DISQUS

AMERICAblog: Yes, that's Hillary and Richard Mellon Scaife yesterday

  • Dave of the Jungle · 1 year ago
  • Dave of the Jungle · 1 year ago
    Whatever works, I guess.
  • Dave of the Jungle · 1 year ago
    Hillary Dear,

    STFU and Drop Out.

    Thanks
  • Rab · 1 year ago
    She is a crazy f**king nut job and I won't vote for her. She and the hillbots made that clear to me when I went to the county convention. She can take that repug-lite attitude and stick it.
  • KarenMrsLloydRichards · 1 year ago
    She'd kiss up to any of her former persecutors for the Gold. So much for the "vast right-wing conspiracy." She must think her charm offensive now will prevent her enemies from attacking her in the general election. If so, she's deluding herself.
  • TheOriginalLiz · 1 year ago
    She will do anything to get what she wants. A truly ruthless person.
  • lynchie · 1 year ago
    The old saying "Any port in a storm" applies her. She has no ethics, is a pathological liar, has no credentials and feels it is her destiny to be President so licking this GOP dick wasn't even a stretch for her. I guess the right-wing conspiracy never happened just like her terror filled trip to Bosnia with Sinbad.
  • lynchie · 1 year ago
    I posted this below but this link:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8464923...

    takes you to youtube and rather than watching the whole Hillary The Movie , click on the Movie trailer. This is what she will face if she wins the nomination. It will be played day and night on every right wing station in the U.S. and quoted frequently by papers like the Post Gazette. The DNC is acting just like our Dem Congress no strength, no unity and no leadership.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    As Josh Marshall says, "it doesn't ring true" and I think that about sums up HIllary. She is unable to successfully deflect her repeated "sniper" fire stories about Bosnia so she is desperately trying to keep the fires burning about Wright and Obama. Her desperation is becoming obvious. This morning on the Today show she was called out for her tactics, she cannot hide what she is doing and David Brooks of the NYT said it is time for her to get out of the race, she cannot catch up to Obama in delegates. In one of the comments yesterday someone said this is her macaca? moment.
  • OlderAndWiser · 1 year ago
    This political whore will go to the far right as often and as long as it takes to achieve her twisted goals, even if it means the destruction of another Democrat.

    Hillary Clinton as Panderer-in-Chief...
  • davidi92260 · 1 year ago
    I am becoming convinced that we get nothing different with our government. These slugs behind the scenes are in charge! I am becoming very disheartened with Hillary.
  • lynchie · 1 year ago
    Washington Post has this short animation of Cheney's comments on Iraq over the weekend.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/c...

    Yeah, he really cares about the vets.
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    Considering Scaife's roving eye, mighten't HRC more wisely have selected a better top to displayed her Day 1 décolletage than the Puritanical wrapper shown?
    Shouldn't Scaife have expected more from Vince Foster's temptress?
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    One thing that bothers me is the repeated use of the word "nasty" in regards to the Democratic race for the nomination. Let me admit that I am an Obama fan but I think I can still be objective when I say the only nastiness is coming from HIllary. I am not hearing Obama slinging nasty comments in the opposite direction. I really wish the press and TV would not make it sound as if BOTH candidates are behaving in a nasty fashion. The worse I have heard from the Obama camp is demanding Clinton's tax returns, hardly a nasty mud slinging comment, yet Clinton's camp is unbelievable with nasty politics. I wish the press would quit referring or insinuating that this is going on on BOTHsides of the respective camps.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    Oh, one last thing before work. This is not the first right wing ass Clinton has cozied up to. Where are the pics of her and Rupert Murdoch? Murdoch as in the owner of Fox news. Hillary is far too cozy with the right wing.
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_laura_r...

    Populist campaign is a K-street fake....
  • Rob Mule · 1 year ago
    You know, there used to be a saying around the Clinton West Wing about events like Tuzla..."If there's no chance of tail, send the First Lady".
  • SarainKC · 1 year ago
    That's it. If she succeeds stealing this nomination I'm voting for Nader. No Fing way will I ever vote for that piece of garbage.
  • aquarius2 · 1 year ago
    Dave

    Thanks. Someone ought to run a story about Hillary's affinity for the right wing press.
  • jimfromthefoothills · 1 year ago
    Any more proof needed that she is really a Neo-Liberal (Neo-Con)? She is just as dangerous as Bush.
  • HereinDC · 1 year ago
    Ok, where are the defenders of Hillary?
    Time for you to post on here and tell us why she did this.

