-
Website
http://www.americablog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.americablog.com/2008/12/with-country-in-crisis-republican.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rob Mule
3337 comments · 78 points
-
Steve_in_CNJ
3410 comments · 788 points
-
tlsintx
4391 comments · 298 points
-
Indigo
5931 comments · 675 points
-
John Aravosis
2959 comments · 1001 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
1 hour ago · 2 comments
-
More about the Yule Goat
13 hours ago · 14 comments
-
Plane incident update
1 day ago · 30 comments
-
Obama now says he didn't campaign on the public option. The Google says he did, a lot.
3 days ago · 117 comments
-
Obama on the health insurance bill
2 days ago · 75 comments
-
Chaos and failure continue on Zimbabwe farms
Time for a real Hail Mary pass for the companies in the form of taking health care off the table: the federal govt needs to move those retirees onto Medicare, and reduce the age of eligibility for Medicare to 60. That's step one.
Pelosi talks big until the money from the lobbyists starts flowing into her campaign and then she rolls over.
Harry Reed sends out his Give 'em Hell Harry e-mails. But these should be renamed, Give 'em Heck, Harry.
I really think we need stronger less entrenched leaders in both houses.
HA-HA-HA-HA-HA! I just spewed soda out my nose. You're kidding, right?
agreed. i find reid baffling. although dems have gained in the last two congressional elections, it would seem to me that a more aggressive strategy is in order.
wouldn't it be effective, and good politics, to MAKE the goopers filibuster? imagine how that would have looked last night- two weeks before Xmas- filibustering a plan to save the auto companies and their workers! I can't see what the downside of that would be for Reid.
http://thesebastards.blogspot.com/
FDR's inaugural address of 1933 contained a threat to ask for "broad executive power to wage war against the emergency" of the Depression, if Congress didn't pass his program of legislation. He didn't need to carry out the threat, since Congress did pass his legislation.
People are tired of hearings, with Senators wagging their fingers at folks on the other side over a variety of incomprehensible offenses. The 28% dead-enders will love the theater, but the rest of the country will be mightily pissed.
Bring it on Republicans, bring it on.
The republicans continue on with business as usual, even after they almost destroyed our country. Their egos and self serving tactics are beyond comparison. They are not only trying to destroy the unions, but middle class America.
THEY HAVE TO BE STOPPED.
If his vote had mattered, he would have voted differently. As he has shown often enough
I just don't understand the underlying beliefs of people in this country about work and why they don't look to their own interests in the first place. Sitting around all day pushing paper really does fry your brain. Most white collar workers don't understand that they have no more autonomy than factory workers--maybe the work is just cleaner and not physically demanding, that's all. Those who shower before work and those who shower after...
If the Dems could allow Ashcroft and Gonzales to get approved, the GOP could damn well allow Eric Holder to be approved. Oh, and since when does the minority have any say in when these hearings start? That should be Leahy's call, plain and simple.
I am sorry about the suppliers, but many if not most of them can shift with support to manufacturing energy smart devices and equipment---why are solar panels so outrageously expensive--everyone I know wants to install one for hot water, but the payback period is just too long. In addition, every school in the country needs a new furnace and new "smart" light and heat controls. Finally, we need "local" electricity generation--the day of the megagrids is over. The lessons from the 70's and subsequent unraveling of the energy efficiency movement is that govt needs to help it in exactly the same way it helps farmers. Small entrepreneurs need marketing help (not just how to advertise, but the actual creation of markets), they need cheap financing, and they need training. Think about the possibilities if the auto industry started thinking of itself as the transportation industry: smart speed controls in cars and on highways and in every tractor trailer truck, new rail cars for Amtrak, an integrated multimodal transportation--how about something like that European plan for continent-wide battery charging stations for electric cars.
Yesterday, when I checked on the progress of the stock I bought in Honda a couple of weeks ago (doing very well, thank you) I was stunned by their website. They are already leasing fuel cell vehicles in the US and elsewhere; they are developing mobility devices for individuals with impairment, and their corporate philosophy is very appealing. GM's website clearly represents the past, muscle cars, power, speed...no corporate philosophy statement.
I'm an optimist, and I'd like to point out that there is no talk of drilling for more oil right now.
And what about PELOSI?
Those 2 clowns have accomplished so little - we here do more for America than they do. All they care in their actions is how it is going to benefit them.
Are they going to be still the "leaders" in 2009?
Dreeeaaaammm! Dream, dream, dream! DrrreEEeaaAAaaammmMMMmmm!