago · 69 comments
-
Can you find the one pet?
3 hours ago · 11 comments
-
A criminal conspiracy of pedophilia called "the Catholic Church"
14 hours ago · 48 comments
-
A dog named Boo
9 hours ago · 22 comments
-
Obama, African-Americans, and gay marriage
16 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Obama admin's OPM, headed by a gay man, reportedly blocks lesbian from getting health benefits
To control spam, I now allow incoming messages only from senders I
have approved beforehand.
If you would like to be added to my list of approved senders, please
fill out the short request form (see link below). Once I approve you,
I will receive your original message in my inbox. You do not need to
resend your message. I apologize for this one-time inconvenience.
Click the link below to fill out the request:
https://webmail.atl.earthlink.net/wam/addme?a=h...
And this blast from the past is also fun: McCain: The Most Reprehensible of the Keating Five
Likely that she makes more money than her parents, and she's just out of school. Wish I could find work like that.
Anyway, you can imagine the conflict of interest out there if Hillary was our nominee right now. Personally, I'd like to see her out on her keester, facing the wall of problems we all face, but I suppose that's hoping too much.
Think of it this way: Hedge funds are steroids. Withdrawal from steroids triggers anxiety.
(A few post back John named you as his econ expert, so I guess John's support of the bailout is based on your advice.) In other words, you're a couple of chumps.
Comments on other posts have tried to point this out to you guys, but you still don't get it. If you got burned — if you didn't see this crash coming — well then, you've certainly got the gullibilty Wall Street depends on.
But how will giving Paulson, a former executive of Goldman-Sachs, $700 billion to spend as he wants, in secret, immune to oversight or legal action forever, solve the problem?
Paulson himself, in front of Congress last week, said he didn't know how he came up with the $700 billion figure, and he admitted he couldn't guarantee it would do any good at all. He'd just like that much money, not strings attached. Once the money's gone, and it hasn't done anything to solve the problem, Paulson will never have to say what he did with $700-billion. No one can ask. No one. And you like that deal?
If so, that puts you in the lower 25th percentile, because 75% of Americans don't.
In 2006, as you remember, the government suddenly quit providing M3 figures — that is, how much money it is printing monthly. As an econ expert, you probably realized at the time that didn't indicate they were going to start printing less money.
And as you know, the government has been operating in the red since 2001 and living on credit.
If it has to raise $700 billion for Paulson and his pals, besides the $700 billion for next year's military commitments... well, maybe a good investment would be paper-and-ink futures, because the government will need to buy lots of both and the presses will be running day and night.
If John thinks buying Euros at $1.45 is painful...or gas at $4...well, just wait.
Sorry to be harsh, but you guys have got to do some homework on this one. Right now you're on the Bush side of this issue. Doesn't that make you at all uneasy?