    What makes this any different than Reverend Wright? ie: Sacife said some very very very bad things about The President of the United States of America and NOW Hillary wants to Associate herself with this man who has said some very very very bad things about the President of the United States?

    Kind of like the shoe on the other foot.
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    I've often been accused of being a Hillary defender, but I would only comment if I felt there was a double-standard or a hypocritical stance in the attack.

    Here, though, the situation is so odd that it's hard to defend, although we don't really know what was discussed, so it's hard to froth at the mouth and attack, either.

    It certainly seems like an odd choice for a candidate who is losing support in her own party, and as with many choices she's made lately, she's taking bad advice and undercutting her strengths and her own good works over the years.
  • jr · 1 year ago
    Hillary Romney Clinton's a Susan Collins haircutted succubus who pleasures herself to 2012 election fantasies
  • jimfromthefoothills · 1 year ago
    What kind of person would send their spouse to a place that they considered "too dangerous" for them self? That was Shrillary's quote. She is a fucking liar. I hate her too and will vote for Nader, the green party or I may write in Kos if she steals this nomination.
  • Coming Undone · 1 year ago
    In Clintons case the enemy of her enemy will still be her enemy. Hillary said that she could not have sat in Rev Wrights church while he gave his sermons(or something like that), but she will sit down with the people that accused her and Bill of so many terrible things from Whitewater to Murder- MURDER.
  • bumpkis · 1 year ago
    Ya gotta wonder if the DEM leadership leans on her, will she switch parties?? Is this why she is talking to SCAIFE?? Anything is possible in the crapola world of politics.
  • HereinDC · 1 year ago
    .
    Hillary has not gone on Stephanie Miller's show, or Ed Shultz's show or Randi Rhodes Show, or Keith Olbermann's show or Sam Seders' show or Thom Hartman's show...and last night even Larry King said she has not gone on his show....
    BUT she finds time to go Right Wing owned shows.

    Even back in 2007 or January 2008...she did not go on any of these shows.
    Seriously.....NOT ONCE has she gone on these shows....even back in the Fall of 2007 when she was ahead in the polls.

    WTF?

    .
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    I think her expectation was that everyone on the left would simply fall in line, and that her best use of her time would be to woo moderates and conservatives who were fed up with the GOP.

    I don't think she expected serious opposition from Obama, and she's been off her gameplan ever since Iowa.
  • EdNSted · 1 year ago
    The illusion that things just happen by accident is extraordinarily useful tool for many professionals. In show business, this illusion makes highly rehearsed and choreographed acts appear spontaneous and improvised. Go watch a Meatloaf show sometime. It gives every appearance of being highly chaotic when in fact every single step is planned and precisely executed. Likewise, in any political campaign the goal is to maintain the illusion of spontaneity while in reality controling every word and subtle nuance.

    In many ways, Richard Mellon Scaife and Hillary Clinton go together like James Carville and Mary Joe Matalin. And the question you gotta be asking yourself here is, what comes next? If this were just about populate vote and pledged delegates, then maybe everyone could safely declare this over and Obama would be the nominee. But anyone who thinks Obama cannot be denied the nomination at this point does not fully appreciarte how the Democratic party works. The last mile is always the toughest.
  • Bub · 1 year ago
    I am quite sure that I read several months ago, that Bill Clinton had a face to face meeting with Schaife and reportedly told him to back off of Hillary.

    What I see, from my little remote perch is that perhaps the Clintons had performed a diplomatic revolution sometime earlier. Probably a promise by Hillary to continue certain policies inherited from Bush if she happens to get elected (I'm thinking Neocon policies, particularly Iraq, but just guessing). This realignment began a long time ago, from her fund raising w/ Murdoch, to Bill's relationship with Bush the elder, and I think those contacts pushed Schaife into meeting with Bill, where upon Bill told him point blank to desist in his attacks. I think Bill's point would have been to inform Schaife that if Hillary is going to carry water for the Neocons, he's got to get on board too. That sort of thing. And I think Schaife here was serving up soft balls for Hillary to whack.

    I'm sure if you look into it, you'll find that Bill Clinton met with Schaiffe in the last 4 or 5 months or something like that. I believe the article said they met at a restaurant in New York City.

    There's more to the Schaife and Hillary thing than meets the eye.
  • lynchie · 1 year ago
    BUB: You are correct. Bill did meet with Scaife. Scaife now claims his great admiration of the Clintons

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/health/25well...

    what a boat load of shit the Clintons are. Bill would hump a dead dog for a vote for Hillary.
  • Pallomine · 1 year ago
    Thing is I can't find the report where I read that.
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    Except do we really think Schaife, Murdoch, and the elder Bush would really support Hillary Clinton over John McCain?!
  • Sage24 · 1 year ago
    The Clintons have cozied up to Schaife, Limbaugh, and Murdoch.
    They have no self respect or dignity.
    They will sleep with the enemy, just to win that damn nomination.
    I have lost all respect for this cheesy couple.
  • ericgoldman · 1 year ago
    Holy Cow! Hilary working to bring people together, even staunch critics! Yeah, you're right, proof positive that she does not have what it takes to be President. I mean, what kind of President would talk to their enemies?

    What's next? Would she propose sitting down with the leaders of Iran and Syria and Cuba without pre-condition, just on the theory that it's good to talk to your enemies? Even if it diminished the power of the Presidency?

    Oh, wait, no that's the OTHER Democratic candidate. From today's Wall Street Journal:

    "Barack Obama is drawing fresh fire for pledging to hold direct talks with foreign adversaries, an approach both Hilary Clinton and John McCain say they will hit hard. Critics in the foreign policy establishment and from rival presidential camps said his idea could undercut pro-Western forces and legitimize leaders whose power the U.S. wants to undermine, including Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad."

    "Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran specialist at Washington's Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who said he is generally supportive of Sen. Obama's agenda[, said] "Only two things can rehabilitate Ahmadinejad politically: bombing Iran or major efforts to engage him" ahead of the [2009 Iranian presidential election.]"

    No, no hypocrisy in this criticism at all, perfectly valid. Keep up the good work!
  • Coming Undone · 1 year ago
    I never thought that this election process would be a walk in the park for Obama, not even a walk in Central Park at night, I knew there would be a lot of muggings and attacks, but I never thought that his biggest enemy would be another Democrat and a former President. I must have been sleep deprived since the 90's and I believe I misspoke several times when I defended the Clinton's. Well I am awake now and will not misspeak about the Clinton's again and if nothing else I have to thank the Clinton's for waking me up to their nature.
  • RetiredCatholic · 1 year ago
    Given the business and professional association of McCain's Charlie Black and Clinton's Mark Penn, I think it is a legitimate question to ask whether or not the Clinton and McCain campaigns are colluded in an effort to corrupt and manipulate the 2008 election against Barrack Obama. The interview, with former Clinton scourge Richard Scaife at her side would appear to make this more than idle speculation or foil hat theorizing.
  • TomJoad · 1 year ago
    As I read a recent column on Obama and Wright by Pierre Tristam, I was struck by something in there..."The word, attributed to the late writer Saul Bellow, is “angelization” — willfully putting someone beyond blame. Angelizing America is the common tongue of all national politicians, the oath candidates implicitly take when running for president. It’s what the most sentimental people on Earth expect. It’s what enables a country that committed its share of atrocities in the past and is committing more than its share of moral degradations today to look itself in the mirror and see something exceptional looking back, rather than just another empire trampling down its march of folly, as the great historian Barbara Tuchman called it. Angelizing America is the unspoken, self-evident pledge of allegiance."

    As an american living in Europe for the last 15+ years, I noticed a surprising culture shock. It is the "pat on the back" or "we're all THE BEST!!" attitude that pervades the US. In an employee evaluation form for example where rating is 1-5 with 5 bing best (or perfect), I had been used to 4's and 5's in the fields. Suddenly it was 3's and 2's. I thought I was doing a bad job. It was explained "we EXPECT you to be competent, and do a good job. 3 is "meets expectations". If you are getting consistent 4's it means you need to move up.

    In the US, people all want to help buy into the "the best" mode. "We're number ONE!", and gets to ridiculous proportions...hearing Bush (or really, almost ANY politician) "speechifying" to some farmers in Ohio "the American farmer are the BEST farmers in the world!" (whereas, I was pretty impressed with Mongolian farmers that figured out how to grow potatos, in that climate and altitude...)

    Or Bill bryson pointing out in a book how a swedish exchange student, would get constantly asked "So...how do you like the US?" and people actually would be hurt if she said she liked it very much, but when asked if she didn'¨t wish she lived here, said "well Sweden is my home, I would always go back there" and they would get dissapointed and almost dismissive. I've seen that played over many times.

    The point is, this obsession with it, the idea that the US can do no wrong, and we call it patriotism, that the US can dictate, and demand, and force it's views, because after all...we are "the FREEST land in the world" (which is definitively NOT so, especially since Bush)...

    SO they can't bear to hear anything negative, not stopping to even wonder if it might be true in one context or another. The "we're always the good guys" is getting ridiculous, when we condone torture, eternal jail without trial, draconian methods, tasering of people simply speaking...

    I don't see any way to change it either, unless there is a real shift in consciousness.
  • Mike_H · 1 year ago
    And unfortunately, it's that sort of uber-patriotism that makes the Rev. Wright's comments such an Achilles' heel for Obama.

    There are many average american voters who will hear what Wright said and it will completely turn them off Obama, period. It's unthinking, automatic, and even against their own self-interest, but that won't matter.
  • BatGuano · 1 year ago
    And my last particle of respect for Clinton... has... evaporated... right.... now.

    This is vile. Deal-with-the-devil vile desperation.
  • uwyoalum · 1 year ago
    to quote a classic They Might Be Giants song:

    "You can't shake the devil's hand and say your only joking"
  • TDH · 1 year ago
    It is common practice for candidates to meet with editorial boards of newspapers. Scaife's newspaper is a big one in Pittsburgh, where a primary is being held as I understand it.

    John -- these stories are not working. The Bosnia story has not moved the Gallup dailies one bit. http://www.gallup.com/poll/105664/Gallup-Daily-... Better try something more substantive.

    How about Obama's second pastor, the anti-gay one? The Rev. Meeks is someone Obama goes to for counseling also.

    http://www.suntimes.com/news/falsani/726619,oba...

    Another person Obama says he seeks out for spiritual counsel is state Sen. James Meeks, who is also the pastor of Chicago's Salem Baptist Church. The day after Obama won the primary in March, he stopped by Salem for Wednesday-night Bible study.
    "I know that he's a person of prayer," Meeks says. "The night after the election, he was the hottest thing going from Galesburg to Rockford. He did all the TV shows, and all the morning news, but his last stop at night was for church. He came by to say thank you, and he came by for prayer."

    Here is the Rev. Meeks in action:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM2M11BsA3g

    http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/James.Meeks.M...


    You can read about Meeks' anti-gay positions at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which posts about hate crimes, and hate groups.

    http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/arti...
  • GrantinHouston · 1 year ago
    I see the Hillarybots are batting "clean up" here. Maureen Dowd this morning said what many of us have been saying for some time here....that Hillary's fallback game plan is to get John McCain elected thinking she can run again in 2012 at age 65 and win. However, the millions of us REAL Democrats who saw her bloody and fracture the party in 2008 won't be like Hillary and have a MEMORY problem.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/opinion/26dow...
  • tbhull · 1 year ago
    Hillary bowing before Scaiffe is not too dissimilar from a prostitute calling an abusive John for business.
  • GrantinHouston · 1 year ago
    Richard Mellon Scaife heavily funded the Arkansas Project which led to most of the investigations of the Clintons in the 1990's including being behind the Troopergate investigations and bringing Paula Jones out of the trailer park. Mellon Scaife was also one who savaged fellow Pittsburgh heiress, Teresa Heinz-Kerry and also funded the Swift Boat Veterans who viciously attacked John Kerry with lies. Of course, John Kerry winning in 2004 could have been a roadblock to Hillary's timeline for becoming President.

    There aren't many reich-wing movements that Scaife hasn't backed with his billions. He formed the Santorum Victory Committee but then Rick Santorum is part of Hillary's fundie prayer group.
  • DeppFan · 1 year ago
    The fact that Hillary would even sit next to Scaife at all, and breathe in his carbon dioxide, makes me doubt everything good I have ever thought about her.
    I'd rather sit through a six hour Rev. Wright sermon than sit next to him.
  • ILiveinaDemocracy · 1 year ago
    You should , I've watched a full-version from one of his sermons and you'll probably end up agreeing with what the man says. Sounds impossible but when your not a sheep ( watching little sound bites that the media keeps feeding and repeating all day) it's a whole different projection of what has been displayed.

    I actually think that she knows that it's over, there is a article at Huffpo were Reid is saying that him and others including Dean are talking proper decission to end this whole fiasco about naming a Democatic nominee before
    the Convention. It's over!! , but she's doing everything possible to bring Obama down all in favor of Mccain and the REpublicans. She's droughting him , making Obama waste his campaign money, time and energy when all of this should be directed at Mccain.At the same time handing ammo over to the Rep machine.

    At the end of the day She and Hubby are good friends with the Republican gang and have done business with them for years. Someone should revoke her Democratic Membership Card.
  • sfo2phx · 1 year ago
    You lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.
  • aravir · 1 year ago
    There is no reason to meet with Scaife's paper other than desperation. I'm guessing the internal PA numbers don't look as rosy as the public numbers.
  • RevDrBillyBob · 1 year ago
    Ah KNEW there was was somethin' Ah liked 'bout her. . . .